Palm Garden Of Largo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 522 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 207 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 135.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (#2) out of three residents sampled. This failure resulted in a fall with major injury for Resident #2 when the individual care plan for transfer was not followed during a shower. Findings included: On 05/18/2026 at 12:15 p.m. Resident #2 was observed lying down in bed. She stated she was still in pain from the fall she had a week ago during a shower. She stated a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred her with the Hoyer Lift without assistance in the shower chair. She stated during her shower she kept telling the CNA she felt like she was going to fall out of the chair. She stated the chair felt like it was falling apart and she knew she was going to fall. She stated the CNA left her in the bathroom alone and that is when she fell out of the shower chair. Resident #2 stated she has never broken anything on her body before and she was in a lot of pain.Review of an admission record, dated 05/20/…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect related to: 1) providing timely care and services to prevent physical/emotional discomfort for toileting assistance for one resident (#4) out of five residents sampled, and 2) protecting residents from unsympathetic/negative attitudes from staff for three residents (#6, #7, and #5) out of three residents sampled. These failures resulted in emotional/psychological distress and a fear of retaliation among residents. Findings included: 1. During a facility tour on 6/21/25 at 9:32 a.m., an observation was made of a call light signal on in Resident #4's room. There were no staff observed in the hallway responding the call light. On 6/21/25 at 9:40 a.m., an observation was made of a staff member at the nurse's station while the call light was displaying on above the nurse's station. The staff member, Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said she was looking for something and could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (#320, #62, #321) of four residents reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 53 residents received accurate evaluations of fall risks to ensure adequate supervision, assistance devices, and individualized interventions were implemented to prevent accidents with injuries. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #321 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: history of falling, difficulty in walking, pain in left hip, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, essential hypertension, and history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. The resident had a recent hospital stay from 2/16/2024 to 2/24/20224 when she was readmitted back to the facility. The admission Record showed an additional diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were utilized related to contact precautions on two resident units (100 and 200) out of three resident units in the facility.Findings included:An observation was conducted on 5/18/26 at 9:42 a.m. of a staff member entering room [ROOM NUMBER], which had a contact precaution sign on the door. The staff did not use personal protective equipment (PPE) while in the room.An observation as conducted on 5/18/26 at 9:53 a.m. of a staff member in room [ROOM NUMBER], which had a contact precaution sign on the door. The staff member did not have any PPE on while in the room. The staff member exited the room, spoke to the nurse in the hall, reentered the room, then exited again. No hand hygiene was observed. At 9:58 a.m. Staff C, LPN entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without donning PPE.An interview was conducted on 5/18/26 at 10:03 a.m. with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff C confirmed a resident in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan for three (#2, #4, #5) of three sampled residents related to bed mobility and transfers. Findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness on 08/18/2021; orthostatic hypotension, intervertebral disc displacement, lumbar region; other specified disorders of the brain; diabetes; anemia; adult failure to thrive; unspecified dementia severe; Cognitive Communication Deficit; stage 3 chronic kidney disease; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, tremor, low back pain, hypertensive chronic kidney disease and spondylosis. Review of the Care Plans showed: ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self-Care and/or mobility deficit. Resident #2 was at risk of developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-performance related to: weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0645 — widespread
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnosis for four of four residents sampled for PASARRs (Residents #16, #20, #74 and #71). Findings included: 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder date 4/26/23, major depressive disorder date 7/14/23, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type date 6/20/23 and anxiety disorder date 4/26/23. Review of a level I PASARR for Resident #16 dated 04/25/23 showed the qualifying diagnoses were not checked or indicated. Further review showed a level II PASARR not submitted following qualifying diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder. 2. Review of the EMR for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were addressed in a timely manner for resident council members with potential to affect a census of 135. Findings included: On 02/26/24 at 2:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #17, who was the Resident Council President. She stated the primary complaints that were on-going were related to food, care, and call bells not answered. She stated the residents complain the issues have not changed and are still ongoing. She stated the Director of Activities (DOA) reports to the DON after each meeting. She stated she would let her know what was discussed at the meeting. Resident #17 said, The problem is they don't have consistency, because they use lots of agency aides. The agency aides makes care more difficult because they don't know the residents or their needs. Some of them don't care. Yes, we have presented grievances through resident council. On 2/27/24 at 1:20 p.m., a Resident Council meeting was held with 11 residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for four of fifty-three sampled residents (#106, #39, #109, #94), as evidenced by:1.) Staff not providing Resident #106 with a call light within his reach, while in bed and during two days observed (2/26/2024, 2/27/2024); 2.) Staff not performing and/or documenting monitoring of psychotropic medication use for Resident #106; 3.) Staff not coordinating dental services as needed for Resident #39; and 4). Failure to provide rehabilitation and restorative services for residents #109, and #94. Findings included: 1. On 2/26/2024 at 1:34 p.m. and at 2:20 p.m., Resident #106 was observed in his room and lying flat in a low to the floor bed, and with covers pulled over him. He was noted resting comfortably with his eyes closed. The call light button and cord were observed lying on the floor on one side of the dresser and close to the roommate's side of the room. The call light was not within Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise and individualize a care plan to reflect a resident's condition for three residents (#320, 321, and 62) out of four sampled residents. Finding included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #320 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Heart Failure, Difficulty Walking, Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes Type 2, Anemia, Monoplegia of upper limb following Cerebral Infarction, other co-morbidities. Review of Resident #320's Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Treatment Transfer Form, AHCA Form 5000-3008 dated 1/5/2024, showed resident to be at risk for falls. Review of Resident #320's Physician Order Summary Report active as of 1/14/2024 revealed resident was receiving: Alprazolam (psychotropic), Diphenhydramine HCl (antihistamine), Bupropion HCl (psychotropic), Dicyclomine HCl (cathartic), Dulcolax (cathartic), GlycoLax…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed, and five errors were identified for four (#17) out of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 16.67% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 2/28/24 at 7:29 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #17. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Vitamin D3 125 microgram (mcg) tablet over-the-counter (otc) (5000 international unit (iu)) - Ferrous sulfate 325 (milligram) mg otc tablet - Gabapentin 300 mg capsule - Tizanidine 2 mg capsule - Tamsulosin 0.4mg capsule - Metformin 1000 mg tablet The staff member had dispensed 2 tablets of Vitamin B12 then moved them both to another cup and set it aside, reporting the Vitamin B12 was to be administered by injection not orally. Staff H confirmed dispensing 6 oral tablets, and these were all the medications to be given at this time. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately in six resident rooms (202, 207, 223, 304, 317 and 325), medications were stored in locked cart while unattended in one (A-wing #2) out of six carts, one insulin vial for one (#37) out of two residents sampled for insulin administration was not expired, medications with a shortened life once open were labeled with an open date on two (A-Wing#1 and Rehab #2) of three sampled medication carts, one (A-wing) of three medication refrigerators were locked and inaccessible to unauthorized personnel, and one (Rehab) out of three refrigerated controlled substance boxes were locked. Findings included: 1. On 2/26/24 at 10:08 a.m., a tube of Preparation H, hemorrhoidal ointment, was observed sitting in a cardboard box on top of a dresser in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W. The observation also revealed one container of disinfecting wipes in the bottom drawer of a dresser belonging to Resident #52 and one on top of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to initiate an effective Infection Control program related to the posting of precautions required for one (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of one rooms observed with a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) caddy hanging from doorway, ensure direct care staff (Staff B, J, BB and DD) kept fingernails at an appropriate length and within policy parameters, ensure facility staff were knowledgeable on the types of PPE required to enter two resident rooms (#104 and #327) with posted precaution signage, and PPE caddies were stocked with required PPE for one (#104) of three residents on precautions. Findings included: 1. On 2/26/24 at 9:41 a.m. an observation was made of a PPE caddy containing gowns, gloves, and face masks hanging from the shut door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The caddy and surrounding area of the doorway did not have a sign posted indicating the type of precautions staff and visitors were to take prior to entering the resident room. (Photographic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of fifty-three sampled residents (#76) was provided and maintained with privacy/dignity during two of four days observed (2/26/2024, and 2/27/2024). Findings included: On 2/26/2024 at 10:20 a.m. while touring the C wing halls, and prior to getting to Resident #76's room, the resident could be overheard calling out and moaning loudly. Upon reaching the resident's room, the door was open, and Resident #76 was noted lying flat in bed and with the covers off her body. She was observed not wearing any clothing and the bottom half of her body was exposed with only wearing an adult brief. Resident #76 was not interviewable. Three staff members were observed walking by the room and did not intervene to cover the resident up or assist the resident. On 2/27/2024 at 7:15 a.m. Resident #76's room was approached, and the door was open. From the hallway, the resident was observed lying in bed and with the covers off her lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$66,613 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $33,248 — penalty dated 2025-06-21
• $33,365 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL