University Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 144.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 1.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews it was determined that the facility did not adequately maintain a safe environment to prevent potential hazards that could have resulted in accidents or injuries in two of five soiled utility rooms. Staff failed to secure two soiled utility room doors on the facility's second floor because paper towels had been placed in the locks, which prevented proper locking. At the time of the survey 140 residents resided in the facility. The findings include:On 04/01/2026 at 1:40 PM, the Wound Care Registered Nurse (RN) completed wound care disposed of a biohazard bag in the soiled utility room, and exited, leaving the soiled utility room door unlocked.On 04/01/2026 at 1:45 PM Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) exited the soiled utility room and the door remained unlocked.On 04/01/2026 at 1:46 PM Staff B, [NAME] exited the soiled utility room and the door remained unlocked.Observation on 04/01/2026 at 1:47 PM revealed someone placed a piece of paper towel in the lock of the soiled utility room door, which stopped the door from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions as evidenced by the walk-in refrigerator contained flower bouquets on the shelves among the fruits and vegetables. This has the potential to affect 128 out of 133 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the Food Storage Policy and Procedure (review date November 2024); Policy-Food storage areas are maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary manner and maximize nutrient retention and food quality; Procedure-1) Perishable foods are stored immediately after delivery. Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 6:47 AM with the Dietary Supervisor and Corporate CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) revealed the walk-in refrigerator with four bouquets of flowers lying on the shelf with vegetables and fruits. Photographic evidence submitted. Interview with the Corporate CDM on 5/19/25 at 6:48 AM. He revealed that the bouquets of flowers were for Nurses' week. He confirmed that the bouquets of flowers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential information for the residents on the fourth floor as evidenced by an observation of an unattended paperwork with residents' pictures, names and rooms left visible on top of the fourth floor's south medication cart. There were 24 residents residing on the fourth floor. The findings included: Observation on 5/19/25 at 6:40 AM revealed confidential paperwork with residents' names, corresponding pictures and room numbers were observed on top of the unattended fourth floor's south medication cart. During an interview on 5/19/25 at 6:55 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) stated: Sorry, I left the paperwork on top of the medication cart; I know all information should be kept private. Interview on 5/21/25 at 1:17 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated: All resident information should be kept confidential. Record review of a policy titled Protected Health Information (PHI), Safeguarding Electronic revised January 2024, Reviewed January 2025 revealed Policy: Electronic protected health information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to update a respiratory care plan for one (Resident #79) out of one sampled resident as evidenced by a respiratory care plan with interventions for a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine, despite physician orders for the discontinuation of the BiPAP machine since 10/15/24. There were three residents with BiPAP machines in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 5/19/25 at 6:52 AM Resident # 79 was observed in bed with eyes closed; a BiPAP machine was observed on the nightstand next to the resident with the tubing extending into drawer (photographic evidence). On 5/20/25 at 9:26 Resident # 79 was observed in bed with eyes closed; a BiPAP machine was observed on the nightstand next to the resident with the tubing extending into drawer. On 5/22/25 at 7:26 AM Resident # 79 was observed in bed with eyes closed; a BiPAP machine was observed on the nightstand next to the resident with the tubing extending into drawer. Record review of Resident #79's demographic sheet revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly secure medications for residents residing on the fourth floor, as evidenced by a plastic bag with medications observed on top of the unattended fourth floor's south medication cart. There were 24 residents residing on the fourth floor at the time of survey. The findings included: Observation on 05/20/25 at 9:15 AM, revealed a plastic bag filled with medications left unattended on top of the south medication cart (photographic evidence). On 05/20/25 at 9:15 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) who was seated at the nursing station was asked if medications were inside the plastic bag on top of the south medication cart. Staff A, RN walked with the surveyor to the medication cart, opened the plastic bag and revealed the contents which included loose pills and pills in containers. Staff A, RN stated:I found these medications in a resident's room, removed it and was going to notify the supervisor when I was called to help another nurse with an emergency situation. On 05/20/25 at 9:25 AM, Staff A, RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective action plans were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F812- Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve - Sanitary and F867- Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)/ Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA). These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 01/11/ 2024, F812 Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve/ Sanitary was cited related the facility's failure to store food under sanitary conditions related to a buildup of ice in the ice cream freezer with the potential to affect 139 out of 143 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of that survey. During this survey with an exit dated 05/22/2025, repeated deficient practice was identified for F812-Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve/Sanitary, related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative and physician about an accident that resulted in an injury which required medical attention for one resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents, as evidenced by during assisted transfer Resident#1 hit her head on the wheelchair and the incident went unreported after bruising was identified and reported the family member to staff. There were 143 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 2/17/25 at 8:15 AM Resident#1 was observed in bed with eyes open repeating the word NO when greeted, a small discoloration was noted under the right eye, a scratch was noted on the right hand and a small scratch on the left leg. Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident#1 revealed an initial admission date of 12/15/21 and readmission date of 8/8/24 with diagnosis that included: Dementia and Unspecified fall. Record review of an Annual Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents as evidenced by during transfer, Resident #1 sustained injuries that were not reported immediately by staff and were discovered by a family member. The findings included: On 2/17/25 at 8:15 AM Resident#1 was observed in bed with eyes open repeating the word NO when greeted, a small discoloration was noted under the right eye, a scratch was noted on the right hand and a small scratch on the left leg. Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident#1 revealed an initial admission date of 12/15/21 and readmission date of 8/8/24 with diagnosis that included: Dementia and Unspecified fall. Record review of an Annual Minimum Data Set reference dated 12/27/24 revealed Resident#1 is moderately impaired cognitively, required substantial/maximal assistance for chair/bed-to-chair transfer and had no falls since admission/entry or reentry or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for two residents (#41 and #93) out of 28 sampled residents. As evidenced by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed standing while feeding Resident #41 and Resident #93 not having any food while his roommate was being fed and eating food. There were 143 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 01/08/24 at 12:15 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), (Staff B) was observed standing over the bed of Resident #41 and feeding him lunch from the lunch tray. On 01/08/24 at 12:15 PM Resident #93's roommate was eating lunch being fed by Staff B meanwhile, Resident # 93 was observed with no food. The surveyor asked Staff B where Resident #93's food was. Staff B reported it will be coming soon. During an interview on 01/08/24 at 12:17 PM Staff B was asked about standing while feeding the resident. Staff B stated, I am sorry but there is only one chair in the room, and it has stuff on it. Staff B acknowledged that she should not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for Resident #343 as evidenced by Resident #343 call light was out of reach and had difficulty using other devices. There were 143 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: On 01/08/24 at 10:31 AM. In an interview with Resident #343. Resident #343 stated, I'm not able to use the call light to ask for help. I'm not able to move my fingers to touch the device. On 01/10/24 at 02:50 PM, during an observation and interview with Resident #343. It was observed that the thumb call light was tucked underneath Resident #343's pillow to the right side of the resident's head. The resident was holding the bed control keypad on his chest. The resident was asked: Are you able to use your call light, if not, how are you able to call staff for assistance? Resident #343 stated, I'm hard of hearing. The call light is too hard to push. It's very difficult. The bed control is hard to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ONYX HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL