Aventura Rehab And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 82.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.26 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not implement a fall care plan for one (Resident #95) of five sampled residents. Resident # 95 in bed, which was positioned high, and the call light was out of reach. There were 24 residents on the facility's Fall Management Program at the time of survey. The findings included: On 04/13/2026 at 9:17 AM, Resident # 95 was observed in a bed positioned at a high level, with the call light placed out of the resident's reach. (Photo evidence) The surveyor remained with the resident.On 04/13/2026 at 9:22 AM Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) returned to room and was notified about the identified concern and stated, Sorry.Record review of Resident # 95's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses include but are not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, and Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris.Record review revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations records reviewed and interviews it was determined that the facility did not accurately complete Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) forms for one out of three sampled residents diagnosed with a Serious Mental Illness (SMI). Resident # 9's diagnosis of Anxiety was omitted on the Level I PASRR form despite being admitted to the facility with this diagnosis. There were 78 residents residing in the facility. The findings included: Resident # 9On 04/13/2026 at 9:40 AM Resident # 9 was observed in bed, no apparent distress noted.On 4/17/2026 at 11:48 AM Resident # 9 was observed in a recliner in room singing loudly and stating ownership of the facility. Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/08/2022 and readmission date of 03/13/2026 with diagnosis that included: Anxiety, Unspecified Mood Affective Disorder, Major Depressive disorder recurrent severe with Psychotic symptoms, and unspecified Psychosis. Record review of an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference dated 07/24/2025 revealed Resident # 9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards for administering medications via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for one out of two sampled residents (Resident #52) with a PEG tube. Facility staff did not check the placement of Resident #52's PEG tube before administering medications. This practice had the potential to cause severe medical complications. There were four residents with PEG tubes residing in the facility at the time of survey.The findings included: Observation on 04/13/2026 at 10:00 AM of medication administration for Resident # 52 being performed by Staff G (RN) revealed after verifying physician orders and preparing four medications in separate cups, Staff G entered the room, ensured privacy, performed hand hygiene, collected water, and donned gloves. Resident #52 was awake in bed with tube feeding off. Staff G attached a 60 ml syringe to the PEG valve,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one (Resident # 95) out of five sampled residents on fall management program; and on the fourth floor and with the fourth-floor housekeeping cart as evidenced by; Resident # 95 was left in a high positioned bed, the call light not in reach while and no staff present. There were 24 residents on the facility's Fall Management Program at the time of survey. 2) Housekeeping cart left unattended with hazardous chemical easily accessible on the cart. There were 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 04/13/2026 at 9:17 AM, Resident #95 was observed in a bed positioned at a high level, with the call light placed out of the resident's reach. (Photo evidence) The surveyor remained with the resident.On 04/13/2026 at 9:22 AM Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) returned to room and was notified about the identified concern and stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate and timely medication administration for two (Resident # 52 and Resident #73) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration observation as evidenced by:1 An omission of a supplement order for Resident # 52 for wound healing. 2. Medications administered 1.5 to 2 hours late to Resident # 46 and Resident #73. There were 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Resident # 52 Observation on 04/13/2026 at 10:00 AM of medication administration for Resident # 52 being performed by Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed after verifying the physicians' orders and preparing four medications in separate medication cups, Staff G, RN knocked, obtained permission, verified the resident's identity, provided privacy, washed hands, and collected water. Resident #52 was awake in bed with the tube feeding off. Staff G donned gloves, used a barrier,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5 % as evidenced by a medication rate of 24.24 %. Observations included: Medications administered 1.5 to 2 hours late to Resident #46 and Resident #73. There were 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Resident # 46 On 04/13/26 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor observed Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), administering medication on the first-floor south cart for Resident #46. Staff A, RN revealed that Resident #46 received medications orally in whole form. Staff A, RN performed hand hygiene, implemented required infection control precautions, verified each medication, and prepared them according to the physician's order. Staff A, RN administered the oral medications, ordered for 9:00 AM, with water: 1. Staff A, RN administered Amlodipine 10 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet, by mouth (PO); ordered to be given once daily. 2. Staff A, RN administered Doxycycline 100 mg, 1 capsule (cap), PO; ordered to be given twice daily; the 9:00 AM dose was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews facility failed to properly store medications during medication administration as evidenced by: Observation of medications on top of the 4th floor medication cart, unattended. Two observations of the facility's staff leaving medications unattended during medication administration. There were 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Resident #72 Observation on 04/15/2026 at 8:58 AM during medication administration Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) left medication at Resident #72's bedside while performing hand hygiene. Interview on 04/15/2026 at 9:28 AM Staff B, RN stated: I am not supposed to leave the pills at the bedside while washing my hands. I should bring the medication and the bedside table with me. The reason is because the patient could grab the medication and take it unsupervised, which is unsafe. I did receive training on this, most recently two weeks ago by my supervisor. On 04/15/2025 at 03:33 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated: The bedside table should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action to correct repeated deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F761; failed to properly store and label medications during medication administration, F689; failed to prevent accident hazards. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect the 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited for F761 and F689 during the recertification and Re licensure survey with an exit date of 09/19/2024.Record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan Reviewed: 3/10/2025 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life.Review of the Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent the elopement of one (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents; as evidenced by, on 04/18/2025 newly admitted Resident #1 who is moderately impaired left the facility undetected at approximately 11:22 AM and boarded a city bus; was located 10 hours later 2.0 miles from the facility by a stranger that observed Resident #1 pacing back and forth before his home and alerted law enforcement. According to Accu weather. com on that day the temperature ranged between 72 degrees and 86 degrees. The findings included: Review of a photograph provided by the facility's Administrator revealed on 04/18/2025 at 11:22 AM Resident #1 was observed ambulating towards the 1st Floor East Exit dressed in long black pants, long sleeve pink top and white sneakers. Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident#1 was admitted on [DATE]; according to the admission assessment the resident was alert and oriented times three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to keep residents' health care information private on two out of four medication carts as evidenced by computer screens left open and unattended on the first-floor South medication cart and third floor medication cart with residents' information visible There were 77 residents resided in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 09/18/24 at 10:26 AM the computer screen on the first south medication cart was left unattended with residents' health care information visible. The Surveyor signaled for Director of Nursing to approach. Staff A, Registered Nurse and Director of Nursing both approached the cart at the same time and were notified that screen was left open. At that time Staff A, Registered Nurse closed the screen. The Director of Nursing stated, Screens should not be left open and unattended. On 9/19/24 at 10:56 AM, this Surveyor walked onto the third floor and observed Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse speaking with a resident near the elevator; a medication cart was observed near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ONYX HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL