Prosper Health And Rehabilitation Center
11375 Prosperity Farms Road, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (561) 626-9702 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,604 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-01)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.4% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 2.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.4% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.6% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.0% | 9.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.9%CMS range 39.2–59.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.6–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.9–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received the necessary care and services for wound care. This is evidenced by the staff failure to provide evidence of thorough assessment when a wound is noted as open; failed to complete the weekly skin checks appropriately; failed to correctly identify skin issues in a timely manner; and failed to ensure wound care is done as prescribed and dated appropriately. This failure affected 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #1 and Resident #2. The findings included:1. Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson Disease, immunodeficiency, muscle atrophy, dementia and history of cerebral infarction. The resident requires total assistance with his activities of daily living and is incontinent of bowel and bladder. An observation of the wound care on Resident #2 was conducted on 06/16/26 at 10:25 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policy and procedures to prevent abuse for 3 of 3 abuse allegations affecting Residents #33, #48, #101, #86, and #38, as evidenced by lack of communication by staff to management, lack of documentation of events, and lack of documentation of notification to management, physicians and families. The census at the time of survey was 98 residents. The finding included: Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI)” with a revised date of 03/2025 included in part the following: Training and Prevention: c) what constitutes abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation, mistreatment, and injury of unknown origin. Reporting policies and procedures established by the center. Reporting: Annually notifying covered individuals, of that individuals obligation to comply with the following reporting requirements a) each covered individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, it was determined, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse. The failure affected 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1.The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI), last revised 03/2025, documents Reporting: Allegations of possible ANEMMI will be reported to state agencies per federal regulation time frame. State agencies may include, Abuse Hotline, State Agencies and Local Law Enforcement.Initial reporting: allegations are reported immediately, but no later than two hours .within five working days of the incident, the facility must provide in its report, sufficient information to describe the results of the investigation and indicate any corrective actions taken. Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure discharge planning was implemented in a safe manner. The failure affected 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1.The findings included:Clinical record review conducted on 07/01/25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Hemiplegia, Dysphagia, Diabetes, Stroke, and status post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Craniotomy.The clinical record documented Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency department on 03/30/25, as per the resident request. The resident had called 911 alleging the aide hit him over the head, the police and EMS (Emergency Medical Services) came, and the police verified there was no hitting on the video the resident presented to them. The resident was then taken to the hospital for evaluation. The resident returned the same day, as this is where he was residing at the time.On 07/01/25 at 12:54 PM, the Administrator (NHA) stated that [another State Government Agency] did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper care and services for the indwelling urinary catheters for 2 of 3 sampled residents, related to improper catheter care for Resident #1, and failure to properly anchor the indwelling urinary catheters for Residents #1 and #67, for the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The findings included: Review of the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care Competency, (not dated), documented, in part, 11. Hold catheter near meatus (insertion site) to prevent pulling when handling and cleanse catheter using clean area of washcloth, washing away from the body and down the catheter at least 3 - 4 inches. Review of the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion/Removal Competency, (not dated), documented, in part, 20. Anchor catheter (thigh if appropriate and coil tubing on bed and attach to mattress). 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current care plan initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of mechanical lift slings (used for the Hoyer lifts) for 7 of 12 sampled residents who require a mechanical lift for transferring (Residents #1, #18, #19, #44, #67, #89, and #100). Three of 12 sampled residents had a lift sling, but there was no name on the sling to identify it to the resident, as per the facility process (Resident #20, #23, #63). Eleven of 13 random non-sampled residents either did not have a lift sling, had one with no name on it, or had one belonging to another resident. At the time of the survey there were 24 residents who were assessed as needing the mechanical lift for transferring. The facility also failed to provide a wheelchair for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #89), and failed to ensure proper bed and or mattress for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #98 and #260). The findings included: 1) On 04/04/24 at 2:00 PM when asked for a policy for mechanical lift transfers, the regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nutrition via enteral tube feeding as ordered for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Residents #100, 29, 67, 1). The findings included: 1) Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to 02/12/24 and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after being sent out to the hospital for pulling out her Peg tube. According to the resident's most recent full assessment, a 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #100 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #100's diagnoses at the time of the MDS included: Hemiplegia following CVA affecting left non-dominant side, renal insufficiency, Diabetes, CVA, Malnutrition, Gastrostomy status, Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Dysphagia. Resident #100's diet orders included: NPO (nothing by mouth) diet, 01/29/24. Enteral Feed - Resident on enteral feeding of Glucerna 1.5 via pump at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff during care for 2 of 8 sampled residents observed. Staff failed to ensure an order for the use of oxygen and failed to replace an empty water bottle for the oxygen of Resident #1; failed to ensure proper order of care for the wound and tube feeding for Resident #1, failed to ensure competency for setting the tube feeding pump for Resident #1, and failed to properly administer medications through the PEG tube (feeding tube surgically placed in the stomach) for Resident #23. The findings included: 1) Review of the policy Oxygen Administration revised 12/2023 documented, General Guidelines: 1. Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula, and/or other device per physicians' orders and/or facility protocol. Observations on 04/01/24 at 4:03 PM, on 04/02/24 at 9:04 AM and 2:05 PM, and on 04/03/24 at 10:58 AM, all revealed Resident #1 wearing humidified oxygen via nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the shower schedule for Resident #19 to ensure he received his 2 showers per week. And the facility failed to ensure a certified nursing assistant communicated Resident #92's desire for outside activities to the Activity Director. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 01/20/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, reference date 03/12/24, revealed a brief interview for mental (BIMS) status score of 15, which indicated Resident #19 was cognitively intact. This MDS recorded no mood or behavior issue. Further review of this MDS, under section GG for functional abilities and goals, it was documented Resident #19 had impairment on both lower extremities (related to double amputation of his lower extremities). This MDS also documented Resident #19 was dependent with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the Facility failed to provide appropriate beneficiary notices for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Residents #58, #110, and #89). The findings included: On 04/02/24 at 10:20 AM, the Administrator was provided a sample list of 3 residents who had been, or still were, residents in the facility and had been discharged from Medicare Part A services. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification (BPN) Review Worksheet (Form CMS-20052) was provided to be completed for each resident. On 04/02/24, the following documentation was provided by the Administrator: 1) Resident #58's BPN Review worksheet showed Resident's last covered day of Part A Services was on 12/05/23. The facility had initiated the discharge from Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. Based on record review, this resident remained in the facility. The facility provided Resident #58 with a NOMNC (CMS Form 10123) on 12/05/23. Based on regulation, The NOMNC ( Form CMS 10123), is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 3 of 6 sampled residents, as evidenced by a lack of timely incontinence care for Residents #23 and #89, failure to trim a fingernail for Resident #23, and failure to ensure mouth care for Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the policy ADL Care and Services, revised 01/2024 documented, Procedure: . 4. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, nail care, and oral care); . c. Elimination (toileting) . 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], admitted to Hospice services on 03/04/22, and moved to her current room on 07/14/22. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a specialty air mattress and protective boots were provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents. Resident #1 was identified as having a facility acquired pressure injury. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was moved to her current room after a short hospitalization stay on 03/28/24. Review of the current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was totally dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living and had three current pressure injuries. A care plan initiated on 01/11/24 documented Resident #1 had a pressure injury to her sacrum and an intervention included the use of a pressure relieving/reducing mattress as ordered or indicated. A care plan initiated on 03/21/24 documented the resident had a stage 2 pressure injury to her left heel. This care plan lacked the intervention of offloading the resident's heels or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented provision of dialysis and ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #55). The findings included: Review of the policy, Dialysis Care revised 08/2023 documented, Standard: To encourage residents' compliance with dialysis schedule/appointment, . Procedure: 2. Facility personnel will provide information that is useful or necessary for the care of the resident to the dialysis center as needed. 4. Correspondence from the dialysis center will be addressed by facility staff and will be recorded in the plan of care as indicated. Review of the record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the orders revealed Resident #55 was scheduled for dialysis services at a dialysis center on Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On 04/04/24 in the afternoon, staff at the North nurses' station were asked how the facility ensures ongoing communication with the dialysis centers. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for 4 of (Residents #20, #5, #98, #53, and #55). The findings included: 1) Resident #20 had the following current orders documented on her March 2024 electronic medication and treatment administration record (eMAR/eTAR): a) Treatment for Bilateral Buttocks: Cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, and apply Zinc Oxide every shift for prevention. b) Mupirocin External Ointment 2 % Apply to Mid back topically every day shift for wound care; Cleanse wound to mid back with Dakin's, pat dry, apply skin prep to peri wound, lightly fill wound with plain packing strip moistened with mupirocin, change daily and PRN (as needed). c) Nystop External Powder 100000 unit/gm apply to sacrum topically twice daily for rash d) Body audit daily every day shift for Skin observation e) Behavior monitoring every shift. A review of the March 2024 eMAR and eTAR showed no staff initials signifying completion of the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely provision of physician ordered antibiotics for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #78). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating she was cognitively intact. A progress note dated 03/31/24 at 12:06 PM, by Staff N, the physician, revealed Resident #78 complained of a cough. The physician's plan included the initiation of the IV (intravenous) antibiotic Zosyn, to be given every 6 hours for seven days. Further review of the record revealed an order dated 03/31/24 at 12:41 for the placement of a midline (intravenous access). The order for the Zosyn was entered into the electronic medical record on 03/31/24 at 12:51 by Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN). A progress note written by Staff M, RN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of the Comprehensive Assessments for 2 of 3 sampled resident, Residents #2 and #3, as evidenced by lack of timely initial and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #2 on 03/05/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the record failed to provide evidence that the resident had a Comprehensive Assessment completed for the resident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes. It is a core set of screening, clinical and functional status elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which forms the foundation of a comprehensive assessment. Review of the electronic record, MDS, noted that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that an accurate nutritional assessment was completed for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for weight loss, Resident #1, who experienced a weight loss. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident # 1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. The resident has a gastrotomy tube (GT / PEG) receiving enteral tube feeding. On 10/05/23, the facility had identified a concern that the resident required tube feeding (GT) related to Dysphagia, CVA (cerebral vascular accident); and had elevated needs for wound healing. The tube feeding provided the resident's sole source of nutrition and had remained NPO (nothing by mouth). Review of the resident's admissions and discharges documented the following: -transferred to the hospital on [DATE]; returned on 10/29/23. -transferred to hospital on [DATE];…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff maintained the resident's respiratory supplies and equipment that are consistent with acceptable standards of practice and physician orders, as evidenced by the observation of multiple resident's respiratory supplies not dated, were expired or were improperly stored. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, documented, in part, Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OHSA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. b. Semi-critical items consist of items that may come in contact with mucous membranes or non-intact skin (e.g., respiratory therapy equipment). Such devices should be free from all microorganisms, although small numbers of bacterial spores are permissible. Physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) composed of individuals with direct care knowledge of the resident and his/her needs. This impacted 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1, reviewed for care plans. The findings included: Clinical record review conducted on 10/03/23 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA/stroke). Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), admission assessment with reference date of 06/29/23, revealed the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily decision making and required extensive assistance with activity of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Conference of 07/05/23 revealed no registered nurse with direct care responsibility for the resident, no nurse aide / certified nursing assistant with direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy reviews, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1, that included failure to implement recommended discharge instructions for follow up diagnostic studies, failure to obtain recommended consults and failure to communicate and coordinate with the resident's responsible party the changes in treatment plan; and facility staff failed to report a skin injury, and subsequently did not investigate and implement additional interventions to minimize reoccurrence for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1. The findings included: 1. Clinical record review conducted on 10/03/23 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services. The resident's diagnosis included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA/stroke) with severe deficits. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with reference date 06/29/23 revealed the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the nursing staff were unable to demonstrate competency related to the provision of nursing assessments and reporting changes in condition. This failure affected 2 of 2 sampled residents, Residents #1 and #2. The findings included: 1. Clinical record review conducted on 10/03/23 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services. The resident's diagnosis included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA/stroke) with severe deficits. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with reference date 06/29/23 revealed the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily decision making, required extensive assistance with activity of daily living (ADLs) and had no skin conditions. The baseline plan of care dated 06/22/23 and comprehensive plan initiated on 07/13/23 documented the resident has altered cardiovascular status related to Atrial Fibrillation, High Cholesterol and Hypertension. The interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of the record reviewed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed 09/28/22. The record lacked any evidence of a care plan meeting with participation of the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team), the resident and or his representative. During an interview on 01/06/23, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated Resident #17 was scheduled to have a care plan meeting soon, in conjunction with the current quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. The SSD was asked to locate and provide evidence of the care plan meeting in conjunction with the September 2022 MDS assessment. During a subsequent interview on 01/06/23 at 12:10 PM, the SSD stated she was unable to find any evidence of a previous care plan meeting. 3. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During interview with Resident #6 on 01/03/23, she stated that she did not recall anyone discussing her plan of care or attending a care plan meeting. On 12/28/22, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 7 sampled residents, as evidenced by: Staff failed to ensure COVID-19 symptom monitoring for Residents #17, #306, #65, #53, and #355; failed to ensure proper indwelling urinary catheter maintenance and care for Residents #53 and #49; and failed to ensure an ointment belonging to another resident was not used for Resident #49. The findings included: Review of the policy COVID-19 Clinical Monitoring and Measures Plan, dated 10/10/22, documented, Standard Measures: Complete COVID-19 Screening UDA, including vital signs on all symptomatic patients. Enhanced Measures: Enhanced Measures become effective when any employee presents with a positive COVID-19 test OR a resident test [sig] positive AND was not previously being cared for in transmission based (airborne-droplet) precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled residents were spoken to and treated in a dignified manner (Residents #303, #304, and #305). The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #303 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and resided on the 200 Unit. Review of the admission progress note, dated 12/29/22 at 7:22 PM, documented she was alert and oriented. This note revealed the resident had a mass to her left arm, with a biopsy incision, sutures, and a dressing. During an interview on 01/03/23 at 11:31 AM, when asked if staff treated her with respect and dignity, Resident #303 became weepy and explained that she was unable to fully use her right arm because of a childhood deformity, and was currently unable to use her left because of a surgical procedure. The resident continued to explain she was choking on phlegm the other night and could not reach the Kleenex. Resident #303 stated a nurse came in and just threw the Kleenex at her. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and update care plans to reflect the status of behaviors such as combativeness, agitation and wandering; and the use of antianxiety and antibiotic medications for 1 of 23 sampled residents, Resident #36. The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Fracture and Parkinson's Disease. The admission minimum data set (MDS), assessment reference date 10/19/22, revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating Resident #36 was cognitively impaired. This MDS recorded that Resident #36 had no behavior issue, it indicated behavior was not exhibited. The clinical records revealed care plans was initiated on 10/12/22. The care plans were started to be reviewed on 10/25/22 with review completion date on 12/13/22. Further review of clinical records revealed the following Physician orders: a. dated 11/21/22, Ativan Injection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely treatment of a fungal rash for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for non-pressure ulcer skin conditions (Resident #306). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #306 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Evaluation dated 12/31/22 at 9:45 PM documented redness and a rash to the resident's sacrum and groin. A subsequent admission progress note dated 12/31/22 at 11:11 PM documented redness and rashes noted to both groin and buttock, and that medications were verified with the physician. Review of the physician orders lacked any type of skin treatment for the rash until 01/04/23. The physician's order dated 01/04/23 documented to apply Zinc Oxide ointment topically every shift until antifungal cream was available, and then to apply Nystatin External Cream topically every shift for 21 days for an acute fungal rash. The resident's base line care plan lacked any skin issues or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of ordered pain medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #304). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Evaluation and baseline care plan dated 12/22/22 at 11:09 PM documented the resident had additional diagnoses of fibromyalgia and neuropathy, both of which can be painful. This admission assessment documented the resident had frequent pain relieved by medication, and the baseline care plan documented to provide medications as ordered. During an observation and interview on 01/03/23 at 1:23 PM, Resident #304 was lying in bed, grimacing, and moaning. When asked what was wrong, Resident #304 stated she had not had her pain medication since yesterday, and finally got it about 30 minutes ago. Resident #304 explained when she asked for pain medication yesterday, the nurse sent in an aide to tell her they only had Tylenol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff adequately monitored Blood Pressure and provided Blood Pressure medications as per physician-ordered parameters for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #6 and #17). The findings included: 1. Resident #6 was admitted with diagnosis to include Coronary Artery Disease. Resident #6's Care Plan, initiated on 06/06/19 and last revised on 12/28/22, documented Resident #6 had Cardiac Disease related to Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, and Coronary Artery Bypass with stents. The interventions included, Administer medications as ordered, obtain vital signs as indicated. A review of the December 2022 electronic Medication Administration Record (e-MARs) showed orders for the following blood pressure medications with parameters: Metoprolol 25 mg bid [twice daily] for HTN (Hypertension), hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) < [less than] 110, HR (heart rate) <60. Clonidine HCI 0.1 mg q 8 hrs [every 8 hours] as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 1 of 6 medication carts, utilized by two different nurses on the 400 pod. The findings included: On 01/03/23 at 12:30 PM, the 400-pod medication cart was observed left unlock and unattended. Staff C, a licensed practical nurse (LPN), was in room [ROOM NUMBER] assisting residents, at the location where the medication cart was placed. Staff C would not have been able to see the medication cart. At 12:33 PM, when Staff C came out the room, she was made aware of the unlock medication cart. She acknowledged the finding. On 01/04/22 at 10:31 AM, the 400-medication cart was left unlock and unattended. The nurse went to administer medications in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During that time, Resident #36 (a resident with confusion, BIMS of 03), was observed sitting immediately next to the medication cart. Resident #36 was observed touching the medication cart. There were 3 other residents with confusion sitting on the 400 pod. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide individual activities for bed bound and/or cognitively impaired residents based on their comprehensive assessments, care plans and personal preferences to support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #16, #43, #52, #69, and #73) reviewed for activities. The findings included: 1) Record review revealed Resident #16 has diagnoses which include Cerebrovascular Disease, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Dementia with Behaviors, Anxiety Disorder, Repeated Falls, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alzheimer's. Her most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 07/11/21, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #16's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], documents for her Activity Preferences that it was very important for this resident to listen to music she likes and to participate in religious services. It was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed ensure that the environment remained free of accident hazards that included excessive hot water temperatures in the resident rooms for 2 (100 and 200 Pod) of 6 residential Pods. The findings included: During the observation tour of the 200 POD on 10/11/21 at 10 AM, it was noted that the temperature of the hot water in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] was hot/scalding to the touch. At the request of the surveyor the temperature of the hot water was taken with the facility's calibrated bayonet thermometer and was recorded at 120 degrees F. The Maintenance Director who accompanied the surveyor stated that room temperatures are checked randomly and do not exceed 110 degrees F. The Director also stated that there are 2 hot water heaters that supply the North Wings Pods (100 & 200) . The boiler room was also observed that houses the hot water heaters and it was noted that the heater was set to 150 degrees F due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #18) was provided Oxygen therapy per physician's order. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pneumonia, Heart Failure, COPD, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Pleural Effusion. On 10/11/21 at 10:30 AM, Resident #18's Oxygen (O2) concentrator was observed to be set at 3.5 liters per minute (lpm); O2 tubing was dated 9/29/21 (photographic evidence obtained). A review of the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) and physician's orders related to Oxygen therapy for Resident #18 showed a Physician's order, dated 08/16/21, for Oxygen at 2 liters via Nasal Cannula for every shift for COPD. On 10/11/21 at 12:35 PM, Staff A (Licensed Nurse assigned to POD 5) was notified to check O2 order and O2 concentrator setting for Resident #18. This nurse went into Resident #18's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests for 1 of 5 sampled resident reviewed (Resident #72). The findings included: On 10/12/21 at 3:11 PM clinical records review for Resident #72; revealed a Physician's order dated 09/01/21 for the following laboratory tests: 1. TSH (Thyroid-stimulating hormone), the thyroid is a small, butterfly-shaped gland located near the throat, the thyroid makes hormones that plays an important role in regulating weights, body temperature, muscles strength and mood. 2. HGBA1c (hemoglobin A1c) a test that measures the amount of blood sugar attached to hemoglobin. Resident #72's records lacked evidence of these ordered test and there was no documentation of the reason for the omission of these labs. On 10/13/21 at 2:54 PM a side by side review of Resident #72's records and interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), an inquiry was made of the mentioned laboratory test results. The DON showed a lab requisition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-14 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #69) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for Nutrition was assessed and provided with adaptive eating equipment that included all drinking cups and mugs to be provided with lids and straws. The findings included: Observation conducted of Resident #69 on 10/12/21 at 12:15 PM noted the food tray was served to the room of Rresident #69. Further observation noted the diet tray card to document all drinking cups to have lids and straws and mug with a lid and straw. Observation of the resident during the meal noted that only a mug with a lid and straw was provided for the hot tea and no cups with lids and straws were provided for the 3 cold beverages. The resident was noted to be blind but eats independently with set-up from staff. It was also noted that the resident requested to eat from a semi reclining position and spillage from the hot and cold beverages was at a high potential. During this observation, Staff stated that the resident requested beverages to be served in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-01-06 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure posting of staffing hours daily for 6 of 9 days reviewed. The findings included: On 01/03/23 at 9:10 AM, an inquiry was made of the Director Of Nursing (DON), and the surveyor requested about posting of staffing hours. The DON stated, it should be posted in the front lobby. The DON subsequently proceeded to go to the front lobby accompanied with the surveyor in search of the staffing hours. When we arrived, the staffing hours that were posted was dated 12/28/22, there were other staffing hours dated from 12/02-through 12/27/22. The current staffing hours were not posted. When inquired about who was responsible to post the staffing hours, the receptionist stated, it was supposed to be the business office staff. The DON stated no, it was supposed to be the staffing coordinator, but the staffing coordinator was currently out on medical leave. At 9:19 AM, the DON went to the business office and obtained the current staffing hours dated 01/03/22 and placed it at the front desk.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,604 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $3,396 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
- $4,285 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
- $4,285 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
- $4,823 — penalty dated 2024-03-12
- $28,815 — penalty dated 2024-03-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ONYX HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 4.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROSPER REHAB HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/04/2023 |
| BP PROSPER TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/05/2023 |
| LF PROSPER TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/05/2023 |
| ALMAKKEE, AMMAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2024 |
| AVRIL, RACHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| HOPKINS, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/05/2023 |
| LANGLAIS, HEATHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/29/2025 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/14/2025 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $382K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105762. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.