Heather Hill Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and supervision for the safety of one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents. Resident #1 suffered a fall with major injury requiring transfer to a higher level of care for treatment. Findings included: Review of the report titled incidents by incident type for 1/1/2026 to 5/20/2026 showed Resident #1 as having an unwitnessed fall on 1/11/2026, 2/10/2026, 3/9/2026, and 4/12/2026. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed:4/12/2026 at 11:40 p.m. Resident returned back to facility from the hospital with a comminuted left humeral head fracture with surgical neck involvement and displacement of the greater tuberosity (meaning: a severe, multi-part break near the shoulder joint. It signifies the bone is shattered into multiple pieces, the main ball of the shoulder joint is damaged, and the rotator cuff attachment is pulled out of place).2/10/2026 at 3:31 p.m. Resident was pushing another resident in wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food in a manner that was appealing in appearance and that was palatable for consumption for six (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) of six sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 10/22/2024 a review of photographic evidence provided by Resident #1's family member revealed Resident #1 had received a blue plate on her over the bed table with what appeared to be two diagonal cut sections of black toast. Further observation revealed the resident had received two grilled cheese sandwiches, both of which were totally black in color, burned, charred and not consumable. Four photographs of the burned and charred grilled cheese sandwiches were kept as evidence. It was determined the photos taken were taken in a manner showing Resident #1's personal belongings on the bed in the background, and it was evident she had received these burned and charred grilled cheese sandwiches. On 10/22/2024 at 1:45 p.m. Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon having a qualifying mental health diagnosis for 7 of 20 residents sampled (Residents #80, #54, #19, #62, #22, #52, and #33). Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, psychosis, anxiety, pseudobulbar affect, and other comorbidities. Review of Resident #54's PASRR Level I Assessment, dated 4/30/2021 did not reveal a qualifying mental health diagnosis marked in section I A. Section 6 was marked yes for dementia with a suspected mental illness although a level II PASRR was not completed. Due to the diagnosis' Resident #54 should have a Level II PASRR requested. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Parkinson's, Schizoaffective Disorder of the bipolar type; Mood Disorder, and other comorbidities. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. An observation on 06/03/24 at 9:13 a.m. revealed Resident #5 laid in bed with a bloody forehead. Further observation showed Resident #5 had a bloody area on the left side of her chest area. Resident #5 was non-verbal and did not response to Surveyor. During an interview on 06/03/24 at 9:13 a.m., Staff N Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated Resident # 5 was known to pick her skin and she must have been picking this weekend as she had new picking spots especially on her chest. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with behavioral disturbances, disorganized Schizophrenia and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Order Summary Report showed Resident #5 had the following orders: -Geodon Oral Capsule 40 [milligrams] mg (Ziprasidone HCl)- Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for schizoaffective disorder. Give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of 30 residents on one (400 - secure) of four units during mealtime and for 30 residents on one (400 - secure) of four units for activities over three (06/03/2024, 06/04/2024 and 06/06/2024) out of four days observed. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/3/24 at 10:50 a.m. of Resident #17 sitting in the dining room on the 400 unit. No staff were interacting with the resident, she had nothing at the table to do, and there were no activities going on. The resident remained in the same spot at 1:48 p.m. No staff interacted with the resident or provided any stimulation. No activities were observed throughout the day on 6/3/24. An observation was conducted on 6/3/24 at 11:59 a.m. during lunch service in the 400-unit dining room. Lunch trays were being set up for residents. There were only two staff members in the dining area to pass trays, set up food, and assist residents. Twenty-three residents were present in the dining area. One resident was wandering around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who entered arbitration agreements understood the contract contents for three residents (#342, #22 and #87) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview conducted on 06/05/24 at 03:03 p.m., Resident #342 stated she had signed the arbitration agreement during orientation. She stated a young man came to the room the other day with a stack of papers and had her sign all kinds of paperwork. She said, To be honest I don't know what that is. Everything was mumbo jumbo (meaning confusing or meaningless). I told my husband to listen to him. The resident and surveyor reviewed the Arbitration Agreement with her signature dated 06/03/24. She said, Yes that is my signature. I don't remember him saying anything about waiving my rights. The resident stated the staff member may have explained those things. I just was not in my right mind. The resident stated I still do not understand it. The resident asked, why…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during medication pass for three out of three observations, for one of one CPR backboard, and during dining on one (100) out of four hallways. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/4/24 at 9:09 a.m. of Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) during medication pass. Staff H was observed preparing medication for a resident, she then administered the medication, took two bottles of body cleanser another resident handed her, then returned to the medication cart and documented on the computer. During this process Staff H did not perform any hand hygiene. At 9:19 a.m. Staff H began pulling medication for a second resident. She left to get medication from the medication room and performed hand hygiene upon returning to the cart. Staff H continued preparing medication for the second resident, put on gloves and crushed/opened medication and placed in pudding, removed gloves, then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for residents in one (400) out of two dining rooms and on one (200) out of four units related to staff standing while assisting residents with eating, not serving residents at a single table their meals at the same time, and having residents eat in the hallway. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/4/24 at 5:16 p.m. in the 400-unit dining room of a table with four residents seated. Three of the residents had their meals and were eating while the fourth resident (#79) did not have any food. At 5:21 p.m. Resident #79 was observed walking to the tray cart and asked why everyone had food but her. She said, I am having to wait. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) walked up to the resident and the resident told Staff A she wanted her food. Staff A told Resident #79 someone would bring it to her in a minute. Staff A proceeded to leave the unit and stand in the hall talking with other staff members.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievance for one (Resident #30) out of three (3) residents sampled. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 6/4/2024 at 5:48 PM the Responsible Party (RP) of Resident #30 stated visiting the resident daily and assists with dinner and gets the resident ready for bed. The RP showed the brief that had just been taken off of Resident #30. The incontinent product appeared saturated with yellow liquid. The RP stated approximately 4 days out of the week when arriving Resident #30 has not been changed and the incontinent product is saturated. The RP stated, they [the facility] do not have enough staff to help with the population of residents on the 400 [memory care] unit. The RP states reporting these events to the nurse on multiple occasions. The RP states telling Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) multiple times including tonight. The RP continued to state staffing is probably the problem, as the unit (memory care unit) usually only has 1 Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review facility did not ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screen was updated when new diagnoses were added for three residents (#9, #11, and #17) out of twenty-six reviewed for PASRR screening. Findings included: Review of admission Records for Resident #17 showed she was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions. Review of Resident #17's PASRR Level 1 Screen, dated 12/23/22, showed no diagnoses or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR not required. No mental illness or suspected mental illness were checked in Section I and dementia was indicated as No in Section II. Review of admission Records for Resident #17 showed during her stay a diagnosis of dementia was added on 10/1/22, anxiety disorder was added on 4/11/24, and persistent mood disorders was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility's policies Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered and Pain Assessment and Management, the facility failed to develop a care plan for pain management for one Resident (Resident #22) and diabetic management with insulin use for one Resident (Resident #80) out of twenty sampled residents reviewed for development of care plans. Findings included: During an interview on 06/03/24 at 9:48 a.m., Resident #22 stated, I had fallen prior to coming to the facility and broke my leg. Resident #22 stated her leg began to heal but was set wrong, so the hospital had to go in and rebreak it and set it correctly. Resident #22 stated after the procedure she came to the facility but stated she was in pain. Resident #22 stated the facility gave her something for pain but felt as though that pain medication did not help much. Resident #22 stated the facility offered her morphine, but she declined as she felt that was too strong and would prefer something stronger than…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $422K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL