College Street Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 40.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident #14 was free from abuse, as a result Resident #14 was physically assaulted by Resident #138 and was injured. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 4/9/23 and ended on 4/18/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 06/14/2023, revealed Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease (group of heart conditions caused by high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high blood sugar), and generalized anxiety disorder (condition with exaggerated tension, worrying, and nervousness about daily life…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted regarding a need to alter treatment for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for notification of changes. (Resident #16 and Resident #24) The facility did not consult with Resident #16's physician about the pattern of low blood pressure over consecutive days and of the blood pressure medication being held for 52 of 60 opportunities in July 2025 or 9 of 12 opportunities for August 2025. The facility did not consult with Resident #24's physician about the pattern of low blood pressure over consecutive days and of the blood pressure medication being held for 7 of 31 opportunities in July 2025 or 3 of 6 opportunities for August 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for complications due to delayed or failed physician intervention. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 08/06/25 Resident #16’s indicated Resident #16 was [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 7 residents (CR #1 and CR #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure 20 boxes of Fiberone chocolate donuts that expired 06/08/25, (58 days expired) were removed from use. The facility failed to ensure discharged residents' (CR #1 and CR #2) medications were removed from use. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by their physicians and exacerbations of their medical conditions.Findings included:During an observation and interview on 08/05/25 at 10:45 a.m. of the facility medication storage room with LVN A, indicated on a shelf there were 20 boxes of Fiberone chocolate donuts (each box had 4 donuts) with a manufacture expiration date of 06/08/25 (expired for 58 days). LVN A said no resident was receiving the Fiberone donuts and eating the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities were accurately reported by the pharmacist consultant for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #16 and Resident #24) The Pharmacy Consultant failed to thoroughly review the medication regimen and identify possible and/or actual irregularities in the blood pressure and heart rate for Residents #16 and #24. The failure could place residents at risk of receiving inaccurate administration of medications which could result in possible adverse effects or residents not receiving therapeutic benefits of medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 08/06/25 Resident #16’s indicated Resident #16 was [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and high blood pressure. Record review of physician orders date July 2025 and August 2025 indicated the orders for Resident #16 included the Coreg 3.125 mg twice a daily for high blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were labeled, stored under proper temperature controls and in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication rooms and 1 of 1 medication refrigerators reviewed for storage of medication and biologicals. The facility failed to store medications within recommended temperature range in the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room. The facility failed to ensure that there were not 3-4 inches of ice build-up and no standing water in the medication storage refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure there was no stool specimen comingled with medications and stored in the medication room refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications, not receiving therapeutic effects of medication and possibly cross-contamination.Findings included:During an observation and interview on 08/05/25 at 11:00 a.m. of the facility medication storage room with LVN A, it was observed in the medication refrigerator,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10%, based on 3 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident # 18) and 1 of 2 staff (LVN A) reviewed for medication errors. LVN A failed to administer Resident #18's senna (vegetable laxative) 8.6mg, hydromorphone (opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) and artificial tears 1 drop to both eyes according to the physician's order. These failures could place residents at risk for decline in health and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #18 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinsonism (disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (progressive brain disorder that causes a gradual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The ADON failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while providing wound care to Resident #2's buttock area wound. CNA C failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while providing peri-care to Resident #2. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings include:Record review of Resident 2's face sheet, dated 08/06/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of having a pressure ulcer of his left buttock and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2's skin conditions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and CNA B did not use Resident #1's debit card to pay their electricity bills. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The past noncompliance began on 02/27/25 and ended on 04/09/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk for misappropriation, exploitation, financial and psychosocial distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/03/25, indicated she was was a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen), cognitive communication deficit (trouble with one or more cognitive processes involved in communication such as attention and memory and problems staying on topic), diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #2's care plan for falls and fall interventions after he fell and sustained a head laceration on 03/22/25. This failure could place residents at risk for injury from falls. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/02/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] and his diagnoses included diabetes (high blood sugar), muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength), unspecified lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle mass and strength), cognitive communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 out of 5 (Resident #3 and Resident #4) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for infection control practices. The ADON failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during care for Resident #3 who had a Foley catheter and wound. The facility failed to ensure the podiatrist followed enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #4 who had an indwelling medical device (g-tube). The failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 06/02/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including insomnia, essential hypertension, muscle weakness, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) for 4 of 14 residents (Residents #10, #20, #21, and #24) and failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #10) to meet the needs of each resident for reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN A did not prepare medications for Resident #21 per the facility policy. RN D did not flush Resident #10's gastric tube (tube surgically inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach) per gravity and did not destroy the used fentanyl (scheduled II controlled medication used for severe pain) patches in a sharps container per policy and with a witness for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX