Ayers Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 297 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards by failing to ensure wound cleanser containing chemicals were secure when not in use for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents with wound care needs.On August 3 and 4, 2025, [Brand Name] Wound Care Cleanser was observed unattended in Resident #1's room at different times by three staff members. The wound cleanser was not removed. Resident #1 consumed the wound cleanser, complained of burning to his mouth and stomach resulting in Resident #1 being transferred to a higher level of care.The facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards by failing to ensure wound cleanser containing chemicals were secure when not in use led to the determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated, (J). The facility's actions placed Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of dementia, at a likelihood of serious harm, such as gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an accurate assessment for 3 (Resident #22, #44, and #109) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory services.Findings include:1)Review of Resident #22's physician ordered dated 4/12/2026 read, Oxygen: Administer Oxygen @ (at) _3_L [liters] via nasal cannula, face mask, CONTINUOUS.Review of Resident #22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 6/13/2026 Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs did not document the use of oxygen.Review of Resident #22's Weights and Vitals Summary documented on 6/13/2026 at 01:05 oxygen saturation was 93 % (Oxygen Via Nasal Cannula), 6/12/2026 at 19:39 oxygen saturation was 93% (Oxygen via Nasal Cannula) through 6/7/2026 at 02:30 oxygen saturation was 98% (Oxygen via nasal Cannula).During an interview on 7/9/2026 at 9:43 AM with the MDS Coordinator stated, That one [assessment] was done by the MDS consultant. Most of them are oxygen saturation documented using oxygen via nasal cannula. It needs to be coded yes with continuous oxygen order. This one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the State of Florida Agency of Health Care Administration Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #22) of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral services. Findings include:Review of Resident #22's admission Record resident was first admitted on [DATE] and has diagnosis including but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder [onset date 5/20/2026].Review of Resident #22's State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 8/28/2025 did not documented any mental or suspect mental illness.Review of Resident #22 Balance Wellbeing Psychology Evaluation Note dated 5/6/2026 read, Chief Complaint. Depression. History of Presenting Illness. The patient presents today for evaluation of major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. They reported symptoms including decrease interest in activities, persistent depressed mood, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and changes in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #22) of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral services. Findings include:Review of Resident #22's admission Record resident was first admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses including but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder [onset date 5/20/2026].Review of Resident #22's Balance Wellbeing Psychology Evaluation Note dated 5/6/2026 read, Chief Complaint. Depression. History of Presenting Illness. The patient presents today for evaluation of major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. They reported symptoms including decrease interest in activities, persistent, depressed mood, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and changes in appetite occurring on more than half of the days. The current episode has persisted for the past three months, also linked to ongoing health concerns. These symptoms are causing the patient moderate subjective distress.Review of Resident #22's Balance Wellbeing Psychology…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #113) by failing to provide timely post-procedure wound care following a dermatology procedure and by failing to implement physician-ordered aspiration precautions.Findings include:Review of physician orders dated 06/16/2026 revealed Resident #113 was referred to UF Health Dermatology for evaluation and treatment of a skin growth.Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed the resident underwent a dermatology procedure on 07/06/2026 and returned to the facility with dressings covering biopsy sites on the head and face.Review of the Resident #113's Dermatology Visit Summary dated 07/06/2026 revealed wound care instructions that read, Allow any pressure dressing applied by your physician to remain in place for 24 hours. Remove dressing and care for the site as noted below . Clean the wound gently every day with mild soap and water and pat dry. Apply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow standards of care for oxygen use when failing to provide accurate oxygen flow rate and change tubing weekly for 2 (Resident #5 and #6) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: 1)During an observation on 7/7/2026 at 10:10 AM Resident #5 was not in her room. There was an oxygen concentrator machine in the room. The oxygen tubing was stored in a bag hanging from the oxygen concentrator. The tubing was dated 6/26.During an observation on 07/08/2026 at 8:35 AM Resident #5 was lying in bed being administered oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was dated 6/26. During an observation on 7/9/2026 at 8:02 AM Resident #5 was lying in bed. Resident #5's oxygen was running at 3 liters and tubing was dated 6/26.During an interview on 7/9/2026 at 8:21 AM Staff F Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed Resident #5's tubing was dated 6/26 and oxygen was being administered at 3 Liters.Review of Resident #5 physician order dated 1/7/2025 read, Oxygen: Administer Oxygen @…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice leaving on attended medication in 1 of 4 hallways and in dinning room area and expired medication in 1 of 5 medication carts. Finding include: During an observation on [DATE] at 9:34 AM Resident #36 was lying in bed. Behind a picture frame on top of the nightstand there was a clear medication cup with a white cream. [photographic evidence obtained] During an interview on [DATE] at 9:34 AM Resident #36 stated, The nurses apply that cream to my groin area. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:08 AM Staff C Registered Nurse stated, [Resident #36's name] is not able to self-administer medication. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:17 AM with Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant stated, I went in to change [Resident #36's name] and she told me she had cream on her nightstand. Nurses are the ones who are supposed to apply that, they are not to leave it at bedside. 2) During an observation on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory services were provided for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for laboratory monitoring (Resident #13).Findings include:Review of Resident #13's physician's orders dated 06/26/2025 revealed an order for Levothyroxine Sodium 137 mcg (Microgram), give one tablet by mouth daily for low thyroid hormone, repeat TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) in three weeks.Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the ordered thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) laboratory test was not obtained. Resident #13 continued to receive levothyroxine therapy without the physician-ordered laboratory monitoring.Review of Resident #13's consultant pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review dated April 2026 recommended a TSH level recheck in six months to one year. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation the recommended laboratory monitoring had been completed.Review of Resident #13's physician progress notes from January 2026 through July 2026 revealed no documentation indicating the physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 out of 4 Residents (Resident #3, #118 and #120) reviewed for discharge had a discharge order in their medical record. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #120 shows admittance to the facility on [DATE] for diagnosis of, but not limited to Type I diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, gastroparesis, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, need assistance with personal care, schizophrenia, depression, hypothyroidism of coordination, other lack abnormalities gait and mobility, hyperlipidemia, anemia, essential primary hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia oropharyngeal, and long-term use of insulin. Review of Resident #120's Health status note dated 5/15/26 reads, Resident discharged back to ALF (Assisted Living Facility) in stable condition. Vital signs stable (VSS), afebrile, and skin intact. Discharge instructions provided and explained, including administration of long-acting and short-acting insulin.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards for hand hygiene for 2 of 5 medication administration observations and failed to follow infection control standards for storage of tubing and nebulizer treatment pieces for 3 (Resident #2, #45, and #121) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: 1)During an observation on 7/9/2026 at 8:22 AM Staff B Registered Nurse (RN) was pouring medication for Resident #110. Staff B poured a white circular pill into her hand from the medication blister pack and poured the medication into the medication administration cup. Staff B entered Resident #110's room and administered the medication to the resident. During an observation on 7/9/2026 at 8:24 AM Staff B, RN performed hand hygiene, placed a tissue as a barrier and on top of the tissue placed a clear medication cup. Staff B began to pour medication for Resident #79. Staff B was pouring Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Oral Tablet 200 MG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) was completed accurately for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #104 reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed a form titled Release of Responsibility on Leave of Absence which documented the resident signed herself out on a leave of absence on 2/2/25 at 12:35 PM. Review of Resident #104's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Resident Assessment and Care Screening Nursing Home discharge date d 2/11/25 read, Section A - Identification Information A2105, Discharge Status Enter Code 04. 04. Short-Term General Hospital. Review of the Skilled Note dated 2/2/25 at 5:37 pm for Resident #104 read, Comments/Narrative Section . Resident left with family at 12:30 to retrieve clothes from home and has yet to come back. She took all belongings with her when she left. Resident advised to be back to facility by 11 pm and verbalized positive understanding. I called and informed resident's daughter, [Daughter's name], that resident was signing out of facility, and she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-08-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $562K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL