University Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled DATING AND LABELING POLICY, the facility failed to ensure that food items were properly labeled, dated, and discarded in accordance with facility policy to prevent potential foodborne illness. This deficient practice had the potenitial to affect all 98 residents receiving an oral diet.Findings include:During tour of the kitchen on 05/11/2026 from 9:40 AM to 10:00 AM, and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the following concerns:Observation of the walk-in freezer revealed a bag with french toast with use by date of 05/7/2026, a bag with hash brown patties, dated 04/19 with no use-by date indicated, a plastic-wrapped hash brown patties labeled with an open date of 04/19 with no use-by date indicated, and a bag uncooked french fries, dated 05/2/2026 and use by date 05/6/2026.Review of the facility's policy titled, DATING AND LABELING POLICY, revised date 01/1/2026, revealed under Policy: Kitchen will assure food safety by maintaining proper dates and labels to all ready to eat food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Self-Administration of Medications, the facility failed to offer and assess a resident for administering her own calcium and medicated mouthwash for one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R48). This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to leave medication at her bedside until she was ready to take it and could endanger other residents who wander and are confused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, revised 01/2026, section 1, revealed that if the resident expressed his/her desire to self-administer medications, as part of their overall evaluation, the staff and or practitioner shall assess the resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident R48 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's poliies titled Care Plans-Baseline, the facility failed to provide an updated baseline care plan for one of 49 residents sampled (R) (R8). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a lapse in care for Foley catheter care, JP (Jackson Pratt) drain, and surgical incision care. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan-Baseline, revised 09/20/2023, section 1 revealed that to ensure the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. Section 2a and b state that the baseline care plan will include initial goals based on admission orders and Physician orders.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R8 was admitted to the facility originally in 2023, but was hospitalized for a hernia repair surgery and was admitted on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses, including but not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for oxygen therapy administration for one resident of 13 residents (R) (R19) reviewed who were receiving oxygen therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident safety by administering oxygen without a current physician order.Findings include:Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R19 revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of the care plan initiated 07/17/2025 revealed a focus stating, Staff explained to me that I need to keep O2 cannula on with humidifier bottle in place to prevent another nosebleed. Interventions included, Encourage me to wear O2 nasal cannula.Further review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative interview, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (R) (R10) reviewed for immunizations were provided education regarding influenza and pneumococcal immunizations and failed to ensure documentation related to vaccine administration, refusal, contraindication, consent, and/or declination for sampled residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. The deficient practice had the potential to place the 98 residents at increased risk of vaccine-preventable illnesses, including influenza and pneumococcal disease.Findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 09/2023, revealed, in part, The infection prevention and control program is a facility-wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals. The policy further revealed, Policies and procedures are utilized as the standards of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, the facility failed to ensure residents were timely offered the COVID-19 vaccine, educated regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine, and failed to ensure documentation related to COVID-19 vaccine administration, refusal, contraindication, and/or consent for one of five sampled residents (R) (R9) reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. This deficient practice had the potential to place R9 at increased risk of medical complications related to COVID-19. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 09/2023, revealed, in part, The infection prevention and control program is a facility-wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals. The policy further revealed, Policies and procedures are utilized as the standards of the infection prevention and control program. The policy additionally revealed infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and cleaning schedule review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the kitchen creating the potential for contaminated food to be served to 97 of 102 residents that received an oral diet. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen and interview on 3/31/2025 from 8:30 am to 9:15 am, the following was observed: a. The floor in the dish room was missing a section of tiles which measured approximately 11 inches by six inches making it an uncleanable surface. Several more tiles were missing underneath the counter in the dish room. The wall underneath the counter had a dark black substance on the entire wall. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated, We try to clean the wall with a power washer each week. It [wall] needs to be replaced. b. A plastic cover over the cart with the large baking pans had a buildup of grime and was sticky to touch. The cover was over the clean baking pans. c. The air conditioning unit, next to the cart with clean baking pans, was observed with a heavy buildup of dust, dirt, and an unidentifiable sticky…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance to five of 49 rooms creating an unsafe, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment for eight of eight residents (Resident (R) 11, R48, R71, R43, R49, R64, R19, and R25) reviewed for the environment of 29 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' homelike environment. Findings include: During observations and interviews on 3/31/2025 from 10:11 am to 11:30 am; at 4:58 pm; and on 4/1/2025 at 10:27 am, the following was observed: a. The end of the handrail was missing outside room [ROOM NUMBER] which exposed a sharp end creating the potential for injuries when residents utilized the rail. b. The call light bulb outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was burnt out. Staff would not know if R11, R48, or R71 turned on their call light for assistance if they were not at the nurses' station, at the opposite end of the hall, to hear the light ringing on the call board. c. There was no call light available for R43.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Nail Care, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for two of three residents (Residents (R) 85 and R8) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure had the potential to cause R85 and R8 to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nail Care, revised 02/18, documented The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and prevent infections . General guidelines, nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming . Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed .Unless otherwise permitted, do not trim the nails of diabetic residents or residents with circulatory impairments . 1. Review of R85's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension, acute kidney failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program and Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control and prevention in 11 of 46 resident rooms (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27) related to storage of resident personal care items. In addition, the facility failed to adhere to and to serve food to residents in isolation using transmission-based precautions (TBP). The deficient practice had the potential to affect all facility residents by exposing them to infection. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program revised September 2023 revealed: 6. Prevention of Infection a. Important facets of infection prevention include: 3) educating residents, visitors, and staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and infection control practices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $477K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA