Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 130.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy titled Housekeeping Operations Manual, the facility failed to ensure the dining room, and 2 of 2 communal shower rooms were maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The deficient practice had the potential to affect patient comfort and safety. Findings include:Review of the undated document titled Housekeeping Operations Manual, documented The main area of concern to a housekeeping department in a healthcare facility is the transmission of bacteria.Observation of the women's communal bathroom on 03/02/2026 at 11:48 AM, 03/04/2026 at 12:18 PM and 2:48 PM, revealed on a shelf: numerous bottles of shampoo, lotion, grooming items scattered across the surface; hairbrush, scissors, wipes, lotions, and cleaning products were observed intermixed and unlabeled. There were small pieces of debris scattered across the shower room floor and appeared unclean and unsanitary with residue along the lower portion of the tile wall. Used washcloths were observed on the hand grab bar, a resident gown was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's policies titled Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of medications for six of 25 medication opportunities observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 24% (percent.) The deficient practice increased the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2/2020 documented that Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Observation on 03/04/2026 at 9:26 AM on A-Hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD revealed resident (R) R106 had physician orders for Glipizide 10 mg {milligrams}, give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily for Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and Fluticasone-Salmeterol inhalation powder 500/50 mcg {micrograms}, inhale 1 puff orally twice daily for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). These medications were not administered due to lack of availability, and the physician was not notified of the missed doses. During the same medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, Insulin Administration, Housekeeping-Infection Control Procedures, and Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for one of four nursing units and two of two shower rooms. Specifically, top of an insulin vial not disinfected, blood pressure cuff not disinfected between residents, Housekeeping Aide pouring liquid from resident cup into mop water, and nursing staff exiting resident rooms without removing gloves and performing hand hygiene. In addition, multiple personal items in the communal shower rooms were unlabeled. The deficient practice increased the risk of cross contamination and spread of infection. Facility census was 127.Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 2/2020, revealed that This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Further review of item 5. Hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, staff and resident interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Personal Property, the facility failed to promote dignity by not exercising reasonable care and protection to prevent damage to the glasses for one resident (R) (R109) from a sample of 47 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect R109 from reaching the highest practicable level of function. Findings include:Review of the Personal Property policy dated 03/2023, documented the facility will promptly investigate any complaints of misappropriation or mistreatment of resident property.On 03/02/2026 at 10:50 AM, R109 was observed in bed wearing broken glasses. R109 showed the arm broken off one side of the glasses and demonstrated that a staff person broke the glasses when something was placed on top of them. R109 stated she informed the nurse when it happened a couple weeks ago and had not heard if they would be repaired or replaced. On 03/04/2026 at 8:55 AM, R109 was observed in bed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, the facility failed to ensure safety and freedom from an act of physical abuse for one resident (R) (R84) from a sample of three residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of life and safety for other residents. Findings include:Review of the policy titled Preventions of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Misappropriation of Property, revised 7/2025, section titled Policy documented, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms.Review of R84 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Transfer of Discharge Notice, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (R) (R131 and R133) were provided with a written bed hold notice or reason for transfer at the time of transfer. This failure had the potential to place the resident or resident's representative at risk of being uninformed about their rights related to hospital transfer and subsequent return to the facility.Findings include:Review of the policy, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised [DATE], documented Our facility shall provide a resident and/or the resident's representative a notice of transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing (Notice Form for Transfer or Discharge). 3. The resident and or representative will be notified in writing of the following information: the reason for the transfer or discharge; the effective date; the location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged ; a statement of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for two of four residents (R) (R112 and R113) reviewed for elopement risk. This deficient practice had the potential to place R112 and R113 at increased risk of not receiving care and services according to their assessed needs. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Wandering, Unsafe Resident, dated 05/2023, documented Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. Monitoring and Managing Residents at Risk for Elopement and Unsafe Wandering: a. Residents shall be assessed for risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care team. B. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate the unique factors contributing to risk in order to develop a person-centered care plan. C. The effectiveness of interventions shall be evaluated, and changes will be made as needed. Any changes or new interventions will be communicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Administering Medications, Provision of Care, and Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for five residents (R) (R47, R72, R106, R137, and R128) of 47 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: ensure a wound vac was applied and connected; ensure medications were administered by the nurse who pulled the medication; notify the physician of deviations from orders; accurately document medication administration; obtain resident weights as ordered; and provide timely pain medication. These deficient practices increased the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2/2020 revealed that Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Further review of item 4.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigation and Reporting, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to provide adequate supervision for two residents (R) (R49 and R145) from a sample of 47 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk of avoidable accidents and injury. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigation and Reporting revised 02/2024 documented The facility shall provide the residents an environment free of accident hazards. Further review of section 7. Supervision item a.Adequacy of supervision is based on the individual's assessed needs and identified hazards in the resident's environment. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, aphasia, expressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician's order for two of 13 residents (R) (R140 and R75) who use O2. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate respiratory treatment and adverse clinical outcomes.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated documented Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician order for this procedure. Review the physician's or facility protocol for oxygen administration.1.Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and pertinent diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sleep apnea, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina, presence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $682K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA