Social Circle Nsg & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump, the facility failed to administer nutritional enteral feedings and hydration according to the current physician orders for one of two residents (R) (R33) receiving tube feeding in the facility. The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to not receive the correct amount of nutrition ordered by the physician which could result in negative outcome for resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump, dated March 2015 under Purpose revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. Under Preparation revealed, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for the procedure . Under General Guidelines revealed, 3. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check for the following information: .(c.) date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policies titled, Administering Medication, and Storage of Medication, the facility failed to properly secure a medication cart when not in use or clearly visible to the personnel administering medication and failed to ensure an eye drop medication was dated appropriately when opened to determine the discard date, for one of two medication carts (North Hall medication cart). The facility census was 56 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication dated 2/2020 under Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 7. During administration of medications, the medication cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of medication nurse or aide. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administrating medication. Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication under the Policy Statement revealed, The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Under Policy Interpretation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly disinfect a glucometer before use for one of eight residents (R) (R22) that have glucometer checks ordered. The deficient practice has the potential to place residents at high risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the facility provided Manufacturer's instruction revealed on page 39 that the facility to disinfect between each patient with [company name] germicidal wipes, [company name] hospital cleaner disinfectant towels with bleach, [company name] wipes, and [company name] Super Sani-Cloth germicidal disposable wipes. Observation and interview on 5/28/2025 at 11:32 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB revealed that LPN BB did not disinfect the glucometer according to manufacturer's instructions. LPN BB removed one of two glucometers on the cart and after successfully completing the blood sugar check for R22, LPN BB used an alcohol wipe to disinfect the glucometer. An interview with LPN BB revealed that she was using [name of manufacturer] glucometer. LPN BB stated that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Service, the facility failed to keep one call light in working condition in one out of 18 rooms on North Hall (Room North 3-B). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for unmet care needs, delayed response during emergencies, and increased likelihood of injury due to the inability to request assistance. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance Service revealed under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. Observation conducted on 5/27/2025 at 10:54 am and on 5/28/2025 at 9:14 am in Room North 3-B revealed the call light was not functioning. When tested, the hallway indicator light did not activate. Interview on 5/28/2025 at 9:16 am with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC confirmed after testing the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident representative and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to document care for one 28 sampled residents (R) (R160). Specifically, personal, bowel, and bladder care were not documented in the medical record. Findings include: Review of the most recent annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Pattern) revealed that R160 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Section I (Active Diagnoses) revealed diagnoses of but not limited to urinary tract infection (UTI), dementia, type two diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure (CHF), and atrial fibrillation. Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed that R160 was substantial/maximum assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL) except she required supervision for eating. Section H (Bladder and Bowel) revealed that R160 was occasionally incontinent for urine but had frequent bowel incontinence. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Dating & Labeling Policy, the facility failed to ensure that opened food items were labeled, dated, and appropriately stored. This failure had the potential to affect 59 of 61 residents who receive an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings included: A review of the facility policy, Dating & Labeling Policy, revealed staff would label and date food products after opening. An observation on 10/27/2023 at 8:10 pm of the stand-alone refrigerator revealed an opened bag of broccoli that was not labeled or dated. An observation on 10/27/2023 at 8:19 am of the Cook's Refrigerator revealed the following: Cheese slices, which had been opened, wrapped in clear plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated. Two red onions wrapped in clear plastic wrap; both onions were unlabeled and undated. Two egg salad sandwiches wrapped in clear plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated. One package of sliced turkey breast wrapped in clear plastic, unlabeled and dated. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, Laundry Operations Manual, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, and Dressing Change for Vascular Access Devices, the facility failed to practice acceptable infection control practices to prevent possible cross-contamination during laundry services, performing hand hygiene during medication administration for one of two nurses, and failed to ensure one peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing was changed for resident (R) R53, every seven days. The sample size was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated October 2017 revealed Policy Explanation and Implementation: 4. Hand Hygiene Protocol: a. All staff shall wash their hands when coming on duty, between resident contacts, after handling contaminated objects, after PPE removal, before/after eating, before/after toileting, and before going off duty. B.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, the facility failed to maintain dignity by ensuring a dignity bag was provided for one of one resident (R) (R26) reviewed with an indwelling catheter. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Policy, revealed staff would promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. Review of the Medical Doctor (MD) orders dated 10/5/2023 revealed that R26 had an order for a Foley (indwelling) catheter. Observation of R26 on 10/27/2023 at 9:05 am revealed R26 was in bed. R26's Foley catheter drainage bag was hanging from the side rail of the bed. The Foley catheter drainage bag was uncovered, without a dignity bag with urine noted inside and visible from the hall. Observation of R26 on 10/28/2023 at 9:01 am and 11:10 am revealed R26 was in bed. R26's Foley catheter drainage bag was uncovered, without a dignity bag with urine noted inside and visible from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives the facility failed to obtain and/or transcribe a physician's order for code status for one resident (R) (R260) of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives revised December 2016 revealed Advanced Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed: 7. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. 20. The Director of Nursing Services or designee will notify the Attending Physician of advanced directives so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care. Record review of R260's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section C- Cognitive Patterns-revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered, and review of the facility's procedure document titled, Dressing Change for Vascular Access Devices, the facility failed to ensure that care plan interventions were followed for one resident (R) (R53) of one resident reviewed for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) (an intravenous catheter that is inserted into a vein in the arm and advanced in the body in the veins until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava) line. In addition, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to treat and prevent further contractures for one resident (R28) of 27 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 9/2023, Policy Statement revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $325K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA