Hazelhurst Court Care and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 53.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Advanced Directive care plan was implemented for one of 11 sampled residents (R)(R1). This failure resulted in CPR not being provided for R1, whose Advanced Directive care plan specified she was a Full Code. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE], at 2:15 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE].An acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on the validation of the Removal Plan, the State Survey Agency determined that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice were removed on [DATE]. Findings included:A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-26 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled Emergency Response Management and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to assess and implement life-sustaining measures for one of 11 sampled residents (R)(1). This failure resulted in CPR not being provided for R1, who was found unresponsive, and whose Advanced Directives specified attempting CPR. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE], at 2:15 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE]. An acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on the validation of the Removal Plan, the State Survey Agency determined that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and the Director of Nursing (DON) job description, facility nursing administration failed to provide effective oversight to ensure that facility nursing staff assessed and implemented the correct Advance Directive for one of 11 sampled residents (R)(1) reviewed for Advanced Directives. This failure resulted in CPR not being provided for R1, whose Advanced Directive care plan specified she was a Full Code.On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.The facility's Administrator and DON were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE], at 2:15 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE].An acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on the validation of the Removal Plan, the State Survey Agency determined that the corrective plans…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and policy titled Food Storage the facility failed to ensure that food was properly labeled and dated and in sanitary conditions to prevent foodborne illness. The practice has the potential to affect 55 residents of 58. Findings include:A tour with dietary manager on 03/27/2026 at 8:20 AM revealed the following concerns:1.Observation on 03/27/2026 of the freezer was found with a large bag of broccoli opened and not labeled, two packs of dumplings that were past the expiration date, a pack of spinach that had passed the expiration date, and a box of what appeared to be frozen cinnamon rolls that were open with no date or label.2. Observation on 03/27/2026 of the pantry revealed four boxes of lasagna and one gallon jug of Worcestershire sauce, that were not dated.3. Observation on 03/27/2026 in the kitchen at one of the perp stations revealed five seasoning containers that were opened and not dated, one pancake and waffle syrup that was opened and not dated, two cans of cooking spray that were open and not dated, one gallon bottle of barbeque sauce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure adherence to established laundry maintenance protocols related to dryer lint trap cleaning. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 58 residents. Findings Include:During an observation on 03/28/2026 at 8:40 AM it was observed that the lint filter of the second dryer that is located near the window had not been cleaned.During an interview on03/28/2026, at 10:52 AM, the Environmental Services Director (ESD) stated that lint traps are required to be cleaned after each use or, at a minimum, every hour, with staff required to document completion. However, the ESD confirmed that the lint trap in the second dryer had not been cleaned in accordance with facility policy. The ESD also confirmed that if the lint filters are not cleaned it could cause a fire.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff and family representative, and facility policy titled, Resident Trust Fund, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or residents' responsible party when their personal funds were within $200 of the Social Security Income (SSI) limit and when accounts had exceeded the amount for one of 39 accounts reviewed, resident (R)45. Findings include:Facility policy Resident Trust Fund dated 07/1/2025 revealed 6. Monitoring Balances: Per OBRA regulations, a resident on medical assistance must be notified whenever their funds are within $200 of their resource asset limit. Fund balances for Medicaid recipients should be monitored monthly by the Resident Trust Custodian to ensure that state maximum balances are not exceeded. The Resident Trust Custodian is responsible for sending a notification letter to the resident/responsible party whenever their funds are within $200 of their resource limit.Review of R45's medical record revealed she was diagnosed with but not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for a resident requiring assistance with personal hygiene (nail care) and oxygen therapy management for two of 24 residents (R) (R28 and R31) sampled. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled RAI/CARE PLANNING MANAGEMENT dated August 2017 under the Interim Care Plan section revealed, C. Based on the nursing admission assessment, the attending physician orders and other information, immediate resident needs are identified, effective interventions are implemented and measurable goals are established . Further review of the policy under the The Care Plan section revealed, The Baseline care plan will be the guide for the comprehensive care plan. 1. Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R28 had diagnoses that included but not limited to, type 1 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, other reduced mobility, and need for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for one of 24 sampled residents (R) (R28) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Specifically, R28 was observed with long, untrimmed fingernails with visible debris containing a brown substance underneath the nail beds.Findings include:Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Hygiene dated January 2025 under the Policy section revealed, Bathing includes cleaning and trimming fingernails and toenails, shaving facial hair, washing the entire body, and shampooing residents hair. Under the section titled Care of Fingernails/Toenails the Policy statement revealed, Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. Nail trimming diabetic residents are per MD (Medical Director) order. Podiatry care is scheduled as needed for those residents with identified podiatry needs.Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, R28 had diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Respiratory System Management, the facility failed to ensure a concentrator was in working order so that the physician's order for oxygen administration was followed for one of 14 residents (R) (R31) reviewed for oxygen administration. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled Respiratory System Management under the section titled Oxygen, Administration-Nasal Cannula procedures 1. Check the physician's orders in the resident's clinical record 5. turn the flow meter to the ordered flow rate. Review of the of medical record for R31 revealed diagnoses that included but are not limited to acute chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia.Review of 31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Sections C (Cognitive Patterns)- a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, and the facility policy, MENUS, the facility failed to ensure they offered an appealing option of similar nutritive value to residents for lunch and dinner meals and failed to provide preferences for meals for one resident (R) 30. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 50 of 53 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: The facility tile, MENUS not dated, revealed, well planned menus aide in meeting the nutritional and psychosocial needs of the residents and are developed, taking into consideration certain budgetary allowances, available personnel, and equipment. When changes in the menus are needed, the changes must provide equal nutritive value. A Resident Council meeting was held on 2/2/2025 during the survey. Residents, specifically R40, revealed that the facility does not have an alternate menu and that if they do not like what is being served their only option is to ask for a sandwich or soup. Other residents expressed concerns regarding lack of choices for food being served. Reveal of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Food Storage the facility failed to discard food from the stand-up cooler by the expiration date. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 50 of 53 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage, revealed under Procedure: 15. Leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Leftover food is used within 48 hours or discarded. The tour of the kitchen on 1/31/2025 started at 8:23 am with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following concerns were identified during the tour in the stand-up cooler: 1. A resealable plastic bag that contained sliced ham with an expiration date 1/29/2025. 2. A plastic container of chicken and noodles with an expiration date of 1/22/2025. Interview on 1/31/2025 at 8:35 am with the DM who confirmed the expired ham and chicken and noodles and discarded them. She stated her expectation was that staff throw away items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Tracheostomy Care, the facility failed to wash/sanitize hands and change gloves during tracheostomy care for one of one resident (R) (14) reviewed for tracheostomy care, and the facility failed to properly dispose of soiled items. This failure increased R14's risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Respiratory System Management Standard, dated August 2021, revealed: Tracheostomy care procedure Nursing actions. 3. [NAME] clean gloves and remove the used tracheostomy dressing being careful to keep the tracheostomy tube in place. 4. Remove used gloves and discard per facility standard. 5. perform hand hygiene. Review of the undated admission Record for R14 located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R14 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, respiratory disorder, unspecified, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and cerebral palsy. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of 24 rooms (Rm 33). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure RM [ROOM NUMBER] privacy curtain was free of brown stains, and a white chalky substance on the curtain. Findings include: Observations on 1/31/2025 at 8:47 am, 2/1/2025 at 8:30 am, and 2/2/2024 at 8:42 am of privacy curtain for RM [ROOM NUMBER] bed A revealed curtain had brown stain on the outer aspect of the curtain and a white chalky substance on the bottom hem of the curtain facing the door. Review of the facility document titled Complete Room Cleaning revealed under Purpose: The complete room cleaning schedule insures that each resident room is discharge-cleaned on a monthly basis. Under section labeled Patient Room (l) Cubicle Curtains- check and report any soil or damage to supervisor. Review of the deep clean schedule for December 2024 revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was deep cleaned on 12/4/2024, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEACON HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $336K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA