Pleasant View Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 96.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough abuse investigation was conducted for six of nine Residents (R) (R2, R3, R4, R6, R5, and R9) reviewed for abuse investigations out of a total sample of 22 residents. This failure had the potential to result in additional residents to be abused by the same perpetrator.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, dated 10/2023, revealed All alleged violations involving mistreatment, sexually inappropriate behaviors, and abuse or neglect will be thoroughly investigated…An immediate investigation into the alleged incident, during the shift it occurred on …2. Interview the resident or other resident witness.' 1.Review of R2's undated Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation; Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, the facility failed to notify the State Survey Agency (SSA) of an allegation of physical abuse for one of seven Residents (R) (R9) reviewed for abuse out of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documentation that the SSA was notified of an allegation of physical abuse when the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of bruising to R9's body by the hospital's Social Worker. This failure had the potential to contribute to further abuse or injury, which could result in mental anguish, physical harm, or fear.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation; Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, dated October 2023, indicated . Reporting-All employees are required to immediately notify the administrative.staff of any complaint, allegation.of resident abuse.as soon as the facility is aware of a situation.they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure three of three garbage dumpsters were maintained in sanitary conditions, free from trash and debris on the ground, and with secure fitting lids. The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, rodents, insects, and other organisms. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster on 8/18/2024 at 3:15 pm with the Dietary Manager (DM) and Maintenance Director revealed trash piled up high and spilling over to the ground in three of three dumpsters. Further observation revealed opened bags of trash, exposing dirty briefs with fecal matter, wipes covered in feces were observed scattered on the ground surrounding the dumpsters. Continued observation revealed swarms of flies and at least 50 large clear white trash bags on the ground around the dumpsters. The large clear bags contained food, trash, and soiled personal care items. An interview at the time of observation on 8/18/2024 at 3:16 pm was conducted with the DM and Maintenance Director. Both staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, F-689 Accidents -Water Temperatures, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures at the hand washing sink in 12 of 28 resident bathrooms and two of three resident shower rooms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from chemical and environmental hazards in one of three shower rooms. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the affected rooms and using the affected shower rooms at risk of avoidable injuries and a diminished quality of life. The census was 101 residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's undated policy titled, F-689 Accidents - Water Temperatures, revealed the section titled F - 689 Description stated, The facility must ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. The section titled Purpose included, The purpose of recording your water temperatures is to assure the Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that one of two medication carts was locked and secured when unattended by the nurse. The deficient practice had the potential to allow unauthorized persons, including residents and visitors, to access medications. The census was 101 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, dated August 2021, revealed the section titled Safe Medication Administration included, Medication carts are to be kept locked at all times and under the vision supervision of the licensed nurse. During observation on 8/18/2024 from 12:15 pm to 12:21 pm, Medication Cart 2 was parked in the hallway, unattended, and unlocked. The medication drawer was pulled, and it opened without a problem. Registered Nurse (RN) JJ approached the cart and locked it. During an observation on 8/18/2024 at 6:41 pm, Medication Cart 2 was parked in the hallway, unattended, out of sight of a nurse, and unlocked. Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Laundry Linen: Handling of, and Biohazardous/Infectious Waste, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent cross-contamination during a glucometer check for one resident, during the storage of linen in one linen storage room, during the storage of soiled linen in two shower rooms, and during the storage of washbasins and urinals in three resident restrooms. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination and spread infections. Findings include: 1. During observation of the glucometer procedure on 8/19/2024 at 10:30 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) GG performed a fingerstick blood sugar on one resident. Observation revealed LPN GG placed the supplies on the surface of the cart before entering the resident's room without sanitizing or placing a barrier on the cart. She performed the procedure and placed the used supplies (including the glucometer, used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to place a privacy bag over the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag of one of two residents (R) (R251) reviewed with a urinary catheter. This failure had the potential to diminish R251's quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: A policy was requested and not provided. A review of the clinical record revealed that R251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. A review of the Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 8/9/2024 for a urinary catheter. A review of R251's care plan dated 8/19/2024 revealed a focus area of an indwelling urinary catheter due to urinary retention. There were no interventions for placing the drainage bag in a privacy bag. An observation on 8/18/2024 at 2:23 pm revealed R251's urinary catheter drainage bag was not in a privacy bag and was uncovered. An observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 54 residents (R) (R49 and R1) reviewed did not have unsecured, unauthorized medications and over-the-counter medication products stored at the bedside. This failure placed R49 and R1 at risk for inappropriate and unsafe medication use and had the potential to allow unauthorized access to medications to other residents and visitors in the facility. Finding include: 1. Record review revealed R49 had diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia, moderate without other behavioral disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, and hypokalemia. A review of R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). A review of the Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 4/4/2024 for Ventolin HFA (high-flow aerosol) solution 108 mcg/act (micrograms/actuation) (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, New Hire Checklist, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screenings, specifically reference checks and fingerprinting, were conducted prior to employment for four of 10 employees reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents residing in the facility at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation from staff. The census was 101 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled New Hire Checklist, revised December 21, 2023, revealed information obtained upon hire included employee references (at least two), background checks to include sex offender state and nationwide, and fingerprint if applicable. The section titled Background and Criminal Checks stated, A background check will be conducted including, but not limited to, consumer credit history, criminal history, fingerprints, driving record, employment, military, education, and general public records, which will provide information concerning these areas, and your character and general reputation. Your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument)/Care Planning Management, the facility failed to implement the person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of 12 residents (R) (R78) with a care plan for fall mats and two of two R (R49 and R68) with a care plan for oxygen (O2). This failure had the potential for R78, R49, and R68 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled RAI/Care Planning Management revealed the section titled Process for Completing the MDS (Minimum Data Set), CAAs (Care Area Assessments), and Care Plans stated, Standard: It is the practice of this facility to conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity. Objective: 1. To identify resident's individual needs and care requirements. 2. To assure [sic] that an interdisciplinary team assesses the emotional, psychosocial, mental, and physical needs of each resident. 1. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEACON HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $495K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA