No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ivy at Davenport

800 East Rusholme Street, Davenport, IA 52803 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (563) 322-1668 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0606) — most recent Dec 20253 immediate-jeopardy citations$146,874 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $146,874 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-25)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1228 E Rusholme St · (563) 421-4244 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
W Mart0.4 mi
1207 E Locust St · (563) 888-5594 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2015 Grand Ave · (563) 328-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.4%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight17.3%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.1%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.5%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.2%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.7%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.2%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.6%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.1%25.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.1%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine21.3%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.7%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.741.491.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.832.081.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.5%CMS range 23.6–56.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.0–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge16.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
58.8%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-25)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, lift manufacturer safety instructions, local fire department personnel interviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide staff education on how to select the right size body sling for residents dependent on the use of a mechanical lift, failed to identify a hospital slide sheet as unsafe for use with a mechanical lift, and failed to have correct mechanical lift sling sizes available to meet the needs of a bariatric resident for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #39) reviewed for mechanical lift transfer. Nursing staff failed to safely transfer Resident #8 when they placed a hospital slide sheet with handles under the resident, attached the handles to the mechanical lift, and engaged the lift. The handles tore from the slide sheet and the resident had to be emergently lowered to a recliner. Resident #8 repeatedly voiced fear of falling. Nursing staff were unable to transfer the resident out of the recliner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of Video evidence, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nursing supervision. Resident #1 had cognitive impairment, known to wander, and had multiple attempted elopements. The video evidence showed on 12/8/25 at 9:25 PM, the facility staff (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA), responsible for Resident #1's care, entered the front door code and let them outside the building and then exited behind them. The CNA re-entered the facility at 9:27 PM without Resident #1 and didn't report to other staff that Resident #1 went outside. The staff at the facility became aware of Resident #1 missing on 12/9/25 at 6:12 AM, by a facility staff member, driving to work. The staff member found Resident #1 approximately 1.7 miles from the facility (approximately a 38-minute walk) near a busy road with 2 lanes of traffic in each direction, wearing a jacket and light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. The MDS for Resident #19 dated 5/24/24, listed diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM). The BIMS reflected a score of 4 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS assessed Resident #19 required substantial staff assist for transfers. The Care Plan for Resident #19 dated 12/4/23, directed he required assist of 1 and gait belt for all transfers. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/24/24, revealed Resident #19's needed max to dependent assist of staff with most activities of daily (ADL's) for task completion due to impaired mobility and weakness. Resident is at risk for falls due to impaired mobility and weakness. He required max to dependent assist of staff with transfers. During an observation on 06/17/24 at 10:54 AM, Staff C, CNA took Resident#19 from under his arm as he stood on the one leg and turned him (stand pivot transfer) from his bed to his scooter. Staff C failed to use a gait belt with the transfer. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and intervention to prevent deterioration of a pressure wound for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed with a pressure sore. (Resident # 153). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #153 as mildly cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 out of 15. The MDS listed the following diagnoses anemia, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency and diabetes. It also identified Resident #153 required extensive staff assistance to total dependence of staff with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The MDS indicated the resident received dialysis. The MDS indicated resident had a Stage 2 and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer. The Care Plan dated 1/23/24 indicated Resident #153 had a pressure ulcer upon admission. The Care Plan directed staff to provide wound cares as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate precautions and care to prevent resident injury, and caused a resident's bone fracture with associated pain and swelling, when they pushed the resident in a wheelchair without footrests applied, for 1 of 8 resident's reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 7/27/23 revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included diabetes, seizure disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia and delirium, and scored 11 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment that indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required extensive assistance of at least 1 staff to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, toileting, bathing and personal hygiene. The assessment revealed the resident had not experienced pain in the 5 days that preceded the assessment. The Care Plan dated 10/31/22 documented Resident #1 has a self care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions related to positioning in bed for a dependent resident at high risk for falls for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for safety. The facility reported a census of 62 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed no score for the Brief Interview for Mental Status. The list of diagnoses included seizure disorder, anoxic brain damage not elsewhere classified, cognitive communication deficit and severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #1 dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL's), and due to medical condition did not attempt rolling left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 dependent for rolling left and right, chair/bed-to-chair transfer. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, kitchen record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to safety store opened food items, maintain temperature logs for the dishwasher, refrigerators, freezers, and for two days of meals, and failed to maintain the cleanliness of the equipment and flooring during two separate observations at varying times. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1. The initial kitchen observation on 03/15/2026 from 9:58 AM - 10:32 AM revealed the following:a. Review of dishwasher temperature logs, revealed from 03/01/2026 through 03/03/2026 temperature checks were completed and the results of the chemical checks were not present. From 03/04/26 through 03/15/2026 temperature and chemical checks results were not indicated. b. Review of three refrigerator temperature logs revealed from 03/10/2026 through 03/15/2026 temperature results not indicated. c. Review of two freezer temperature logs revealed from 03/10/2026 through 03/15/2026 temperature results not indicated. d. Review of food temperature logs revealed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a private area to make telephone calls for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #57) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/8/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #67 which included heart failure, depression, and anxiety. The MDS listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 4 out of 15, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. On 3/16/26 at 10:35 a.m., via phone, the Resident's Representative (RR) stated she sent the resident a cell phone but it went missing after approximately a week. The RR stated the facility did not have a portable phone for residents to use so the cell phone was the only option. On 3/23/26 at 12:38 p.m., Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated residents could use the phone in the dining room or at the nursing station but it was not private. On 3/23/26 at 12:51 p.m., Staff A, LPN stated that there was a phone at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate and accessible Advance Directive decisions for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Residents #22 and #27). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #27, dated [DATE] included a list of diagnoses, which included: hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anemia. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed two Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment forms (commonly referred to an IPOST. An IPOST is a document used to indicate Advanced Directive choices and signed by the resident or a representative and a physician) dated [DATE], signed by the Resident #27 and the physician. a. The first IPOST, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #27 chose: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) - CPR/Attempt Resuscitation; Medical Interventions -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of a significant weight gain for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for nutrition. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 2/17/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #8 which included morbid obesity, heart failure, and diabetes (a disease which caused abnormal blood sugars). The MDS listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Care Plan entries, dated 7/19/25, stated the resident had altered cardiovascular status related to congestive heart failure and directed staff to monitor and report changes in weight.Review of the Weight Summary for Resident #8 revealed the following weights:2/3/26 535.4 lbs (pounds)3/11/26 574.5 lbsThe resident's weight change from 2/3/26 to 3/11/26 resulted in a 7.3% gain.A hospital Medication Administered Report, dated 3/18/26, stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident representative/staff interviews, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of a resident's cell phone from loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for missing items (Resident #67). The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated [DATE], listed diagnoses for Resident #67 which included heart failure, depression, and anxiety. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 4 out of 15, indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #67 passed away on [DATE]. The facility lacked documentation of the belongings of Resident #67 that were packed up by staff after her death on [DATE]. The Resident Representative reported the family picked up the belonging within 48 hours.On [DATE] at 10:35 a.m., via phone, the RR stated she sent the resident a cell phone and it went missing after one week. On [DATE] at 9:22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a background check prior to 1 of 3 newly hired staff starting their employment. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:The facility New Hire Reporting report listed a start date for Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) as 6/5/25. Review of Staff L, CNA personnel file revealed the most current background checks on file as:a. Single Contract License and Background Check (SING) completed 9/22/21. The Criminal History Background Check Results read: Further research is required. Please await DCI (Division of Criminal Investigations') final response for criminal history. An Approval Notice dated 9/28/21 read, in part .The Iowa Department of Human Services has completed a Record Check Evaluation on the criminal or abuse history of the applicant and the result of the evaluation is that the applicant MAY WORK for your agency .b. Iowa Record Check Request completed on 9/27/21 confirmed a Waiver Signature on File for Staff L, CNA. c. Iowa Criminal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete an updated assessment, notify the physician, and provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for Resident #40 revealed a list of diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, kidney insufficiency, malnutrition, anxiety disorder, depression, osteomyelitis, difficulty walking and the use of a manual wheelchair. The MDS indicated the resident used of opioid pain medication, antiplatelet medication, insulin and anticonvulsant medication. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. The Behavior section of the MDS indicated no physical (hitting, kicking, pushing, etc.) behavioral symptoms directed toward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to notify a resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident #3). The facility also failed to provide a recapitulation of stay, to provide an appropriate plan of care for discharge to the community and failed to notify the long term care (LTC) Ombudsman before the discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge (Resident #40). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:1. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 scored 14/15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #3 had the following hospitalizations: a. admitted to the hospital on [DATE], returned to the facility on [DATE]. b. admitted to the hospital on [DATE], returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans are revised to reflect changes in the care needs and the monitoring needs for 3 of 18 residents (Resident #39, Resident #50, and Resident #65) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 1/3/26, listed the following diagnoses for Resident #50 insomnia, obesity, and depression. The MDS listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of15, which indicated intact cognition. A 2/1/26 Administration Note stated staff found a bottle of sleep aids on the resident's night stand that was open with pills on the nightstand, floor, and bedside table. The staff member educated the resident with regard to self-medicating and notified the provider. A 2/3/26 Physician Progress Notes stated the resident should not utilize OTC (over the counter) medications without approval of the provider. The note stated if staff located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assist 1 of 1 residents (Resident #59) to wash her hair in a preferred manner in an attempt to lessen the physical discomfort the task caused the resident. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #59 dated 02/02/2026 included diagnoses of other forms of scoliosis lumbar region, hypercalcemia (calcium too high), and need for assistance with personal care. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 14/15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #59 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe self, and set up or clean up assistance with personal hygiene.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) Diagnosis List revealed a Need for Assistance with Personal Care added as an Additional Diagnosis on 12/23/25. The Care Plan for Resident #59 included a Focus area, dated 11/20/25, to address The Resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor resident weights per physician orders for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #65) reviewed for nutrition. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool for Resident #65, dated 3/10/26, list of diagnoses included malnutrition, weakness, and heart failure. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) score as 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. A 3/7/26 Daily Skilled note stated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], received tube feedings, and was nothing by mouth(NPO) status.On Order Summary Report listed a 3/6/26 order for daily weights x 3 days, weekly weights x 4 weeks followed by monthly weights. The March 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) listed a 3/6/26 order for daily weights x 3 days, weekly weights x 4 weeks followed by monthly weights. The 3/6/26 and 3/9/26 entries for daily weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received performance evaluations every 12 months. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: 1. An untitled employee profile report, dated 3/25/26, listed Staff S CNA's hire date as 7/11/23.The facility lacked documentation of a completed performance evaluation for Staff S in the last 12 months. 2. An untitled employee profile report, dated 3/25/26, listed Staff T CNA's hire date as 9/30/20.The facility lacked documentation of a completed performance evaluation for Staff T in the last 12 months. On 3/25/26 at 8:04 a.m., via phone, the Director of Clinical Services stated the facility should carry out yearly performance evaluations for CNA's.The facility policy Evaluation Process, revised 8/27/25, stated the facility would review the work performance of employees with a formal written evaluation. The policy did not specify how often the facility completed the evaluations.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Residents #6 and #65). The facility's medication error rate calculated as 7.69%. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/3/26, list of diagnoses for Resident #6 included diabetes (a disease which caused fluctuations in blood sugar), heart failure, and anxiety disorder. The MDS stated the resident received insulin (an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar) and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed an order for insulin glargine (a long-acting insulin with a brand name of Lantus) 30 units every 12 hours.On 3/18/26 at 8:15 a.m., Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) retrieved Resident #6's Lantus pen from the medication cart and stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 residents (Residents #6 and #39) reviewed for medications were free of a significant medication error The State Agency intervened prior to a nurse giving Resident #6 the incorrect dose of insulin; and Resident #39 missed a dose of an intravenous antibiotic. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/3/26, list diagnoses for Resident #6 included diabetes (a disease which caused fluctuations in blood sugar), heart failure, and anxiety disorder. The MDS stated the resident received insulin (an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar) and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed an order for insulin glargine (a long-acting insulin with a brand name of Lantus) 30 units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies on the current survey which had been previously identified in 2025. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:Review of the CMS 2567 form dated 3/6/25 revealed, in part, deficiencies had been identified with notification of changes, care planning, assistance with activities of daily living, accidents and hazards, and kitchen sanitation.Concerns with the above areas were identified during the facility's current recertification and complaint survey completed 3/25/26.Review of the CMS 2567 form dated 7/16/25 revealed, in part, deficiencies identified with accidents and hazards. Concerns with the above area was identified during the facility's current recertification and complaint survey, completed 3/25/26. Review of the CMS 2567 form dated 12/16/25 revealed, in part, deficiencies identified with accidents and hazards.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, homelike environment. Observations of the facility revealed the floor heating vent covers bent, broken, or falling off showing the internal metal heating elements in resident rooms for 1 of 3 hallways and in 1 of 1 resident common area. The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 12/15/25 at 11:30 AM, room B4 had a baseboard heater that ran along the bottom length of one wall. The metal cover on the heater appeared bent away from the wall and exposed a large area of the internal heating element. The internal heating element contained metal plates that felt warm when touched. The resident's bed, in room B4, placed approximately 2 feet away and parallel to the baseboard heater. On 12/15/25 at 2:48 PM, the metal cover in room B4 appeared straightened and replaced. The baseboard heater no longer exposed the heating elements. During an observation on 12/16/25 at 9:26 AM, room B1 had a baseboard heater that ran along the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, employee personnel record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a background check was completed on staff, prior to working with dependent adults, for 1 of 5 staff personnel files reviewed. The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility provided document, titled New Hire Orientation Schedule, revealed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), completed new hire orientation on 11/20/25 Review of the facility provided document, titled Background Screening Report, ordered 11/19/25, listed the results as pending for a national criminal and sex offender search. Review of the facility requested Single Contact License and Background Check for Staff A, dated 11/19/25, revealed that Staff A's criminal history required further research. Review of the facility provided document, titled Iowa Criminal History Record Check Request SING form S, dated 11/20/25, revealed Staff A had simple and serious misdemeanor convictions. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, payroll record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to prevent neglect which resulted in a fall, and verbal abuse which caused a resident to feel bad about them self for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility reported a census of 66 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 4/2/25 revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #1 which included hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, generalized weakness and difficulty walking. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 points, indicated intact cognition. The assessment indicated Resident #1 always able to make herself understood, understood others and had no symptoms of delirium. The assessment revealed the resident required maximal staff assistance to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, toileting, toileting hygiene, dressing the lower body and the resident unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident freedom from potential abuse by permitting an alleged preparator to return to work prior to the initiation and completion of an investigation by the State Agency for 1 of 2 allegation of resident abuse reviewed. The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 5/9/25 revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #2 which included schizophrenia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 points indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #2 presented with history of delirium, which included disorganized thoughts and unable to focus attention. The MDS assessed Resident #2 required substantial staff assistance to transfer on and off the toilet and toilet hygiene. Review of a facility self-reported incident revealed, in part,.On 6/13/25, HR Manager [name redacted] reported to the administrator that Resident [name redacted, Resident #2] told her that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the the facility failed to ensure staff followed transfer precautions identified on the resident's care plan that resulted in a fall (Resident #1) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer techniques, and failed to ensure that nursing staff utilized gait belts during resident transfers as required. The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 4/2/25 revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #1 which included hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, generalized weakness and difficulty walking. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 points, indicated intact cognition. The assessment indicated Resident #1 always able to make herself understood, understood others and had no symptoms of delirium. The assessment revealed the resident required maximal staff assistance to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, toileting, toileting hygiene, dressing the lower body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Food and Drug Administration Drug Labeling resource, resident responsible party and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure prescribed psychotropic's where adequately clinically indicated and necessary to treat a specific condition for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6). The facility failed to coordinate services between the psychiatric provider and primary care provider to prevent the potential of administering unnecessary medications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 4/20/25 revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #1 which included cerebrovascular accident (a stroke), anxiety, and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicated moderately impaired cognition. The Behavior section indicated no hallucinations, delusions, or physical or verbal behavioral symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies on the current survey previously identified in 2023 and 2024. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) website under the facility's visit history revealed deficient practices identified during the Recertification and Complaint Survey ending on 3/6/25 also cited during the following survey's: a. F689 cited during Recertification Surveys ending on 6/5/23 and 6/24/24, and a Complaint Survey on 10/21/23. b. F812 cited during Recertification Surveys ending on 6/5/23, and 6/24/24. c. F865 cited during Recertification Survey ending on 6/24/24. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 12:20 PM the Administrator reported awareness of repeated deficiencies cited during the past survey and the current survey. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment free of odors in 2 of 4 hallways, and failed to ensure the handrails of one of four hallways to be free of exposed sharp edges. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: #1. During an interview on 2/24/25 at 10:59 AM, a resident representative for Resident #45 stated when she visited the facility the smell of urine was overpowering. She stated she could smell it as soon as she walked into the building. Observations of the A and B halls revealed the following: On 2/24/25 at 12:33 PM, the end piece to the handrails outside room B2 and B8 missing, exposed sharp edges noted. On 2/24/25 at 1:40 PM, hallway outside room B5 noted to have a strong odor of urine. On 2/25/25 at 8:00 AM, strong odor of urine noted in back dining room by A and B halls. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator reported the facility currently did not have a Maintenance Supervisor as the last one quit on 3/1/25. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 11:40 AM, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, palatable temperature of foods served at the noon meal on 2/25/25. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 12:11 PM, the State Agency requested a test tray for the noon meal. At 12:17 PM, the Dietary Manager took food temperatures of the refried beans with a result of 134.2 degrees F (Fahrenheit); and of jello cake with whipped topping with a result of 69.2 degrees F. During an interview on 2/25/25 at 12:20 PM, the Dietary Manager reported he expected temperatures for hot food items be at least 135 degrees F, and cold food items be under 41 degrees F. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS indicated the resident required supervision or touching assistance with eating. During an interview on 2/24/25 at 11:44 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 dietary staff covered their hair while in the kitchen. The facility reported a census for 65 residents. Findings include: During a kitchen observation on 2/25/25 at 11:00 AM, Staff G, Dietary Aide hairnet covered part of her hair. Staff G had multiple long braids of hair not covered by the hairnet and braids hung down her back. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 11:52 AM, Staff G only had part of her hair covered with 2 hairnets. Staff G had part of her braids hang down her back not in the hairnet. Staff G asked about wearing hairnets in the kitchen and Staff G stated they needed to wear them and she had 2 of them on. Staff G queried if all her hair needed to be in the hairnet and she stated yes, all of her needed covered. Staff G informed part of her hair not covered by the hairnet and she tried to put her hair in the hairnet and was unsuccessful and commented she had a lot of hair and had a hard time getting all of it in her hairnet. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 9:41 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in the medication regime for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #10) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12 out of 15. Diagnoses listed on the MDS included: depression, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review Resident #23 Care Plan, Date Initiated: 1/13/22 included a Focus area to address The resident has impaired cognitive function or impaired through processes r/t (related to) HX (history) of ETOH (alcohol) abuse. Interventions included, in part: a. Communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding his capabilities and needs. Date Initiated: 1/13/2022. b. The resident needs supervision/assistance with all decision making. Date Initiated: 1/22/22. During an interview on 3/3/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment when the resident discontinued hospice services for one of one resident reviewed for hospice (Resident #53). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #53 dated 1/24/25 revealed the resident scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The General Note dated 12/24/24 at 12:23 PM revealed, Resident expressed wanting to come off hospice, hospice RN (Registered Nurse) and social worked came and resident signed off services effective today. MD (Medical Doctor) notified. The Physician Progress Note dated 12/27/24 at 12:13 PM revealed, Reason for visit: staff reports resident is off hospice and wishes to pursue treatment for her cancer .States that she did not want hospice any longer when she was informed that they do not do chemo (chemotherapy) treatments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to address smoking as a focus area for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Residents #51 and #264). The facility reported a census of 65. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #264 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 and had the following diagnoses: malnutrition, anxiety disorder and respiratory failure. The MDS identified Resident #264 dependent on staff for toileting, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear. During an observation on 2/24/25 at 1:33 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed Resident #264 in her wheelchair outside to the smoking area. Resident #264 proceeded to smoke a cigarette. Review of the Care Plan revealed a lack of a Focus area, Goal and Interventions to address Smoking. During an interview on 3/3/25 at 3:04 PM Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) reported Resident #264 smoked and that should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to hold care conferences quarterly, failed to revise the care plan when the resident discontinued hospice services for four of twenty-two residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #18, Resident #52, Resident #53, Resident #54). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/26/25, review of Resident #53's Care Plan revealed, I am receiving Specialty Services such as Hospice with [Hospice Company Redacted]. The General Note dated 12/24/24 at 12:23 PM revealed, Resident expressed wanting to come off hospice, hospice RN (Registered Nurse) and social worked came and resident signed off services effective today. MD (Medical Doctor) notified. The Physician Progress Note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The MDS dated [DATE] listed diagnoses for Resident #265 included: neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to nerve damage) , urinary tract infection and epilepsy. The MDS indicated Resident #265 dependent on staff for assistance with toileting, showers, dressing, putting on and removing footwear and personal hygiene. The MDS identified Resident #265 with an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #265's Care Plan, dated 12/18/24, revealed a Focus area to address The resident has a seizure disorder r/t (related to) epilepsy. Interventions included, in part: a. Give medications as ordered. Monitor/document for effectiveness and side effects. Date Initiated: 12/18/24. b. Give seizure medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 12/18/24. Review of the Order Summary Report, document dated 3/4/25, revealed a Physician's Order for Epidiolex Oral Solution 100 Mg (milligrams/Ml (milliliters)(Cannabidiol). Give 2.5 ml by mouth two times a day for partial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide set up assistance for resident identified with an impaired ability to eat independently for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #23) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain function impairment), Crohn's disease, end stage renal disease and diabetes. Per the MDS, Resident #23 required set up or clean up assistance for eating. Review of the Care Plan, Date Initiated: 2/11/25 identified a Focus area to address Resident is at risk for or has actual IMPAIRED ABILITY TO EAT INDEPENDENTLY. The Intervention directed staff to EATING AND DRINKING: The resident usually requires a helper to provide SETUP ASSISTANCE prior to or following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure wheelchair foot pedals utilized when residents assisted via wheelchair, and failed to ensure staff utilized a gait belt during transfer for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #12, #21). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 scored 9 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Per this assessment the resident used a walker and wheelchair. Review of Resident #12's Care Plan dated 10/18/23 revealed, Resident is at risk for or has actual IMPAIRED ABILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY MOVE/NAVIGATE WHEELCHAIR R/T (related to) Limited Mobility, Musculoskeletal impairment. The Intervention dated 10/25/23 revealed, Foot pedals when push assist is given for navigating in wheelchair. On 2/24/25 at 11:23 AM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed secure the tubing for a urinary catheter in a position that prevented it from sitting on the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 as cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 6 and had the following diagnoses: renal insufficiency (kidney failure), encephalopathy (a medical condition characterized by a general dysfunction of the brain) and malnutrition. The MDS also identified used an indwelling urinary catheter. On 12/23/22, the Care Plan identified Resident #45 with the problem of an Indwelling Catheter related to urinary retention, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition where urine flows backward from the bladder into the ureters). During an observation on 2/26/25, Resident #45 sat up in her wheelchair in the back dining room. The catheter tubing noted to be on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to coordinate communication with the dialysis center for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident #18). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS indicated the resident received dialysis. The MDS revealed the medical diagnosis for renal insufficiency, renal failure, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The Care Plan revealed a Focus area dated 10/22/24 for hemodialysis related to ESRD. The Intervention dated 10/22/24 indicated encourage the resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday every day shift at 9:30 . Review of the Physician Orders revealed the an order for Outpatient hemodialysis treatments: Day/s of the Week & Approximate Time: Tues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure timely follow up for medication regimen review recommendations identified by the Pharmacist for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #47). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #47 dated 12/3/24 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, the resident took antianxiety medication. The Pharmacist Review/Visit Progress Note dated 12/31/24 at 1:10 PM revealed, in part, Alprazolam PRN (as needed) and hydroxyzine PRN orders require stop dates - letter generated. The Pharmacist Review/Visit Progress Notes dated 1/28/25 and 2/24/25 stated the same recommendation and documented letters were generated/regenerated. On 3/4/25 at 2:40 PM, Resident #47's pharmacy recommendations and response communication requested for the following dates 12/31/24, 1/28/25, and 2/24/25. One…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) utilized for incontinence care, wound care, and gastrostomy tube site care for one of two residents reviewed for EBP, and failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during medication administration for one of ten residents observed during medication administration (Resident #16) when a barrier was not utilized for the glucometer. The facility also failed to ensure the infection control policies were reviewed annually by the facility's Medical Director. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/27/25 at approximately 8:16 AM during an observation conducted for medication administration, Staff L, Registered Nurse (RN) had the glucometer directly on Resident #16's over the bed table. Staff L checked the resident's blood sugar and set the glucometer back on the table. At 8:19 AM, Staff L set the glucometer by the sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide immunizations to 3 of 5 residents reviewed. (Residents #23, #50 and #58). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: A review of the immunization records revealed the following: Residents #23 and #48 did not have documentation of the pneumococcal vaccine given. Residents #23 and #50 did not have documentation of the influenza vaccine given in 2024. During on interview on 3/4/25 at 9:59 AM, the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist stated she had not had a chance to look at immunization status related to flu and pneumvax since she started at the facility a month ago. She stated currently, there is no one assigned to enter the immunization data when residents are admitted . A review of the facility policy titled: Influenza Vaccination dated as last revised 7/1/24 had documentation of the following: 1. Influenza vaccinations will be routinely offered annually from October 1st through March 31st unless such immunization is medically contraindicated, the individual has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders directing treatment for pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident's #1 and #2), and failed to follow standard infection control practices during wound care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed. (Resident #1.) The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/6/24, revealed Resident #1 diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, diabetes and cerebrovascular accident (a stroke). The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of score 15 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #1 required extensive staff support to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed and chair, and for dressing, toileting and bathing. The assessment revealed the presence of a Stage 3 (a full-thickness ulcer that extends through the skin and into deeper tissue and fat, but does not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) pressure ulcer present on admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility document review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions for the storage, preparation and handling of beverage cups during 1 of 1 meal services observed; and failed to maintain appropriate temperatures for frozen food stored in 1 of 3 freezers. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: On 06/17/24 at 10:10 AM, during an initial tour of the main kitchen, the stand alone freezer thermometer indicated a temperature of 30 degrees Fahrenheit. The kitchen stove top appeared to be coated with a black substance and grease. During an observation of the noon meal on 6/17/24 from 12:15 PM to 12:38 PM Staff A, Dietary Aide served 10 glasses to 9 residents with bare fingers touching the drinking rim surface of the glass. On 06/18/24 at 11:00 AM, throughout lunch preparation the floor in kitchen noted to be heavily flooded around the dishwasher, continuing towards the front of the kitchen near the preparation sink, in front of the steam table, and in front of the food preparation counter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 resident reviewed for EBP (Resident #9, #25). The facility failed to handle laundry with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 2 out of 2 observations. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS for Resident #9 dated 5/1/24, listed diagnoses of venous insufficiency and diabetes mellitus. The MDS reflected she scored 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Statues (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected 2 venous ulcers. The Diagnoses Sheet for Resident #9 dated 6/20/24, listed diagnoses resistant to multiple antimicrobiales drugs (MDRO), venous insufficiency and diabetes mellitus. The Care Plan for Resident #9 revised on 5/20/24, lack her MDRO diagnosis and lack intervention related to EBP. The facility Matrix dated 6/12/24, listed Resident #9 with a stage 4 pressure ulcer (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to keep the facility free from vermin. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/17/24 at 2:40 PM a hole in the outside soffit (underside of roof overhang) measuring roughly 2 feet by 2 feet on the right side of the entrance was found. In an interview on 6/18/24 at 11:59 AM Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) remarked she had heard things in the ceiling and assumed they were raccoons. In an interview on 6/18/24 at 12:31 PM Staff I, Occupational Therapist noted she had heard residents complain about raccoons in the ceiling. She reported there is a crawl space attic above the front of the building. In an interview on 6/18/24 at 1:30 PM the Director of Maintenance stated he started working at the facility about three months ago. At that time, he put all the soffit back up that had fallen down. He reported there were raccoons in the facility before he started. He was just made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey previously identified during surveys completed in the last twelve months. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a recertification survey which occurred 04/11/23 to 06/05/23 revealed the facility received immediate jeopardy level and harm level citations related to the following areas: a. Free of accidents, hazards, supervision, and devices b. Food procurement, storage/preparation/service and kitchen sanitation. c. Treatment and services to prevent or heal pressure ulcers The facility's plan of correction for this survey revealed documentation present at the end of the CMS-2567 form included the following: a.) Free of accidents and hazards: Residents were reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-24 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff members were provided mandatory education on the rights of residents and the responsibilities of the facility for 5 of 6 employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: A review of the employee education files on 6/20/24 at 9:42 AM revealed the following staff did not have record of resident rights and facility responsibilities education: a. Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) b. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) c. Staff K, CNA d. Staff A, Dietary Aide e. Staff J, LPN On 6/20/24 at 11:30 AM a request made to facility clinical administrative staff to provide documentation of the required education. A second request made at 1:36 PM. In an interview on 6/20/24 03:08 PM the Director of Clinical Service explained she expected all staff to complete their core competency requirements for education, including the 12 hours of yearly education and the yearly competency evaluations. The facility policy titled Orientation, revised 10/01/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to clarify and ensure a current copy of a resident's advance directive was in the medical record for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #253 and Resident #15) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. The Order Summary for Resident #253, dated [DATE], revealed both an active Physician order for full code/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the start date of [DATE] and an active Physician order for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) with the start date of [DATE]. The Electronic Health Records (EHR) lacked documentation of Iowa Physician Orders for Scope Of Treatment (IPOST). The EHR and Nursing Progress Notes additionally lacked documentation the facility offered or assisted with completion of advanced directives. The Care Plan, initiated [DATE] and revised [DATE], revealed Resident #253 had advanced directives on record with the goal that if the resident's heart stops…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to have staff complete the Dependent Adult Abuse training within 6 months of hire for 1 of 6 employees reviewed, and to complete the Single Contact License & Background prior to the start date of a nursing staff for 1 of 6 employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. During employee file record reviews on 6/20/24 at 9:34 AM Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was found to be hired on 3/30/23. The Dependent Adult Abuse (DAA) training certificate was absent from her employee file. On 6/20/24 at 11:30 AM, request made to facility administrative staff for documentation of DAA training completion for Staff C, A second request made at 1:36 PM. During an interview on 6/20/24 at 1:44 PM, the Director of Clinical services stated the facility did not have a DAA training certificate for Staff C. 2. During employee personnel file reviews on 6/20/24 at 9:34 AM Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) found to be hired on 5/23/24. A Single Contact License & Background…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to identify, assess and treat a skin tear in a timely manner (Res# 304). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident #304 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses: stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hemiparesis (inability to move one half of the body). The Care Plan updated 5/14/24 included goals to maintain or develop clean or intact skin. Interventions instructed staff to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury, and conduct weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue and exudate and any other notable changes or observations. The Physician Order dated 6/05/24 instructed staff to complete a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to have a physician conduct the first resident assessment within 30 days of admission for three of five residents reviewed (Res #47, Res #5, Res #304). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) report dated 5/07/24 for Resident #47 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 5 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS diagnoses included: stroke, seizure disorder, and metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance that damages the brain). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated Resident #47 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Physician Progress Note dated 2/19/24 at 10:36 AM revealed a new resident initial visit was conducted by a Nurse Practitioner (ARNP). 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #50 documented a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS diagnoses included: fractures and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were provided routine competency evaluations for two of three employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the employee personnel files on 6/20/24 at 10:05 AM revealed Staff C, CNA did not receive routine competency evaluations. The employee was hired on 3/30/23. 2. A review of the employee education files on 6/20/24 at 10:45 AM revealed Staff K, CNA did not receive routine competency evaluations. Staff K was hired on 4/01/20. On 6/20/24 at 11:30 AM documentation of CNA competency evaluations requested. A second request made at 1:36 PM . On 6/24/24 the Director of Clinical Services reported she could not find a performance evaluation for Staff K. During an interview on 6/20/24 03:08 PM, the Director of Clinical Services explained she expected all staff to complete their core competency requirements for education, including the 12 hours of yearly education and the yearly competency evaluations. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants were provided the required minimum of 12 hours of in-service education yearly for one of three employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings Include: A review of the employee education files including online training transcripts and in-service sign in sheets on 6/20/24 at 10:05 AM revealed Staff C, CNA did not have 12 hours of in-service education yearly. The employee was hired on 3/30/23. On 6/20/24 at 11:30 AM, a request made to the facility clinical administrative staff to provide documentation of the required education. A second request made at 1:36 PM. In an interview on 6/20/24 03:08 PM the Director of Clinical Service explained she expected all staff to complete their core competency requirements for education, including the 12 hours of yearly education and the yearly competency evaluations. The facility policy titled Required Training, Certification, and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides, revised 10/01/22 instructed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's urinary catheter bag and tubing didn't touch the floor for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinent cares (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated cognition moderately intact. The MDS revealed the resident used an indwelling catheter. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses of neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 12/23/22 for indwelling catheter related to urinary retention, obstructive and reflux uropathy. The intervention dated 12/23/22 revealed position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed the following medical diagnoses: a. flaccid neuropathic bladder, not elsewhere classified b. retention of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Pharmacist and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to receive and administer medications for a newly admitted resident as prescribed and ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: A Daily Skilled Progress Note dated 12/7/23 at 7:18 PM, documented Resident #1 admitted to the facility for skilled services. The note recorded the resident with the following conditions: GU (genitourinary, referring to the reproductive or urinary system), neurological (brain or nerve related), and mood condition. Hospital records for the prior hospitalization from 11/23/23 to 12/7/23 revealed the diagnosis for the visit as seizure and stroke risk. A review of hospital records for the 11/23/23 admission revealed prior to discharge the resident last received the anti-epileptic medications as following: a. Lamotrigine 100 milligrams (mgs) 1 tab at 12/7/23 at 9:24 AM. b. Levetiracetam,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, personnel record review, the Iowa Board of Nursing and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had appropriate competence to administer intravenous (IV) medications, fluids and assessment skills related to care for 2 residents with central IV lines (Resident's #3 and #4), and compliance with mandated regulations that included those set forth by the Iowa Board of Nursing for 2 nursing staff, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) from a staffing agency, and Staff G, facility LPN. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. The 7/6/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses that included renal failure, intestinal malabsorption, anxiety and long term use of antibiotics. The MDS documented the resident required assistance of 1 staff to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed and chair, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and unable to ambulate. The Nursing Care Plan included the following problem: Resident is receiving TPN (total parenteral nutrition) Initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-24 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff members were educated on the mandatory quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program for five of six employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the employee education files on 6/20/24 from 9:42 AM to 10:56 AM revealed the following staff did not have a record of completed education on QAPI: a. Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) b. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) c. Staff K, CNA d. Staff A, Dietary Aide e. Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A review of the General Orientation Plan, dated 2022 revealed the absence of QAPI training. On 6/20/24 at 11:30 AM. a request made to facility clinical administrative staff to provide documentation QAPI education. A second request made at 1:36 PM. In an interview on 6/20/24 03:08 PM the Director of Clinical Service explained she expected all staff to complete their core competency requirements for education, including the 12 hours of yearly education and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$146,874 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $27,275 — penalty dated 2026-03-25
  • $20,823 — penalty dated 2025-12-16
  • $85,737 — penalty dated 2024-06-24
  • $13,039 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-25 for 77 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-01 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IVY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ACCORDIUS HEALTH AT ST MARY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 04/01/2020
BOGDAN, DAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
HYMAN, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
VU, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 21%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,838per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$270per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165436. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next