Angel Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2026-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and accident prevention for 1 (Resident (R)65) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The failure resulted in R65 sustaining a right 11th rib fracture on 09/02/2025 after the resident fell. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, revised on 10/06/2025, revealed, The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s). 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s). 4. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. The policy revealed, . 3. Implementation of Interventions- using specific interventions to try to reduce a resident's risks from hazards in the environment. The process includes: a. Communicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent missappropriation of resident property for Resident (R)2 and R3. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 removed 5 pills from the narcotic locked box, belonging to R2 and R3. LPN1 did not administer the medications to the residents, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation/Misappropriation/Mistreatment/Injury, implemented on March 2022 and revised on April 6, 2023, documented, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and the rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property. Compliance Guidelines: 2. D. c. Misappropriation of Resident Property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a procedure was followed during wound care, to prevent the spread of infection for Resident (R)9, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 06/14/23 and revised on 10/26/23, documents, All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 6. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Dressing Change (clean Technique), states: 9. Wash hands/use sanitizer and apply gloves. 10. Remove the soiled dressing and discard in trash bag at bedside. 11. Remove gloves and discard. 13. Wash hands/use hand sanitizer. 14. Put on gloves. 15. Clean the wound according to order. Clean from the center outward. Linear wounds may be cleansed from top to bottom. 16. Discard soiled gauze or Q-tip used for cleaning. 17. Remove gloves and discard if contaminated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide food storage in a safe manner in 1 of 1 main kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety with an implementation date of March 2022, revealed Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. Policy Explanation and Complaisance for Staffing: 6. The head cook, or designee, shall be responsible for checking the refrigerator daily for food items that are expiring, and shall discard accordingly. Review of the facility policy titled, Sanitation Inspection with an implementation date of March 2022, revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility, as part of the department's sanitation program, to conduct inspections to ensure food services areas are clean, sanitary and in compliance with . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 4. Sanitation inspections will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 8 residents, (Resident (R)13, R68, R53, and R73), had their call light within reach. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated August 2022, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside . to allow residents to call for assistance. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All staff will be educated on . ensuring resident access to call light. 5. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. Review of R13's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 07/07/2022 with medical diagnosis that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, end stage renal disease, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and anemia in chronic kidney disease. Review of R13's Quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident(R)33 was invited to attend care planning meetings and to have input on focused care areas, goals and interventions recognized by the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans dated Sept. 2022 revealed . The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that's includes, but is not limited to: . d. The resident and the resident representative, to the extent practicable. R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/22/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicated she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/16/22 at 1:28 PM, R33 stated that she was not invited to care plans and did not know what a care plan was. Review on 10/18/22 of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and biologicals were removed from 2 of 2 treatment carts and not stored with other medications and biologicals for resident use on 2 of 2 halls, [NAME] and Rose. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, number 8 states, Unused Medications: The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective and or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible or missing labels. These medications are destroyed in accordance with our Destruction of Unused Drugs Policy. An observation on 10/18/22 at 9:40 AM of the treatment cart on [NAME] Hall revealed, 2 bottles of DUKAL Iodoform sterile wound packing medicated gauze, Lot A28421. One bottle contained an open date, but no expiration date. The second bottle did not contain an open date or an expiration date. Further observation on 10/19/22 at 9:40 AM of the treatment cart on [NAME] Hall revealed 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dumpster area in a sanitary manner to prevent the harborage of pests for 1 out of 2 dumpsters. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse with an implementation date of March 2022 revealed, Policy: The facility shall properly dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 7. Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/16/2022 at 11:36 AM, observations were made of the facility's dumpster area. There were 2 large dumpsters and a large recycle bin labeled Cardboard Only. Of the two dumpsters, one dumpster did not have a lid. In an interview on 10/16/2022 at 12:10 PM, the Kitchen Manager (KM) verified the lid was missing on one of the two dumpsters. The KM further stated the garbage man broke it. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$13,520 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $13,520 — penalty dated 2026-02-07
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-05 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IVY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC