Prestige Care Center of Fairfield
400 Highland Street, Fairfield, IA 52556 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 73 certified beds · (641) 469-2140 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Mar 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $106,751 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.9% | 17.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.9% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 4.2% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.8% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.8% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.6% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.2% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.0% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 36.4% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.9% | 20.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 13.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.85 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.77 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 65% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.4%CMS range 24.9–52.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.8–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 56.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow physician orders for warfarin administration, also known as Coumadin, after one of three residents (Resident #3) had an elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR) lab result of 6.7 on 1/17/25. Previous to this INR result, Resident #3 had an order for warfarin 5.5 mg daily, with a goal of a therapeutic INR range of 2.5 to 3.5. After an INR result of 6.7, a physician order was given to hold Resident #3's warfarin dose on 1/17/25, and starting on 1/18/25 decrease the daily dose from 5.5mg to 5.0mg daily. The Medication Administrator Record (MAR) documented a 5.5mg dose of warfarin administered to Resident #3 on 1/17/25, and 5.5 mg warfarin doses administered on 1/18/25, 1/19/25, and 1/20/25. On 1/21/25, Resident #3 had a repeat INR test with a result of 12.4. Resident #3 admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with pneumonia, urinary tract infection and INR of 13. The resident treated with Vitamin K (antidote to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The MDS assessment tool, dated 5/12/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #13 which included Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and Parkinson's disease(a disorder which caused tremors and difficult mobility). The MDS listed her cognition as severely impaired. A 2/15/25 Care Plan entry stated the resident was at risk for falls related to confusion. On 6/3/25 at 9:56 AM, Resident #13 sat in a shower chair in her room. The door was open and no staff were within sight of her. At 10:12 AM Staff A Registered Nurse(RN) and Staff R Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) walked by the resident's room and Staff A asked Staff R if she just finished the resident's shower. Staff R said no she had been done. Staff R closed the resident's door and they both walked away. The resident remained in her shower chair until 10:36 AM At 10:36 AM Staff R stated she was not sure what time she completed the resident's shower but stated she required 2 staff members for the transfer and the other staff were at the other end of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff, resident responsible party and State Climatologist interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident safety and prevent a resident's elopement, when they failed to identify a resident's change in condition and actions that placed the resident at high risk for elopement, for 1 of 9 resident records reviewed (Resident #8). Resident #8 eloped from the facility and 0.7 miles away from the facility when located by staff approximately 20 to 25 minutes after he was last observed at the main entrance door. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 8/23/23 revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility 8/16/23 with diagnoses that included acute cholelethiasis (gal stones), Parkinson's disease and altered mental status. The MDS documented that the resident scored 9 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment, that indicated severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to address the random wandering of one resident (Resident #29) and failed to prevent a fall which resulted in a fracture for one resident (Resident #65). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set, dated identified Resident #29 as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 0 and with the following diagnoses: Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency and diabetes Mellitus. It also identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, toileting and bathing and totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. A review of the undated care plan did not identify the resident with the problem of risk of elopement. During an observation on 3/14/23 at 7:43 AM, the resident self-propelled in her wheelchair out through side door and the alarm sounded. She had pushed herself out through the first door and hand her hand on the safety bar of the second door which led immediately outside. The surveyor had to flag down staff to assist the resident. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received only medications prescribed to him for one of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors and failed to ensure a resident remained free from a significant medication error during medication administration for one of three residents reviewed for the medication administration task (Resident #11, Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 1/17/23 documented the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Potential Medication Error Investigation dated 10/17/22 provided by the facility documented, in part, At approximately 0945 Charge Nurse on [NAME] Avenue [Staff D] LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) who was training [Staff E] LPN reported to D.O.N. (Director of Nursing) that resident [Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff prepared and served food in accordance with safe hygienic practices to prevent cross-contamination of foods for 1 of 1 observation of a meal service. The facility reported a census of 54 residents.Findings include:During an observation on 6/29/2026 at 11:29 AM, Staff R, [NAME] and the Dietary Manager prepared meals. Both staff members wore gloves. Staff R opened a drawer to retrieve a pair of tongs, removed a lid from a steam table container with her gloved hand, and used the tongs to place three chicken-fried steak patties into a blender. Using a 2-ounce spoon, Staff R carried a spoonful of broth from a pan on the stove across the kitchen and added it to the blender. Staff R then reached into a drawer to retrieve a spatula. After pushing the patties further down into the blender, Staff R carried three more spoonfuls of broth across the kitchen, one at a time, to add to the blender. Staff R held her gloved hand under the spoon. Broth spilled into Staff R's gloved hand, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the family and the physician that 1 of 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for notification missed six doses of an anti-anxiety medication scheduled for administration two times daily. The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The list of diagnoses included anxiety disorder, and the resident prescribed an anti-anxiety medication. Review of the Clinical Physician Orders section in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed an order for Alprazolam tablet 0.5 milligram (mg): take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily for anxiety. Start Date: 5/18/26.Review of the June 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a Resident #21 did not receive the alprazolam on the following dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the provision of a routine medication for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 54 residents.Findings included:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/23/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #9 which included heart failure, obesity, and high blood pressure. The MDS listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of15, indicating intact cognition. A 7/11/25 Nursing Note listed a new order for fluticasone (a nasal spray used to reduce inflammation) 50 micrograms (mcg) 2 sprays daily in the morning.A 7/12/25 Nursing Note stated the medication was unavailable. A 9/20/25 eMar (electronic Medication Administration Record) note stated the medication was not in the facility.Progress Notes on the following dates stated the medication was on order: 2/7/26, 2/8/26, 2/9/26, 2/10/26, 4/14/26, 5/16/26.A 6/26/26 eMar note stated the medication could not be located. On 7/1/26 at 12:13 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent when a medication administration observation resulted in a 7 percent error rate. The facility reported a census of 54 residents.Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/4/26, list of diagnoses for Resident #42 included anxiety, depression, and muscle weakness. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, indicates a moderate cognitive impairment. The June 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #42 listed a 2/2/26 order for sucralfate (an oral medication used to coat the stomach in order to prevent ulcers) 1 gram, 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. The order directed staff to make this into a slurry (a semi-liquid mixture of solids suspended in a liquid, usually water) and administer 1 hour prior to meals. During an observation on 6/29/26 at 3:02 p.m., Staff J Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered Resident #42, 1 gram of sucralfate in a tablet form with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, provider and staff interviews, the facility failed to reorder a medication and utilize the emergency pharmacy stock in an effort to prevent a resident from missing six doses of an anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The list of diagnoses included anxiety disorder, and the resident prescribed an anti-anxiety medication. Review of Resident #21's Care Plan dated 3/18/26, revealed a Focus area to address [name redacted, Resident #21] uses anti-anxiety medications r/t (related to) anxiety disorder. 3/17/26 GDR (Gradual dose reductions) declined for Alprazolam- [name redacted, Resident #21] refuses to try because she has taken this medication for so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff served meals that met the therapeutic needs (Resident #18) and preferences (Resident #49) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for diet orders. The facility reported a census of 54 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident #18, dated 5/1/2026, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. The list of diagnoses included diabetes, aphasia (difficulty swallowing) and morbid obesity. The MDS identified Resident #18 as dependent on staff for eating, and the received a mechanically altered, and therapeutic diet. Review of Resident 18's Care Plan dated 5/1/2026, revealed a Focus area to address [name redacted, Resident #18] has a potential nutritional problem of weight fluctuations r/t advanced age, current cognitive status, and need for mechanically altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to administer medications within the timeframe directed by the manufacturer/pharmacist for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #31, #41, #53) reviewed for medications, and failed to follow professional standards of medication administration by ensuring the same staff member set up medications as who administered them for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/10/25, revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #31 which included diabetes (a disease which causes abnormalities in blood sugars), heart failure, and morbid obesity. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan, dated 3/15/23 revealed a Focus area to address diabetes, with an Intervention to administer diabetes medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of nursing staff schedules, list of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) certified staff, facility policy and staff interview the facility failed to ensure CPR certified staff available in the facility 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 2:35 PM, the Administrator reported being aware of there being a shortage in CPR coverage for third shift (10:00 PM to 6:00 AM) and the weekends. The Administrator explained the facility had a CPR class scheduled for [DATE]. The Administrator also reported she had not sent the most updated list of staff with CPR certification. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she provided the updated staff list for CPR certification. The DON reported there were still time gaps in the CPR coverage for the facility. Review of the nursing staff schedule for [DATE] and the list of CPR certified staff revealed the lack of at least one CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. During a continuous observation on 6/5/25 at 3:05 PM, in the Bonnefield Unit call lights visualized activated above the door for Resident #12 and Resident #38 room. At 3:11 PM, Staff M, CNA, came out of the shower room with Resident #17. Staff M pushed the resident in a shower chair down the hall and passed by Resident #12 and Resident #38's room. Staff M heard commenting to Resident #17 that she was going to take her to her room and then see what the others needed. Staff M took Resident #17 into her room and shut the door At 3:11 PM, Resident #14 activated her call light. No staff observed in hallway. At 3:17 PM, Staff M, CNA, exited Resident #17's room, walked down the hallway past Resident #12's and Resident #38's room to the shower room, entered the shower room, and exited with a blow dryer. Staff M, CNA, returned back to Resident #17's room. At 3:23 PM, Staff M, CNA, exited Resident #17's room, knocked on and entered Resident #14's room, talked briefly with the resident, left Resident #14's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sanitary kitchen conditions in an effort to prevent cross contamination during 2 of 2 meals observed. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 6/02/25 at 11:50 AM, the following observations were made: a. The stove had pancake batter spilled on top and over the sides of griddle, additional grime and food crumbs noted across the back and sides of the stove. b. The deep fat fryer had two baskets kept stored above the oil, the wired baskets were coated in grime and the oil appeared dark brown in color. c. The inside of microwave oven had food crumbs and spills on the top, sides, and on the turntable in the microwave. d. The dry storage room floor littered with trash which included plastic spoons, papers, sugar packets, and boxes. e. A stand up freezer next to ice maker had an open paper bag of french fries. The fries were falling out of bag onto bottom of freezer. During an observation and interview on 6/4/25 at 10:40 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity by not providing a meal in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #41) and failed to ensure the provision of a catheter dignity bag for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #42). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/16/25, listed the following diagnoses for Resident #41: anxiety, depression, and morbid obesity. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 13 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan, dated 4/1/25, revealed a Focus area to address [name redacted] has a behavior problem false allegations regarding staff. Interventions included, in part: Caregivers to opportunities for positive interactions and attention and to stop and talk with the resident. During an interview, on 6/3/25 at 12:58 PM, Resident #41 stated Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure self medication administration assessments were completed. for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self medication safety (Resident #23 and Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/9/25, list of diagnoses for Resident #23 included heart failure, diabetes (a disorder which caused abnormalities in blood sugar), and anxiety disorder. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 13 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan, dated 12/27/23, revealed a Focus area to address [Name redacted] is non-compliant with medication administration . Review of the June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed metformin (a medication used to treat diabetes) 500 milligrams (mg) 2 tabs twice daily scheduled at 8:00 AM. and 8:00 PM. During an observation on 6/3/25 at 10:51 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure consistent communication and clarification of resident code status, either to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for code status (Resident #44). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #44 dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored 10 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. On [DATE] review of Resident #44's Care Plan revealed the following: I have requested that CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation)measures ARE to be performed (FULL CODE STATUS). The Intervention dated [DATE] revealed, Initiate CPR if you find me pulseless or breathless and continue CPR until Paramedics arrive to take over. Review of the resident's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) form dated [DATE] revealed DNR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide privacy during an enteral tube feeding for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for privacy. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Per the MDS. Resident #53 dependent on staff for eating and required a gastrostomy tube (tube going through abdomen into stomach to provide nutrition and hydration, commonly called a G-tube, feeding through a G tube is referred to as an enteral feeding). The MDS list of diagnoses included hemiplegia or hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), traumatic brain injury, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Care Plan, dated 3/19/25, revealed a Focus area to address [name redacted] requires tube feeding r/t (related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors were identified for the use of antipsychotic medication for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment the resident had no hallucinations or delusions, and had no physical, verbal, or other behaviors. The assessment further revealed resident took antipsychotic medication on a routine basis, with gradual dose reduction (GDR) contraindicated. Review of the Care Plan dated 5/2/24, revised 4/9/25, revealed the following: [Resident #11] uses psychotropic medications. 1/3/25 GDR (gradual dose reduction) declined for Risperidone r/t (related to) continued symptoms of mild depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse per regulatory guidelines for 3 of 3 potential incidents (involving Resident #15 & Resident #21, Resident #165 and a staff member, and Resident #61 & Resident #42) reviewed for abuse. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/10/25 revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #21 which included abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, and adult failure to thrive. The MDS indicated the resident had a fall without injury during the review period and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 5 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of the Care Plan, dated 5/4/23 revealed a Focus area to address [Name redacted] is at risk for falls r/t (related to) gait/balance problems. Review of an Incident Note entered on 5/15/25 at 1:08 PM revealed staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an ongoing discharge planning process for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge (Resident #215). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #215 revealed the resident scored 14 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. The Care Plan for Resident #215 canceled on 4/7/25 revealed, [Resident #215] has no plans to discharge from facility. Review of Resident #215's Care Conference Review form dated 1/16/25 revealed the line titled Discharge Potential had been left blank on the form. Review of documentation emailed by the facility's Administrator on 6/11/25 at 3:30 PM revealed a Notice of Transfer or Discharge form for the resident dated 1/27/25. The form included notice to transfer/discharge the resident on 2/26/25. Per the Transfer or Discharge form, reasons for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to revise Care Plans to include significant resident information related to significant weight loss, severe allergies, wheelchair safety and change in advanced directive status for 4 of 21 residents (Resident #7, Resident #15, Resident #44, Resident #52) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/23/24, revealed the list of diagnoses for Resident #52 included hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic pain syndrome. The MDS stated the resident depended on staff for eating assistance and had a feeding tube. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated an admission date of 11/18/24. Review of the December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order with start date of 11/20/24 to check weights on admission and weekly for four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the provision of an adequate number of baths for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for bathing assistance(Residents #5 and #43). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/24/25, reveal a list of diagnoses for Resident #43 which included heart failure, depression, and obesity. The MDS indicated the resident dependent on staff for showering/bathing assistance. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan, dated 12/31/24, revealed the resident dependent on staff to provide a shower and requested a shower on Tuesday and a bed bath on Friday. During an interview on 6/2/25 at 1:43 PM, Resident #43 stated she received a bath on Tuesdays and Fridays. She stated last Friday (5/30/25), the staff documented in the record that she refused her bath but she did not.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and intervene for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #36 and #41) with high blood sugar results. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/24/25, revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #36 which included diabetes, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), and seizure disorder. The MDS listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 8 out of 15, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident had diabetes and directed staff to observe for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). The June 2025 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) listed an order for Lispro insulin (a type of rapid-acting insulin). The order directed staff to administer 10 units of Lispro for a blood sugar greater then 399 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dl) and to notify the provider. Review of electronic health record (EHR) Blood Sugar Summary for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out interventions to prevent and treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident # 52). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling. Stage IV is full thickness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions and infection control techniques during catheter care, and intervene in a timely manner reports of an indwelling catheter leaking for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #7) reviewed with an indwelling catheter. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed impairment on both sides of the lower extremities. The MDS revealed resident utilized an indwelling catheter, and dependent on staff for toileting. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses for multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder, and urinary tract infection in the last 30 days. Review of the Care Plan, revised on 6/2/25, revealed a Focus area for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) wounds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and carry out interventions in a timely manner after a significant weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/23/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #52 which included hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic pain syndrome. The MDS stated the resident depended on staff for eating assistance and had a feeding tube. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of the December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an admission date of 11/18/24 and listed an 11/20/24 order to check weights on admission and weekly for four weeks. Review of the Care Plan, dated 11/29/24 revealed entries stated the resident was at nutritional risk due to a mechanically altered diet. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure consistent completion of post dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #44) for dialysis. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #44 dated 5/1/25 revealed the resident scored 10 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Per this assessment, the resident received dialysis while resided in facility. Review of Resident #44's Care Plan dated 4/26/24, revised 12/5/24, revealed the following: [Resident #44] is at risk for complication related to receiving dialysis for diagnosis of ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease). Receiving dialysis on M-W-F (Monday-Wednesday-Friday). Review of the resident's pre and post dialysis assessments from 5/28/25 to current revealed the following: Although the resident had a pre dialysis completed on the following dates, the resident lacked completion of a post dialysis assessment on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the provision of therapy services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for specialized services (Resident #23). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/9/25,revealed a list of diagnoses for Resident #23 which included heart failure, diabetes (a disorder which caused abnormalities in blood sugar), and anxiety disorder. The Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 13 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. During an interview on 6/3/25 at 10:51 AM, Resident #23 stated she would like to receive therapy services to become more mobile. Review of a 7/29/24 Social Service note, written by Staff G, former Social Services Director, stated the resident wanted physical therapy but did not have a payor source. The note stated the social worker would check on different options. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation regarding follow-up to the resident's wish for therapy between 7/29/24 and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Matrix, the facility policy, the Facility Assessment, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment identified and addressed the specialized staff training and supply needs for residents in the facility who currently receive hemodialysis (treatment to filter waste and excess fluids from the blood and kidneys) and receive nutrition, hydration and mediations through the use of an enteral tube (a tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach, specifically a gastrostomy tube or G-tube). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the facilities Resident Matrix, dated 6/2/25, revealed the facility identified a total of 3 residents received hemodialysis (Residents #29, #44 and #37) and 2 residents received nutrition, hydration and medications through the use of a G-tube (Residents #52 and #53). The Resident Matrix identified none of the 5 residents as new admissions due to dates of admission greater than 30 days past. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/16/25, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment in the resident's room when a pervasive urine odor present in the resident's room for one of one resident reviewed for environment (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 revealed the resident scored 4 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment, the resident was frequently incontinent of urine. The Care Plan dated 6/5/25 revealed, The resident is non compliant with hygiene needs r/t (related to) not wanting to wear incontinent product even though incontinent of urine. Doesn't always take snack when offered as ordered for blood sugar control. Observation on 6/03/25 at 9:12 AM revealed when entered Resident #9's room, immediately noted a strong urine odor present. Observation on 6/5/25 at 9:35 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY §483.45(b)(2) Establishes a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation Based on clinical record review, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to complete shift change controlled substance counts with the required two licensed nurses per facility policy. The facility reported census was 65. Findings include: According to Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy: 9. Inventory Verification b. Two licensed nurses account for all controlled substance and access keys at the end of each shift. In an interview on 8/19/24 at 2:15 p.m. Staff C, Certified Medication Aide, stated she worked 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on 7/9/24 and was responsible for passing medications on [NAME] hall. Staff C stated at 2:00 p.m. she completed the narcotic count with Staff G, Registered Nurse, and all narcotics were accounted for and the medication cart keys were passed on to Staff C. Staff C stated at the end of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY §483.45(h)(1) In accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. Based on clinical record review, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure custody of medication cart keys were only accessible to authorized personnel. The facility reported census was 65. Findings include: According to Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy: 9. Inventory Verification b. Two licensed nurses account for all controlled substance and access keys at the end of each shift. In an interview on 8/19/24 at 2:15 p.m. Staff C, Certified Medication Aide, stated she worked 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on 7/9/24 and was responsible for passing medications on [NAME] hall. Staff C stated at 2:00 p.m. she completed the narcotic count with Staff G, Registered Nurse, and all narcotics were accounted for and the medication cart keys were passed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately code antiplatelet medication, insulin, and hospice services for 4 of 23 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Residents #21, #22, #25, and #34). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #34's MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included a medical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM). The MDS reflected Resident #34 received insulin 7 out of 7 days in the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus dated 10/20/23 indicated Resident #34 had type II DM and used insulin glargine. The interventions dated 10/20/23 directed to give diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed the medical diagnosis for type II DM without complications. The Clinical Physician Orders reviewed on 6/27/24 included an order dated 10/19/23 for Insulin Glargine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a comprehensive individualized care plan that accurately reflected the resident's plan of care for 4 of 23 residents reviewed (Residents #22, #25, #28, and #60). The review of the 4 residents Care Plans failed to address diabetes, a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), use of antibiotics, wounds, hospice level of care, and use of oxygen therapy. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #25's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Resident #25's Medical Diagnoses reviewed 6/25/24 listed a diagnosis added in 2022 of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The Care Plan Focus revised 3/20/23, indicated Resident #25 had a potential of alteration in nutritional status related to stroke (CVA), weakness, depression, and needed a mechanically altered diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have enough staff in the dining room during lunch to assist residents with eating and help a resident out of the dining room to the bathroom. This resulted in an incontinent episode in the dining room for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for insufficient staffing (Residents #17, #33, #41, and #45). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #17 required total assistance with toilet hygiene and needed supervision/touching assistance with toilet transfers. The MDS included a diagnosis of non Alzheimer's dementia. The Care Plan Focus dated 2/5/24 reflected Resident #17 had a risk related to gait/balance problems, incontinence, poor communication/comprehension, and vision/hearing problems. The Interventions dated 2/5/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they followed the for residents who received a pureed diet. The meal lacked pureed cornbread as directed on the menu for one of one observation of the puree process. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Week 4 Wednesday Diet Spreadsheet directed the following meal for pureed: a. 1 serving of puree barbecue pork b. 1 serving puree potato salad c. 1 serving puree creamy coleslaw d. 1 serving puree cornbread/margarine e. #8 scoop cinnamon applesauce f. 6 fluid ounces coffee or hot tea g. 8 fluid ounces milk On 6/26/26 at 11:08 AM observed Staff H, Cook, prepare the pureed pork, potato salad, and coleslaw. Staff H failed to puree cornbread as directed in the menu. The Diet Type Report sheet reviewed on 6/26/24 listed five residents had a pureed diet with one additional resident who requested a pureed diet. On 6/27/24 at 1:25 PM, the Dietary Manager explained the might have missed the cornbread the day before, and acknowledged the meal should have cornbread. The Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. In addition, the facility failed to test the low temperature dish machine temperature and chemical level. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: On 6/24/24 at approximately 10:40 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: a. Bins of cornstarch and sugar contained scoops stored inside of the bin in the product. b. Observation of the chest freezer revealed two bags of hamburger in bags that had openings and exposed to air. A few loose tater tots observed in one storage compartment inside of the chest freezer. c. Loose debris observed on the bottom level inside of the bread refrigerator. d. One open and undated container of cultured sour cream observed in Refrigerator 5. When asked when the sour cream got open, the Dietary Manager responded probably over the weekend, and acknowledged they should have dated the sour cream. On 6/24/24 at 11:35 AM when questioned about testing the dishwasher, the Dietary manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to give the resident meal choices prior to the meals for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices (Resident #58). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included a diagnosis of Stage 4 chronic kidney disease. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 11:16 AM, Resident #58 described the quality of the food as not good. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 11:27 AM, Resident #58 stated the staff brought her meals without letting her pick what she wanted. She heard other people got choices. She states no one came around and told her what the meals are and they didn't give her a menu. Resident #58 stated if she didn't like the food, she just wouldn't eat it. On 6/27/24 at 8:14 AM, Resident #58 stated they just brought her breakfast. She repeated they just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a resident's hospitalization for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Progress Note dated 3/11/24 at 1:40 PM indicated someone called the nurse to Resident #28's room for a need to transfer to hospital. The facility's provider saw resident that afternoon with new orders (N.O.) to send to them to the emergency room (ER). The nurse called report called to the ER nursing staff and completed a situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) assessment, transfer assessment and sent them with Resident #28. The Nursing Note dated 3/12/24 at 4:38 PM reflected, Resident #28 returned to the facility around 4:00 PM. The March 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to follow the special recommendations as directed by the Preadmission Assessment Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #34). In addition, the facility failed to submit the PASRR level II in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #34). The Level II Special Recommendations directed the facility to designate a Power of Attorney (POA) for Resident #34. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The MDS revealed resident took antianxiety and antidepressant medications during the 7 day lookback period. The Care Plan Focus dated [DATE] indicated PASRR identified Resident #2 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their medication. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Medication Aide (CMA) administered a resident's medication under their name and did not hold the medication cup in their hand in their shirt pocket prior to administration to the resident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for professional standards (Residents #33 and #45). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Clinical Physician Orders reviewed on 6/27/24 listed the following medication orders of white pills: a. tramadol (pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) 2 tablets b. gabapentin (pain medication) 600 mg 1 tablet c. meclizine (medication for dizziness) chewable 25 mg 1 tablet d. buspirone HCl (hydrochloride) (antianxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow-up after a resident had documentation of no bowel movement from 6/17/24 through 6/23/24. In addition, the facility failed to perform adequate assessment of a non pressure wound for two of three residents reviewed for assessment and intervention (Residents #3 and #51). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS listed Resident #3 had frequently incontinence of bowel without constipation. The Clinical Physician Orders reviewed on 6/25/24 included an order dated 4/19/23 for Dulcolax (bisacodyl) rectal suppository 10 MG. Insert 1 suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation. The Physician order dated 4/19/23 revealed, Milk of Magnesia Oral Suspension (Magnesium Hydroxide) with directions to give 30 ml orally every 24 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep a resident free from injury while repositioning them in bed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #22). This resulted in Resident #22's head hitting the bed rail. The incident caused a bruise to Resident #22's forehead. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #22's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified an incomplete BIMS exam due others rarely or never understanding her. The MDS included a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset. The Care Plan Focus dated 2/15/23 indicated Resident #22 had a potential for impaired skin integrity related to fragile skin. The Interventions dated 2/15/23 directed to use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surfaces. The Incident Report #1542 dated 6/5/24 at 11:39 AM reflected as a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) changed Resident #22. They rolled her to the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for continuous administration of oxygen for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #12) for respiratory care. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], reflected she had severely impaired cognition. Resident #12 had shortness of breath at rest, while lying flat, and with exertion. The MDS included diagnoses of ventricular tachycardia (abnormal heart rate), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rate affecting breathing), heart failure, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and non Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS indicated Resident #12 used oxygen therapy during the 7-day lookback period. The Care Plan initiated 6/6/24 included the following Focuses a. Resident #12 had an altered cardiovascular status related to atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarct (MI or heart attack). - The Interventions instructed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve mandarin oranges at the appropriate temperature; they failed to serve the room trays at the appropriate temperature; and touched food on a plate with gloves and did not remove the gloves after handling the food or wash their hands. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Finding include: During an observation on 5/22/24 at 12:05 PM, Staff A, [NAME] checked the temperatures of the lunch food prior to service revealed the following: a. broccoli 168.5 degrees F (Fahrenheit) b. pork loin 166.2 degrees F c. potatoes 147.4 F degrees F d. mandarin oranges 42 degrees F During an observation on 5/22/24 at 12:10 PM, lunch meal service began. Staff A wore gloves during meal service. During an observation on 5/22/24 at 12:19 PM, Staff A moved over the resident's broccoli and potatoes using her gloved hand on the plate, and didn't remove gloves after touching the food on the plate. During an observation on 5/22/24 at 12:23 PM, Staff A put potatoes on the plate and then used her hand to push…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident's blood glucose over 450 mg/dl (milligrams/deciliter) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated cognition moderately impaired. The MDS revealed a diagnosis of Type II DM (diabetes mellitus) without complications. The MDS revealed the resident received insulin 7 out of 7 days. The Care Plan revealed the focus area for Type II DM and currently took Humalog and Tresiba dated 11/3/23. The interventions dated 11/3/23 revealed monitor, document, and report signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia such as increased thirst and appetite, frequent urination, weight loss, fatigue, dry skin, poor wound healing, muscle cramps, abdominal pain, Kussmaul breathing, acetone breath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to answer a call light in less than 15 minutes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for insufficient number of staff (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The MDS revealed the resident needed partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and toilet transferring. The MDS revealed a diagnosis of cerebral palsy. The Care Plan revealed a focus area for risk for falls related to gait and balance problems dated 9/28/23. The interventions dated 9/28/23 revealed making sure call light within reach and encourage to use it for assistance when needed and prompt response to all requests for assistance. During an observation on 5/20/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and the facility policy the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse in a timely manner and failed to report facial bruising of an unknown origin for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse reporting (Residents #1, #2, and #3). The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated moderate impaired cognition. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and heart failure. The MDS revealed the resident didn't take an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. The MDS documented the resident dependent with toileting, showering, and lower body dressing and required substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene. The MDS revealed no falls since last assessment. Review of the Self Report list dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and the facility policy the facility failed to thoroughly investigate facial bruising of unknown origin for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for inadequate nursing supervision. The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated moderate impaired cognition. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and heart failure. The MDS revealed the resident didn't take an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. The MDS documented the resident dependent with toileting, showering, and lower body dressing and required substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene. The MDS revealed no falls since last assessment. The Progress Note dated 12/2/23 at 10:28 AM revealed when started peri cares before breakfast, staff observed a purple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff and Fire Marshall interviews, the facility failed to follow Life Safety Code regulations (mandated by the Fire Marshall) when they applied a combination lock to 1 of their fire exit/egress doors on 10/3/23, without consultation with or authorization from the State Fire Marshall. The lock prevented the fire exit door from opening unless a code was entered, the lock remained on the door through 10/26/23 and was a direct violation of Life Safety Code regulations. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include Observation on 10/25/23 at 10:37 a.m. with Staff J, Dietary Manager, revealed an illuminated Exit sign mounted from the ceiling above the Employee Entrance door located on the north side of the facility, a security code key pad mounted to the wall on the right side of the door, a 4 digit code followed by the # sign entered on the key pad required to de-activate the alarm for 3 minutes when the door was opened. If someone opened the door again after it was closed in that 3 minute period, the alarm automatically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents received the correct medications, as ordered and directed by their physicians, for 1 of 9 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The medication administered to Resident #2 in error were intended for Resident #3, and resulted in a delay of analgesic medication administration for Resident #3. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 9/5/23 revealed Resident #2 had diagnoses that included arthritis, tension headaches and right upper quadrant pain (of abdomen), scored 10 out of 15 points on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment, that indicated minimal cognitive impairment without symptoms of delirium present. The MDS documented that the resident was always able to make herself understood and understood others. The MDS revealed the resident had experienced occasional pain during the 5 days that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident and staff interview, clinical record review the facility failed to completed accurate MDS's for 4 out of 4 resident reviewed Resident (# 14, 23, 31 and 37). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. Resident # 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], listed diagnoses of fusion of the spine, cervical region and muscle weakness. The Nurses Note for Resident # 23 dated 11/21/2022 at 3:26 AM, read contacted 911 for transport to emergency room (ER). The Nurses Note dated 11/21/2022 at 9:04 AM, read ER nurse stated resident to be admitted for observation. The MDS Tracking for Resident # 23 failed to show a discharge return anticipated MDS dated [DATE] and failed to show a entry MDS dated [DATE]. 2. The MDS for Resident # 14 dated 3/3/23, listed diagnoses of saddle embolus(a blood clot, air bubble, piece of fatty deposit, or other object which has been carried in the bloodstream to lodge in a vessel) of pulmonary artery (rare type of acute pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain the integrity of a resident's liquid Morphine (a narcotic pain medication) and handle the medication per accepted standards, failed to prime an insulin pen prior to insulin administration, and failed to implement a gradual dose reduction per physician orders for four of nineteen residents reviewed for standards of practice (Resident #21, Resident #27, Resident #31, Resident #64). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #64 dated 9/2/22 revealed the resident was rarely to never understood. The Physician Order dated 6/2/22 discontinued on 10/15/22 documented, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML (milligram per milliliter) Give 5 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain/ shortness of breath. a. Review of a Self Report summary dated 9/7/22 documented, in part, the following: On 09/07/2022 during 0600 (6:00 AM) the change of shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident council notes, test tray tasting and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food served by a method to maintain a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility reported a census of 64. Findings include: Continuous observation on 3/15/23 beginning at 11:21 am, Staff M, Cook, began to prepare for meal service. The temperatures for the food when placed on the steam table were as follows: Apple brats: 210 degrees Cauliflower: 169 degrees Sweet potato puffs: 169 degrees Cheese sauce: 177 degrees Cauliflower, puree texture: 148 degrees Sweet potato, puree texture: 165 degrees Apple brats, puree texture: 165 degrees Apple brats, chopped texture: 201 degrees Food was divided between two steam tables. Table 1 was in the first floor dining room. This table was used to serve residents of the first floor. Table 2 was kept in the main kitchen. Table 2 was used to make food trays for residents of the second floor. Trays were first made for the residents on [NAME] unit on the second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the resident representative when the resident had a condition change and the facility sent the resident to the hospital for 1 out of 4 (Resident 164). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], listed diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, and diabetes mellitus. The Brief Interview of Mental States score reflected a 15 (intact cognition). The MDS reflected the resident able to understand and make his needs known. The Nursing Note dated 8/16/2022, at 12:57 PM, read the Primary Care Provider (PCP) ordered Resident # 164 transferred to the emergency room (ER) related to his low Oxygen saturation, shortness of breath (SOB), left lower leg red and swollen. The note read the wife aware of the transfer. The note continued to list Resident # 164's diagnoses of COPD, CHF, Hypoxia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide documentation to show verification of licensure for a Certified Nurses Aide/Certified Medication Aid (CNA/CMA) for one of two CNA human resources records reviewed. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. A review of the human resources record for Staff C, CNA/CMA revealed a hire date of 2/13/23 and revealed the following: a. SING (single contact repository which expedites the process of checking backgrounds of potential employees) check had no documentation to show verification of CNA licensure. b. No documentation to show verification of CNA licensure through the DCW (direct care worker) registry. In an interview on 3/16/23 2:25 PM, the Business Office Manager (since July 2022) reported she also had been responsible for the completion of the hiring process and HR (human resources) record documentation. She reviewed the HR file for Staff C and verified she could not find documentation of checking for CNA licensure verification and admitted she forgot to run…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to provide documentation of completion of dependent adult abuse mandatory reporter training had been completed for one of two nurses' HR (human resources) records reviewed. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. A review of the HR record for Staff N, RN revealed a hire date of 7/14/22 and had no documentation to show she completed the dependent adult abuse mandatory reporter training within 6 months of her hire date. In an interview on 3/16/23 2:25 PM, the business office manager (since July 2022) reported she also had been responsible for the completion of the hiring process and HR (human resources) record documentation. She reviewed the HR file for Staff N, RN and could not locate certificate of completion of dependent adult abuse mandatory training. She verified Staff N had been hired 7/14/22, she should have provided a copy of certificate of completion upon hire and admitted she forgot to follow-up and check. She also reported this should have been completed January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure two allegations of staff tampering with Morphine, a narcotic pain medication, had been reported to the State Agency and/or reported to the State Agency in a timely manner per accepted regulatory timeframes upon review of the contents of one of three Facility Reported Incident (FRI) files which involved Resident #64. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a Self Report summary dated 9/7/22 documented, in part, the following: On 09/07/2022 during 0600 (6:00 AM) the change of shift narcotic count between [Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN)] and [Staff G, Certified Medication Aide (CMA)], Staff G questioned the remaining doses of Morphine Sulfate Solution in the bottle for [Resident #64]. [Staff G] states she witnessed [Staff F] going over to the kitchenette sink, turning the faucet on, letting water run into the bottle and returning to the medication cart stating there, now the count is right. [Staff G] reported to her Charge Nurse-[Staff O, Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of tampering with a resident's Morphine, a narcotic pain medication, had been thoroughly investigated upon review of documentation contained in one of three Facility Reported Incident files. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: Review of a Complaint Hotline Compliance Report with a date and time of call documented as 9/15/22 at 12:53 PM contained inside a Facility Reported Incident folder pertaining to a separate incident documented the following: Summary of Complaint: The caller states they are calling to make a report their [family member] witnessed [Staff J] licking morphine from her fingers. They state that she is extremely upset about this but doesn't know who to talk to about it. The caller feels this needs to be investigated. 4:55pm EST: Per Admin request [initials redacted] called the caller to verify identify of accused person. The caller verified that it was not [Staff J], but instead it was [Staff K] [Job Title Redacted] that was witnessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update care plans for three of four residents reviewed (Residents #29 #39, #56) The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set, dated identified Resident #29 as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 0 and with the following diagnoses: Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency and diabetes Mellitus. It also identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, toileting and bathing and totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. A review of the undated care plan did not identify the resident with the problem of risk of elopement. During an observation on 3/14/23 at 7:43 AM, the resident self-propelled in her wheelchair out through side door and the alarm sounded. She had pushed herself out through the first door and had her hand on the safety bar of the second door which led immediately outside. The surveyor had to flag down staff to assist the resident. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to transcribe the order for continuous oxygen to the Treatment Administration Record and to the care plan for one of two residents reviewed with oxygen (Resident #39) The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 as moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 10 and with the following diagnoses: Pneumonia, Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure. It also identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with repositioning and personal hygiene and totally dependent on staff for locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, toileting and bathing. It also identified the resident to occasionally incontinent of bowel. A review of the physician orders revealed the following: 1/12/23 02 2 liters per nasal cannula continuously, humidified air (resident admitted [DATE]) An observation on 3/13/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate, complete Controlled Substance Shift Count & Usage Record sheets to account for all doses of Morphine for one of three residents reviewed for narcotic records (Resident #64). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #64 dated 9/2/22 revealed the resident was rarely to never understood. The Physician Order dated 6/2/22 discontinued on 10/15/22 documented, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML (milligram per milliliter) Give 5 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain/ shortness of breath. Review of the September 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #64 documented doses of PRN (as needed) Morphine had been administered on 9/6/22 on the following dates and times: 7:30 AM and 4:40 PM. No other doses had been administered on that day. No doses of PRN Morphine had been documented on the MAR for 9/7/23. Review of two Controlled Substance Shift Count and Usage Records for Resident #64,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications were used only to treat a specific, diagnosed and documented condition for 1 of 5 (Resident #31) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the presence of short and long-term memory impairment. The MDS documented the resident exhibited no wandering behavior during the 7-day look back period. The MDS documented diagnoses that included dementia and depression. The Care Plan, reviewed 3/10/23, identified the resident had impaired thought process due to dementia. It directed staff to cue, orient and supervise the Resident as needed. The Care Plan failed to reflect the resident having anxiety. The Medication Order dated 1/25/23 docuemented a verbal order for Sertraline, an antidepressant medication, to be given one time a day for anxiety. The order was transcribed by Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The Active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to utilize proper infection control practices while providing incontinence care for one of five residents observed (Resident #39). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 as moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 10 and with the following diagnoses: Pneumonia, Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure. It also identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with repositioning and personal hygiene and totally dependent on staff for locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, toileting and bathing. It also identified the resident to be occasionally incontinent of bowel. During an observation of incontinence cares that began at 3/15/23 at 8:10 AM, Staff C, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and Staff H, CNA both entered the room, closed the door, used alcohol hand rub and donned gloves. At 8:11 AM Staff C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to post the facility census and nurse staffing information on a daily basis. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Observations on n 6/4/25 at 10:30 AM and 4:00 PM, 6/5/25 at 8:10 AM and 4:00 PM, 6/9/25 at 10:10 AM and 4:15 PM, and 6/10/25 at 8:20 and 9:11 AM revealed a lack of visible posting of the facility census and nurse staffing information in the lobby area. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 9:11 AM, the Administrator reported the daily census and nurse staffing information should be posted in the lobby above the sign in/out table. The Administrator confirmed the absence of a posted daily census and nursing staffing information. The Administrator explained the Staffing Coordinator was responsible for posting this information and that the Staffing Coordinator might have pulled the information down in order to update it. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 11:00 AM, the Staffing Coordinator stated she had not been aware, prior to today (6/10/25) that this was her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-10-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. (Resident #3, #5). Facility reported census was 62. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 8/30/24, Resident #5 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #5 required maximal to dependent assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #5's diagnosis included diabetes mellitus and obesity. Resident #5 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 6:30 a.m. Resident #5 stated housekeeping is poor, noting her room is filthy and not cleaned as it should be. Area under her recliner is visibly dirty. Staff B, Housekeeper observed leaving Resident #5's room on 10/22/24 at 9:30 a.m. Staff B. Room noted bedroom floor felt gritty, bathroom floor wet with pooled dark water. When the floor wiped with a clean tissue gritty residue and dirt removed from the floor. Debris noted along the back side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of CMS 2567 reports, and facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey previously identified during the surveys completed in the last fifteen months. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: a. The CMS 2567 form from the recertification, compliant, and incident survey dated 3/13/23 to 3/20/23 reflected the facility received a deficient practice for no actual harm level citations for MDS (Minimum Data Set) accuracy, care plan timing and revision, professional standards, and respiratory care. b. The CMS 2567 form from a complaint survey dated 5/1/23 to 5/9/23 revealed the facility received a deficient practice for actual harm for free from accident hazards; and no actual harm level citation for care plan timing and revision, in addition to, assessment and intervention. c. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-03-20 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, infection preventionist interview, and Director of Nursing (Director of Nursing) interview the facility failed to have required contingency plans for staff who are not fully vaccinated, failed to have actions in place to be taken if staff indicated they had refused to get vaccinated and had not qualified for an exmption, failed to address staff who are not fully vaccinated due to either an exemption or temporary delay in vaccination. Findings include: Review of the facility COVID-19 staff vaccination matrix and staff formula spreadsheet had shown eleven staff working who had no documentation of COVID 19 vaccination. The facility reported 94 employees. The information had been provided by the facility. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) the infection control staff who had kept the staff COVID-19 vaccination status had left facility employment late December 2022. The DON had stated that herself and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordination had the infection control certification and had provided proof of the certificate. The DON had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-03-20 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide the 2 out of 2 residents reviewed with the required Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10055 (Resident # 50 and Resident # 56.). The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings included: 1. The facility completed the CMS form 20052 read Resident # 56 entered Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) care on 11/16/22 and her last day of SNF coverage 12/18/22. The form reflected the she exhausted the 100 days. The Census Report showed R # 56 entered the facility on SNF 11/16/22 and stopped SNF on 12/17/22. 2. The CMS form 20052 completed by the facility read R # 50 entered SNF care on 7/29/22- 9/9/22. The form read R # 50 reached her highest practical level. The Census Report showed Resident # 50 started SNF on 7/29/22 and the SNF stay ended on 9/9/23. On 3/20/23 at 1:30 PM, the Social Service Staff, reported she only provided the CMS 10123 Form when a resident discharged from SNF level of care. She stated she would provide them the other form if they requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$106,751 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $59,099 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
- $31,803 — penalty dated 2025-02-18
- $15,849 — penalty dated 2023-11-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-29 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESTIGE CARE CENTER — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KAPLAN, YISROEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2022 |
| LAHASKY, EPHRAM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2022 |
| ASCHENDORF, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| JACOBS, TALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/02/2025 |
| WEI, SHIPENG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $444K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165602. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.