Prestige Care Center of Plattsmouth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 84.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Nebraska Licensure reference: NAC 75: 12-006.11(E); NAC 75: 12-007.10(A) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all foods were labeled, sealed, and dated after opening, ensure outdated foods were not available for use, and satellite refrigerators were kept clean, ensure staff performed hand hygiene and gloving to prevent cross contamination during meal prep and dining, and failed to handle resident dinnerware and utensils in a sanitary manner. The facility census was 87 residents.Findings are: Record review of the facility Food Safety Requirement policy revised 03/2026 revealed the following: -Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. -Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms. -Preparation of food, including thawing, cooking, cooling, holding, and reheating. - Employee hygienic practices.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.19(C)(i)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(D)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff handled clean clothing and linens, completed hand hygiene during 1 (Resident 2) of 4 sampled resident's wound care, failed to ensure a medication aide wore gloves when opening a medication capsule for 1 (Resident 69) of 4 sampled residents, failed to ensure 1 (Resident 34) of 1 sampled resident's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure device (CPAP)(a machine used to treat sleep apnea) mask and nebulizer (neb)(a machine used to deliver liquid medications to the lungs) kit were stored, failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes to prevent potential cross contamination (transfer of bacteria from one surface to another), and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact cares for Resident 66. The facility census was 87. Findings are:A. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0923 — widespread
  Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.007.04(D)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.19(A)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1.009.02Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the exhaust ventilation system was working in all resident's restrooms. This affected all residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy with a date reviewed/revised of 03/2026 revealed the resident rooms would have adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Observation on the following dates and times revealed the following resident restroom exhaust ventilations systems (vents) were not working and pulling air from the restrooms: - 03/30/2026 at 9:01 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] - 03/30/2026 at 1:47 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] - 03/30/2026 at 9:51 AM in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] - 03/30/2026 at 10:23 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] - Strong urine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Nebraska Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Nebraska Licensure reference: 175 NAC 1-009.04(D)(i)(1&2)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe hot water temperatures to prevent accidents in occupied resident rooms 301, 302, 303, 306, 308, 503, 506, and 512. The facility census was 87 residents.The findings are: Review of facility's Safe Water Temperature policy, implemented 4/19 and revised 5/25 indicated that the maximum water temp for sinks is 120 degrees. A. Record review of admission Record for Resident 30 revealed admission date of 2/7/23 with diagnoses that included severe vascular dementia with mood disturbance. Resident 30's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool completed by long-term care facilities to evaluate resident health status and care needs) was completed in February of 2026. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score obtained on the MDS was 0. A BIMS score of 0 indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11D Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure food was provided in a manner that was maintained at a temperature that was appealing to residents. This had the potential to affect 72 residents. Findings are:Observation on 04/01/2026 at 1:55 PM revealed the final room trays were being plated to serve to the facility residents by the Dietary Manager (DM). The lunch meal consisted of pork, mashed potatoes, brown gravy, spinach bake, and green beans. During the observation a test tray was requested to be prepared and provided with room trays for residents who ate in their rooms. On 04/01/2026 at 2:09 PM the DM accompanied the room trays including the test tray out of the kitchen. Once the final resident room tray was delivered, the test tray was delivered to the recreation room at 2:13 PM. The DM and using the facility thermometer obtained the temperature of the food with the following results:-The pork temperature did not register. The pork had good flavor but was cold.-The mashed potatoes and gravy temperature did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0917 — pattern
  Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents in semi-private rooms had their own private designated closet space. The facility census was 87. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Resident Rooms policy with a date reviewed/revised of 03/2026 revealed that each resident bedroom would have individual private closet space with cloths racks and shelves assessable to the resident. A record review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy with a date reviewed/revised of 03/2026 revealed the facility will provide sufficient individual closet space in each resident room. A record review of the facility's Daily Census dated 04/01/2026 revealed 11 rooms occupied on 200 hall, 18 occupied on 500 hall, 15 occupied in unit, 5 occupied beds in 100 hall, 18 on 200 hall, 19 on 400 hall for a total of 87 total resident. There was 26 rooms that were semi-private and 52 residents had shared closets. An observation on 03/30/2026 at 9:15 AM revealed resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning), was accurately coded related to incontinence and an indwelling catheter for 1 (Resident 8) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Findings are:Record review of Resident 8's MDS section H: Bladder and Bowel, dated 02/12/2026, revealed that the resident was always incontinent with urine and did not have an indwelling catheter. Record review of Resident 8's Care Plan identified use of a suprapubic catheter dated 1/18/2021. Observation on 04/01/2026 at 07:39 AM, Resident 8 in bed with catheter bag noted to be hanging on side of bed. An interview on 04/02/2026 at 9:58 AM the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS Coordinator) confirmed that bowel and bladder section of the MDS was coded incorrectly. They revealed that floor nurses complete nursing MDS assessments and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that providers orders were followed for wound care for Resident 5. The facility had a census of 87.Findings are:A record review of Resident 5's Clinical Resident Profile revealed Resident was admitted on [DATE].A record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated, standardized clinical assessment used in Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing homes to evaluate resident functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive status) dated 12/17/2025 revealed Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a standardized 15-point screening tool used to assess a patient's cognitive function) of 3 indicating Resident 5 is severely cognitively impaired.A record review of Resident 5's medical record revealed the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia (severe paralysis) and Hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral Infarction (stroke) affecting the left side, Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(ii)Based upon record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (resident 3) of 1 sampled resident received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain vision. The facility census was 87 residents at the time of survey. The findings are: Record review of facility's Use of Outside Resources policy, reviewed/revised 03/2026 stated that the facility would assume responsibility for the timeliness of services provided, that arrangements would include the communication structure, and that the facility would maintain documentation and reports of recommendations of the services provided. Record review of a signed but undated Facility Services Agreement between the facility and the vendor shows that under item 2.6, the facility shall continue to assume responsibility for obtaining services that meet professional standards and principals and b) the timeliness of the services. Review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed that Resident 3 was admitted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and record blood pressures for the continued use of blood pressure support medications for 1 (Resident 66) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 87.Findings are:Record review of facility policy titled Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use dated revised 01/2026 revealed: - 2. The attending physician will assume leadership in medication management by developing, monitoring, and modifying the medication regimen in collaboration with residents and/or representatives, other professionals, and the interdisciplinary team. Each resident's drug regimen will be reviewed on an ongoing basis, taking into consideration the following elements: -a. Dose (including duplicate therapy) -b. Duration of use -c. Indications and clinical need for medication -d. Adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences -e. Preventing, identifying and responding to adverse consequences. -3. Documentation will be provided in the resident's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-04 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE CARE CENTER — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE