Evercare Of Breese
1155 North First Street, Breese, IL 62230 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (618) 526-4521 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- the CMS record shows $164,735 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 32.2% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 39.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.6%CMS range 37.6–57.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.7–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 6.1–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 78.7 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.70 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and treat a suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) for 1 of 4 (R7) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 25. This failure resulted in R7 documented as having an SDTI reported as first being observed on 8/20/2024 to the right toe(s) with no skin monitoring or treatments implemented until 10/8/2024. At that time gangrene was present, requiring hospitalization with right second toe amputation on 10/19/2024. Subsequently R7 required additional amputation to her right lower extremity, above the right knee on 11/30/2024. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/20/2024 when staff documented a skin area of concern on R7's right toe(s.) No assessment or treatment was documented on her right toe(s) until 10/8/2025 when she was hospitalized , diagnosed with gangrene, osteomyelitis and had her right 2nd toe was amputated on 10/19/2024. Due to worsening infection R7 was re-hospitalized and additional amputation to her right lower extremity, above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate, recognize, isolate, track/trend and treat a scabies outbreak per current standards of practice for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R6, R7, and R10) in a sample of 13 reviewed for infection control. Applying the reasonable person concept, a reasonable person would have extreme discomfort due to itching and psychosocial distress issues due to anxiety, embarrassment, shame, or even isolation. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:1. R1's Face Sheet, print date of 09/30/25, documented R1 has diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and transient cerebral ischemic attack. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 and she requires assistance with her activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly transfer and use appropriate assistive devices for transfers for 1 of 3 (R2) resident investigated for falls. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining a left knee periprosthetic fracture of the tibial component. Findings include: R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) undated documents that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's EMR dated 2/9/22 documents a diagnosis of other abnormalities of gait and mobility. R2's EMR dated 11/5/24 documents a diagnosis of difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. R2's EMR dated 8/14/24 documents a diagnosis of unspecified fracture of left fibula, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/26/24 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS documents that the resident was independent for roll left and right. The MDS documents that the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for sit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, implement new care plan fall prevention/interventions, and assure current interventions were in place for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in R2 having an unwitnessed fall and sustaining a fractured hip that required surgery to repair. Findings include: 1. R2's admission Record, with admission date of 09/07/24, documented R2 has diagnosis of but not limited to Dementia, osteoporosis, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right knee. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 is severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 04 out of 15 and requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe, dressing of upper half of body, bed mobility, substantial/maximal assistance with dressing of the lower half of body, putting on/taking off footwear, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain management for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for pain management in the sample of six. This failure resulted in R2 having to endure increased untreated pain for a prolonged period of time Findings Include: R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented that R2 is cognitively intact. R2's Pain Care Plan, dated 8/8/23, documented, (R2) has complaint of pain at times related to Osteoarthritis. The nursing (staff) monitors his pain each shift and prn (as needed). He (R2) is offered pain medications as per medical doctor orders. On 1/30/24 at 11:30 AM, R2 stated, I hurt a lot. I have to take pain medicine R2's Physicians Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/29/23, documented that R2 was admitted to hospice with a diagnosis of Colon Cancer. R2's POS, dated 1/18/24, documented, Morphine Sulfate 20 mg (milligrams)/ML (Milliliters) by mouth in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday prior to Dialysis. R2's POS, dated 1/2/24, documented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the privacy policy for 1 (R5) of 3 residents reviewed for privacy in the sample of 3.Findings include: R5's Undated Face Sheet documents he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents he is alert. On 9-17-2025 10:35 AM V10, Former LPN stated she received a text message on her personal cell phone on 9/6/2025 which included V1 Administrator, V3 ADON and V24 RNC and it had R5's first and last name and documented detailed health information regarding R5 which she felt was not appropriate to communicate via cell phone text message because it is not secure or encrypted and it's a HIPPA/privacy violation. V10 stated the text message was initiated by V3. V10 stated she responded to the text message immediately, Please delete my name and do not message me again. Probably shouldn't put HIPAA information with an employee you banned from your facility. An undated text message sent at 12:21 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prescribe physician ordered medications upon admission for 2 (R1 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 3. Findings include: 1. R1's Undated Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and panic disorder. R1 was covered by Med A benefits. R1's Hospital Discharge Paperwork, dated 8/7/2025, documents continue these medications which included Austedo XR 24 milligrams (mg) take 48 mg by mouth daily for treatment of depression and Vraylar 3 mg 1 capsule by mouth daily for treatment of depression. R1's Physician's Summary Report, dated 8/7/2025 documented do not send on Austedo XR 24 milligrams (mg) 2 tablets by mouth a day for treatment of depression and Vraylar 3 mg give 1 capsule by mouth once a day for treatment of depression. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/2025, documents no Austedo 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms are maintained at comfortable temperature for 2 out of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for homelike and comfortable environment in a sample of 4. Findings Include: 1. R2's Face Sheet, print date of 07/07/25, documented he has diagnoses of but not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented he is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and he is dependent on staff or requires substantial/maximal assistance with his activities of daily living (ADLs). On 07/02/25 at 1:40 PM, R2 was lying in bed with just a sheet on the lower half of his body. He did not have on any clothing on the upper half of his body. He had a small osculating fan sitting on his over the bed table blowing directly on him. The room was warm and stuffy. R2's room did not have any air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to insure the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the possibility to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility Assessment Tool undated documents under staff RN minimum of 12 hours per day. Facility's January 2025 Nursing Schedule documents that the facility did not have an RN (Registered Nurse) working on 01/01/25, 01/02/25, 01/04/25, 01/05/25, 01/15/25, 01/16/25, 01/17/25, 01/18/25, 01/19/25, and 01/24/25. On 01/29/25 at 12:50 PM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing) stated that in January, the facility did not have an RN working every day. She stated that the facility did hire a new RN that started January 22nd. On 01/31/25 at 9:58 AM, V1, Administrator supplied a paper that stated (Facility Name) staffs Nurses and CNAs to State and Federal requirements and resident needs. Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 01/28/25 documents a census of 77 residents residing in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedure for 1 of 3 residents (R18) who was on contact isolation precautions for Clostridium difficile (C-diff). Findings include: R18's Face Sheet, with a print date of 07/17/24, documented R18 has a diagnosis of but not limited to enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, and requires assistance with his activities of daily living (ADL). R18's Progress Notes, dated 7/2/2024 at 5:41 PM, documented R18 was admitted to the local hospital with pneumonia and C-diff. On 07/17/24 at 11:02 AM, V21, Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) was in R18's room on the north end of the 100-hall doing therapy with him using exercise bands. V21 was observed not wearing a gown or gloves. She also was observed to have an over the bed table with her computer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinence care for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R4, R6, R7) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 19. Findings include: 1. R6's Care Plan, dated 4/18/22, documents (R6) has an ADL (activity of daily living) deficit related to weakness, removal of R (right) hip, no weight bearing and confusion due to dx (diagnosis) of Dementia. (R6) is unable to communicate her needs to staff. It continues Toileting: (R6) is incontinent of B&B (bowel and bladder). Ensure (R6) is clean and dry by checking on her every 2-3 hours and prn (as needed) when she is hollering out or restless. (R6) is resistive when receiving peri care from staff. It also documents (R6) is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Staff check (R6) at least every 2 hours. Provide peri care when needed and change. With last revision date 11/29/21. It continues Clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. INCONTINENT: Check every 2-3 hours and prn for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within residents' reach and easily accessible for 2 of 5 residents (R13, R28) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 19. Findings include: 1. R13's Face Sheet, with a print date of 11/17/22, documents R13 has diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Fractures of Pelvis with Stable Disruption of Pelvic Ring, Initial Encounter for Closed Fracture. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R13 is moderately cognitively impaired, and requires extensive assistance, 2 plus person physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She also requires 2 plus person physical assist with transfer. R13's Care Plan, with an admission date of 08/05/22, documents The resident has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. It further documents TOILET USE: The resident is able to: extensive assistance of two staff members. TRANSFER: The resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed prior to and during a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) dressing change as well as while providing incontinent care to prevent the spread of infection for 3 of 12 residents (R18, R6, R34) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. Findings include: 1. R18's Physician's Orders dated 11/10/2022 documents, Change PICC dressing weekly on Mondays and PRN (as needed) if it becomes loose, soiled or moist. On 11/15/2022 at 11:06 AM, V12, Registered Nurse (RN) picked up a bag of medication from the medication storage area and entered R18's room to administer R18's Intravenous (IV) medication. R18 was observed with a PICC line located in R18's left arm. The transparent dressing was soiled with blood underneath. V12 stated she is going to change R18's dressing. Without the benefit of hand hygiene, V12 applied nonsterile gloves and proceeding to pick up a plastic bag from the bottom of the trash can. V12 then began removing R18's PICC line dressing. V12 touched the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$164,735 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $29,100 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $24,252 — penalty dated 2025-10-16
- $12,674 — penalty dated 2025-05-20
- $87,877 — penalty dated 2025-01-31
- $10,832 — penalty dated 2024-10-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-11 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| RKS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| RKS MANAGER LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| HELLMAN, YOSEF | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| ROSENBLATT, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/11/2025 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2025 |
| WEINBERGER, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2025 |
| FLICK, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2025 |
| HULTS, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2025 |
| KINNARD, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.