Evercare Of Lebanon
1201 North Alton, Lebanon, IL 62254 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (618) 537-4401 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0609) — most recent Apr 2026
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $295,717 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-16)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 94.3% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.27 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.56 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 76.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sexual abuse allegations were reported for 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse. This failure occurred when R2, who had known sexually inappropriate behaviors, went into R3's room and was observed with his hands in R3's briefs and staff did not report the incident. A reasonable person would likely suffer serious psychosocial harm, such as emotional distress or trauma and fear for safety as a result of sexual abuse. Findings include: Immediate Jeopardy began on 03/24/26 in the A.M., when R2, with known sexually inappropriate behavior, was seen in R3's room with his hand in R2's brief and staff did not report the incident.V1 (Administrator), V12 (Regional Nurse Consultant) and V21 (Regional Director of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 04/10/26 at 12:57 PM. Abatement plan number one was not accepted. Abatement plan number two was accepted. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the Immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure residents did not exit through an exit door and were being supervised to prevent any potential elopements for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 pushing the exit alarm and exiting the facility around 7:45 PM with no staff intervention on 9/25/2025 from a secured memory unit and leaving the facility when it was pitch dark and he was later found at 10:00 PM (two hours and 15 minutes later) and returned to the facility. This past compliance occurred from 9/25/2025 to 9/26/2025. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/25/2025 when R2 eloped from the facility and there was no staff available to redirect R2. R2 was found at 10:00 PM (two hours and 15 minutes later) and returned to the facility. The area R2 was found is straight from the facility to the residential area but there was no straight access unless one went through steep hills, terrain with lots of sticks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents did not exit through an exit door and were being supervised to prevent any potential elopements for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for elopement in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in R2 pushing the exit alarm and exiting the facility around 3AM on 6/19/2025 from a secured memory unit into pitch darkness and was found wandering around by a civilian driving in his car two subdivisions over (one block east and one block north) from the facility. This past non-compliance occurred on 6/19/2025.Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 6/19/2025 when R2 eloped from the facility at around 3AM in the morning in the pitch darkness and R2 was found on the side of the road by a civilian. The civilian was driving their car and contacted the police department because R2 was confused and wandering around in the street. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/3/25 at 2:30PM. The surveyor confirmed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate pressure relief to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing and prevent declines in existing pressure ulcers in 1 of 1 resident (R8), reviewed for Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcers in the sample of 37. These failures led to R8 developing a new pressure ulcer and a decline in current pressure ulcers.Findings Include: R8's Face Sheet, undated, documents R8 has the following diagnoses, in part: Cerebrovascular Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury, Vascular Dementia, Epilepsy, Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Hyperlipidemia, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to the Sacrum (Coccyx), and Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer to the Left Hip.R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R8 has severe cognitive impairment, is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living has three stage 2 pressure ulcers that were not present upon admission, and three stage 3 pressure ulcers, one was present upon admission.R8's Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (R3 and R5) were protected from resident-to-resident abuse. This failure resulted in R3, who was nonverbal under end-of-life care, being the victim of sexual abuse by another resident (R2) with known inappropriate sexual behaviors. A reasonable person would likely suffer serious psychosocial harm, such as emotional distress or trauma and fear for safety as a result of sexual abuse. Findings Include:1. R3's Face Sheet, admission date of 03/13/16, documents R3 has diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of upper-outer quadrant of unspecified female breast, major depressive disorder, recurrent, in partial remission, and hypertension (HTN). R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired, and she was dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living (ADLs) R3's Care Plan documents R3 has a terminal prognosis related to (r/t) cerebral atherosclerosis and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 7 of 8 residents (R23, R37, R41, R42, R44, R45, R49) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in harm based upon the reasonable person concept, as R23, R41, R42, R44, R45, and R49 would have experienced psychosocial harm including fear, anger, and humiliation as a result of physical abuse, since a reasonable person would not want to be physically abused in their home. Findings includes: 1. During the survey from 2/20 through 2/27/24, R44 was residing on the memory care unit. R44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R44 is severely cognitively impaired. R44's Resident to Resident Investigation entitled Investigation of possible Neglect/Abuse form, dated 3/4/23, documents R44 was convinced that R42 is his wife. The Investigation documented that both reside on the dementia unit. The Investigation documented R44 became agitated at R42 grabbed her wrist and then slapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 7. This failure resulted in harm as a reasonable person would not engage in sexual encounters without the decisional capacity to do so. Findings include: 1.) R2's Physician Order Sheet, (POS), dated October 2023 document, a diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbances, hypertension, Alzheimer late onset, major depression, and severe with psychotic symptoms. R2 was also taking Quetiapine fumarate 25 mg once daily in the afternoon and two 50 mg tablets by mouth of Quetiapine at bedtime. Quetiapine is an Antipsychotic medication. R2's baseline Care Plan dated, 8/28/2023 document, R2 is alert to self, for bed mobility she is dependent, with locomotion walks with walker, toileting she is an assist of one and uses pull up briefs. For ambulation, she is independent, she has poor safety awareness, wanders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure misappropriation of medication did not occur for 2 of 3 residents (R6 and R7) reviewed for missing medication in the sample of 8. This past non-compliance occurred from 10/8/2025 to 10/29/2025. Findings include: On 11/19/2025 at 2:52 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, on 10/18/2025 during the day shift the DON was notified by staff nurse that she tried to reorder (R6 and R7's) medication and the pharmacy had told them they had already sent them a supply of 2 cards (sixty doses). (R6 and R7) were both missing medications. There was only one card on file and there should have been two for each of them. Staff were interviewed and all stated they were doing narcotics counts but the sheet showing there were 60 pills vs thirty was not present either, so everyone's count was off, and we did not know until we got ready to reorder the medication. We were not able to locate the medication, and we did replace but the medication was missing. On 11/19/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility was unable to account for narcotic medication (alprazolam) for 2 of 3 residents (R6 and R7) reviewed for missing narcotic medication in the sample of 8. This past non-compliance occurred from 10/8/2025 to 10/29/2025. Findings include: 1.) On 11/20/2025 at 1:44 AM, R6 was on the locked dementia unit on the female side. R6 was confused and not able to answer questions regarding if she had ever missed any medications. R6's Physician Order Sheet for November 2025 document a diagnosis of: POTS (Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome), schizoaffective disorder, HTN (hypertension), hypothyroidism, Afib (atrial fibrillation), anxiety, anemia insomnia, HLD (Hyperlipidemia), GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease), polyarthritis, dementia, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, vitamin D deficiency, depression, and allergic rhinitis. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents severe cognitive impairment for decision making of activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-10-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an adequate number of staff available to care for the residents when reviewed for staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the building. Findings Include:The facility's Final Report to the state surveying agency, dated 10/3/25, documents R2 eloped from the facility on 9/25/25 at 7:45 PM from the male locked memory care unit, on which he resided. On 10/7/25 at 5:05 AM, there were two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant), one on the male locked memory care unit, one on the female locked memory care unit, and one nurse that was working both the male and female locked memory care units. V28 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), was observed in the beauty shop with the lights off, leaned back in a chair, sleeping. V28 was working on the 100 hallway with two CNAs.On 10/7/2025 at 5:20 PM, V19 (LPN) stated, I was working the night (R2) got out of the facility. I was on the women's unit and earlier that day the exit door on the woman's side (200 hall) was sticking which would cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the required Registered Nurse (RN) coverage services for eight consecutive hours a day for seven days a week. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents living in the facility.Findings include: On 7/8/2019 at 10:33 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, No, we do not have a RN working every day for 8 consecutive hours except for (V2) who is the Director of Nursing (DON). We have a Census of 78 residents. The DON is the only RN we have working in the building. We are in the process of recruiting. The only RN we had working was the DON. On 7/8/2025 at 10:39 AM, V2 stated, I am the only RN working in the building. I know I only count as half, but we do not have any other RN that worked on the days you requested. The Facility's Nursing Schedule dated 6/25/2025 -7/28/2025 documents there was no RN working in the facility except for the RN House Supervisor/DON. During this survey from 6/30/2025 to 7/3/2025 no RN was observed working in the Facility. V2 was not present in the building during the survey. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide Register Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility reviewed for RN coverage in a sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Nursing Master Schedule documented the following dates did not have an RN working: 11/10/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/30/24, 12/1/24, 12/7/24, 12/8/24, 12/14/24 and 12/15/24. On 12/17/24 at 11:38 AM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated during the weekends the facility will frequently not have an RN on duty. On 12/17/24 at 10:54 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is aware the facility is short on RN coverage over the weekends. V1 stated there are job postings for RNs on three different websites and one RN is having health concerns so has she not been able to pick up shifts lately. The facility's Nurse Staffing Policy, undated, documented it is the policy of the facility to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to operationalize the facility's Legionella Policy and Procedure and perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infections (R5). This has the potential to affect all 54 residents. Findings include: 1. On 12/17/24 at 9:20 AM, V17 (Maintenance Director) stated that he runs the water and flushes toilets monthly in the empty rooms. V17 stated he also checks the temperatures of the hot water in each room and flushes the boilers monthly. A log was provided with documented these checks occurring monthly. V17 stated that the city performs the water sampling. On 12/17/24 at 3:15 PM the Legionella Policy and Procedure was reviewed with V17. The policy documented to run water through taps and showers no longer in use or used infrequently for a minimum of one minute weekly. In addition, to check hot and cold-water temperatures after water has been running for one minute randomly weekly. V17 stated that he only runs the taps and showers in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to feed residents in a dignified manner for 4 out of 4 residents (R11, R14, R17, R34) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1.R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented he has severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R34's MDS further documented he is dependent on staff for eating assistance. R34's Care Plan last revised on 09/4/2024 documented R34 is dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with interventions for staff to feed him his meals. On 12/16/2024 at 12:25 PM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) fed R34 while standing over him. 2. On 12/16/24, at 12:14 PM, R11, R14, and R17 were seated at a table together in the dining room. When questioned regarding needed level of assistance, V14 (CNA) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement progressive care plan interventions and ensure interventions were followed to prevent falls for 4 of 6 residents (R5, R10, R30, and R31) reviewed for falls in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R10's Face Sheet, admission date of 04/12/24 documented R10 has diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension (HTN). R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R10 is moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of eight out of 15 and he requires supervision or touching assistance with transfers and walking. R10's Care Plan, with admission date of 04/14/24, documented R10 has risk factors that require monitoring and intervention to reduce potential for self-injury. High risk for fall per risk assessment. Had a fall in previous six months when residing at home with son. Date initiated: 04/22/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date medications containers that had been opened, and to ensure proper medication storage was maintained during medication administration for 4 of 4 residents (R6, R32, R49, R105) reviewed for medication labeling and storage in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. On 12/16/24 at 9:48 AM, R49 was seen walking around her room. There was a cup of medications with eight pills in it sitting on the nightstand table. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) had already passed medications on R49's hall. R49's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 12/1/24 through 12/31/24, documents the following eight medications were given at 8:00 AM: Allopurinol 100 MG (milligram) Once Daily, Amlodipine 10 MG Once Daily, B Complex/C Folic Acid 1 MG Once Daily, Metoprolol 100 MG Once Daily, Sevelamer Carbonate 800 MG (2 tabs) TID (three times daily), Hydralazine 100 MG TID, and Vitamin D 4000units Once Daily. 2. On 12/16/24 at 10:07 AM, R32 was seen sitting on the side of her bed with Ellipta and Flonase Inhalers seen sitting on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care per standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (R5, R11, R26) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R11's Face Sheet, original admission date of 06/25/2020, documented she has diagnoses of but not limited to of Brain aneurysm, hypertension (HTN), Seizures, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Osteoarthritis, and Acute metabolic encephalopathy. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R11 is severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 07 out of 15 and is dependent on staff for her activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's Care Plan, admission date of 04/07/2024, documented R11 may be predisposed to develop skin impairment caused by pressure. Related to (R/T) Right hemiplegia, neuropathy, decreased mobility, incontinent bowel, and bladder (B&B). High risk per Braden. Goal: R11 will have intact skin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated as well as provide humidified water per their policy for 3 of 3 residents (R5, R12, R31) reviewed for oxygen administration, in the sample 39. Findings include: 1. On 12/16/2024 at 10:46 AM, R12 was wearing an oxygen cannula connected to a humidifier bottle attached to an oxygen concentrator. There was no date observed on the bottle or the tubing. On 12/17/2024 at 1:05 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles are changed on night shift by the nurse and it should be dated. R12's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 12/1/2024-12/31/2024 documents R12 has a Physician's Order for oxygen at 2-5 Liters/minute as needed for shortness of breath. R12's Physician's Orders do not include an order to change the oxygen tubing. On 12/17/2024 at 1:50 PM, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the oxygen tubing should be dated to ensure it is changed weekly. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to document the discharge in the medical record and communicate necessary information for receiving facility for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents, R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, chronic liver disease, anxiety, and chronic depression. R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documented, R2 was severely cognitively impaired with inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS documented, R2 had delusions, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and was independent with mobility. R2's Care Plan starting [DATE] documents, R2 has behavioral disturbances including stripping clothes in public areas, verbal aggression, and throwing items at staff. R2's Nurse's Note dated, [DATE] at 8:00 PM documents, R2 was sent to the emergency room after exhibiting physically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow discharge requirements for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents, R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, chronic liver disease, anxiety, and chronic depression. R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documented, R2 was severely cognitively impaired with inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS documented, R2 had delusions, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and was independent with mobility. R2's Care Plan starting [DATE] documents, R2 has behavioral disturbances which include stripping clothes in public areas, verbal aggression, and throwing things at staff. R2's Nurse's Note dated [DATE] at 8:00 PM documents, R2 was sent to the emergency room after exhibiting physical aggression and sexually inappropriate behaviors. R2's Medical Record does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to allow a resident to return to the Facility following hospitalization in 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for transfer/discharge in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents, R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, chronic liver disease, anxiety, and chronic depression. R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documented, R2 was severely cognitively impaired with inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS documented, R2 had delusions, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and was independent with mobility. R2's Baseline Care Plan dated [DATE] documents, plan to initiate behavior monitoring and psychiatric medication use. R2's Care Plan starting [DATE] documents, R2 has behavioral disturbances which include stripping clothes in public areas, verbal aggression, and throwing things at staff. R2's related diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for a least 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility working schedule for February 2024 shows V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was the only RN scheduled on 2/1/2024, 2/2/2024, 2/5/2024, 2/6/2024, 2/7/2024, 2/8/2024, 2/9/2024, 2/12/2024, 2/13/2024, 2/14/2024, 2/15/2024, 2/16/2024, 2/19/2024, 2/20/2024, 2/21/2024, and 2/22/2024. On 2/21/2024 V2 (DON) was observed working in the facility as a floor nurse. On 2/22/2024 at 3:10PM V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated During the week we have the Director of Nursing as our RN coverage. On the weekends we have an RN that comes in. On 2/23/2024 at 8:40AM V2 stated I work the floor whenever there is a call off. We also use agency to fill in. On 2/23/2024 at 9:00AM V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated There is an RN that usually works the weekends…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine sanitizes dishes, and failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a manner that prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 64 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 2/20/24 at 8:00 AM, there was a flexible hose attached to the back of the ice machine that was covered in a black, patchy substance. The hose was resting directly on floor where any drainage would run directly onto the kitchen floor. 2. On 2/20/24 at 8:03 AM, V4 (Cook) stated she tested the dish machine before breakfast but could not remember where she placed the test strips. On 2/20/24 at 8:05 AM, V4 located the dish machine test strips and placed one strip into the machine mid-cycle. The chemical sanitizing dish machine utilized quaternary sanitizer. V4 stated I'm trying to get it (to change colors). V4 tested three different strips which all resulted in a yellow color. V4 stated the test strip should result in a green color to indicate correct level of sanitizer. V3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure progressive fall interventions were in place for 2 of 11 residents (R26, R35) reviewed for falls in the sample of 38. Findings include: 1.R35's Face Sheet documents R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and traumatic brain injury. R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R35 was severely cognitively impaired, ambulated with wheelchair, and was dependent with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfer. R35's Care Plan starting 3/14/23 documents, Resident has risk factors that require monitoring and intervention to reduce potential for self-injury r/t (related to) fall. R35's Fall Risk Assessments dated 9/11/23 and 1/12/24 both documented R35 was at high risk for falls. The Facility's Fall Log dated 2/22/24 documents R35 had falls on 3/15/23, 3/19/23, 4/3/23, 4/20/23, 8/30/23, 9/1/23, 9/11/23, and 1/12/24. R35's Care Plan intervention for her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ordered specialized rehabilitative services for 4 of 4 residents (R29, R52, R111, R161) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services in the sample of 38. Findings include: 1. On 2/20/24 at 10:34 AM, R111 stated she was unhappy because she came to this facility from the hospital for physical therapy and has yet to have any therapy or even meet with a therapist. R111's Face Sheet documents R111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R111's Social Service admission Assessment documents R111 had a fall at home and was being admitted for therapy rehab. R111's Physician Order dated 2/19/24 documents, PT/OT/ST (Physical Therapy/Occupational Therapy/Speech Therapy) eval (evaluation) when available. R111's Baseline Care Plan dated 2/14/24 documented R111 was alert to time, self, and place, and made her own decisions. It documents R111 used wheelchair and walker for ambulation and was dependent with one person assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician prescribed therapeutic diet orders for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for therapeutic diets in the sample of 38. Findings include: R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, and end stage renal disease. The Face Sheet documents R5 goes to dialysis three days per week. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R5 was severely cognitively impaired. R5's Care Plan reviewed 11/9/22 documents, Potential risk for altered nutritional status and/or weight loss related diagnosis renal failure, goes to dialysis 3x/week. The Care Plan intervention documents Provide diet as ordered. See POS (Physician Order Summary) for current diet order. R5's Physician Orders for 2/1/24 through 2/29/24 documents diet as, cottage cheese at breakfast and lunch, no OJ (orange juice)/bananas/baked potato/tomato products, mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 12/13/2023 at 1:10 PM, Staffing schedules were requested from the facility for the past 14 days. On 12/14/2023 at 1:25 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she was not aware of any issues with RN coverage and the facility had a RN working every day in the facility. On 12/14/2023 at 2:13 PM, the staffing scheduled provided by the facility document RN coverage every day, for 8 consecutive hours for the past 14 days. V10 (RN) was documented as working on Saturday 12/2/2023 and Sunday 12/3/2023. On 12/14/2023 at 3:39 PM, no timecards or documentation was provided documenting V10 was providing services on 12/3/2023. On 12/14/2023 at 4:04 PM, V1 stated, I do not have a timecard for (V10) for 12/3/2023. I thought she worked but I was mistaken. The Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 12/13/2023 at 3:05 PM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted. A large clear container containing a soggy salad with dressing on it with a date of 12/9/2023 was in the walk-in refrigerator. On 12/13/2023 at 3:07 PM, in the walk-in refrigerator there was a large clear 8-quart container labeled nuggets and it was dated 12/5/2023. On 12/13/2023 at 3:09 PM, in the walk-in refrigerator there was a clear 8-quart container of some type of noodle with a red sauce on top of it and what looked like some ground meat. There was no date and/or label on it to identify it. On 12/13/2023 at 3:11 PM, in the freezer upon opening the door, one had to push very hard, when the door opened there was large amount of white colored ice approximately 1 foot in length and 2 feet in width. All the boxes on the shelf were covered with white crystals,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with incontinence briefs, pads, and diapers that promote residents' dignity for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R13, R14) reviewed for resident needed supplies, in the sample of 15. The findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet, dated 7/24/23, documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's Medical Record, documents R2's Diagnosis include chronic kidney disease (CKD), Hypertension (HTN), Hypothyroidism, Obesity, Osteoporosis, and Pulmonary Embolism. R2's Care Plan, dated 7/24/23, documents R2 has alteration in bladder elimination related to incontinence, wears adult briefs. It continues R2 has risk factors that require monitoring and intervention to reduce potential for self-injury related to falls. Risk factors include use of assistive device, need for assistance with ADL (activities of daily living) completion. Interventions: Review quarterly and PRN (as needed) resident's ADL, mobility, cognitive, behavior and overall medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-11 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to complete quarterly Resident Assessments/Minimum Data Sets (MDS) in a timely fashion for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R8, R10) reviewed for quarterly MDS in the sample of 14. Findings include: 1. On 12/11/2023 at 11:59 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, I got a little behind in coding when I took over as administrator. MDSs (Minimum Data Sets) should be done within 14 days of the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) date. (R1's) was late. R1's MDS documents R1's Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for the quarterly assessment was 9/17/2023. It further documents it was not submitted until 11/15/2023. On 12/7/2023 at 2:45 PM V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/MDS) verified the above information, and stated the ARD date is the due date. V12 stated MDSs are submitted quarterly. 2. R2's quarterly MDS documents R2's ARD was 9/8/2023. It further documents R2's quarterly MDS was not submitted until 11/17/2023. 3. R8's quarterly MDS documents R8's ARD was 8/12/2023. R8's quarterly MDS documents it as submitted 11/15/2023. 4. R10's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to revise care plans as needed for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R8, R10) reviewed for Care Plans in the sample of 14. Findings include: 1.On 12/11/2023 at 11:59 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, I got a little behind in coding when I took over as administrator. MDSs (Minimum Data Sets) should be done within 14 days of the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) date. (R1's) was late. (R1's) Care Plan was last revised 5/1/2023. R1's MDS documents R1's Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for the quarterly assessment was 9/17/2023. 2. R8's Care plan was last revised on 4/3/2023. R8's MDS documents R8's ARD was 8/12/2023. 3. R10's Care Plan was last revised on 7/9/2023. On 12/11/2023 at 12:10 PM, V1 stated R1's, R8's, and R10's Care Plan had not been updated/revised in a timely fashion. The Facility's Policy dated 7/20/2022 documents, It if the policy of (Facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident Assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 50 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 10/31/2023 at 1:20 PM, Staffing schedules were requested from the facility for the past 14 days. On 10/31/2023 at 1:25 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she was not aware of any issues with Registered Nurse/RN coverage and the facility had a RN working every day in the facility. On 10/31/2023 at 2:13 PM, the staffing scheduled provided by the facility document RN coverage every day, for 8 consecutive hours for the past 14 days. V6 (Registered Nurse) was documented as working on Saturday 10/21/2023 and Sunday 10/22/2023. On 10/31/2023 at 2:29 PM, there were no timecards or documentation provided that V6 was providing services on the weekend of 10/21/2023 and 10/22/2023. On 10/31/2023 at 4:02 PM, V1 stated (V6) had called off those two days (10/21/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe condition regarding lint buildup and failed to follow the Facility Policy. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/24 at 9:15 AM, V16 (Laundry/ Housekeeping) stated that she has never cleaned the lint traps and doesn't know when they were last cleaned. The two lint traps each measuring 36 inches x 23 inches located at the bottom of each dryer showed an accumulation of a moderate amount of lint. A horizontal red sign on the door handles states Urgent: Lint compartment must be cleaned daily. On 12/17/24 at 9:20 AM, V17 (Maintenance Director) stated that he cleans the lint traps monthly and provided a checklist that showed the monthly cleaning log that documented when the lint traps were cleaned V17 stated that he thinks that it would be better if this was done at the end of each shift. V17 checked with V18 (Regional Maintenance Director) who stated that the lint traps should be changed after every dryer cycle. On 12/17/24 at 1:15 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$295,717 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $118,202 — penalty dated 2026-04-16
- $14,508 — penalty dated 2025-10-14
- $90,415 — penalty dated 2024-02-27
- $72,592 — penalty dated 2023-11-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-22 for 34 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-29 for 24 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| RKS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| RKS MANAGER LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| HELLMAN, YOSEF | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| ROSENBLATT, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEINBERGER, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| CNH FINANCE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| ECAPITAL HEALTHCARE CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| HULTS, ASHLEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PEERY, ALEXIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ZAMAN, ASAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $646K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145897. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.