Evercare At Edwardsville
401 St Mary Drive, Edwardsville, IL 62025 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (618) 692-1330 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $423,998 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 90.7% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 55.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 1.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.97 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 36.4–58.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 9.0–18.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.0–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficiencies at this level require two deficient practice statements.A. Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure residents were free of neglect for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for neglect in the sample of 16. This failure occurred when (R2) was transferred from another nursing home to the facility on [DATE], with no dialysis services set up and/or scheduled prior to her acceptance to the facility. No alternate dialysis treatment was put into place while the facility was waiting for the new provider to perform treatment. R2, who was receiving dialysis 5 days per week prior to her facility admission, subsequently did not receive dialysis services for 12 days, experienced shortness of breath, sweating, weakness, jaundice eyes, and critical lab levels (potassium levels (6.2 mEq/L - milliequivalents/Liter) (normal 3.4-5.0) ; BUN (blood urea nitrogen (74) (normal 7-25 <=23.0) , and elevated serum creatinine levels 9.17 (normal 0.55-1.02 mg/dl - milligrams/deciliters) requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure coordination of care for a resident to receive medically necessary hemodialysis for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for dialysis services in the sample of 16. This failure occurred when (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not receive dialysis services for 12 days. R2 was sent to the hospital per family request where she was found with critical lab values, shortness of breath and had a 5 day hospital stay.Findings include:The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) was presented and called on 10/29/2025 at 1:12 PM, with V1, Administrator, V22, [NAME] President of Clinical Operations and V23 Regional Director of Operations. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/8/2025 at 1:20 PM when R2 arrived at the facility. (R2) was transferred from another nursing home to the facility on [DATE], with no dialysis services set up and/or scheduled prior to her acceptance to the facility. No alternate dialysis treatment was put into place while the facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor, assess, and notify the physician of an acute change in condition to ensure timely medical treatment for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when R3 began having ongoing respiratory distress with no medical monitoring resulting in death from pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 9:51 AM, when staff identified that R3 was having respiratory distress, failed to provide ongoing assessment/monitoring to address respiratory distressed caused by pneumonia. At 7:10 PM, R3 was found unresponsive, and the facility called 911. R3 expired at the hospital. V1, Administrator, and V2, Director of Nursing, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:05 PM. Confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the required equipment (gait belt) during transfer and appropriately use the full mechanical lift to prevent falls in 2 of 3 residents (R3, R29) reviewed for accidents and hazards in the sample of 38. These failures resulted in R3 sustaining a left femur fracture and R29 sustaining a hematoma to her head and requiring emergency care. Findings include: 1. R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent with transfers from chair to bed or bed to chair. R3's Care Plan initiated 8/30/25 documents R3 requires extensive assistance for transfers related to weakness and impaired mobility. R3's Progress Note by V34, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated 1/12/25 at 10:01 PM documents at approximately 6:55 PM, an unnamed Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform timely incontinent care for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R3 feeling embarrassed, ashamed, demeaned, disrespected, unwanted, and less than a man. Findings include:R3's Care Plan, dated 02/11/2025, documents Problem: I require assist for my ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) r/t (related to) weakness and decreased mobility. Approach: I require extensive assist of 2 staff with toileting tasks for bm (bowel movement) and 1 for urinal use.R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R3 is cognitively intact, occasionally incontinent of urine and bowel, and requires Partial/moderate assistance with toileting. R3's Progress Note, dated 07/20/2025 at 09:18 PM, documents Resident called 911 while CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) was in there attending to his roommate. Resident was aware that cna will assist him next. 911 stated that resident called them 5 times within a short span…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to assist residents with incontinent needs to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 3 (R3) reviewed for staffing in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in a delay in incontinent care for R3 causing him to feel embarrassment, ashamed, demeaned, disrespected, and unwanted. Findings include:R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R3 is cognitively intact, occasionally incontinent of urine and bowel, and requires Partial/moderate assistance with toileting. The Police Report, dated 7/2025, documents on 7-20-25 at 7:38 PM V9, Police officer, responded to facility in reference to patient R3 calling the police to get the nursing staff to help him. Upon arrival met with V10, Charge Nurse. V10 stated that R3 is a problem patient and falsely calls for help and uses up resources even though he doesn't need help. V9 explained to V10 why he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure pain medications were readily available for administration in order to prevent increasing pain/discomfort for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for opioid medications, in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 11/26/2024 at 9:20 AM, a staff member who wishes to remain anonymous, stated, Sometimes (R1) runs out of pain meds (medication). I am not sure if it's the pharmacy or the doctors fault. It tells you on the card when to re-order so we should all be observant of that. I don't know where the disconnect it. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) can't write those scripts (Controlled substance prescriptions). (R1) was out the other day (pain medication not available). It was 11/22 (2024) and she was out a day or two. She claims her pain is 5-10 on the pain scale. On 11/26/2024 at 10:03 AM, R1 stated she takes Oxycodone because her hip deteriorated. R1 stated, Every month, it's no surprise- I need another script (prescription). They make phone calls. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the availability of scheduled opioid medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services, in the sample of 6. This failure caused R1 to miss several doses of pain medication, resulting in discomfort and experiencing symptoms of withdraw. Findings include: On 11/26/2024 at 9:20 AM, an anonymous staff member stated, Sometimes (R1) runs out of pain meds (medication). I am not sure if it's the pharmacy or the doctors fault. It tells you on the card when to re-order so we should all be observant of that. I don't know where the disconnect it. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) can't write those scripts (Controlled substance prescriptions). (R1) was out the other day (pain medication not available). It was 11/22 (2024) and she was out a day or two. She claims her pain is 5-10 on the pain scale. On 11/26/2024 at 10:03 AM, R1 stated she takes Oxycodone because her hip deteriorated . R1 stated, Every month, it's no surprise- I need another script…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R53's Face sheet documented an admission date of 6/6/2023. Diagnoses included Dysphasia, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Lymphedema, Type 2 Diabetes. R53's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documented that R53 is significantly cognitively impaired. R53 is dependent on staff for rolling left to right, sitting to lying and sitting up on bedside. R53's Care Plan, dated 3/13/2024, documented, I have experienced an actual fall on 8/19/23, 1/2/24, 1/25/24, 3/12/24. Interventions include geri care to be ordered by hospice, dycem added to wheelchair, interdisciplinary to review fall and provide interventions as indicated, increased supervision, laid down after meals. R53's fall risk assessments, dated 3/12/2024, documented, (R53) is at high risk for falls. R53's fall risk assessments, dated 1/2/2024, documented that R53 was at high risk for falls. R53's progress notes, dated 3/12/2024 at 1:50PM, Called to room by Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA. (R53) laying on the floor beside bed on her right side. The over bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide consistent pain relief and timely management of pain pump for 1 of 2 residents (R138) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in R138's pain not being managed properly. Findings Include: R138's Face sheet documented that he was admitted on [DATE]. R138's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R138 was moderately cognitively impaired. R138's Pain Care Plan, dated 3/9/24, documented, Problem: I have potential for pain/discomfort R/T (Related to) Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and weakness. Approach: Record/report to Nurse any s/sx (signs and symptoms) of non-verbal pain: Changes in breathing (noisy, deep/shallow, labored, fast/slow); Vocalizations (grunting, moans, yelling out, silence); Mood/behavior (changes, more irritable, restless, aggressive, squirmy, constant motion); Eyes (wide open/narrow slits/shut, glazed, tearing, no focus); Face (sad, crying, worried, scared, clenched…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Primary Care Physician of ongoing respiratory distress for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for notification in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R3 having a delay in treatment and subsequent death. Findings include: R3's Face Sheet, undated, documented R3's was admitted on [DATE] with primary diagnosis as acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. R3's Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 9:51 AM, [Recorded as Late Entry on [DATE] 09:51 AM], documents Charge Nurse came to Nursing station, informed this writer was having difficulty administering meds to resident and asked this writer to assist. Entered room, resident noted in bed with HOB (head of bed) elevated to facilitate breathing, O2 (oxygen) continuous @ (at) 2L (liters) via nasal cannula. Resident not easily aroused by verbal stimuli, sternal rub administered, resident aroused, with meds given without difficulty. Resident stated she was hot, ac (air conditioner) turned on for comfort.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for neglect in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R3 having ongoing respiratory distress from 8:00 AM until 7:10 PM without physician consultation and medical treatment. R3 expired from pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. Findings include: The facility's Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol policy, dated [DATE], documents Neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The Policy documents The facility management and staff will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse and neglect. The Policy documents The medical director will advise facility management and staff about ways to ensure that basic medical, functional, and psychosocial needs are being met…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 91 residents living in the Facility.Findings include:On 3/17/26 at 6:55 AM, in the standing freezer there were two boxes of uncooked beef patties stored directly on top of a box of cookie dough.On 3/17/26 at 7:00 AM, in the deep freeze there were multiple bags of food in plastic gallon storage bags. There were three bags labeled bone in chicken that had red frozen liquid inside. These bags were stored directly on top of bags labeled pound cake and brown sugar pineapple. V5, Cook, stated this freezer is primarily used for leftovers and asked if the chicken should be moved. She verified the chicken was uncooked and the beef in the other freezer was also uncooked.On 3/18/26 at 10:18 AM, V1, Administrator, stated she expects the Facility to follow its food storage policies.The Facility's Food and Supply Storage Policy dated 8/1/25 documents food and supply storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication administration protocols were followed in 4 of 4 residents (R11, R21, R32, and R74) when reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 38.Findings include: 1. R74's Undated Face Sheet documents he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis: wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra and low back pain. R74's Quarterly Minimal Data Set, dated 12/23/2025 documents R74 was cognitively intact, high-risk drugs: opioid, pain management: resident received scheduled and PRN (when needed) pain medication regimen, pain last 5 days: yes, pain frequency: occasionally, pain interference with day-to-day activities: occasionally, pain intensity: 3 out of 10. R74's Care Plan, dated 3/30/2025 documents resident has chronic pain r/t (related to) T-12 compression fracture, chronic back pain, depression, long history of pain medication use, GERD, and head injury as a child. Approaches documented include: report to nurse my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide palatable meals for 4 of 4 residents (R4, R24, R34, R50) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 38.Findings include:1.R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 was cognitively intact.R4's Diet Order dated 2/25/25 documents R4 is on a regular diet.On 3/17/2026 9:50 AM, R4 stated, The food is nasty, just ultimately nasty. We have complained and complained and complained and nothing changes. I think people in prison get better food than (we do) in here. The steam table doesn't work and the food is usually cold.2.R24's Face Sheet documents R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R24's MDS dated [DATE] documented R24 was moderately cognitively impaired.R24's Diet Order dated 9/30/25 documents R24 is on a regular diet with no added salt.On 3/17/26 at 7:28 AM, R24 stated the food is terrible, has no taste, and is cold much of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 2 (R4, R10) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in R4 being tearful and scared of staff. Findings include:R4's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R4's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is alert and cognitively intact with diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, malnutrition, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anemia.R4's Care Plan did not address abuse.R10's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R10's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents R10 is alert and cognitively intact with diagnoses included: anxiety, malnutrition, respiratory failure, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, anemia and renal insufficiency. Received scheduled and PRN pain medication regimen. Pain was present occasionally. Pain interference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the facility's abuse policy regarding abuse for 2 (R4, R10) of 6 residents investigated for abuse in the sample of 38.Findings include: R4's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R4's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is alert and diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, malnutrition, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anemia.R4's Nurse Progress Notes, dated 2/2026 no documentation of allegations of abuse or mistreatment staff to resident.R4's Care Plan did not address abuse.R10's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R10's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents R10 is alert and diagnoses included: anxiety, malnutrition, respiratory failure, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, anemia and renal insufficiency. Received scheduled and PRN pain medication regimen. Pain was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 2 (R4, R10) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38.Findings include:R4's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R4's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is alert and cognitively intact with diagnoses: anxiety, depression, malnutrition, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anemia.R4's Nurse Progress Notes, dated 2/2026 no documentation of allegations of abuse or mistreatment staff to resident.R4's Care Plan did not address abuse.R10's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R10's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents R10 is alert and cognitively intact and diagnoses: anxiety, malnutrition, respiratory failure, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, anemia and renal insufficiency. Received scheduled and PRN pain medication regimen. Pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to investigate abuse for 2 (R4, R10) of 6 residents investigated for abuse in the sample of 38.Findings include:R4's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R4's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is alert and diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, malnutrition, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anemia.R4's Care Plan did not address abuse.R10's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted on [DATE].R10's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents R10 is alert and diagnoses included: anxiety, malnutrition, respiratory failure, debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, anemia and renal insufficiency. Received scheduled and PRN pain medication regimen. Pain was present occasionally. Pain interference with day-to-day activities occasionally. Pain intensity 3 out of 10.R10's POS, dated 2/2026 a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their abuse policy by reporting and investigating allegations of misappropriation for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8. Findings include:R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and Alzheimer's disease.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with transfer. R3's Physician Order dated 5/28/25 documents 5 mg (milligrams) oxycodone, given every four hours.On 12/11/25 at 2:59 PM, V1, Administrator, stated V6, R3's Family, reported R3 did not receive any of her medications on 11/21/25. V6 reported she watched the video footage from the video camera in R3's room, and R3's nurse never entered R3's room to give medications. On 12/11/25 at 3:20 PM, V1 stated the Facility did notify her of V6's allegation of missing medications on 11/21/25, and the nurse in question was V20, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8. Findings include:R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and Alzheimer's disease.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with transfer.R3's Physician Order dated 5/28/25 documents 5 mg (milligrams) oxycodone, give 1 tab every four hours.On 12/11/25 at 3:20 PM, V1 stated the Facility notified her that V6 alleged R3 had medications missing on 11/21/25.On 12/12/25 at 9:02 AM, V6 stated R3's nurse, whose identity was unknown, never entered R3's room during her shift and told V6 the oncoming nurse would give R3 her medications. The oncoming nurse, whose identity was unknown, told V6 the medications were missing and had been documented as given. One of the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), whose name was unknown,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8. Findings include:R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and Alzheimer's disease.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with transfer.R3's Physician Order dated 5/28/25 documents 5 mg (milligrams) oxycodone, give every four hours.On 12/11/25 at 2:59 PM, V1, Administrator, stated V6, R3's Family, reported R3 did not receive her medications on 11/21/25. On 12/11/25 at 3:20 PM, V1 stated the Facility did notify her of V6's allegation of missing medications on 11/21/25, and her nurse was V20, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). V1 came in and watched the Facility's video footage that night and checked R2's Medication Administration Records (MARs) which documented the medications had been given. V1 felt the issue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to allow resident to remain at the Facility and failed follow proper procedures for discharge for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 8.Findings include:R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of colon and chronic pain.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with transfer.R2's Care Plan dated 9/2/25 documents, My goal is to remain in the facility for long-term care.R2's Progress Note by V21, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), on 10/23/25 at 10:42 PM documents R2 returned to the Facility after being sent out for aggressive behaviors.R2's Progress Note by V25, Registered Nurse (RN), on 10/24/25 at 11:50 AM documents R2 was transferred to (Facility) with medications. On 12/10/25 at 8:53 AM, V9, Ombudsman, stated she received an email stating R2 got into an altercation with another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to communicate required resident information to the receiving provider for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 8. Findings include:R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of colon and chronic pain.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with transfer.R2's Progress Note by V25, Registered Nurse (RN), on 10/24/25 at 11:50 AM documents R2 was transferred to (Facility) with medications. V25 was unable to give report to the receiving (Facility), and there was no documentation that paperwork was sent with R2.On 12/12/25 at 3:35 PM, V25 stated she discharged R2, If you want to call it that (discharge). She was not aware that R2 was being discharged until V19, Restorative Aid, came to tell her as they were getting ready to leave the Facility. V25 stated she did not even have R2's paperwork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to notify the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for notification in the sample of 16. This failure resulted in R2's Physician not being notified when R2 did not receive dialysis for 12 days resulting in R2 being hospitalized . Findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) for October 2025 documents a diagnosis of Hypoglycemia, unspecified; Hyperlipidemia, unspecified; End stage renal disease; Dependence on renal dialysis; Disorder of kidney and ureter, unspecified; Essential (primary) hypertension; Acquired absence of right leg below knee, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications. R2's POS does not have an order for dialysis. R2's POS does document, Monitor dialysis catheter, twice a day 6:00 MA-6:00 PM-6:00 PM - 6:00 AM.R2's Facesheet document R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's Care Plan with a start date of 10/8/2025 Problem: I am at risk for alterations in nutrition due to d/x (diagnosis of) hypertension, Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide enough licensed nursing staff to adequately meet the needs for 4 of 4 (R3, R10, R12, and R13) residents reviewed for staffing in the sample of 13. These failures have the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Findings include:1.R3's face sheet, print date of 9/15/25, documented R3 has diagnoses including pneumonia, anemia, hyperlipidemia, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, unspecified convulsions, and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/25, documented R3 is cognitively intact.On 9/16/25 at 8:18 AM R3 stated her evening shift medications are often administered late and the nurses must wake her up so she can take them. Surveyor asked R3 if she has experienced increase pain due to her scheduled Tylenol not being administered as ordered every 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer medications at the scheduled times for 4 of 4 (R3, R10, R12, and R13) residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 13. These failures have the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Findings include:1.R3's face sheet, print date of 9/15/25, documented R3 has diagnoses including pneumonia, anemia, hyperlipidemia, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, unspecified convulsions, and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/25, documented R3 is cognitively intact.R3's care plan, undated, documented R3 has chronic pain with interventions including administer analgesia as per orders. R3's 9/1/25 - 9/16/25 MAR (medication administration record) documented R3 has an order for acetaminophen 325 mg (milligrams), 2 tabs, every 4 hours.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse in 1 of 5 residents (R2), reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2 being hit in the face by R1, which resulted in redness and R2 feeling fearful of R1.Findings Include:On 8/6/25 at 3:35 PM, R1 was observed, when surveyor knocked on his door, R1 cracked the door, the surveyor asked if she could come into his room, he stated no, when asked if she could talk with him, he stated no and shut the door. R1 appeared paranoid.On 8/6/25 at 3:37 PM, R2 was observed in his room, in a wheelchair, calm, and pleasant. R2 stated he had an incident with R1 a while ago, he had opened R1's room door for him, to be nice, and R1 was cussing at him and hit him upside the head in the face and scratched his arms. R2 stated his head bled where R1 had hit him. Stated he feels fairly safe in the facility but doesn't feel safe around R1. R2 stated he is around R1 sometimes and staff are around so he can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 3 of 3 residents (R71, R77, R78, R80) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 44. This failure resulted in R80 being pushed by R40 causing R80 to be sent out to the hospital. Finding include: 1.) R80's Face Sheet, undated, documents R80 has the following diagnoses: Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, Vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, and Generalized anxiety disorder. R78's Face Sheet, undated, documents R78 has the following diagnosis: anxiety disorder. R80's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/11/25, documents R80 is severely cognitively impaired. R78's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R78's cognition is intact. R80's Care Plan, date initiated 2/7/25, documents R80 has a potential for physical harm towards others related to personal space, dementia and poor impulse control. R78's Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screen Resident Review (PASRR) recommendations were completed for a resident with a qualifying diagnosis and disruptive behaviors, ensure the resident assessments were accurate, as well as ensure the interventions for behaviors were successful for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for behavioral health services, in the sample of 6. Findings include: R4's Face sheet dated 12/2/2024 documents R4 has a diagnosis of Mild intellectual disabilities, Schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. R4's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 12/21/2024 documents, Determination: Short term approval without specialized services. Date of approval ends June 18th 2024. It further documents the nursing Facility should complete a Resident Review when the residents short term approval is ending soon. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 does not have any potential indicators of psychosis including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 3 (R1, R4) residents, reviewed for Resident Assessments, in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. On 11/26/2024 at 9:20 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R1 rates her pain between a 5-10 on the pain scale. On 11/26/2024 at 10:03 AM, R1 stated she takes Oxycodone because her hip deteriorated. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact. It further documents R1 had not received scheduled or PRN (as needed) pain medications nor received non-medication interventions for pain. It further documents a Pain Assessment Interview should be conducted. R1's Physician's Orders dated 7/30/2024 documents, Oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams)- take one tablet by mouth twice daily. R1's Care Plan dated 11/13/2024 documents R1 has potential for pain/discomfort and Approach: Observe the effectiveness of pain interventions q…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer ordered medications to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 9. Findings include: R2's Face sheet documents an admission date of 1/11/2024 with diagnoses of Metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's, Interstitial Cystitis (chronic) with Hematuria, Dysphagia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired. R2 is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) and requires substantial assist for mobility and transfers. R2's Care Plan dated 10/2/2024 documents Problem: I have potential for pain/discomfort related to diagnosis of pain, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, GERD, Interstitial cystitis (chronic) with hematuria and constipation. Interventions include: Record/report to Nurse any signs/symptoms of non-verbal pain: Changes in breathing, vocalizations, mood/behavior changes, eyes, face, body. Observe the effectiveness of pain interventions every shift. Review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and thorough incontinent care for 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R5) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. On 10/1/24 at 9:45 AM R1 stated it sometimes takes 2 hours to get changed when she is incontinent. She stated she has not been changed today and is wet. She stated the last time she was changed was last night sometime, but does not know what time. She stated she only gets changed one time on night shift on most nights, but she has to wait a long time to get changed on all shifts. R1 stated the only time her Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had been in her room was to deliver her breakfast tray. On 10/1/24 at 10:25 AM V9, CNA came in to provide incontinent care for R1. He stated he had not changed R1 yet today because she was not dirty earlier. When V9 went into the bathroom to put washcloths into the sink under running water, R1 stated, He didn't check to see if I was wet at all today. V9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: After reviewing Licensed Nurse schedules, dated February 2024 and March 2024, RN timecards for the time period of 2/1/24 to 3/12/24, and daily staffing sheets dated 2/1/24 to 3/13/24, it was determined there was not an RN working 8 consecutive hours a day on 2/2/24, 2/9/24, 2/17/24, 3/2/24, 3/3/24 or 3/8/24. On 3/13/24 at 11:05 AM V2, Director of Nursing stated that she thought if an RN worked 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM that would count as RN coverage for that date when she started her shift at 10:00 PM. On 3/13/24 at 12:43 PM V1, Administrator, stated that they do not have a specific policy for RN coverage and they just try to follow the regulations. The document, Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 3/13/24 documents the total number of residents in the facility on that date was 85.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food is stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 85 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 3/12/2024 at 8:08 AM, the ice machine in the kitchen had no air gap present. The gray drainage hose in the back of the ice machine from the ice machine went directly into the drain with no air gap present. The hose was directly in the drain. This allows for potential backflow into the ice machine from the sewage drain. On 3/12/2024 at 8:15 AM, V5, Dietary Manager stated, I am not sure why there is no air gap present. We recently got an ice machine for just the kitchen. We use the ice for everything we need for preparing and storing food. I know it is important for preventing contamination and there should be a separation and air gap to prevent any backflow. On 3/12/2024 at 4:02 PM, V1, Administrator stated, We had some issues with the ice machine, and we now have a designated ice machine just for kitchen use. I will make sure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based in interview and record review the facility failed to adequately develop an ongoing infection control program that adequately collects data to calculate and analyze infection rates and failed to operationalize infection control policies to adequately define infection control practice in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 85 residents living in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's February 2024 Infection Log documented that R64 had a diagnosis of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and was given Cefdinir 300mg (milligrams) QD (daily) from 2/18/24 through 2/23/24. The February Infection Control Log did not document the organism and surveillance was not completed. The facility's January 2024 Infection Control Log documented that R142 was diagnosed with an UTI and was started on Cipro 500mg BID, but the culture and sensitivity was not completed and the organism was not documented on the Infection Control Log. The facility's December 2023 Infection Control Log documented R143 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection UTI, and he was placed on Cipro 500mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide/ensure the arbitration agreements were complete before the residents or resident representatives signed them for 5 of 5 residents (R28, R53, R70, R73 and R78) reviewed for arbitration in the sample of 38. Findings include: 1. R28's Arbitration and Limitation of Liability Agreement Between Resident and Facility dated 1/11/24, signed by V30, R28's guardian, did not include Section III with instructions of how to contact the facility if she wished to rescind the arbitration agreement in 30 days after she signed the agreement. 2. R53's Arbitration and Limitation of Liability Agreement Between Resident and Facility dated 6/6/23, signed by V31, R53's Healthcare Power of Attorney (HCPOA), did not include Section III with instructions of how to contact the facility if he wished to rescind the arbitration agreement in 30 days after he signed the agreement. 3.R70's Arbitration and Limitation of Liability Agreement Between Resident and Facility dated 9/4/23, signed by V32, R70's HCPOA, did not include Section III with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed perform antibiotic stewardship for 4 of 4 (R143, R142, R64, R28) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 38. Findings Include: 1. The facility's December Infection Control Log, documented that R143 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection UTI, and he was placed on Cipro 500mg twice daily (BID) from 12/8/23 through 12/22/23. The Organism was not documented on the December Infection Control Log so surveillance could be completed. R143's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated from 12/1/23 through 12/31/23, documented, Cipro 500mg Twice daily from 12/9/23 through 12/11/23 at 8:00AM and 8:00PM. R143's Medication Administration Record for the month of December, documented that Cipro was given from 12/8/23 through 12/11/23. 2. The facility's January Infection Control Log, documented that R28 was diagnosed with a UTI, and her Urine Culture and Sensitivity documented that there was no growth per the hospital lab. R28 was given Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate 875 mg-125mg BID from 1/15/24 through 1/22/24. R28's POS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and have a treatment in place to a new pressure ulcer for 1 of 5 residents (R40) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 38. Findings include: On 3/13/24 at 4:26 PM observed R40's coccyx with V2, Director of Nursing (DON) and V22, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who assisted R40 to turn onto her right side. R40 had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer with no dressing in place to her coccyx. It was about the size of a quarter and had a pink base. V2 stated she was not aware R40 had a pressure ulcer and would be taking measurements and putting a treatment on R40's wound. V2 stated she would consider R40's wound to be a Stage 2 pressure ulcer. She stated whoever the nurse is who first observed the pressure ulcer should have measured the area and notified the Medical Doctor (MD) and family. V2 stated she would be putting a treatment on the pressure ulcer now. R40's Face Sheet, undated, documented that she was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is prescribed antipsychotic medications has specific, targeted behaviors warranting a need for that medication for 1 on 5 residents (R70) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample 38. Findings include: On 3/12/24 at 12:00 PM, R70 was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room waiting for her lunch meal. She was alert and oriented to self, pleasant, and cooperating with V10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who was getting her set up for lunch. V10 stated she had never observed R70 have any types of behaviors or resistance to care. On 3/12/24 at 12:15 PM V12, Registered Nurse (RN) stated (R70) is cooperative with care and does not have any behaviors. She continued to state that R70 has been on Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) since she was admitted . She stated R70 just had a party for her 100th birthday. R70's Face Sheet, printed on 3/14/24 documented her diagnoses to include Unspecified dementia, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the residents representative/POA (Power of Attorney) with a change in condition in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for Physician/Family notification in the sample of 4. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: Dysphagia, Hypomagnesemia, Vascular Dementia, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Low Back Pain, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Depression. V3 was listed as R2's POA. R2's Progress Note, dated 12/7/23 at 11:10 AM, documents resident is to wear a mask related to COVID exposure when out of his room. He has to be reminded related to his Dementia. There is no documentation in R2's Progress Notes indicating V3, R2's POA, was notified that he was exposed to COVID. On 1/4/24 at 8:10 AM, V1, Administrator, stated V3, R2's POA, was notified of R2's exposure to COVID by V12, Social Service Director, and she documented it on their COVID log. Stated V10, R2's Daughter, came in when R2 was on isolation for COVID exposure and was upset because she wasn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage 8-hours daily, 7 days per week in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 8/29/2023 at 3:00 PM, the Nursing Working staffing schedule from 6/1/23 through 8/29/23 was reviewed with V2, Director of Nurses (DON). There was no consecutive 8-hour RN coverage in 24 hours in the Month June 2023 for the following dates: 6/22, 6/24, 6/25, and 6/26/23. There was no consecutive 8-hour RN coverage in 24 hours in the Month July 2023 for the following dates: 7/10, 7/14, 7/27, and 7/28/23. There was no consecutive 8-hour RN coverage in 24 hours in the Month August 2023 for the following dates: 8/1, 8/4, 8/5, 8/9, 8/10, 8/14, 8/15, 8/16, 8/17, 8/22, 8/23, 8/24, 8/25, and 8/29/23. On 8/29/2023 at 8:30 AM V1, Administrator, stated that the Census is 82. On 8/29/2023 at 2:45 PM V1 stated that they are actively recruiting staff. V1 stated that they have had interviews. V1 stated that they have hired 1 RN for Monday thru Thursday. V1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$423,998 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $14,435 — penalty dated 2026-03-20
- $207,735 — penalty dated 2025-10-30
- $24,000 — penalty dated 2024-12-02
- $35,363 — penalty dated 2024-03-15
- $142,465 — penalty dated 2023-09-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROSENBLATT, YEHUDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
| WEINBERGER, SHMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| EU SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
| AMPADU, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| HULTS, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| RIXIE, TERESA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| RUDD, SHERRI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| RKS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
| RKS MANAGER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| HELLMAN, YOSEF | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $925K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145555. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.