No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bria Of River Oaks

14500 South Manistee, Burnham, IL 60633 · For profit - Corporation · 309 certified beds · (708) 862-1260 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$219,662 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $219,662 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-14)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3340 E 134th St · (773) 646-3889 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
CVS Photo0.6 mi
470 Torrence Ave · (708) 832-2943 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14512 S Torrence Ave · (708) 360-3277 · Call to confirm hours
Park
14102 S Muskegon Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
238 Torrence Ave · (866) 727-5050

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms99.0%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.0%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.7%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.0%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%63.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.1%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.362.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.932.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
8.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 8.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.3%CMS range 18.6–50.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge8.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge8.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge0.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.2–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
35.6%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 309 beds and averages 264.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-13)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 23 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its abuse policy by not reporting an observed incident of abuse to the Abuse Coordinator immediately, and failed to prevent a resident (R5) from being sexually assaulted by another resident (R6), for one out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of eight. This failure resulted in V11 (CNA) observing R5 facedown in the bed crying with R5's naked buttocks exposed, and R6 directly behind R5 in a bed, while R6's pants were around R6's knees. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/12/23 when the sexual assault was witnessed. V1 (Administrator) was notified on 12/21/23 at 11:45 AM of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by observations, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/22/23, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R5 is a [AGE] year old with the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical assault/abuse for a resident R9 by the V10 (Activity Aide/CNA). V10 grabbed R9 by the arms, took R9 down to the floor, landed on his back, and held R9 down. This failure resulted in R9 subsequently complaining of pain, He was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with acute bilateral lower back pain and elbow and thumb pain; R9 said he was scared this would happen again. This affects one of three residents (R9) reviewed for physical assault/abuse. Findings include: R9 face sheet shows R9 has muscle wasting and atrophy, anxiety, and right ankle contracture. MDS dated [DATE] section show other behaviors symptoms not directed towards others. On 4/4/25 at 10:11am R9 was observed to be alert to person, place, time and situation. R9 said V10 hit him and slammed him to the floor. R9 said this happened by the fire extinguisher near the Nurses station, R9 escorted surveyor to the area. R9 identified V10 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment for a resident with a new onset of left leg pain. This affected one out of three residents (R1) reviewed for nursing assessments in a total sample of seven. This failure resulted in R1 being delayed treatment and not sent to the hospital for a fractured left hip for four days. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: epilepsy, Todd's paralysis, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. The Hospital Records dated 2/22/25 document R1 was admitted to the hospital for left hip fracture post fall. R1 reported falling while trying to get in the wheelchair two days ago. R1 is unable to move the left lower extremity and reported achy and tenderness. R1 is guarded and rated the pain a ten out of ten. R1 reported taking pain medication with minimal relief. R1 was admitted for further evaluation. Upon exam, R1 had extremity pain, limited range of motion, and joint swelling to the left hip. The admitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and identify the underlying cause of a resident's (R1) new onset of pain in the left leg, and failed to inform the primary care provider of continued pain after being adminstered tramadol 50mg. This affected one out of three (R1) residents reviewed for pain management in a total sample of seven. This failure resulted in R1 having increased pain levels for four days before R1 was sent to the hospital for treatment of a left hip fracture. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: epilepsy, Todd's paralysis, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. The Hospital Records dated 2/22/25 document R1 was admitted to the hospital for left hip fracture post fall. R1 reported falling while trying to get in the wheelchair two days ago. R1 is unable to move the left lower extremity and reported achy and tenderness. R1 is guarded and rated the pain a ten out of ten. R1 reported taking pain medication with minimal relief. R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures for abuse prevention and behavior management by not calling for assistance or physically intervening during a resident-to-resident verbal and physical altercation; the facility also failed to identify an incident of abuse. This failure applied to two (R2, R3) of two residents reviewed for abuse and resulted in R2 sustaining a compression fracture of the spine, developing anxiety, and feeling unsafe in the facility after an altercation with another resident. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Muscle Wasting, and Atrophy who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/25/2024 at 12:11 PM, R2 stated that last Thursday (11/21/2024) morning at around 6 AM, the nurse came to his room and, cut on the light and advised she wouldn't leave it on for too long. R2 stated he responded that it was ok because he didn't get sleep anyway. R2 stated the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff was aware of a high risk falls resident required supervision and monitoring and failed to prevent a resident from falling from the wheelchair while on 1:1 monitoring by staff. This affected two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for supervision. This failure resulted in R1 suffering a left arm fracture after falling while walking in the hallway unsupervised or without monitoring, and R2 from falling from the wheelchair and sustaining a laceration to the right ear. Findings Include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year-old with the following diagnosis: dementia, schizophrenia, unsteadiness on feet, and displaced fracture of the left humerus. A Nursing note dated 9/22/24 at 8:30 PM documents that the nurse was notified by staff that R1 was observed getting off the floor in the annex (hallway on the first floor). As the nurse was waiting for the elevator to go downstairs, R1 came off the elevator and ambulated to R1's room. The nurse immediately followed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) identify emergency care was needed for two residents who exhibited a change in physical and mental status. These failures applied to two (R1, R2) of four residents reviewed for nursing care and resulted in R1 experiencing a delay in care of two hours before emergency services were called, after being assessed with high blood pressure and mental status change; R1 was admitted to the hospital with a critical change in neurological condition; this failure also resulted in R2 going into cardiac arrest approximately two hours after the nurse assessed R2 with low blood sugar. Findings include: R1 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of cerebral infarction, type II diabetes and Dementia. According to the Minimum Data Set, R1 demonstrated mild cognitive impairment, but was able to make needs known to staff. Per nurses notes effective 7/18/24 at 5:14pm, R1 was found in his room vomiting. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer; failed to timely identify, assess, and treat skin breakdown; failed to provide a plan of care to prevent skin breakdown; failed to provide preventative low air loss mattress; and failed to educate staff on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. This deficiency applies to 1 resident R77 out of 28 reviewed for pressures in the sample of 28. This failure resulted in R77 sustaining 1 facility-acquired stage 3 sacrum pressure ulcer. Findings include: R77 is [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 3/23/23, with diagnoses including but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/26/24, showed R77 with no pressure ulcers and at risk for pressure ulcer development, with only a pressure reducing device for chair, but no other pressure ulcer preventative treatments were provided. Care plan, dated 3/24/23, reads, (R77)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. This applies to 3 of 15 residents (R6, R3 and R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in R5 hitting R6 in the face. R6 was sent out to the local hospital and sustained a displaced right maxillary sinus fracture and displaced fracture of the right zygomatic arch. The findings include: 1. The facility's Abuse Final Report, dated 2/9/24, documents on 2/3/24, R6's interview statement: he was in the hallway when R5 approached him saying things that were not making sense .the next thing, he got hit in the face by R5. R5's interview statement he thought R6 hit him in the foot and got mad and hit R6. Interviews of witness: two staff members verbalized they were present with residents, as they observed them having a verbal disagreement .R5 abruptly swung at R6 R6 was sent out to the local hospital for further medical evaluation. CT scan conducted there was a mildly displaced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prescribed treatment order was performed for a resident with a diabatic foot wound. This failure resulted in R1's diabetic foot wound showing signs and symptoms of an infection and requiring hospitalization. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 19. The findings include: R2's face sheet shows R2 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including type 1 diabetes, weakness, schizophrenia, anxiety, hypertension, and alcohol abuse. R2's Wound Progress note, dated 8/28/23, documents a diabetic right plantar full thickness foot wound measuring 1.9cm (centimeters) x 1.5cm x 0.5cm with moderate serous drainage. The treatment includes to apply Iodsorb gel, alginate calcium and gauze dressing daily. R2's Wound Progress Note, dated 9/4/23 and 9/12/23, documents R2's visit has been rescheduled as patient is stable per facility staff. R2's Skin/Wound Evaluation, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of wound, failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions, and failed to maintain the appropriate amount of linens for incontinence management. These failures affected one (R93), of four residents in the sample of 66, and resulted in R93 re-developing a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to left ischium. Findings include: R93 is a [AGE] year-old, female, admitted in the facility on 02/05/2018, with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Agitation and Pressure Ulcer of Other site, Stage 4 (04/29/19). Per facility's list of residents with pressure ulcers - facility acquired, R93 is on the list. R93 has a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on the left ischium. R93's POS, dated 12/14/19, documented: Daily skin assessment everyday shift for standard care. R93's current POS (Physician Order Sheet) documented: 07/24/23 - Cleanse left ischium with normal saline, skin prep the periwound apply Alginate AG (silver)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly monitor two cognitively impaired residents (R190, R224) to prevent harm or injury; failed to identify, evaluate, and follow their facility's policy for an injury investigation by not initiating an investigation or assessment of R190's hematoma to her left elbow; and failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident (R224) with gait/and balance impairment. These failures applies to two of five residents (R190, R224) reviewed for falls and/or injury and resulted in R190 sustaining a hematoma to the left elbow, and R224 sustaining bruises to both knees. Findings include: 1. R190's medical record indicates she has a past medical history not limited to: dementia, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, schizophrenia, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, overactive bladder, extrapyramidal and movement disorder. R190's Minimum Data Set Section C-Cognitive Patterns that showed resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affected one resident (R180) who was physically abused by (R215). As a result of this failure, R180 was taken to the hospital where he was treated for a right temporal sulcal subarachnoid hemorrhage and right temporal hemorrhagic contusion, and was admitted to neuro ICU for further evaluation. Findings include: R180 is a [AGE] year-old male, who has resided at the facility since 2020, with past medical history of weakness, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, Schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes, and anemia. R215's Minimum Data Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], section G (functional) assessed R215 as requiring supervision for all Activities of daily Living (ADL), including walking in room and corridor. R215's Behavior assessment, dated 5/25/2023, documented behavioral symptoms of physical aggression towards self and others, wondering that affects others. R180's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices in Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) availability. The facility also failed to ensure proper hand hygiene/handwashing is performed after glove usage. This deficiency affects the 1st floor and 2nd floor reviewed for Infection control.Findings include:On 5/23/26 at 10:03AM, observed 1st floor and 2nd floor isolation bins without appropriate PPE in place.On 5/23/26 at 10:17AM, V8 (Certified Nurse Aide) observed wearing gloves in the hallway, removed gloves and no hand hygiene performed. On 5/23/26 at 10:17AM, V8 said that she is not supposed to wear gloves in the hallway and perform hand hygiene, before and after glove usage. V8 said she did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal.On 5/23/26 at 10:35AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that staff is not to wear gloves in the hallway for infection control purposes. V2 said staff should perform hand hygiene before and after glove usage. V2 said that PPE should be stocked in isolation bins and accessible to staff.5/23/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels of 71-81 degrees for residents at the facility. This failure affected 8 residents R1 through R8, who were reviewed for a safe, comfortable environment. Findings Include: On June 23, 2025, between 11:20 a.m. and 11:45 a.m., with V3 (Maintenance Director), several randomly selected rooms were observed to ensure comfortable temperatures. Temperatures in the selected rooms on the second floor where R1, R2, R7, and R8 reside are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]-82 degrees; 208-87 degrees; 209-83 degrees; 223-81 degrees; 228-82 degrees. R1 was in bed in the room and stated It's too hot here R1 added that it's been hot for a while. R2 was in the room and stated he was hot, and that the air conditioner had been leaking water, and staff put a blanket underneath it and promised to fix it. R7 was in bed and nodded that she was not comfortable. R8 stated that it's been a few weeks, and they did not fix…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that air conditioners in the second and third floor hallways and in some residents' rooms are in good repair to provide cool, comfortable and functional environment for residents. This failure affected a total of 127 residents (59 residents on the second and 68 residents on the third floor), that were reviewed for functional and comfortable environment. Findings Include: On 6/23/25 at 10:30am after the entrance conference, V2(Director of Nursing) presented the Facility's Census that shows that 59 residents reside on the second floor while 68 residents reside on the third floor. On 6/23/25 between 10:30am and 11:15am during observation with V3(Maintenance Director), the second-floor hallway temperature was 84 Degrees Fahrenheit. Several randomly selected rooms (208, 207, 227, 228, 304, 308, and 310), were observed with air conditioner units that were not functioning properly and blowing warm air. On 6/23/25 between 11:30am and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their behavior management policy and facility practice and document an incident of performing crisis prevention intervention techniques for one of one residents R9 reviewed for behavior management and documentation. Findings include: 4/4/25 at 1:15pm V12 (LPN) said she was R9's nurse on 3/31/25 going into that morning of 4/1/25. V12 said V10 did not inform her that he initiated and performed crisis prevention intervention technique on R9, by grabbing R9 by the wrist bilaterally and taking R9 down to the floor and holding R9 in that position. 4/4/25 at 2:16pm V13 (LPN) said she was R9 Nurse on 4/1/25 during the morning shift and V10 did not report to her that he initiated and performed crisis prevention intervention technique on R9, by grabbing R9 by the wrist bilaterally and taking R9 down to the floor and holding R9 in that position. 4/4/25 at 11:45am during a phone interview with V2 (acting Administrator) V2 said she was not aware that V2 initiated and performed a crisis prevention intervention technique on R9 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their discharge and change in condition policies and did not notify a family member of a resident's change in condition and needed to be sent out to the hospital. This affectes one out of three residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition policy and procedures. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: chronic obstructive pulmonary, disease, type 2 diabetes, and left eye glaucoma. A Nurse Practitioner note dated [DATE] documents the nurse practitioner saw R1 for a concern for hyperglycemia and altered mental status. R1 is positive for confusion and hyperglycemia upon assessment. Plan is to transfer to the hospital for medical evaluation. A Nursing note dated [DATE] at 11:42AM documents R1 was sent to the hospital due to altered mental status and uncontrolled hyperglycemia. There is no documentation that a family member was notified of this transfer. A Nursing note dated [DATE] documents R1 admitted to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -- Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for housekeeping and maintenance by not keeping residents' room in clean condition, not replacing heavily soiled mattresses when needed, not removing unclean clothes from the room in a timely manner, and not ensuring residents windows were covered or that windows coverings were replaced when needed. This failure applied to nine (R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) of nine residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: On 11/25/2024 at 11:44 AM Observed R4 and R5's window partially covered with torn paper blinds. R4 stated he would prefer his window covers to be replaced. On 11/25/2024 at 12:11 PM R2 stated he was previously living in room R9 and R10's current room. R2 stated housekeeping in that room was bad. R2 stated staff are not responding timely when residents pee and poop and leave a mess behind. R2 stated that one-night last week, there were dirty/soiled linens and briefs left in the shower room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the hospital discharge instructions by not scheduling a follow-up appointment to evaluate an ear laceration. This affected one of three residents (R2) reviewed for follow-up appointments. Findings Include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old with the following diagnosis: hemiplegia to the right side following cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, aphasia, and vascular dementia. A Nursing note dated 9/1/24 documents the CNA made the nurse aware that during meal time, R2 was observed sliding out of the wheelchair. To prevent a fall, the CNA slid R2 from the chair to the floor, where R2 rested on R2's buttocks. A skin tear was noted on the right ear. The physician was made aware, and an order was placed to send R2 to the hospital for evaluation. R2 returned from the emergency department with a treatment order for the laceration. There was also a referral to see an outside physician in three days. The primary physician and family were notified. A Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve an portion of food that meets the needs and preferences of the residents. This failure applies to all 238 residents receiving meals from the facility. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female, with a diagnoses history of Psychosis, Auditory Hallucinations, Bipolar Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder, Non-Toxic Multi Nodular Goiter, and Abnormal Results of Thyroid Function, who was admitted to the facility 3/22/2023. R3 is a [AGE] year-old female, with a diagnoses history of Dementia, Schizophrenia, COPD, Dysphagia, Extrapyramidal Movement Disorder, and Hypothyroid Disorder, who was admitted to the facility 01/27/2021. On 09/13/2024 at 9:50 AM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, (R1) and (R3) could eat all day. The food portions are too small. (R1) eats pureed meals and they provide a scoop of pureed foods which doesn't seem adequate. The meal portions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to 1) identify emergency care was needed for two residents (R1 and R2) who exhibited a change in physical and mental status; 2) failed to monitor blood sugar levels for two residents (R5 and R6) who received diabetic medications daily; 3) failed to accurately demonstrate insulin preparation and 4) failed to ensure availability of resident specific diabetes medications used for emergencies. Findings include: R1 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of cerebral infarction, type II diabetes and Dementia. According to the Minimum Data Set, R1 demonstrated mild cognitive impairment, but was able to make needs known to staff. Per nurses notes effective 7/18/24 at 5:14pm, R1 was found in his room vomiting. The nurse on duty (V4 Registered Nurse) assessed vital signs which included abnormal blood pressure (177/94) and decreased oxygen saturation (87%) on room air. V4 administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse to 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for physical abuse in the sample of 15. The findings include: The Facility Reported Incident (FRI) as final, dated 4/5/24 (date of incident 3/30/24), documents, Allegation Type: Physical. The FRI show (R2), BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14, alert and oriented with diagnoses of schizophrenia, depression and weakness. (R1) BIMS of 14, alert and oriented x 3 with diagnoses of hypertension, schizophrenia and chronic kidney disease. (R1) was aggressive towards (R2). (R1) stated he heard some sounds and when he opened his eyes, he could see (R2) going through his pants pocket he had out by his dresser. (R1) said he yelled at (R2) for him to stop but (R2) did not (stop) so he got up and hit (R2). Staff overheard a verbal disagreement and in the process (R1) hit (R2) in the face. They were both separated. (R1) was sent to the hospital for psych eval and (R2) was sent to a local hospital for further medical evaluation. R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 15 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation , interview, and record review, the facility fails to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents in 10 of 12 resident rooms observed for maintenance of interior surfaces. Findings include: The following was observed on 6/8/24 with V7 ( Maintenance Director ) . R15's room wall damage next to toilet room door. Metal door jamb is rotted through. R11's room wall damage at floor wall junction. R12's room wall damage at floor wall junction. R13's room large hole in wall behind headboard of bed. R3's room wall behind toilet large hole rotted through wall . R4's room wall damage in toilet room. R5's room hole in wall at floor wall junction in toilet room . R8's room holes in walls at wall floor junction. R9's room holes in walls at floor wall junction. R10's room holes in wall behind headboard of bed. On 6/9/24 at 1PM, V7 ( Maintenance Director) stated, I am aware of the wall damage in the residents rooms. We are currently re-doing resident rooms and common areas throughout the facility. Facility policy titled General Policy For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer was assessed by a Dietician upon admission for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for Dietician services in the sample of 15. The findings include: R7's admission Record, dated 5/31/24 ,shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with the following diagnoses: gout, weakness, diabetes, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, heart failure, end stage renal disease, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, and dependence on renal dialysis. R7's Wound Care Telemedicine Initial Evaluation, dated 3/1/24, shows R7 has a stage 4 pressure wound being present for more than 14 days, and recommended a Dietician consult. R7's Order Summary Report, dated 5/31/24, does not show an order for a Dietician consult. The facility was unable to provide documentation of an assessment/evaluation from the Dietician. On 5/31/24 at 10:35 AM, V18, Dietician, said he normally sees any high risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record revie,w the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 4 residents (R6, R15, R16 and R17) reviewed for cold food in the sample of 17. The findings include: On 11/4/23 at 12:01 PM, the kitchen staff started plating the noon meal for the 1st floor-north unit. A test tray was plated first of tuna casserole and mixed vegetables. The food was plated on plastic plates. The plastic plates were covered with a clear plastic cover, with a hole on the top of the cover. The food trays were placed on an open food cart. The first cart was delivered to the 1st floor dining room at 12:07 PM. A second cart was delivered to the 1st floor dining room at 12:12 PM. A third cart was brought to the 1st floor dining room at 12:13 PM. Two Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs started passing out trays to all the residents in the dining room at 12:14 PM. The trays on the 3rd cart that was brought out were passed first. The trays for the residents who where not eating in the dining room were transferred to one of the open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensurie ice machine equipment was stored properly, failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent contamination, failed to ensure storage containers were clean and free of contamination, failed to ensure stored foods were free of spillage, failed to ensure storage equipment was clean and free of rust, and failed to promptly discard food showing signs of expiration. These failures have the potential to affect all 232 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 07/31/23 from 10:05 AM to 10:35 AM, observed: *Several small fruit cups and several small cups of cottage cheese stored in the kitchen cooler, not covered. V23 (Food Services Manager) stated, These food cups should be covered with a lid. V23 asked V24 (Dietary Aide) why the food cups were not covered, and informed him they should be covered. V23 stated the food cups should be covered to prevent contamination from insects, hair, or other sources of contamination. *Several heads of wilted lettuce were stored in the walk-in cooler. *Sugar bin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and well maintained environment by not ensuring residents residents rooms or the facility were cleaned consistently and thoroughly; and the facility failed to maintain an effective preventative maintenance plan. This failure directly affected 28 residents (R4, R14, R17, R59, R66, R69, R73, R79, R91, R97, R123, R137, R143, R146, R154, R180, R181, R184, R189, R215, R224, R238, R342, R442, and R592 ) and has the potential to affect all 232 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: On 07/31/2023 at 10:30 AM, reviewed resident roster provided by V1 (Administrator) that showed total number of residents as 237. Per CMS form 672, facility submitted a total in-house census of 232 residents. 1. On 07/31/23 at 10:00 AM, the corner of first floor dining room to right of entrance doors with 5 ceiling tiles having visible water damage, and black stained with mold-like appearance to all 5 tiles. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This failure affects all 232 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings include: On 07/31/2023 at 10:30 AM, reviewed resident roster provided by V1 (Administrator) that showed total number of residents as 237. Per CMS form 672, facility submitted a total in-house census of 232 residents. On 07/31/2023 at 09:45 AM, upon entering facility, multiple black flying insects and pests were observed by surveyor and survey team at front lobby area. At 10:00 AM, while waiting in first floor dining room for conference room to be made available for survey team, multiple black flying insects and pests were observed by surveyor and survey team throughout dining room along with food debris on the floor under multiple tables. On 07/31/2023 at 1:00 PM, observed multiple black flying insects within third-floor dining room and several windows in this same room to be opened with no visible screen on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene, bathing, and grooming for 4 (R29, R66, R68, R120) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 66 residents. Findings include, 1. 08/01/23 11:48 AM, R68 was in R68's room, and appeared unclean with pungent urine and body odors prevalent on his person. R68 was asked if he was offered assistance to bathe or wash his face. R68 stated, No it's too dirty in the shower. I'll go when I want to go. R68's Care plan, dated 1/27/2023, reads in part, (R68) has potential risk for alteration self-care motivation related to diagnosis and history of PTSD. Goal: (R68) will comply with the bathing and grooming schedule through the next review. Interventions: Assess and document the deficit that appears to cause poor self-care motivation. Document interventions used to help the person maintain a clean, proper appearance. Discuss the importance of being clean and well dressed in terms of physical comfort and enhanced interpersonal relationships.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate an investigation of an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse, failed to complete a thorough investigation, and failed to maintain documentation that an alleged violation was thoroughly investigated. This failure affected one resident (R180) who was physically assaulted by another resident (R215). Findings include: R180 is a [AGE] year-old male who has resided at the facility since 2020, with past medical history of weakness, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, Schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes, and anemia. On 08/01/23 11:20AM, R180 was in his room, awake and alert. and oriented x 3. R180 stated the day he went to the hospital, he was walking down the hallway on the first floor, and another resident was sitting on the floor in the hallway in front of his room. The resident stuck out his leg and tripped him. He asked the resident what he was doing and he stood up, grabbed him and started punching him, threw him on the ground, and he hit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the strength of the sanitizing solution for disinfection of food contact surfaces met the manufacturer's recommendation, and failed to use the recommended dish washer water temperature. These failures have the potential to affect all 136 residents in the facility reviewed for food storage and sanitation. Findings include: On 8/2/22 at 9:30 AM, during a tour of the Kitchen with V22 (Dietary Manager), V22 tested the sanitary bucket containing solution of water and chemical sanitizer with test strip. The color strip reading was at 0. The test strip used did not meet the manufacturer standard of 50ppm to 100ppm. On 8/2/22 at 9:30 AM, V22 stated, The color should change, and the reading should be between 200ppm to 400ppm, and the water temperature is not hot enough. Facility policy Titled Warewashing includes 2; all dishware, serviceware, and utensils will be cleaned and sanitized after each use. Procedures: all dish machine water temperature will be maintained in accordance with .for high temperature or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide call lights within reach for 4 residents (R439, R22, R27, and R163) out of 10 residents observed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 36. Findings: 1. R439 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses not limited to end-stage renal disease, and acquired absence of right leg below the knee amputation. On 8/02/22 at 11:30 AM, R439 stated she would like to get up to her wheelchair. Surveyor told R439 to call for assistance, but the call light was not in reach. 2. R27 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis not limited to COVID-19, and is on isolation. On 8/02/22 at 10:30 AM, R27 said he wanted a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Surveyor asked if he called the staff for assistance, and he said he does not know where his call light is. Surveyor looked around but couldn't see the call light within R27's reach. 3. R163 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses not limited to COVID-19, and is on isolation. On 8/02/22 at 10:30 AM, R163…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure window coverings were in place for two of ten residents (R53, R191) and privacy curtains were available for two of ten residents (R23, R212) reviewed for privacy, in a sample of 36. Findings include: 1. R53's medication review report, dated 8/03/2022, indicated an admission date of 9/10/2016, and diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions, and bipolar disorder. On 8/02/2022 at 10:50 AM, R53's room window was observed with no curtains and facing the street. R53 said, Look at this window, there is no curtain, and there was never any put up. On 8/02/2022 at 12:01 PM, V5 (Maintenance Supervisor) observed R53's room window without curtains, and said there should be curtains on all the windows. 2. R191's medication review report, dated 8/03/2022, indicated an admission date of 06/29/2022, and diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and suicidal ideations. On 08/02/2022 at 11:23 AM, R191's room window was observed with no curtains, and is facing the smoking area. On 8/02/2022 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functional and sanitary environment related to bathroom toilets not flushing and toilets accumulated with waste, for four of ten residents (R17, R67, R76, R227) reviewed for environment in a sample of 36. The facility also failed to maintain a functional and sanitary environment for two of three shower rooms with a potential to affect 57 residents on the second floor. Findings include: 1. R17's Physician Order Sheet, dated for 8/4/2022, indicates a Diagnosis of Major Depressive disorder. On 8/2/2022 at 10:30 AM, R17 was standing in the doorway of his room and said, My toilet is filled up and does not work. Surveyor observed R17's toilet filled with waste. R17 said, It's been like that for days. On 8/2/2022 at 11:30 AM, V5 (Maintenance Supervisor) observed R17's toilet filled with waste and unable to flush. V5 said, I did not know the toilet was like that. 2. On 8/2/2022 at 10:35 AM, R67 was in the hallway, and pulled the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming for three residents (R106, R119, R150) of ten residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 36. Findings include: 1. R106's care plan indicates R106 has a self-care deficit in dressing and grooming. On 8/2/22 at 12:00 PM, R106 had an unkempt beard and underarm odor. R106 said, I asked to shave, and they act like they don't hear me. 2. R150's care plan indicates R150 requires extensive physical assist with daily care needs. On 8/2/22 at 1:30 PM, R150 had thick facial hair. R150 said, I guess I'll have to wait for my family to come and shave it. 3. R119's care plan indicates R119 has a self-care deficit and requires assistance with daily care needs. On 8/3/22 at 8:30 AM, R119 had unkempt beard growth. R119 said, I've been wanting to get shaved. On 8/4/22 at 2:45 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Residents are given two showers or baths a week. If they refuse, it should be documented. Residents should be shaved as needed or when they request it or need it. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply a hand splint for one resident (R145) out of ten residents observed for range of motion in the sample of 36. Findings Include: R145's record indicates R145 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses not limited to: difficulty in walking, unsteady feet, and contracture, unspecified hand. R145 has an order for a right hand carrot to prevent further contractures. R145's care plan indicates R145 has a contracture to right hand. On 8/2/2022 at 10:30 AM, R145 was laying in her bed. Surveyor observed R145 had a right hand contracture with no splint. On 8/2/2022 at 11:00 AM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) LPN said R145 should have a splint on. On 8/2/2022 at 11:54 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) said V7 should have the splint on. On 8/3/2022 at 12:00 PM, V11 (Restorative Nurse) said Restorative Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) are responsible to apply the splint, but when the aide is off, V11 is supposed to apply the splint. V11 said she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-05 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for one of ten residents (R53) reviewed for dental services in a sample of 36. Findings include: R53's medication review report, dated 8/03/2022, indicated an admission date of 9/10/2016, and a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. R53's care plan, dated 3/27/2017, indicated an intervention of Dental evaluation by licensed dentist if warranted. R53's most recent admission assessment did not indicate any oral or dental assessment. Facility was unable to provide dental consult documentation for R53. On 8/02/2022 at 10:50 AM, R53 said she is in pain from head-to-toe. When asked why, R53 opened her mouth and pointed at her teeth. R53 was observed with missing, broken and decayed teeth. On 8/04/2022 at 11:28 AM, V12 (Social Service Director) said if the residents want to see a dentist, he initiates setting up the appointment for them to be seen. V12 said currently, there is no routine dental checkup scheduled for the residents. V12 said if the residents or the nurses do not ask him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$219,662 in federal fines across 7 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $22,984 — penalty dated 2025-03-14
  • $25,604 — penalty dated 2024-12-03
  • $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-10-10
  • $30,550 — penalty dated 2024-07-13
  • $30,602 — penalty dated 2024-05-31
  • $82,833 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
  • $13,039 — penalty dated 2023-11-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-20 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIA HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BERKOVITS, FREDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 11/01/2012
SEGAL, DOVIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 11/01/2012
WEISS, AMYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 01/01/2024
WEISS, NATANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF24%since 11/01/2012
NWAGWU YOULO, CHIMNOYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
OLANREWAJU, ROSEMARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WEINFELD, AVRUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2012
WEISS, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.9M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 96%Medicare 2%Other / private 2%

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$251per resident / day
operating cost
$7,632per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145735. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next