Bria Of Godfrey
1623 29 West Delmar, Godfrey, IL 62035 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 68 certified beds · (618) 466-0443 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 12 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $209,961 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-19)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 100.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.4% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 11.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.30 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.45 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.0%CMS range 47.6–74.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.2–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.1–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 50.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a resident with history of falls was assessed appropriately by nursing staff after a fall. This failure would have resulted in a reasonable person enduring pain for over a day due to a rib and clavicle fracture until nursing staff was notified completed an assessment. Findings include:R2's December 2025 Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, with fluctuations, chronic respiratory failure, severe protein calorie malnutrition, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, abnormal weight loss, delirium due to physiological condition, and anxiety disorder. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], document R2 was severely impaired for cognition for activities of daily living. R2 uses a wheelchair and requires substantial/maximal assistance-Helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort. R2's Care Plan: Falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error in 1 of 6 residents (R3) when reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R3 being admitted to the hospital with a principal problem of Accidental Drug Overdose. Findings Include: R3's Progress Note, dated 4/17/25 at 6:59 PM, documents the following: This Nurse recognized that I administered a wrong medication to the resident. Res. (Resident) has NKA (No Known Allergies). Res sent to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. NP (Nurse Practitioner, Administrator, and D.O.N (Director of Nurses) all made aware. ER MD (Medical Doctor) aware. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/18/25 at 5:50 PM, documents the following: Update resident admitted with hypoglycemia and medication error. Resident stable and alert at this time. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/20/25 15:02 PM, documents the following: Resident returned to facility via ambulance at 14:55 (2:55 PM). R3's Medication Error Report, dated, 4/17/25, documents the following: Occurred on 4/17/25 at 6:50 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral gastrointestinal feedings and care were provided as ordered for 3 of 3 (R2, R1, R3) residents reviewed for enteral feeding management. This failure resulted in R2 requiring hospitalization for treatment of aspiration pneumonia related to food regurgitation. Findings include: 1. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and acute respiratory failure. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented he is severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff to assist with all mobility. R2's Care Plan, dated 5/30/24, documented R2 is at risk for complications related to tube feeding with a goal to remain free of aspiration pneumonia throughout next review. Interventions for this care plan are documented to be, in part, administer tube feedings as ordered. R2's Progress notes on 2/20/25 at 7:33 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have physician prescribed narcotic pain medication for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pain. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing severe pain, becoming incontinent of bowel and bladder, and displaying agressive behaviors. Findings include: R2's Undated Face Sheet documents he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, pain thoracic spine, low back pain, and chronic pain syndrome. R2's Care Plan documents, focus pain alteration in comfort related to the advanced disease process, chronic physical or psychological disability, musculoskeletal, neurological issues due to diabetic neuropathy and osteoarthritis of the right hip. Goal: resident will not experience a decline in overall function r/t (related to) pain through next review. Will maintain adequate levels of comfort as evidence by no s/s (signs or symptoms) of unrelieved pain or distress, verbalizing satisfaction or expressing with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure appropriate fall interventions were in place and supervise 1 of 4 (R3) residents reviewed for falls and safety in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R28 sustaining multiple falls, bruising of varies stages of healing, and a laceration to R3's head. Finding includes: 1. R3's admission Record, not dated, documents R3's admission date 5/30/2024. It also documents Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting left non-dominant side, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with other specified complication, Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Cerebral Infarction, unspecified, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, unspecified, Difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right femur, Chronic pain syndrome, Unspecified History of falling, and polyneuropathy, unspecified, listed as diagnoses. R3's Baseline Care Plan, dated 5/30/2024, documents R3 is at high risk for falls. It continues, Interventions: A. Call light within reach B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the residents' need for assistance with personal care, bathing, showers, and oral care, and failed to ensure residents were provide an effective way to call for help for 5 of 7 (R23, R41, R45, R150, R151) residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 34. This failure resulted in R151 feeling frightened and scared. Findings include: 1. R151's admission Record, not dated, documents R151 was admitted on [DATE], and lists Type 2 Diabetes with diabetic Polyneuropathy, Hemiplegia, and Hemi paresis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side as diagnoses. R151's Interim Baseline Care Plan, effective date 7/12/23, documents, B. Falls, 3. Intervention Call light within reach. R151's admission Observation, effective date 7/12/23, documents R151 is responding to environment, alert to person, place, and time. R151's Call light Ability Screen, effective date 7/12/2023, documents R151 is able to use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care, including changing dressings, and failed to perform skin and wound assessments for 3 of 6 residents (R23, R32, R150) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 34. This failure caused R23 to develop an unstageable pressure sore on his left heel, that went unnoticed by the staff, with no Physician Orders or treatment. Findings include: 1. R23's admission Record, undated, documents R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's Electronic Medical Record, documents R23's Diagnosis include: COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Emphysema, Type 2 DM (Diabetes Mellitus), Cerebral Infarction, Lumbago with Sciatica, Gastrostomy, Convulsions, Major Depressive Disorder, Malignant Neoplasm of lung, ASHD (Atherosclerotic Heart Disease), Anemia, Adult Failure to Thrive, MI (Myocardial Infarction), HTN (Hypertension), Hyperlipidemia, and Malignant Neoplasm of Pelvic Bones, Sacrum, and Coccyx. R23's Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfers and progressive interventions for 3 of 4 residents (R30, R32, and R35) reviewed for falls in the sample of 34. This failure resulted in R32 falling and fracturing his right hip requiring surgical repair. Findings include: 1. R35's electronic medical record documents R35 has had 5 falls from 2/1/2023-6/25/2023. Fall report, dated 2/1/2023, documents, At 18:15 PM, (R35) was getting off the toilet and had pulled up his (incontinence brief), pants still down to knee, he fell and was lying on right side in doorway of bathroom. He stated he did not hit his head. No injury noted. Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting, 2/9/202, documents, RCA (root cause analysis) resident on toilet and fell pulling up pants, all previously care planned intervention in place and adding education staff to stay with resident while using restroom. Care plan reviewed and updated. R35's record documents R35 had a fall 3/10/232023 at 21:52 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinence and catheter care for 5 of 5 (R23, R41, R42, R45, 150) residents reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 34. This failure resulted in R42 feeling angry, sad, alone, and like no one wants to take care of her. Findings include: 1. R42's Care Plan, dated 5/25/23, documents, skin: (R42) has potential for skin integrity issues such as pressure ulcers/injuries as she always is incontinent of bowel and bladder and requires limited assistance with the bed mobility ADL. She has diagnoses of DM type 2, anemia, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. R42's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R42 is cognitively intact, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and is totally dependent on 1 staff for toileting. On 7/18/2023 at 12:50 PM, V2, Director of Nursing, and V5, Restorative Aide, assisted R42 with incontinent care. R42 was incontinent of urine and bowel. V5 opened R42's incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the formation of pressure ulcers, failed to treat pressure ulcers as ordered by the physician and failed to provide pressure relief for residents with pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 residents (R39, R33) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 26. This failure has resulted in R39 developing an unstageable, pressure ulcer to the right knee. Findings include: 1. R39's admission Record, documents R39 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of: pressure ulcer right hip, displace avulsion fracture of left ilium, nondisplaced zone I fracture of sacrum and, nondisplaced fracture of shaft of right clavicle. R39's Care Plan, dated 6/28/22, documents (R39) has both potential for and actual impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) fragile skin, combative behaviors and was admitted with a non-blanchable discoloration to the right hip area which was noted to be a Stage one pressure injury. He was seen by the wound specialist and he noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance, supervision, and implement progressive interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 6 residents (R38, R196) reviewed for falls in the sample of 26. This failure resulted in R38 falling and sustaining a laceration to the back of the head, requiring 5 staples. Findings include: 1. R38's admission Profile, print date of 9/28/22, documents R38 was admitted on [DATE], and has diagnoses of: difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. R38's Fall Risk Evaluations, dated 8/24/22, 8/27/22, 8/31/22 and 9/5/22, all document R38 is a high fall risk. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R38 is severely cognitively impaired and requires limited assistance of 2 staff members for bed mobility, extensive assistance of 2 staff members for transfer and toilet use, limited assistance of 1 staff member for walking in room and on the unit and extensive assistance of 1 staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist with feeding, monitor weights, and implement progressive interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 3 residents (R40) reviewed for weight loss in a sample of 26. This failure resulted in R40 having a significant weight loss of 10% in 1 month and 17 % in 3 months. Findings include: R40's admission record, dated 09/29/2022, documented an admission date of 6/07/2022, with diagnoses of stroke, dysphagia, other lack of coordination, and major depressive disorder. R40's Care plan, dated 06/23/2022, documented, Provide one-to-one staff intervention to promote proper nutritional intake. It continues, Offer between meal snacks & meal substitutions, as appropriate. Offer the resident a bedtime snack. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented her cognition was moderately impaired, and she required limited assistance of 1 staff member for eating. R40's Dietary Evaluation, dated 08/30/2022, V18, Dietician, documented, 85 (year…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a supporting diagnosis for a prescribed antipsychotic for 1 of 6 residents (R6); reviewed for chemical restraints in a sample of 7.Findings include:R6's Facesheet with a print date of 5/4/26, documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 2/5/26. R6's Facesheet also documented she was admitted with the following diagnoses of fracture of right tibia, fracture of upper and lower end of right fibula, alcohol abuse, insomnia, and major depressive disorder.R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she was cognitively intact.R6's Medication Order Audit documented V25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), placed an order on 1/16/26 at 9:44 PM for Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 50 mg (milligrams) to be given 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for prophylaxis. Additional information on the order documented in red letters Alert? Black Box Warning! R6's Order details on Quetiapine also documented under notes to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure the alleged perpetrator of an abuse allegation did not have access to residents when an allegation of abuse occurred, and failed to ensure all abuse allegations were investigated. This has the potential to affect all 50 residents living in the facility. Findings include:R10'S Physician Order Sheet (POS) for December 2025 documents a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Type 2 diabetes mellites with other specified complications, muscle weakness, acquired absence of left leg below knee, major depression disorder, single episode, several without psychotic features, and dependence on wheelchair. R10's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], document R10 has an impairment on both his upper and lower extremity on one side. R10 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living, uses a wheelchair and needs substantial assistance for most ADL's (activities of daily living).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct dose of physician prescribed medication (Lantus insulin) in 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 3. Findings Include:R2's Undated Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has medical diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Anxiety Disorder.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired.R2's Previous Physician Order, dated 8/4/2025 at 9:27 AM ,documents Lantus Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 27 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes mellitus.R2's Nurses Notes, dated 9/23/2025 at 10:02 PM, documents, The other Nurse stated she gave resident 27 units of Lantus, I told Nurse res (resident) was mine and already had insulin. Telehealth Medical Doctor (MD) aware stated check fasting blood sugar (fsbs) every hour. Res was given snack and glucose gel. Sugar is 231, however res is being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R2's undated face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, altered mental status, and dementia.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she has memory problems and is moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documented R2 requires set-up assistance for eating and requires staff supervision for all other activities of daily living (ADL's). R2's care plan, dated 7/15/25, documented R2 is a currently at a high risk for falls with a goal that she will remain free of falls. Her interventions for this care plan include: encourage appropriate use of wheelchair, evaluate multiple falls to determine any patter, fall risk assessment quarterly and as needed, keep bed in lowest position, keep frequently used items within reach,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0917 — isolatedMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure each resident had a closet with shelf space for 1 of 6 residents (R2) reviewed for closet space in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 6/5/2025 at 12:48 PM, V8, Family of R2, stated, (R2)'s room was at the end of the hall. There was a small space, but no actual closet, and from the ceiling the facility had a PVC pipe running from one end to the other then forming a box, that I guess that was where my mom was supposed to hang her clothes. There was no shelving, and we went out and bought her a curtain and put it on tension rod, so it would be more homelike for her. It was not homelike before that, trust me on that one. (R2) had a single room but there was no closet, just this space with the PVC pipe. There was no portable wardobe just the PVC pipe for the clothes. On 6/5/2025 at 1:14 PM, R2's former room did not contain a built in wardrobe. There was a small space boxed in a square, with white PVC pipe running all the way across the ceiling. At one end of the PVC pipe was a square made out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician in 2 of 4 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. On 4/8/25 at 11:55 AM, V5, R2's Daughter, stated R2 had not been receiving her daily medications. R2's Face sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: Three Part Fracture of the Left Humerus, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Neuropathy, MDD (Major Depressive Disorder), CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), Cardiac Pacemaker and Defibrillator, History of Falling, Arthropathy, Gout, HTN (Hypertension), Low Back Pain, and Chronic A. Fib (Atrial Fibrillation). R2's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 4/1/25 through 4/30/25, documents the following physician orders, dated 4/1/25: Spironolactone Oral Tablet 25 MG (Milligrams) give 0.5 tablets by mouth one time a day for High Blood Pressure; Sertraline HCl (Hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 25 MG give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression; Furosemide Oral Tablet 40 MG give 1 tablet by mouth one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge was complete, including housing, Durable Medical Equipment (DME), and medications needed prior to discharging the resident to the hospital, and then failing to accept the resident back to the facility upon hospital discharge for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements. This failure resulted in R2 having to find a place to live, not having appropriate DME, and not having medications available as needed. The findings include: R2's admission Record, dated 3/26/25, documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged to the hospital on 3/5/25. R2's diagnosis include: Spinal stenosis cervicothoracic region, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), nicotine dependence, rhabdomyolysis, suicidal behavior, major depressive disorder, alcohol use, hypothyroidism, hypertension (HTN), bipolar disorder, mood affective disorder, encephalopathy, spondylosis with myelopathy, and osteoarthritis. R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3, R11, R12) for risks of self-harm upon their admission to the facility. This failure has the potential to affect those residents from self- harm. Findings include: 1.R2's Face Sheet undated documents he was admitted to the facility 7/26/24, with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Cerebral, Infarction, Unspecified, Restless and Agitation, Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood disturbance and Anxiety, and Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Agitation. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 has moderate cognitive impairment, reports 12-14 days (nearly every day) of feeling bad about himself or that he is a failure or that he has let his family down; is feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. R2's Psychiatric Progress note, dated 8/27/24, from the area psychiatric services documents R2's family reported R2 threatens family and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer 4 of 4 residents ( R2, R3, R5, R13) medications as prescribed and according to the facility's policy and procedures. This failure resulted in residents receiving their medications two hours or more after the scheduled times. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet undated documents he was admitted to the facility 7/26/24, with pertinent diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Cerebral, Infarction, Unspecified, Restless and Agitation, Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood disturbance and Anxiety, and Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Agitation. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 has moderate cognitive impairment, reports 12-14 days (nearly every day) of feeling bad about himself or that he is a failure or that he has let his family down; is feeling down, depressed or hopeless. R2's Physician Order Summary, dated October 2024, documents R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to utilize physician ordered pressure relieving devices and or treatments for two of three residents (R3, R35) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 31. Findings Include: 1. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired. R3's MDS also documents need substantial to maximum assistance in rolling from left to right. R3's Braden Scale, dated 6/28/24, documents R3 has a moderate risk of developing pressure ulcers. R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 7/28/24, documents, (pressure Relieving boots) to bil (bilateral) feet when in bed, for sore heels. R3's Skin Care Plan intervention documents protect heels initiated on 2/28/24. On 08/13/24 at 2:20 PM, R3 was laying in bed and her heels were directly on the bed. On 8/15/24 at 2:20 PM while watching catheter care, R3 did not have on pressure relieving boots and her bilateral heels were red. R3's heels were lying flat on the bed. On 8/15/24 at 3:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure progressive fall interventions were implemented for 2 of 6 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for falls in the sample of 31. Findings include: 1-R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and tremor. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 was moderately cognitively impaired and ambulated with supervision. R1's Care Plan, initiated 7/17/20, documents R1 is at risk for falls related to balance issues, tremors, marching gait, osteoporosis, and psychoactive drug use. R1's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 6/27/24, documents R1 is at high risk for falls. The Facility's Incident Log documents R1 had falls on 11/20/23, 1/1/24, 2/19/24, 2/20/24, 2/21/24, 3/1/24, and 6/19/24. R1's 2/19/24 Fall Investigation documents R1 lost her balance and fell when trying to use the restroom. The fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat pressure wounds for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressures ulcers in the sample of 5. Findings include: 1. R2's ELH (electronic health record) encounter for orthopedic aftercare for surgical amputation; type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications; unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition; elevated white blood cells; major depressive disorder; vitamin d deficiency; anxiety; vitamin b12 deficiency, anemias; adult failure to thrive; acquired above the left knee amputation; personal history of diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue; pulmonary hypertension unspecified; peripheral vascular disease; hyperlipidemia. R2's ELH dated 05/06/24 documents that the resident was admitted into the facility. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 515/2024, documents alert and oriented to self and place. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) indicates a score of 3; severe cognitive impairment. Dependent upon assistance of ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform catheter care for 3 of 3 residents ( R2, R3, R4) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 5. Findings Include: 1. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired. R2's Care Plan, dated 5/7/24, documents R2 requires use of indwelling catheter related to Obstructive Uropathy and Urinary Retention. R2's Care Plan did not document to clean the catheter as an intervention. R2's Local Hospital Notes, dated 5/18/24, documents the nurse noted R2 had a contaminated catheter. On 5/18/24, R2's (Indwelling) catheter was changed. R2's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for the months of March and April did not document any catheter care. The TAR for the month of May did not document any catheter care until 5/22/24. 2. R3's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R3 is moderately cognitively impaired. R3's Electronic Health Record diagnosis, dated 1/12/23, documents Obstructive and Reflex Uropathy Unspecified. R3's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete wound treatments as ordered by the physician in 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 4. Findings Include: R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: Multiple Sclerosis, Local Infection of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Paraplegia, Anemia, Urge Incontinence and Pressure Ulcer of the Left Buttock. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/24, documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12, which indicates R2 has moderate cognitive impairment, and has an unstageable pressure ulcer present upon admission. R2's Care Plan, dated 10/9/23, documents R2 was admitted to the facility with actual skin complications related to pressure injuries of the left buttock, left heel and right heel with an intervention to provide treatment as ordered to the left buttock wound as per POS (Physician Order Sheet) / TAR (Treatment Administration Record) until resolved. R2's Wound Evaluation &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) coverage for residents reviewed for staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/25/24 at 7:50 AM, R2 stated, Sometimes, on the weekend or evening/night time they only have 1 nurse and 1 CNA working. On 4/25/24 at 12:50 PM, R3 stated, They need more CNAs and nurses in the evening and at night. On 4/25/24 at 12:45 PM, R4 stated, They need more CNAs and nurses in the evening and at night. On 4/25/24 at 3:00 PM, V7, CNA, stated she was the only CNA working evenings tonight that is employed by the facility. V7 also stated there were two agency CNAs working and two nurses. V7 stated they are short all the time in the evening. On 4/25/24 at 3:40 PM, V9, RN (Registered Nurse), stated, They need more CNAs; it varies but they need more help on the evening shift. On 4/25/24 at 3:45 PM, V9, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), stated during the day, they have enough CNAs and nurses, but she thinks they need more CNAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide perineal care and adhere to infection control practices to prevent infections in 2 of 3 residents (R1, R5) reviewed for UTIs (Urinary Tract Infection) in the sample of 5. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, undated, documents the following diagnoses: Acute Cystitis, Polyuria, Alzheimer's Disease and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/1/24, documents R1 is dependent with toileting and incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's Care Plan, dated 1/1/24, documents R1 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) deficit. R1's Progress Note, dated 4/17/24 at 1:19 PM, documented, Resident difficult to arouse, resident did not eat breakfast or lunch, resident did take her medication, Vital signs were WNL (within normal limits), except oxygen was between 70-60's, oxygen placed at 2 L (liters) per N/C (nasal cannula), oxygen now at 95%, MD (medical doctor) assessed resident, new order received to send out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered by the physician in 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, undated, documented R2 had a diagnosis of Chronic Pain. R2's Physician Order Sheet, documented the following order, 4/18/24 Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10/325mg (milligrams), give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours. R2's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated February 2024, documented the following order, 2/9/24 through 2/20/24 - Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10/325mg, give on tablet by mouth 4 times a day and every 6 hours as needed for pain. R2's MAR, dated April 2024, documented the Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen was not administered 4 times as ordered. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/16/24, documented R2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which indicates that R2 was cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan, dated 2/12/24, documented, (R2) has an alteration in comfort. R2's Progress Note, dated 2/10/24 at 1:26 PM, documented, Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality and good tasting food to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3, R4) reviewed for food palatability, in the sample of 5. Findings include: 1. On 4/25/23 at 7:55 AM, R2 stated he doesn't get a full meal, and it tastes horrible. R2 also stated this happens more for the evening meal. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/16/24, documented R2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15, indicating R2 was cognitively intact. R2's Grievance, dated 3/26/24, documented R2 filed a grievance in reference to the unsatisfactory food here. The summary was that R2 was educated on the always available menu items and substitutions are available upon request. 2. On 4/25/24 at 12:45 PM, R4 stated the food quality was terrible, tasted bad, and sometimes the portions weren't big enough. R2 stated some nights she goes to bed still hungry. R4's MDS, dated [DATE], documented R4 had a BIMS score of 13, indicating R4 was cognitively intact. 3. On 4/25/24 at 12:50 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices to prevent infections in 2 of 3 residents (R1, R5) reviewed for Infection control in the sample of 5. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, undated, documented the following diagnoses: Acute Cystitis, Polyuria, Alzheimer's Disease and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/1/24, documented R1 was dependent with toileting and incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's Care Plan, dated 1/1/24, documented R1 had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) deficit. R1's Progress Note, dated 4/17/24 at 1:19 PM, documented, Resident difficult to arouse, resident did not eat breakfast or lunch, resident did take her medication, Vital signs were WNL (within normal limits), except oxygen was between 70-60's, oxygen placed at 2 L (liters) per N/C (nasal cannula), oxygen now at 95%, MD (medical doctor) assessed resident, new order received to send out for evaluation and treatment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, and labeled with expiration dates. This failure has the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility. On 07/17/23 at 09:35 AM, the medication storage room was inspected. The unlocked refrigerator, located in the medication storage room, contained the following: 1. An open, multi dose vial of tuberculosis, (TB), solution not labeled with an open date on the box or the vial. 2. One opened box of influenza vaccine with 2 doses in the box, and 6 doses scattered on the bottom of the refrigerator, with an expiration date of 06/30/2023. 3. Two unopened boxes of influenza vaccines, with the expiration date of 06/30/2023. 4. An opened box of Hydrocortisone Acetate 25mg rectal suppositories, with an expiration date of 10/2022. On 07/17/23 9:45 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), stated, There should be an open date on the TB solution. She said she normally dates it when she opens it. V4 said she takes them to the Director of Nursing (DON), and they will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control and technique was maintained by not disinfecting a multi-resident glucose meter for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R44), and not doing proper hand hygiene and glove changes for 4 of 4 residents (R23, R32, R41, R45) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 34. 1. R3's Face Sheet, print date of 07/20/23, documents R3 has a diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus. R3's Physician's Orders, order date of 02/21/23, documents blood glucose monitoring four times a day for diabetes. On 07/17/23 at 12:13 PM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed taking the blood glucose meter from on top of the medication cart and entering R3's room and used the blood glucose meter to obtain R3's blood sugar level. V4 then returned to the medication cart, laid the blood glucose meter on top of the medication cart, and moved on to R44's room. V4 failed to disinfect the glucose meter after it was used. 2. R44's Face Sheet, print date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity for 4 of 5 residents (R14, R31, R41) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R31's admission Record, undated, documents R31 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R31's Electronic Medical Record, documents R31's diagnoses include: Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD), Anxiety Disorder, COVID-19, Major Depressive Disorder, Acute Kidney Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, (DM) and Hypertension, (HTN). R31's Care Plan, dated 6/5/23, documents, (R31) demonstrates significant mood distress/depression related to placement. Interventions: Aid the resident in decreasing feelings of hopelessness by: Promoting resident responsibility and decision making, provide positive feedback for decision making. It continues (R31) presents with moderate to extreme anxiety related to being in facility long term. Interventions: Evaluate the potential factors contributing to feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed identify and asses an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 (R42) residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 34. Findings include: R42's Nursing admission Observation, dated 7/8/2023, documents, skin condition normal. It also documents, Indicate any bruises, lesions, surgical wounds, scars, open areas, rash: Coccyx superficial excoriated areas to upper inner buttock. skin protectant oint, (ointment), with every incont, (incontinent), episode. redness to buttock noted. R42's Progress Note, dated 7/8/2023 at 12:45 PM, documents, Resident arrived via (local) ambulance stretcher from (local hospital) admitted to (resident room number), denies pain no distress, meds confirmed and verified, resting in bed quietly call light in reach. As of 7/18/2023 at 2:30 PM, R42's medical record does not document bruising to R42's abdomen. On 7/18/2023 at 12:50 PM, V2, Director of Nursing, and V5, Restorative Aide, assisted R42 with incontinent care. V5 lifted R42's gown up over her abdomen revealing a large discoloration in various…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preparation areas are protected from dirt and debris and hair restraints are worn in the kitchen to prevent potential food contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents living in the facility. Finding include: On 9/26/22 at 9:53 AM, V11, Cook, was operating the dish machine. V11 was not wearing a hair net. On 9/27/22 at 11:52 AM, the kitchen was toured. The south wall of the kitchen has an air duct running up the wall, which comes from the air conditioner located on the outside of the building. The air duct goes up approximately 14 feet from the floor, and at the top of the vent duct it has a large vent box that has a total of 3 air vents, one on the front of the vent box, and one on each side. All three of these vents are 3/4 of the way covered with a mixture of black grease, dust, dirt, and cobwebs. This combination of debris also covers about 3 feet of the wall and ceiling on all sides of the vent box. The walls are also noted to have paint that is peeling and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain walls, doors, electrical outlets, and floors in good repair. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 9/28/2022 at 10:20 AM In R39's and R14's room, the window ledge, window sill, and door to the entrance of the room were in disrepair. The window ledge and sill were broken, with large pieces of hard material, approximately 2 inches thick, broken and crumbled on floor and in the window sill. R39's was observed lying in the bed with bed pushed against the ledge. The side of the door facing the hall has an area, approximately 4ft by 4ft, of thin wood that has pulled away from the door on three sides, leaving sharp, jagged and rough edges that a resident could injure themselves on. On 9/29/2022 at 10:10 AM V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated the sill to the window has been broken for some time. V4 stated she was not sure how long the facing has been like that on the door. V14 stated the facing was sharp and could cause an injury. V4 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, timely and complete incontinence care for 4 of 5 residents (R6, R9, R33 and R199) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she is always incontinent of bladder, and was not rated on bowel incontinence. R33's Care Plan, dated 8/23/2022, documents Assist and encourage resident to turn and reposition every one to two hours and PRN and Provide skin care after each incontinent episode. On 09/27/2022 at 12:00 PM V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V7, CNA, turned and repositioned, and offered fluids to R33, but did not check her adult incontinent brief to see if she was incontinent. On 9/27/2022 at 1:15 PM, R33 was incontinent of stool while lying in bed. On 9/28/2022 at 3:30 PM, V20, CNA stated when she turns and repositions a resident, she checks the adult incontinence brief. On 9/28/2022 at 3:34 PM, V21, CNA stated when he turns and repositions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to utilize infection control practices during oxygen use, obtain physician's order for respiratory care and develop interventions to address respiratory care for 4 of 4 residents (R6, R11, R30 and R33) reviewed for respiratory therapy in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R6's Care Plan, undated, documented, (R6) has Oxygen Therapy ordered at 3L per nasal cannula as needed related to diagnosis of respiratory failure. Has a BIPap at (Hour of Sleep). He is noted to have shortness of breath when lying flat at night and must have the head of bed elevated. He does wear his BIPap at (Hour of Sleep). It continues, OXYGEN SETTINGS: The resident has O2 via nasal prongs at 3L PRN for signs and symptoms of dyspnea. R6's Physician's Order sheet, dated 9/28/2022, does not document an order for oxygen at 3 liters/minute per nasal cannula. It documents a diagnosis of Chronic Pulmonary Obstruction Disease On 9/26/2022 at 8:40 AM, R6 was sitting on the side of his bed and his oxygen nasal cannula tubing was dated 9/20/2022 and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene, failed to perform wound care in a manner which prevents infection, and failed to cleanse resident equipment used during medication administration to prevent cross contamination for 5 of 16 residents (R9, R30, R33, R39) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 26. Finding include: 1. On 9/28/22 at 10:15 AM, V16 and V17, Physical Therapy Assistants (PTAs), entered R9's room to transfer him from his wheelchair to his bed. V16 and V17 both donned gloves without hand hygiene. On 9/28/22 at 12:07 PM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON), stated staff should wash their hands before putting on gloves and in between glove changes. 2. On 9/26/22 at 11:15 AM, V26, Registered Nurse (RN), entered R30's room to apply a fentanyl patch. V26 donned gloves without hand hygiene. V26 removed the old patch, threw away gloves and patch at medication cart, applied new gloves with no hand hygiene, dated the new patch, and applied it to R30's left upper arm. The facility policy Hand Hygiene, dated 1/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide linens to bathe/shower and showers rooms that are clean and clutter free. This failure has the potential to affect all 45 residents in this facility. The findings include: On 8/1/23 at 8:40 AM, V3, Maintenance Director, stated, The Administrator and I are the ones who order some supplies. We had an issue a couple weeks ago and for some reason, we ran out of linen. I have no idea what happened to all of our towels and washcloths, but they said they didn't have any. I know (V1) and myself ordered three cases of what we thought were washcloths on 7/5/23. With those we ordered five dozen incontinent pads for the beds, and five dozen towels. When we got the washcloths, they were hand towels and not washcloths. I believe the staff were using disposable wipes while they were out. I believe a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), was cutting up towels to use as washcloths. On 8/1/23 at 2:00 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, We only have someone working in laundry from 8:00 AM until 4:00 PM every day. I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$209,961 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $39,865 — penalty dated 2025-12-19
- $98,228 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
- $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-04-22
- $17,713 — penalty dated 2025-02-28
- $41,730 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-10 for 15 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BRIA HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEINFELD, AVRUM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| WEISS, DANIEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| FORGE INVESTMENTS LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 97% | since 12/27/2023 |
| FORGE GP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SEVEN SPECIES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| WEISS, AMY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| WEISS, NATAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| AUSTELL, RIKKI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DHALIWAL, NAVDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| WHEAT CHAFF LP | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/27/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $186K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145656. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.