Lakeside Health & Rehab Center
1200 University Avenue, Carlinville, IL 62626 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (217) 854-4433 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $251,582 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-15)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 84.1% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 37.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 28.3% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.34 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 9.34 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.8%CMS range 35.5–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.5–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.2–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 49.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide interventions to prevent decannulation for a resident with known behaviors of self-decannulation; and failed to ensure that staff were provided tracheostomy recannulation education for extubation for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed for tracheostomy in the sample of 2. The failure resulted in R3's self-decannulation of her tracheostomy which compromised R3's health status. R3 required emergency transfer to the local hospital on [DATE] and required two attempts at reinsertion of the tracheostomy and arterial line placement. After reinsertion of R3's tracheostomy by an ENT physician, R3 became hypoxic with oxygen saturation in the 80's and had increased work for breathing. R3's hospital records document R3 ultimately died on [DATE] with clinical impression of tracheostomy complications, cardiopulmonary arrest and heart block. R3's death certificate is pending investigation. This failure has the potential to affect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to report a fall timely, follow fall incident procedures, and use gait belts during transfers for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3); reviewed for Quality of Care in a sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 being moved before a nurse's assessment and delayed treatment for that R2 succumbed multiple pelvic fractures from later requiring surgery. Findings include:1.R2's Facesheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, in part, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and age-related osteoporosis prior to her fall.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfers and going from sitting to standing.Care Plan initiated 1/14/26 documented R2 was at risk for falls and included the following intervention, in part, for staff to encourage call light usage.R2's Fall Incident Investigation documented her fall occurred on 2/10/26 at 9:00 AM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to implement preventative measures to reduce the development of and worsening of pressure injuries in 2 of 7(R55, R39) residents in the sample of 31. This failure resulted in R55's skin on 1/7/25 documented as mid buttocks maceration to a developed and documented sacrum pressure ulcer stage 3 on 1/16/25; and other in house developed pressure wounds. R39 also developed several in-house pressure injuries. Findings include: 1. R55's Face sheet documents an admission date of 1/7/2025. Diagnosis include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Dysphagia, Type 2 Diabetes, Congestive Heart Failure. R55's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R55 is moderately cognitively impaired. R55 is dependent for rolling left to right and chair to bed transfers. R55 is at risk for pressure injuries and has unhealed pressure injuries. R55's care plan updated 3/4/2025 documents Actual Pressure Ulcer; Site(s):…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide progressive interventions and to prevent multiple falls for 1 of 5 (R47) residents investigated for accidents in a sample of 31. The failure resulted in R47 sustaining a right hip fracture and then sustaining a right hip surgical incision dehiscence requiring a return to the hospital for sutures and antibiotics. Findings include: R47's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) undated documents that the resident was readmitted to the facility after right hip surgery on 12/04/24. R47's EMR dated 4/25/24 documents a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site; and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. R47's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/11/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 4 out of 15. The MDS documents that the resident requires substantial/maximal assistance for roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent injury to R2's right second toe during transport to the facility from the hospital. This failure resulted in R2's right toe striking the plate at the bottom of door, causing a wound to the second toe of right foot and toenail being removed. Findings include: On 1/29/2025 at 12:40PM V13, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) removed socks from R2's feet. R2's second toe of right foot, toenail is off and area dried blood. No dressing in place as verified by V13. On 1/29/2025 at 10:55AM V14, facility transport stated she provided transport for R2 from hospital in (town name) to the facility on 1/15/2025. V14 stated when pushing R2 into the facility R2's foot hit the plate at the bottom of the door. V14 stated it was bleeding and she notified the nurse. On 1/29/2025 at 12:50PM V8 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she was on duty when R2 arrived at the facility on 1/15/2025. V8 stated R2's toenail was off and bleeding. V8, LPN stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, identify, assess, monitor, implement progressive interventions, and to handle soiled pressure ulcer dressings appropriately to prevent pressure ulcers and encourage healing for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 going for 9 days without a treatment in place for a left heel pressure ulcer and R3 having one pressure ulcer on the left medial foot that was unknown by staff, one pressure ulcer on the left great toe that did not receive treatment or a full assessment for 9 days and R3 developing osteomyelitis requiring Intravenous Antibiotics. Findings include: 1. On 9/3/24 at 8:41 AM, V7, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) and V8 CNA are in R3's room in the middle of cleaning her up. R3 is lying on her left side. R3 has a visible sacrum pressure ulcer approximately 4 inches (in) by (x) 3 in x 2.5 in deep. The old dressing has yellow brown drainage on it. The dressing is on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-04-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician's hospital discharge orders for a high-risk anticoagulant medication for 1 of 2 residents (R49) reviewed for anticoagulant medications in the sample of 27. This failure resulted in R49 receiving double the ordered dose of Eliquis for three days and being hospitalized for 11 days with the diagnosis of Severe Blood Loss Anemia, Acute on Chronic with a differential diagnosis of GI (Gastrointestinal) Bleed, AAA (Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm), and Autolysis. Findings include: R49's Face Sheet documents, R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses to include: Embolism and Thrombosis of Lower Extremities, Other Long Term (Current) Drug Therapy, Anemia, and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. R49's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 02/24/23 documents, the following order: Eliquis 2.5 mg, (milligram), give 5 mg every 12 hours. R49's Facility Physician Order Summary Report, dated 02/24/23 documents, the order dated 02/24/23: Apixaban…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) to provide timely care to the residents in the sample of 29, when reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include:On 5 /19/26 at 9:36 AM, R7 pressed the call light button due to being incontinent of urine. R7 stated she is unsure how long she was been wet because she fell asleep, but she is wet now. R7 stated she is left in a wet depends for extended periods of time and has waited over 30 minutes for her call light to be answered by staff to help her. On 5/19/26 at 9:40 AM, V22, Activity Aide, walked into R7's room and asked what R7 needed. V22 walked out of R7's room with R7's call light still on.On 5/19/26 at 9:47 AM, V14, CNA, entered R7's room and turned off the call light. V14 took R7's clothes out of R7's closet and turned on the water from R7's sink.On 5/19/26 at 9:49 AM, V14 walked out of R7's room and left the faucet water running. R7 stated this is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide timely emergency room (ER) transport for 1 of 1 residents (R61) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 29. This failure resulted in R61 not being sent to the ER for more than eight hours after receiving the physician order. R61 decompensated later that day and required oral intubation.Findings include: 1-R61's Face Sheet documents R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), toxoplasma meningoencephalitis, cryptococcosis, and streptococcal pneumonia. R61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R61 was cognitively intact and required partial assistance with bed mobility and transfer. 05/20/2026 10:03 AM, R61 was sitting up in his bed. He was very thin with orbital wasting. He stated he did not receive his IV medications in the Facility for a couple of days on admission and ended up in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). R61's Physician Order dated 4/23/26 documents Ganciclovir…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate nephrostomy care to prevent infections in 1 of 2 residents (R10), reviewed for bowel/bladder incontinence, catheters, and UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) in the sample of 29. This failure resulted in R10 having multiple UTIs with hospitalization. Finding Include:On 5/20/26 at 10:40 AM, nephrostomy care was observed with V21, Wound Nurse, with the following noted: Prior to entering room, V21 donned a gown, gloves, and mask. V21 entered the room and removed the left nephrostomy dressing, dated 5/19/26, and discarded it in the regular trash can. There were no gloves available in the room, V21 exited the room and brought in a box of gloves. V21 donned the gloves with no hand hygiene completed. V21 then proceeded to clean the nephrostomy tube on the left injection site and flushed it with normal saline as ordered. V21 then cleaned the injection site again and removed her gloves. V21 then donned new gloves without completing hand hygiene. V21 then cleaned around the left nephrostomy tube site,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to obtain and properly administer prescribed medications for 2 of 3 residents (R15, R61) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 29. This failure resulted in R61 missing three doses of a prescribed intravenous (IV) medication and being transported to the hospital where he required intubation.Findings include: 1-R61's Face Sheet documents R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), toxoplasma meningoencephalitis, cryptococcosis, and streptococcal pneumonia. R61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R61 was cognitively intact and required partial assistance with bed mobility and transfer. On 5/20/2026 at 10:03 AM, R61 stated he did not get his IV medications for a couple days when he was admitted to the Facility and ended up in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). R61's Hospital Discharge Paperwork dated 4/23/25 documents R61 received a dose of Ganciclovir 7 milliliter (mL) IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize infection control techniques in 5 of 5 residents (R3, R7, R10, R15, R28), reviewed for infection control in the sample of 29. This failure resulted in R10 having multiple UTI's (Urinary Tract Infections) with hospitalization. Findings Include: 1) On 5/20/26 at 10:40 AM, nephrostomy care was observed with V21, Wound Nurse, with the following noted: Prior to entering room, V21 donned a gown, gloves, and mask. V21 entered the room and removed the left nephrostomy dressing, dated 5/19/26, and discarded it in the regular trash can. There were no gloves available in the room, V21 exited the room and brought in a box of gloves. V21 donned the gloves with no hand hygiene completed. V21 then proceeded to clean the left nephrostomy tube injection site and flushed it with normal saline as ordered. V21 then cleaned the injection site again and removed her gloves. V21 then donned new gloves without completing hand hygiene. V21 then cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 16. Findings include:R6's admission Record, print date of 10/2/25, documents R6 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Alzheimer and Dementia.R6's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R6 is severely cognitively impaired, uses wheelchair, is dependent on staff for toileting, showers, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and all mobility except rolling in bed.R6's Care Plan, dated 12/12/23, documents, (R6) has a Self-Care Deficit As Evidenced by: Needs assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) related to dx (diagnosis): ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED, HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE WITHOUT HEART FAILURE. Intervention: Transfer: Two person physical assistance required Date Initiated: 12/13/2024.R6's Therapy to Nursing Recommendations, dated 8/21/25, documents R6 transfers with assist of 2 with a wheeled walker.R6's Health Status Note, dated 9/3/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to maintain residents' well-being and dignity by accommodating preference for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R4, and R5) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 6/6/2025 at 9:14 AM, R4 stated, the facility runs out of towels, pads and sheets all the time. I think they need to order more. They are always running out. It happens a lot, too much. I have my own briefs that I keep at my bedside, but staff had come in here and taken mine. I get cold sometimes and they do not have enough blankets and when I ask, they say they do not have any more. On 6/6/2025 at 9:18 AM, R2 stated the Facility at night runs out of adult briefs and pull ups at least two or three times a month. On 6/6/2025 at 9:28 AM, R5 stated the Facility has run out of (adult diapers) and staff made her stay in her room when she did not want to because they did not have anything to put on her. On 6/6/2025 at 10:29 AM, V8, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated, I started working in the Facility as a housekeeper and then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents residing in the facility when reviewed for Sufficient Staffing in the sample of 31. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 3/25/25 at 12:20 PM, R4 stated they need more CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) everyday, all day. R4 stated the CNAs are leaving and not staying. R4 stated she is constantly having to wait for her call light to be answered and care provided. R4 stated she has had to sit in her urine for long periods of time and she is tired of it and is trying to move to another facility. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/5/25, documents R4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R4 is cognitively intact and is dependent with toileting. 2. On 3/25/25 at 9:35 AM, R2 stated there were only 2 CNAs on 3/22/25 during the night for the entire building. R2 stated it is harder to get care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date two opened multi-dose vials of Tuberculin Serum when reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/25/25 at 1:39 PM, the medication storage room refrigerator was observed with two multi-dose vials of Tuberculin Serum, opened and undated. The Tuberculin Product Information, dated October 2021, documents a vial of Tubersol (Tuberculin) which has been entered (opened) and in use for 30 days should be discarded. The Medication Storage Policy, dated 7/1/23, documents the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner and in accordance with state and federal regulations. Medications shall be administered prior to the manufacture's expiration date. On 3/26/25 at 3:21 PM, V2, Director of Nurses, stated if the Tuberculin Serum is a multi-dose vial, it is used on multiple residents and should be dated when opened. The CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) for 671,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility opened a package belonging to a resident without their permission for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for Communication with Privacy in the sample of 31. Findings include: On 3/25/25 at 9:35 AM, R2 stated he had ordered a wireless charger and when it came, staff (unknown) opened the package prior to giving it to him without his permission because they thought it was medication. R2 stated he tells the staff when he has ordered something, so they don't open it and he does not order his medication anymore, the facility does. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's admission Contract, dated 12/20/24, documents R2 declined authorization for the facility to inspect and open official correspondence. On 3/26/25 at 8:58 AM, V1, Administrator, stated V1 the resident's mail/packages are not opened by staff. On 3/26/25 at 3:21 PM, V2, Director of Nurses, stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 resident (R265) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 31. Findings include: R265's Face Sheet documents R265 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and metabolic encephalopathy. R265's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R265 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with mobility. R265's Care Plan does not address risk of abuse and neglect. R265's Weekly Skin Inspection dated 3/13/25 did not document any skin impairments. R265's Progress Note by V15, Registered Nurse (RN), on 3/14/25 at 11:45 AM documents, At 11:30 a.m. activities personnel brought resident to the nurse's station and showed this nurse a skin tear to resident's right arm. Skin tear 5 cm (centimeters) x 3 cm x 0 cm noted to resident's right arm. Resident unable to explain how she sustained the skin tear. R265's Progress Note by V15 on 3/14/25 at 2:16 PM documents, New order per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R265) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 31. Findings include: R265's Face Sheet documents R265 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and metabolic encephalopathy. R265's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R265 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with mobility. R265's Care Plan does not address risk of abuse and neglect. R265's Weekly Skin Inspection dated 3/13/25 did not document any skin impairments. R265's Progress Note by V15, Registered Nurse (RN), on 3/14/25 at 11:45 AM documents, At 11:30 a.m. activities personnel brought resident to the nurse's station and showed this nurse a skin tear to resident's right arm. Skin tear 5 cm (centimeters) x 3 cm x 0 cm noted to resident's right arm. Resident unable to explain how she sustained the skin tear. R265's Progress Note by V15 on 3/14/25 at 2:16 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was administered in a manner that prevents foodborne illness for 1 of 4 residents (R10) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 31. Findings include: R10's Face Sheet documents R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including brain stem stroke, functional quadriplegia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy (feeding tube) status. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R10 was moderately cognitively impaired, dependent with mobility, and had a feeding tube. R10's Care Plan initiated 7/29/21 documents R10's nutrition must be provided via feeding tube due to history of stroke with dysphagia. R10's 3/13/25 Diet Order documents NPO (nothing by mouth). R10's Physician Orders dated 3/17/25 documents Jevity 1.2 per PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) via pump rate of 65 mL (milliliters) per hour with 150 mL water flush every 4 hours. On 3/25/25 at 9:15 AM, R10 was sleeping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify resident specific behaviors and develop a behavioral care plan with individualized interventions for residents with behavioral health needs for 3 of 6 residents (R2, R3, R8) reviewed for behavioral health services in the sample of 10. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's MDS goes on to document that R2 has verbal behaviors directed towards others and rejects care. R2's Care Plan, dated 1/14/25, fails to identify R2's verbal behaviors or rejection of care, therefore no resident specific interventions were implemented. R2's Care Plan does not address R2's diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder or interventions to address this. R2's Progress Note, dated 2/8/25 at 8:39 AM, documents the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide timely assessment and treatment for a wound for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 7. Findings include: On 1/29/2024 at 12:40PM V13, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) removed a sock from R2's feet. R2's second toe of Right foot, was observed as having the toenail off and dried blood. No dressing in place as verified by CNAs. R2's Physician Orders (PO) dated 1/15/2025 documents refer to wound care for consult as needed. R2's PO dated 1/17/2025 documents Right (R) second toe as needed cleanse to R second toe with wound cleanse, apply skin prep and cover with dry dressing change 3 times a week and as need (prn). R2's PO dated 1/15/2025 with documented start date 1/19/2025, documents R second toe every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday; cleanse area to R second toe with wound cleanser, apply skin prep and cover with dry dressing change 3 times a week and prn. R2's skin and wound note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to respond to call lights timely for 4 of 6 residents (R2, R3, R5, R6) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. On 1/7/25 at 10:35 AM, R3 stated sometimes it can take a long time for her call light to be answered and for her to get cleaned up. R3 stated it is worse during supper time and at night. R3 stated the average wait time during the night is an hour. R3 stated sometimes the staff will come in her room, turn her call light off and tell her she has to wait her turn and then they leave the room. R3 stated right now she is wet with urine and needs cleaned up, she put her call light on about five minutes ago and an unknown CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) came into her room and told her she had to get help from staff on the other side of the building and then would be back to clean her up. On 1/7/25 at 10:46 AM, R3's stated no one has come back to help her. R3's call light was not activated at this time.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to don appropriate Personal Protectant Equipment (PPE) when caring for isolation residents, failed to educate visitors on proper PPE usage during a COVID-19 outbreak, and failed to supply PPE for staff and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 57 residents living in the facility. The findings include: V3, Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse, provided a list of those who were COVID positive with 19 residents and 15 staff members listed in the facility. 1. On 12/31/24 at 8:45 AM, R2 was seen lying in bed with V4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), sitting at her bedside with only a N-95 mask on and no further PPE. R2 had an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign posted on entrance to her room with a cart of PPE equipment sitting outside her door. The PPE cart outside R2's door had no gowns in the cart. Per R2's Physician Order, R2 should be on Contact Isolation and not EBP. R2's Physician Order, dated 12/18/24, documents Contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate care plan interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 4 (R6) residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 16. Finding include: R6's Face Sheet, dated 1/2/25, documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical diagnosis of Dementia and Acquired Absence of Eye. R6's Care Plan dated 12/23/2024 documents R6 has a chair and bed pad alarm in place for safety related to cognitive deficits, history of falls, and lacking safety awareness with interventions in place including check placement and function of alarm every shift and as needed, perform alarm assessment quarterly and as needed. R6 is at risk for potential complications related to falls with interventions including assisting R6 to keep non-skid footwear on at all times while up, bilateral half side rails to aid in bed mobility, ensure bed is in the lowest/locked position when in bed, make sure call light is always within reach, use toilet with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review the Facility failed to provide a RN (Registered Nurse) 8 hours a day 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 51 residents of the facility. Findings include: The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 3/10/24, documented there was no RN on duty 3/10/24. The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 3/17/24, documented there was no RN on duty 3/23/24. The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 3/24/24, documented there was no RN on duty 3/24/24 nor on 3/30/24. The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 3/31/24, documented there was no RN on duty 3/31/24 nor on 4/6/24. The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 4/7/24, documented there was no RN on duty on 4/7/24 nor on 4/13/24. The Facility's Nursing Schedule, dated 4/14/24, documented there was no RN on duty on 4/14/24. On 4/15/24 at 10:13 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated the facility does not have a RN on duty everyday and that her full time RN recently went from full time to PRN (as needed). V2 stated she generally works Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM. On 4/17/24 at 2:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post nurse staffing information. This has the potential to affect all 51 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 4/15/24 at 10:20 AM, the daily nurse staffing was not posted. On 4/15/24 at 10:25 AM V6, Medical Records/CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant), stated we normally post it up by the front door, but I don't see it anywhere today. On 4/15/24 at 10:30 AM V1, Administrator, stated she is new and does not know who is responsible for posting the daily staffing. On 4/15/24 at 10:34 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated she just started working at the Facility in January and she does not know who is responsible for posting the daily nurse staffing. On 4/17/24 at 1:15 PM the daily nurse staffing information was observed on a bulletin board on the hallway behind the nurse's station. The daily nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place and was not readily accessible to residents and visitors. The Facility's Posting Daily Staffing Policy, dated 7/1/23, documented the Facility will post on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to falls after a resident was moved to a new room for 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for falls/accidents in a sample of 30. Findings include: R19's Face Sheet, print date of 04/18/24, documents R19 has the diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, and dementia. R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R19 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting assistance, part of dressing, personal hygiene, transfer, substantial/maximal assistance shower/bathe. R19's Care Plan, with admission date of 02/04/2021, documents: I am at risk for falls. I admitted to facility with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, high blood pressure, diabetes, depression, neuropathy, CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), obesity, Parkinson's Disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place to prevent further falls for 1 of 3 residents (R19) who were reviewed for falls/accidents in a sample of 30. Findings include: On 04/17/24 at 10:20 AM, Upon entering R19's room she was observed to be sitting in her room in her wheelchair. There were no non-skid strips on either side of her bed, there was no sign located in her room that stated Call Don't fall, and no sign posted in her room to remind her not to bend over and pick up objects. On 04/18/2024 at 10:19 AM, This surveyor went in to speak with R19 again. There were no non-skid strips observed beside the bed and there was still no signage posted reminding her to call for help or to not bend over and pick up objects. R19's Face Sheet, print date of 04/18/24, documents R19 has the following diagnoses but not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, and dementia. R19's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to justify why a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was not attempted per a pharmacy recommendation; and, failed to ensure the resident had the proper diagnosis for the psychotropic medications for 2 of 6 residents, (R4, R28) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 30. Findings include: 1. R4's Face sheet dated 4/17/2024 does not include a diagnosis of depression or anxiety. R4's Order Summary Sheet dated 4/17/2024 documents, does not include depression or anxiety under the Diagnoses portion. R4's Order Summary Report dated 4/17/2024 documents R4 takes Sertraline 100 mg (Milligrams) once a day for depression. Monitor for anxiety, agitation, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, tachycardia (rapid heartbeat), confusion, tremors and muscle rigidity. R4's Order Summary Report dated 4/17/2024 documents Trazodone 50 mg at bedtime for Depression. Monitor for anxiety, agitation, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, tachycardia (rapid heartbeat), confusion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely until administration and not left at bedside for 1 of 16 residents (R4) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 30. Findings include: On 4/17/2024 at 10:00 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to identify a pill that was laying on R4's bed sheet. V2 stated she was unsure but would find out what the pill was. At this time, R4 stated, I just forgot about taking it (the pill). On 4/17/2024 V2 stated the pill was identified as R4's Torsemide (medication taken for edema/swelling). R4's Order Summary Report dated 4/17/2024 documents, Torsemide 20 mg (Milligrams): give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to edema. On 4/18/2024 at 10:25 AM, V2 stated, (R4) dropped her pill. We notified the doctor. I would want them to ensure the pills are swallowed. The Facility's Policy, Medication Administration Policy/Procedure dated 7/1/2023 documents, Purpose: To ensure proper administration of oral medications. It continues to document it is the responsibility of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain stool for occult for 1 of 6 residents (R47) reviewed for labs in the sample of 30. Findings include: 1. R47's health status note dated 4/11/2024 at 7:21 documents received call from physician office new order occult stool x3. R47's health status note dated 4/17/2024 at 13:54 documents (R47) was taken to the bathroom and denied the urge to have a bowel movement. Once Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisted (R47) up from his toilet seat. CNA noticed that (R47) did have a small bowel movement into the toilet. Unable to collect sample at this time. On 04/18/24 at 10:45 AM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated she had reviewed R47's toileting sheets and R47 had 3 stools in the time frame the stool for occult blood was ordered. V2 stated R47 also had a stool on 4/17/2024 at 13:54 and stool for occult was not collected because staff removed specimen collection container from the toilet prior to R47 using the toilet. V2 stated there had been miscommunication in regard to stool for occult on R47. V2 stated the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to use hand hygiene between glove changes prior to entering an Enhanced Barrier Precaution room; and, failed to utilize gloves while in the Enhanced Barrier Precaution room and while touching surfaces with potential bodily fluid contamination for 2 of 24 residents (R4 and R15) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 30. Findings include: 1. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. On 4/17/2024 at 10:00 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to identify a pill that was laying on R4's bed sheet. R4's white fitted bed sheet had a yellow discoloration in the form of circular ring, underneath R4's mid-section. The pill was laying on this area with an over-turned medication cup. At this time V2 felt the bed sheet, ungloved, and stated it was dry, but she was unsure what the discoloration was. R4 then placed the pill back in the medication cup. V2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of the inability to administer an antibiotic as ordered for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for physician's notification in the sample of 3. Findings include: R2's admission record, with print date of 12/11/23, documented a medical diagnosis on 11/25/23 of sepsis and urinary tract infection. R2's Minimum Data Sent (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 as being mild cognition impaired, alert and orientated to person and place. On 12/11/23 at 11:20 AM, R2 stated he was putting on his long sleeve shirt and the Intravenous Line (IV) site was accidentally pulled out from his right arm from his shirt sleeve. R2 stated that he receives an antibiotic every day through his IV site, since 11/25/23, and the IV from his right arm came out the day of 12/1/23. R2 stated he has not received his antibiotic antibiotics since then, but received an antibiotic pill which was started on 12/6/23. R2's Physician's Order (PO), documents R2 should receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer antibiotic as ordered by physician to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for UTI in the sample of 3. Findings include: 1. R2's admission record, with print date of 12/11/23, documented a medical diagnosis on 11/25/23 of sepsis and urinary tract infection. On 12/11/23 at 11:20 AM, R2 stated he was putting on his long sleeve shirt and the Intravenous Line (IV) site was accidentally pulled out from his right arm from his shirt sleeve. R2 stated that he receives an antibiotic every day through his IV site, since 11/25/23, and the IV from his right arm came out the day of 12/1/23. R2 stated he has not received his antibiotic antibiotics since then, but received an antibiotic pill which was started on 12/6/23. R2's Physician's Order (PO), documents R2 should receive Ceftriaxone Sodium solution reconstitute 2 grams use intravenously every 24 hours for urinary tract infection for 11 days and to begin on 11/25/2023 and to end final dose on day of 12/5/2023. R2's December 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform complete incontinent care for 4 of 6 residents, (R4, R16, R51 and R156) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections, (UTI), in the sample of 27. Findings include: 1. On 04/13/2023 at 1:21 PM, V16 and V17, Certified Nursing Assistants, (CNAs), approached R4 who was in bed to provide incontinent care. R4's adult diaper was wet with a sanitary pad, and toilet paper inside her vagina with dried feces on the toilet paper when the adult diaper was removed. V16 and V17, stated, they were not sure when R4 had been changed or was taken to the bathroom last. They usually change residents every two hours, but they're not sure what time R4 was changed last. Both CNAs stated, they work another hall. V17 wet a washcloth in the basin and used a shampoo, body cleanser that required rinsing. V16 and V17 then rolled R4 over onto her right side, cleansed the left side of her buttocks, then rinsed, patted dry. V17 cleansed, R4's left buttocks, rinsed, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-04-14 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their policy to track COVID-19 vaccination for staff and ensure all staff are fully vaccinated or have a religious or medical exemption. This has the potential to affect all 53 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: The Facility's COVID-19 Vaccination list documents V19, V20, and V21 have not completed their initial vaccine series. The Facility's Staff Vaccination Rate is 94.9%. On 04/13/23 at 1:30 PM, V3, Infection Preventionist, (IP), stated, V20 has consented to getting the vaccine, but has not received it yet. She stated, V21 does not want the vaccine and needs to get a waiver. She was unsure of V19's vaccination status but said she would find out. On 04/14/23 at 8:45 AM, V21, Housekeeper, stated, the facility has not offered her the COVID-19 vaccine or provided her any education regarding the vaccine or the possibility of an exemption. On 04/14/23 at 9:20 AM, V3, Infection Preventionist, (IP), stated, (V19) and (V20) will be getting their second doses today. On 04/14/23 at 8:40 AM, V1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$251,582 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $108,500 — penalty dated 2026-04-15
- $104,706 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $27,583 — penalty dated 2025-03-07
- $10,793 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-05 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SUMMIT HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC ILLINOIS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2023 |
| APOGEE TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2023 |
| SC ILLINOIS I TBD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2023 |
| ALBERS, CHAS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| LICHTMAN, SHALOM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| LIGHT MAN LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $295K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145456. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.