No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gillespie Health & Rehab Ctr

7588 Staunton Road, Gillespie, IL 62033 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (217) 839-2171 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 839-2171 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (12% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
715 Broadway St · (217) 839-4491 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
120 S Macoupin St · (217) 839-9901 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Harmon's0.6 mi
900 N Hardroad · (217) 835-2514 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
502 S Macoupin St · (217) 839-3667

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.8%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.1%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.6%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.0%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.5%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%63.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.7%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.002.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.6%CMS range 38.8–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.5–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.5–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
12.5%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 70.7 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-17)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement an individualized transfer plan, initiate and implement appropriate interventions for 4 of 8 residents (R20, R9, R17 and R39) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 39.The findings include: 1 On 5/20/2026 at 9:02AM V24 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V23 CNA transferred R20 from wheelchair to bed with mechanical lift. Prior to transfer R20 sitting in wheelchair with sling in place. After attaching sling straps to the lift. V23 CNA operated the lift. V24 held on to sling and V24 placed her right foot on bar underneath wheelchair that attaches to wheel of wheelchair. R20's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R20 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) of 15. R20's MDS documents R20 is dependent on staff for chair to bed transfer. R20's care plan dated 10/20/2025 document R20 needs assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) related to limited Range of Motion (ROM) to bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate a physician ordered antibiotic timely for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in the sample of 4.Findings include:1. On 9/17/2025 at 8:59AM R2 stated she had symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and a specimen to the lab and results had been sent to the physician, but (the physician) was in the hospital. R2 stated she was not receiving an antibiotic for a UTI. R2 stated she has had UTI's in the past and septic. R2's culture report dated 9/15/2025 documents greater than 100,000 Eschericia Coli in urine. R2's report (faxed back to the facility from the physician) documents Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) x10 days dated 9/16/2025. R2's Medication Administration Records dated 9/16/25 did not document the initiation/administration of physician ordered Macrobid. R2's current face sheet dated 9/17/2025 documents R2 has a diagnosis in part of chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), and personal history of urinary tract infection. On 9/17/2025 at 12:44PM V1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide complete incontinent and peri care to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1.On 9/17/2025 R2 placed on bedpan per V6 and V7, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA'S). R2 voided on the bedpan. Both V6 and V7 removed bedpan from under R2. V6, CNA cleansed R2's bilateral groin, inner thighs, wiped peri area front to back. V6 did not separate R2's labia. V6 rinsed and dried all areas, prior to V6 and V7 turning R2 on side to cleanse buttocks and rectal area. R2's current face sheet dated 9/17/2025 documents R2 has a diagnosis in part of chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), and personal history of urinary tract infection. R2's urine Culture results dated 9/15/2025 documents equal or greater 100,000 Escherichia Coli. R2's Care plan dated 5/11/2023 documents R2 is at risk for impaired skin/ deep tissue injury related to immobility, obesity, incontinence of bowel and bladder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a multi dose vial with a shelf life of 30 days was dated to indicate when it was opened and failed to ensure a bottle of controlled substance medication was labeled the residents name and physician's order. This failure has the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: 1. On 4/14/2025 at 2:52 PM the medication storage room and mediation cart were inspected with V10, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). 1. There was a bottle of Morphine Sulfate (Opioid pain medication/controlled substance) in a locked box. Neither the bottle or the box was labeled with a name or physician's orders. At this, time V10 stated the medication had been opened and there had been medication used from the bottle. V10 stated, I don't know whose (medication bottle) that is. That one doesn't even have a name on the box. During this observation, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) entered the medication storage room. V2 stated, That one (morphine bottle) is (R17's). It needs wasted. She doesn't have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide substitute food choices for 5 of 24 residents (R16, R28, R30, R49, R63) reviewed for meals. Findings include: 1. On 04/14/25 at 12:25 PM, R63 was served her lunch by V6, Dietary Manager, R63 was served a grilled cheese sandwich. R63 stated she wanted turkey. V6 stated she would get her turkey. V6 returned with the turkey. The turkey was on bread and had gravy on top. R63 stated I just want turkey that I could cut up with my knife and eat with a fork. V6 stated, How about a sandwich. V6 folded the turkey into a sandwich and walked away. On 4/15/25 at 2:35 PM, V1, Administrator, stated R63 should have been given plain turkey. V1 stated, She doesn't eat that much already. R63's Face Sheet, print date of 4/15/25, documents R63 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Dementia and severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition. R63's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R63 is severely cognitively impaired and requires set up clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. R55's admission Record, dated 4/16/25, documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction with Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Dysphagia, Emphysema, Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Malignant of Neoplasm of Sigmoid Colon, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, and Diverticulitis. On 4/15/25 at 1:05 PM, R55 used call light to let staff know he had to use restroom. V4, CNA, assisted R55 to the toilet to have bowel movement (BM). When finished, V4 wiped R55's buttocks and anal area with a wet washcloth sprayed with peri-wash, then dried R55. Using the same soiled gloves, V4 then pulled R55's incontinence brief and pants up, adjusted R55's shirt, and assisted R55 back to his wheelchair, then removed her soiled gloves. 5. R216's admission Record, dated 4/16/25, documents R216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Aphasia, Dysphagia, Chronic Kidney Disease-stage 2, Hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for three of seven residents (R31, R38, R216) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 49. The Findings Include: 1. R38's admission Record, dated 4/16/25, documents R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease-stage 3, Hypertension, Descending Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm, Cerebral Infarction without residual deficits. R38's Care Plan, dated 3/20/25, documents R38 has a Self-Care Deficit as Evidenced by: Needs assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living). Interventions: Toilet Use - One-person physical assist required. It continues R38 has a Potential for impaired skin integrity related to: falls, impaired mobility, occasional incontinence. Interventions: Provide peri-care as needed. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R38 has a severe cognitive impairment and requires setup or clean-up assistance for toileting, partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to check placement of a J-tube (Jejunostomy) and label enteral feeding for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 49. Findings include: On 4/15/25 at 12:30 PM, V14, Licensed Practical Nurse, entered R50's room. R50 has a J-tube for medications and feedings. V14 stopped R50's tube feeding, disconnected the tube feeding, administered 30 milliliters (ml) of water, the hydroxyzine cocktail, and flushed with another 30 ml of water. V14 stated, I have to go and get another ruler. I dropped the one I had. V14 left the room and returned with another ruler and measured the length of the J-tube. On 4/15/25 at 12:40 PM, R50's hanging disposable tube feeding bag is dated 4/15/25. The bag fails to document what type of feeding or rate of the feeding. On 4/15/25 at 12:40 PM, V14 stated, I should have measured the J-tube before I administered the medications. I recently hung a new disposable tube feeding bag and filled it with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the use of an antibiotic and utilize infection surveillance when considering initiation of an antibiotic for 2 of 4 (R32, R41) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1 On [DATE] at 10:57 AM, V3, Infection Preventionist was questioned on how she tracks the infections in the facility. V3 stated she looks at the 24-hour report for new antibiotic orders, checks the order, and puts that information on the tracking sheet that she uses. V3 stated that the computer program infection tracker has the information on McGreer and the cultures if any were obtained. V3 was asked to pull up R41's McGreer assessment for a urinary tract infection that is on the monthly infection tracking log. V3 pulled up the McGreer and stated, I am not sure how the system works because it never tells you if they qualify for a true infection. V3 was questioned what symptoms R41 presented with to get a urine culture, V3 stated, Her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's advance directives and physician's orders reflected resident's wishes for 2 of 3 residents (R41 and R58) reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1. R41's Face Sheet, with original admission date of [DATE], documents R41 has diagnoses of but not limited to chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) lower respiratory infection, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic atrial fibrillation. R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R41 is severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 06 out of 15 and she is dependent on staff for most of her activities of daily living (ADLs). R41's Care Plan, not dated, documents Resident desires CPR be initiated in the event of cardiac arrest, resident wishes will be honored thru next review, Full Code/CPR, In the event of cardiac arrest,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications are labeled and stored appropriately until they are administered for 4 of 4 residents (R4, R21, R23, R32) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 34. Findings include: On 5/24/23 at 7:50 AM, V7, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was observed doing the AM medication pass on the 100 and 200 Halls. When V7 opened the top drawer of the medication cart, there were three medication cups containing multiple pills and capsules. These cups were labeled with R4's, R21's, and R23's names, but no other identifying information or dates were written on the cups. There were two cups of clear fluid on top of the medication cart. 1. R4's Physician Order Summary dated 5/24/23 documents he takes the following medications in the morning: Fluoxetine 10 milligram (mg), Ergocalciferol 2000 units (u), Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 mg 2 tabs, Vitamin B12 1000 micrograms (mcg), Miralax 17 Grams (Gm), Aspirin 81 mg, Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets, Odansatron 4 mg, and Trihexyphenidyl 1 mg. On 5/24/23 at 8:25 AM, V7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to follow up on Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendations for residents with significant weight loss and ensure RD recommendations are implemented in a timely fashion in 2 of 5 residents (R14, R48) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 34. Findings include: 1. R14's Face Sheet documents R14 has diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, vitamin D deficiency, Barrett's Esophagus without dysplasia, essential (primary) hypertension, and age-related cognitive decline. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R14 was severely cognitively impaired, walked independently, and had no significant weight loss. R14's Care Plan dated 4/18/23 documents, I may be at risk for nutritional problems r/t (related to) age related cognitive decline. The Facility's Weight Losses list documents R14 as a resident who has lost weight. R14's Weight and Vitals Summary dated 5/25/23 documents R14 weighed 155.9 pounds on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUMMIT HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SC ILLINOIS HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2023
APOGEE TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2023
SC ILLINOIS I TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2023
SCHARDAN, KIMIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2023
LICHTMAN, SHALOMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
LIGHT MAN LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$489K
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 7%Other / private 21%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $489K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$272per resident / day
operating cost
$8,263per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$256per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145367. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next