Pavilion Of South Shore
7750 South Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60649 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (773) 731-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $105,248 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 100.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 22.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.2%CMS range 28.8–53.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.6–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.43 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 108.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for elopement. This failure resulted in R2 leaving the facility unsupervised through an exit door. R2 was found hours later by the police, taken to the hospital by EMS (Emergency Medical Services), and admitted with a diagnosis of hypothermia. This situation was identified as an immediate jeopardy. The Administrator was notified and presented with the immediate jeopardy template on [DATE] at 11:24 AM. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] and removed on [DATE]. The facility presented an acceptable removal plan on [DATE]. However, the deficiency remains out of compliance at the second level of harm until the facility evaluates the effectiveness of the removal plan. Findings Include: On [DATE] R2 was observed to be missing from the facility-by-facility staff. R2 was not found after a facility and community search was conducted by the facility. Per facility documentation the Chicago Police department was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R1, R5) oxygen administration via a functional oxygen concentrator for two (R1 and R5) out of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. This failure resulted in R1 having trouble breathing on [DATE] causing emotional distress, and R5 having trouble breathing on [DATE] causing hospitalization. Findings Include:MDS (minimum data set) with review date of [DATE], BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 8 indicated R1's has a moderate cognitive impairment.MDS (minimum data set) with review date of [DATE], BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 13 indicated R5's has cognition is intact. On [DATE] at 10:43 AM, this surveyor observed R1 laying on his bed, he is currently on oxygen via concentrator, the setting is 3 liters. R1 appears calm and collected and free of pain. R1 is alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. R1 stated in the past the facility left him without receiving oxygen. R1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (R1) was free from abuse. This failure affected R1 who was attacked by another resident R2. As a result, R1 sustained a human bite, had to get a tetanus shot and was treated with antibiotics as a prophylactic for infection. this as the potential to affect all 41-resident residing on the 2nd floor. Findings include: On 09/18/24 at 10:25am, R2 observed in bed. R2 was unable to recollect what happened on 08/14/24. R1 stated I'm fine. At 10:28am, R1 stated that on (08/14/24), R2 was in the room stealing from R1 and R3 drawer. R1 stated I (R1) was out of the room for a minute and when I came back, I (R1) saw R2 taking my stuff, food from my drawer and from R3's drawer who was at the hospital at the time. R1 stated when I (R1) asked R2 to put the things back, R2 attacked me (R1). R2 tried to hit me with a walker pointing to the walker in the room. R1 stated so I tried to defend myself and R2 bit me on my fingers and I had to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure that adequate supervision is provided to two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for supervision. This failure affected R1 and R2 who had an altercation that resulted in R1 having a human bite. R1 had to get a tetanus shot and was treated with antibiotics as a prophylactic for infection. this has the potential to affect all 41-resident residing on the 2nd floor. Findings include: R1's medical record admission record showed that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes but not limited to unspecified viral hepatitis C without hepatic coma, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia, weakness, pain right lower leg, pain left lower leg, open wound of right arm and other disorders of veins. R2's medical record admission record showed that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes but not limited to Aphasia following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status as evidenced by an unrecognized significant weight loss, failed to serve food desired by a resident and failed to care plan weight loss for one resident (R57) in a sample of 26 total residents. This failure resulted in R57 experiencing a 17% weight loss that was not recognized and addressed by the facility. Findings: On 04/16/24 at 12:30 PM, R57 was observed in his wheelchair in dining room. V16 (CNA) presented lunch and said that it was a cheeseburger. R57 looked at the meal and said I want a cheeseburger. Not this. V17 (CNA) stated It is a chicken patty. He wants two peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. That is what he likes. On 04/16/24 at 12:50 PM, R57 was observed in the dining room eating a sandwich with a second sandwich wrapped on the plate. On 04/17/24 at 8:46 AM R57 was observed in his wheelchair in the hallway. When asked if he had eaten breakfast, he responded No. I'm hungry. V29 (CNA) was asked if R57 had eaten breakfast.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory tests were completed and followed up in a timely manner for one resident (R2) out of three residents reviewed for improper nursing care. Findings include:Record review of R2's face sheet reads medical diagnoses that included but are not limited to other seizures, vascular dementia, and liver disease. R2's care plan reads in part R2 presents with a diagnosis of seizures (date initiated 9/17/25). One intervention includes lab tests for therapeutic monitoring of medication levels per MD (Medical Doctor) orders. Notify MD of subtherapeutic or toxic levels.Record review of R2's hospital discharge instructions dated 12/10/25 shows R2 was hospitalized due to seizure disorder with instructions to obtain Valproic Acid level in one week.R2's Physician's orders printed on 3/10/26, document that R2 was admitted on [DATE] with the orders to receive Valproic Acid Oral Solution 20 milliliters (ml) two times a day related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family member in a timely manner when a change in condition occurred. This failure affected 1 resident (R1) reviewed for changes in condition. Findings include: On 4/13/2025 at 8:06 AM, R1's progress notes document in part, (R1) was noted with change in condition. upon assessment SPO2 89% oxygen given at 2L, SPO2 94% on 2L Oxygen. HOB elevated 30dg. Hospice notified. On 4/13/2025 at 12:40 PM, R1's progress notes document in part that R1's family member (V11) was made aware of the change in R1's condition at 11:15 PM. On 5/5/2025 at 11:05 AM, V11 (R1's Family Member) stated that on 4/13/2025 at around 11:00 AM, V11 received a phone call from the facility around and informed V11 that R1 had taken a turn for the worst and that R1 was in distress since 7:00 that morning. V11 recalled that V5 (Registered Nurse) had told V11 that R1 was having abnormal vital signs, vomiting, and difficulty breathing. V11 explained that the nurse on night shift that was responsible for R1's care had left without letting V11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of property for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: On 02/22/2025, at 12:07 PM, V4 (Social Services Director) states she recalls having a conversation with V9 (R1's Family Member) and educating V9 about filling out an inventory list whenever new items or valuables are brought into the facility for R1 in case something comes up missing. V4 states V9 informed her that R1 had a diamond ring and bracelet on when R1 was admitted to the facility. V4 states she informed V9 that these items were not inventoried but V9 was insistent that R1 had these items. V4 states she searched for R1s' inventory list but could not find one and states the facility does not have an inventory list of R1s' diamond ring or bracelet. V4 states an inventory list should be completed by staff upon admission for all residents but she does not have an inventory list for R1. V4 states she does not remember seeing R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse prevention program and conduct a thorough investigation for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: Record review documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 11/23/2024. R1s' Facesheet documents that R1 has diagnoses not limited to: Parkinson's Disease, neurocognitive disorder, essential hypertension, bilateral knee osteoarthritis, venous thrombosis, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, visual hallucinations, long term use of anticoagulants, and chronic heart failure. R1s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R1 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 08/15, indicating that R1 is cognitively impaired. On 02/22/2025, at 12:07 PM, V4 (Social Services Director) states V9 (R1s' Family member) informed her that R1 had a diamond ring and bracelet on when R1 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1-Perform proper hand hygiene when passing food tray, after handling soiled dishes, and before handling clean dishes. 2- Properly label perishable items inside the walk-in fridge 3- Prevent personal food items inside the walk-in fridge. These failures have the potential to affect all 110 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 2/4/25 at 9:50 AM, during initial round with V9 (Director of Dietary), surveyor observed the prepared apple sauce dated 1/29/25, concord grape jelly without a discard date, and a personal bottle of energy drink and water inside the walk-in fridge. V9 stated that the apple sauce is over six days and it is expired, and every item should have an in and out date, and serving residents with an expired food without proper storage could make resident sick with food borne illness. V9 stated that personal/staff food or drink should not be inside the walk-in fridge. V9 stated there is only one resident who receives nothing by mouth (NPO). On 2/4/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to (1) dispose of kitchen garbage properly in a contained dumpster, (2) failed to keep the dumpster area clean free of debris, the garbage area was not maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent harborage and feeding of pest. These failures could affect all 111 residents that reside in the facility. Findings Include: On 2/5/25 at 9:16 AM, During the initial facility tour, with V20 (Director of Maintenance) and V19 (Assistant Maintenance) observed the outside dumpster area where kitchen garbage is disposed with the large dumpsters uncovered with lids. All around the dumpsters were food garbage, papers, and foul odors. V19 stated that the dumpster is open, but it should be covered. V20 stated that the uncovered plastic bags in the dumpster are from the kitchen, and the housekeeping. V20 stated that when the lids to the two dumpsters are not properly covered, it could invite pest, racoons to the facility. V20 stated that V20 will call the garbage pick-up company to pick up the dumpsters. Facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility [A] failed to ensure shared equipment were cleaned and decontaminated between each use for 4 [R61, R68, R72, R263] and [B] failed to follow their infection control procedures to post Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage outside 1 [R39's room] resident with active right subclavian perma catheter for dialysis in a sample of 23 residents. Findings Include: On 2/4/25 at 9:42AM, V8 obtained R61's blood pressure [103/69] with a manual blood pressure device placed on R61's bed linen, that was on top of the medication cart. After use, V8 then placed the manual blood pressure device back on top the medication cart and did not sanitize the blood pressure device. On 2/4/25 at 10:11 AM V8 obtained R72's blood pressure [130/73] with the same blood pressure device, sitting on the bed side, without sanitizing the device blood pressure. On 2/4/25 at 10:20 AM V8 obtained R263's blood pressure [123/71] used the manual blood pressure cuff sitting on R263 legs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure that call lights are within easy reach for two (R25, and R58) residents out of 8 residents reviewed for call lights in a sample of 23. Findings Include: 1. R25's face sheet shows R25 is an [AGE] year-old male. R25's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, age related nuclear cataract, left eye, blindness left eye, history of falling, presence of pacemaker, wedge compression fracture of third lumbar vertebra, anxiety disorder, and atrial fibrillation. 2. R58's face sheet shows R58 is a [AGE] year-old male. R58's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, repeated falls, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure code status should be consistent with plan of care and physician order for one (R29) resident reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 23. The findings include: R29's admission record documented initial admission date on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, Dysarthria following cerebral infarction, Ataxia following cerebral infarction, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, Unspecified osteoarthritis, Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, Foot drop right foot, Chronic kidney disease stage 3, Essential (primary) hypertension. On [DATE] At 1:01 pm V2 (Director Of Nursing / DON) stated each resident should have an advance directive whether DNR (Do not Resuscitate) or Full code and have an order. V2 said care plan should be developed for advance directives and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their peripheral inserted central catheter line dressing change policy, [A] failed change the line catheter dressing when not intact or compromised in any way, [B] failed to label the dressing with date or time, and [C] failed to enter physician orders of dressing changes and intravenous flush orders for one [R61] resident in a sample of 23. Findings include: On 2/4/25 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor observed V8 [Registered Nurse] during medication administration observation. On 2/4/25 at 9:42A M, V8 obtained R61's blood pressure [103/69] with a manual blood pressure device that was on top of the medication cart. After use, V8 then placed the manual blood pressure device back on top the medication cart and did not sanitize the blood pressure device. Surveyor observed R61 resting in bed with left arm midline intravenous catheter dressing halfway lifted completely on one side with no date. V8 [Registered Nurse] stated, I noticed the midline dressing was completely lifted on one side, upon making rounds this morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow plan of care and physician order to apply hand roll or splint on right hand for 1 (R29) resident. This failure could potentially affect 1 (R29) resident reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 23. The findings include: R29's admission record documented initial admission date on 12/3/18 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, Dysarthria following cerebral infarction, Ataxia following cerebral infarction, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, Unspecified osteoarthritis, Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, Foot drop right foot, Chronic kidney disease stage 3, Essential (primary) hypertension. On 2/4/25 at 11:03 AM Observed R29 sitting up on wheelchair in the dayroom, alert and verbally responsive, right hand contracted, fist closed, no device in placed. On 2/5/25 At 1:01pm V2 (Director Of Nursing/ DON) stated splint / any device should be applied as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that smoking materials (cigarette and lighters) were kept by staff for safety. This failure could potentially affect 3 (R28, R84, R93) residents reviewed for smoking in a sample of 23. The findings include: R28's admission record showed admission date on 11/7/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Interstitial pulmonary disease, Unspecified asthma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Anemia, Essential (primary) hypertension. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/6/2024 showed R28's cognition was moderately impaired. R84's admission record showed admission date on 7/31/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Unilateral primary osteoarthritis right hip, Anemia, Pain in right lower leg, Pain in left lower leg, Opioid dependence. MDS dated [DATE] showed R84's cognition was intact. R93's admission record showed admission date on 3/4/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Type 1 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, Essential (primary) hypertension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen use and no smoking signage was posted on a resident's (R213) door who's on continuous oxygen, failed to date humidifier bottle for oxygen concentrator and nebulizer mask for 1 (R71) resident, and failed to follow physician order for oxygen liter flow and provide humidification for continuous use of oxygen for 1 (R28) resident out of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care in a final sample of 23. Findings Include: On 2/04/25 at 11:24 AM, R213's sleeping in bed observed on oxygen at 3 liters per minutes (LPM) via nasal cannula. Surveyor did not observe oxygen in use and no smoking signage posted on R213's door or over R213's bed. On 2/05/25 at 11:22 AM, R213's lying in bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R213 was using oxygen via nasal cannula set to 3 LPM. R213 stated that [R213] has heart failure and [R213's] oxygen saturation goes down at times. There was no oxygen in use and no smoking signage posted on R213's door or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the risk versus benefits of using a bed rail and review them with the resident prior use, and failed to implement person-centered comprehensive care plan addressing the use of the bed rail. These failures have the potential to affect 1 (R213) out of 4 residents reviewed for bed rails in a final sample of 23. Findings Include: On two separate occasions on 2/04/25 at 11:24 AM and on 2/05/25 at 11:22 AM, R213 was observed resting in bed and noted with one full bed rail up on the right side of R213's bed. On 2/05/25 at 1:50 PM, interviewed V14 (Restorative Licensed Practical Nurse) and stated that restorative does the residents' bed rail assessments, and they need to be completed before using the bed rail. V14 stated that the purpose of the bed rail assessment is to determine the need for use of bed rails prior to use. V14 stated [V14] will first explain to the resident or representative what rails are used for and the complications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess eligibility and offer pneumococcal vaccine to three (R39, R48, R72) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal immunization. These failures had the potential to affect 3 (R39, R48, R72) residents eligible to receive the Pneumococcal vaccinations in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. R39's admission record showed admission date on 5/19/2020 with diagnoses not limited to End stage renal disease, Malignant neoplasm of prostate, Cardiac tamponade, Hypothyroidism, Secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, Malignant neoplasm of colon, Secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung, Essential (primary) hypertension, Dependence on renal dialysis. R39's MDS (Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed cognition was intact. MDS showed Pneumococcal vaccine was not up to date. Reviewed R39's immunization record, no documentation found for pneumococcal vaccine. R39's Covid-19 vaccine consent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to assess eligibility and offer covid-19 vaccine to three (R39, R48, R72) of five residents reviewed for covid-19 immunization. These failures had the potential to affect 3 (R39, R48, R72) residents eligible to receive the covid 19 vaccinations in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. R39's admission record showed admission date on 5/19/2020 with diagnoses not limited to End stage renal disease, Malignant neoplasm of prostate, Cardiac tamponade, Hypothyroidism, Secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, Malignant neoplasm of colon, Secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, Secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung, Essential (primary) hypertension, Dependence on renal dialysis. MDS (Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed R39's cognition was intact. MDS showed R39's covid vaccination was not up to date. Reviewed R39's immunization record, no documentation found for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call lights of residents are accessible as stated in the care plans. This failure has the potential to affect 2 residents ( R1 and R2). Findings include: On 12/4/24 between 10:10am and 11:05am during observation on the third floor, the following were observed: At 10:18am, R1 was observed in bed with call light not accessible. The surveyor asked R1 if R1 knows how to use the call light to call staff for help, R1 stated that he tries to use the call light. R1 looked up and down the side of the bed and there was no call light within reach. The surveyor asked V5(CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) V5 to help R1 find the call light. V5 looked behind the bed and stated, It's on the floor. At 10:50am, R2 was observed sitting on the edge of the bed in the room and looking and trying to bend towards the wall where the call light was supposed to be. The surveyor asked R2 for the call light and R2 stated I don't see it. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the fall prevention interventions as stated in the care plans for residents with diagnoses of Dementia who are also at risk for falls. This failure has the potential to affect two residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for proper footwear as a fall prevention intervention. Findings include: On 12/4/24 between 10:10am and 11:05am during observation on the third floor, the following were observed: At 10:25am, R3 was observed sitting in the wheelchair in the day room with white socks that are smooth on the bottom. The surveyor notified V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) who confirmed the resident's name. V3 stated I will find non-skid socks for him. This is not okay for fall prevention. At 10:55am, R4 was observed in the room sitting in the wheelchair with blue socks that are smooth on the bottom. V6(CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) was notified. V6 stated I will ask the ADON for the non-skid socks. The socks need to grip to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide transportation for a resident (R1) who required daily methadone clinic visits. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R1's face sheets shows that R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] R1's progress note dated May 24, 2024, authored by V5 (Social Service Director) documents in part that R1 discharged from the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA) on May 24, 2024. R1 has a diagnosis which include but not limited to opioid dependence, uncomplicated, psychoactive substance abuse, depression, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows that R1 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status score and indicated that R1's memory was ok. R1's hospital record Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 05/18/24 shows that R1 has orders to receive Methadone HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG by mouth starting May 19, 2024. On 06/11/24 at 11:03 am, V2 (Director of Nursing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure food items were labeled and dated per facility policy, b.) discard expired and/or rotten foods, c.) keep food storage areas clean, d.) conduct hand washing in between handling dirty and clean plateware/equipment. These failures have the potential to affect all 110 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 04/16/24 at 9:18 AM, during initial kitchen tour V5 (Dietary Manager) stated all food items need to be labeled with a in date or delivery date, an open or prepared date and a use by date or expiration date. Depending on what the food is determines its expiration or use by date. V5 pointed to a documented posted outside the walk-in cooler and stated that piece of paper has the use by dates on it organized by the item. V5 stated it is the responsibility of the staff member who puts the item in the cooler to label and date the item and it is V5's responsibility to monitor expiration dates and throw out any expired or items beyond the use by date. V5 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures to (a) ensure there was signage outside of the resident's (R74) room indicating Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP); (b) provide readily available personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies outside of the resident's (R74) room; (c) use PPE in isolation rooms (R74, R28, R85, R410); (d) maintain infection control practices during medication administration (R4, R93, R105); (e) ensure a resident's (R85) urinary catheter bag remained off the floor; and (f) contain soiled linens in sealed bags during transport. This has the potential to affect 111 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R85's physician order sheets (POS) documents in part: Single Room Strict Contact Isolation for (ESBL [Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases], Herpes) (ordered 04/09/2024), resident on enhance barrier precautions due to [history of] ESBL, [urinary] Catheter (ordered 04/05/2024), and [urinary] catheter care every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of professional practice to maintain resident dignity by standing over four residents (R7, R22, R57, R91) during feeding assistance out of a sample of 26 total residents. Findings: On 04/17/24 at 8:54 AM, R57 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. V29 (CNA) was observed standing next to wheel chair feeding R57 breakfast. On 4/18/2024 at 12:42 PM, V16 (CNA) was observed standing in the room of R57 with his lunch tray in front of R57 giving R57 liquid from a cup. On 04/16/24 at 12:35 PM, V16 (CNA) was observed standing over R22 while V16 assisted R22 with eating lunch. On 04/18/24 12:38 PM V29 (CNA) was observed standing over R91 feeding him lunch. When surveyor asked the resident's name, V29 provided the name and stated I'm helping him because he has trouble with his vision. Policy titled Resident Rights dated 12/2012 and revised 11/2013, 4/2014 and 4/2017 states in part: Policy Statement: Employees shall treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy by not providing residents going to dialysis during mealtimes with a sack lunch for four (R29, R40, R45, R101) out of four residents reviewed for dialysis services in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 04/16/24 at 11:30 AM, R45 stated R45 goes out to dialysis three times a week on Monday-Wednesday-Friday. R45 stated they don't send me to dialysis with a meal or snack. R45 stated R45 usually leaves the facility at 10:00 AM and returns between 4:30-5:00 PM. R45 stated on dialysis days R45 eats breakfast and dinner at the facility. R45 stated R45 does not eat lunch or anything in between breakfast and dinner on dialysis days because the facility does not send him to dialysis with a sack lunch or snacks. R45 stated by the time R45 returns to the facility after dialysis it is time for dinner. R45 complains about being hungry on dialysis days because R45 eats breakfast around 8:00 AM and then does not consume anything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility [A] failed to label individual resident's insulin medications with an open date, [B] failed to dispose expired insulin, [C] failed to refrigerate unopened insulin in 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling in a sample of 26. On 4/16/23 at 9:22 AM, V18 [Licensed Practical Nurse] and surveyor conducted inventory of the third-floor medication cart, observed the following: R72's [1] Open Novolog Flex Pen was opened and used, no open or expiration date. [2] Open Lantus insulin pen with an open date of 3/14/24, expiration date of 4/12/24, and [3] Open [NAME] pen with no open date. R72's physician orders: 12/14/23-Novolog Solution 100 units/ml, inject 10units three times per day. 9/6/22-Lantus Solution 100 unit/ml, inject 25 units at bedtime. R2's [1] Unopened Levemir Flex Insulin Pen read on the package Refrigerate Until Open. [2] Insulin Aspart Flex Insulin Pen with open date of 3/7/24, expiration date of 4/7/24. R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to determine self-administration of medication was appropriate for three (R5, R57, R69) out of three residents observed with medication at bed side in a sample of 26. Findings Include: On 04/16/24 at 10:41 AM, surveyor entered R69's room and observed one medication in a medication cup on R69's bed side table. R69 stated the nurse left the medication on R69's table this morning, but R69 does not want to take the medication. At 10:45 AM, R69 triggered the call light, and V30 (Registered Nurse/RN) entered R69's room, V30 picked up the medication, V30 identified the medication as Colace 100 MG capsule administered at 9:00 AM. V30 stated V30 usually stay with R69 to ask if R69 wants the medication, but V30 did not ask R69 today because V30 went out of R69 to attend to other residents. V30 stated V30 should have stayed with R69 to take medication and that the medication should not have been left on R69's bed side table. R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to place a resident's (R410) call light in a position that allowed the resident to utilize it for one out of a total sample of 26 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R410's comprehensive care plan documents in part that R410 has Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit due to paraplegia (paralysis of the lower body) and multiple diagnoses (initiated 04/25/2023). R410's care plan also documents in part that R410 is at risk for falls related to multiple diagnoses (initiated 07/17/2023). Interventions initiated 07/17/2023 documents in part: Call light in reach and answer in a timely fashion. On 04/16/2024 at 10:37 AM, R410 was alert and oriented to person, place, and year. R410 laid in bed which was the furthest from the hallway. R410 was laying towards right side with a pillow under right forearm. R410 had contracted hands. R410 stated I'm burning up and asked the surveyor to remove R410's blankets. R410 stated uses call light to call staff but cannot reach it. Call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress was available for 1 (R74) resident with Stage IV pressure ulcer and failed to ensure the low air loss mattress was in the correct setting for 1 (R56) resident. These failures affected 2 (R56 and R74) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer in a sample of 26. The findings include: R74's health record documented admission date on 9/8/2021 with diagnoses not limited to Multiple sclerosis, Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, Bipolar disorder, Cannabis abuse, Other psychoactive substance abuse, Strange and inexplicable behavior, Major depressive disorder, Delusional disorders, Insomnia, Anemia. On 4/16/24 at 12:41pm Observed R74 sitting on the side of the bed, alert and verbally responsive. R74 stated he has wound on his bottom and not sure how he got it. He said he has a wound when he was admitted to the facility. R74 had no air mattress in place. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the left-hand splint and left AFO (Ankle Foot Orthosis) were in place. These failures affected 2 (R38 and R54) residents reviewed for limited range of motion in a sample of 26. The findings include: R38's health record documented admission date on 12/15/2020 with diagnoses not limited to Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Aphasia following cerebral infarction, Personal history of covid-19, Chronic fatigue, Multiple and bilateral precerebral artery syndromes, Repeated falls, Rhabdomyolysis, Hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, Ataxia, Major depressive disorder, Essential (primary) hypertension, Alcohol abuse, Cannabis use, Hyperlipidemia. R54's health record documented admission date on 12/15/2019 with diagnoses not limited to Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Unspecified chronic bronchitis, Low back pain, Age-related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident (R18) at risk for falls for one out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: R18's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 02/06/2024 documents in part that R18 is at risk for falls. R18's comprehensive care plan documents in part that R18 is at risk for falls/accidents related to medical complexities, impaired mobility, and multiple medications (initiated 08/08/2023). R18 had an unwitnessed fall on 02/04/2024. Interventions to prevent further falls document in part: floor mats down while resident is in bed (initiated 02/05/2024) and Resident's bed at the lowest position at all times (initiated 02/05/2024). On 04/16/2024 at 10:13 AM, R18 was lying in bed. There were large, blue, floor mats to each side of the head of the bed. The one on the left side of R18 was folded in half and not laid flat. The one on the right side of R18 was folded in half and standing on its side-not laid flat on the floor next to R18's bed. On 04/17/2024 at 10:20 AM, V24 (Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to place oxygen cannula tubing in a bag when not in use for one (R103) resident of three residents reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 04/16/24 at 11:48 AM, observed in R103's room oxygen cannula tubing attached to R103's oxygen concentrator hanging across the top of the concentrator. Cannula oxygen tubing was not stored in a bag or covered in anyway. The oxygen concentrator was not turned on and R103 was not in R103's room at this time. On 4/16/24 at 11:57 AM, observed R103 sitting on R103's bed. Next to R103's bed was R103's wheelchair with a portable oxygen tank on the back with oxygen cannula tubing attached and draped over a pole coming from the portable oxygen tank. The oxygen cannula tubing attached to the portable oxygen tank was not stored in a bag or covered in anyway. Observed R103 wearing the oxygen cannula tubing attached to the oxygen concentrator which was infusing oxygen at two liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to obtain medication consents and care plan for the use of an antidepressant for R85, in a total sample of 26. Findings include: R85's face sheet documents in part an admission date of 01/20/2023. R85's physician order sheets (POS) documents in part an order for Nortriptyline HCl (hydrochloride) Capsule 10 MG (Milligram) Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for depression. R85's progress notes and Medication Administration Records (MARs) document in part that R85 received the medication since admission. R85's January 2023 MAR documents in part that the first dose was on 01/21/2023. R85's November 2023 MAR documents in part that facility discontinued Nortriptyline on 11/22/2023 and reordered it on 11/29/2023. R85's March 2024 MAR documents in part that the medication was discontinued on 03/21/2024. R85's April 2024 MAR documents in part that it was reordered on 04/02/2024. Surveyor verbally requested R85's psychotropic consents multiple times on 04/18/2024 and via electronic mail on 04/18/2024 at 10:20 AM. Facility provided a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility staff failed to report an elopement and unusual occurance (unscheduled hospitalization) to the Illinois Department of Public Health for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for reporting. R2 eloped from the facility, was located with the assistance of the local police department , taken to local the hospital and recieved treatment for hypothermia. The facility also failed to follow the facility policies for reporting an accident, incident or unusual occurrence. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Findings Include: On [DATE] R2 was observed to be missing from the facility-by-facility staff. R2 was not found after a facility and community search was conducted by the facility. Per facility documentation the Chicago Police department was notified and participated in the community search. R2 was later identified at the Hospital after arriving via EMS (Emergency Medical Services) and admitted with a diagnosis of hypothermia. R2 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R3) of 4 residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, according to the side rail assessment, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, as evidenced by: Findings Include: R3 has diagnosis not limited to Paraplegia, Asthma, Epilepsy, Insomnia, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis of Unspecified Deep Veins of Unspecified Lower Extremity, Malignant Neoplasm of Colon, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Schizoaffective Disorder and Long Term (Current) Use of Anticoagulants. R3 MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. Assist Rail Screening dated 10/23/23 document in part: D. Recommendation: This facility uses assist rails which may be in a horizontal or vertical position. 1. The resident has been assessed and it is recommended to use: 3. Two assist rails. Care plan document in part: Focus: R3 has decreased mobility skills (roll to side) due to Paraplegia. Intervention:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's medications are administered as ordered by the physician. This failure affected two residents (R1 and R2) of seven residents reviewed for quality of care and administration of prescribed medications. Findings include: On 11/14/2023 at 3:00pm V2(Assistant Director of Nursing) presented R2's MARs (medication administration records) and POS (Physician Order Summary Report) to the surveyor, which were reviewed. There were missing entries of nurses' signatures or codes on the MARs for August 2023(8/1/2023 to 8/31/2023), September 2023 (9/1/2023 to 9/30/2023) and October 2023(10/1/2023 to 10/31/2023) for the following dates, times, and medications: 1. 8/17/2023 at 0600 Pantoprazole Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 40mg-Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. 2. 8/17/2023 at 0600 Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%- Instill 1 drop in both eyes three times a day. 3. 8/19/2023 at 1400 Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%- Instill 1 drop in both eyes three times a day. 4. 8/17/2023 at 0600…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, that facility failed to ensure that one resident (R3) was free from pain, after a suspected unwitnessed fall. This failure affected one of 7 residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: R3 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: History of falling, Intervertebral disc degeneration, Cervical disc degeneration, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Ataxic gait and Hypertension. R3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 3 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. On 11/13/23 during investigation, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said, R3 was discharged after going out to the hospital. She (R3) was complaining of pain and the family requested that she (R3) be sent to hospital for further evaluation. On 11/15/23 at 10:45 AM, V8 (Director of Nursing) said, I was not aware of R3 stating that she had a fall or complaining of pain. Surveyor inquired about the expectations regarding falls and pain management. On 11/15/23 at 10:45 AM, V8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to discard food items stored in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage room by the use-by date; failed to follow proper food storage practices and labeling of food to prevent food-borne illnesses; failed to don a hairnet while in the kitchen; failed to ensure sanitizing buckets had the required amount of sanitizing solution needed for proper sanitizing per the manufacturer's recommendation; failed to ensure cleanliness of kitchen and storage refrigerator and failed to isolate dented cans from non-dented cans to prevent the spread of food-borne illness and contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all 113 residents receiving an oral diet in the facility. Findings include: On 03/12/23 at 9:13 am, Surveyor entered the facilities kitchen area. Surveyor observed V17 (Dietary Cook) at the cook station handling foods not wearing a hairnet. At 9:15 am, Surveyor and V17 toured the facilities kitchen with the following observations: Nine Ready Care health shakes observed in the walk-in refrigerator on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-15 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track, and ensure 100% of staff were vaccinated with Covid vaccine to help prevent the spread of Covid-19 as required by CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). These failures have the potential to affect all 114 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 03/12/22 at 11:00 am, V1 (Administrator) stated that the official facility census is 114 residents. On 03/12/22 at 1:00 pm, Surveyor requested the facilities staff vaccination matrix from V2 (Director of Nursing, DON). V2 was unable to provide the facilities staff vaccination matrix to surveyor. V2 stated, The Infection Preventionist is out on maternity leave. Surveyor asked V2 to complete the Covid-19 Staff Vaccination Matrix created by the Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. On 03/13/22 at 9:10 am, V2 gave surveyor a copy of employee immunization list with missing documentation for 12 employees. Surveyor inquired if the employees with undocumented Covid vaccinations have any exemptions. V2 stated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident room identifier outside of 11 resident rooms on the first floor. This failure has the potential to affect all 22 residents residing in the affected rooms. Findings include: On 03/12/23 at 10:27 AM, this surveyor observed 11 out of 18 rooms on the first floor with no signage outside of the door to identify which room it is, or which residents reside in the room. On 03/12/23 at 11:58 AM, another surveyor verified that the following rooms did have a sign with the room number outside the door: 106, 108, 109, 115, 116, 117, 118. Therefore, according to the facility floor plan, the following rooms were missing room identifiers: 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 110, 111, 112, and 114. On 03/12/23 at 11:38 AM, the surveyor inquired about the missing room number signs. V26 (Maintenance Assistant) stated, They supposedly ordered signs. The surveyor inquired who ordered the signs. V26 stated, The administrator or regional maintenance director. V26 added, They supposed to have them (doors) marked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who depend on staff's assistance for their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care and grooming receive shaving. This affects four residents (R13, R20, R24, and R106) out of 45 residents reviewed for ADL care and grooming. Findings include: On 03/12/23 at 10:10 am, Surveyor observed R13 in R13's room awake, alert in bed. Surveyor observed R13 ungroomed, unshaved with a facial beard, mustache (hair above upper lip). When R13 was asked when was the last time R13's facial hairs (beard and mustache) were shaved, R13 stated, I (R13) don't remember. I (R13) look rough. The girls (referring to the CNA's) come in when they come in to shave me (R13). On 03/12/23 at 10:12 am, Surveyor observed R24 in R24's room awake, alert in bed. Surveyor observed R24 ungroomed, unshaved with facial beard, mustache (hair above upper lip) and long nasal hairs coming from both nostrils reaching down to R24's beard. R24 was asked when was the last time R24's facial hairs (beard and mustache) and nasal hairs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses counted the controlled medications at the end of the shift, failed to maintain an accurate account of controlled medication for 1 (R22) resident, and failed to document administration of as needed controlled medication for 1 (R22) resident. These failures affected 1 resident (R22) reviewed for medication labeling and storage and have the potential to affect all 35 residents in the 3rd floor. Findings include: The (03/12/2023) census in 3rd floor was: 35. On 03/13/2023 at 11:25am, during the medication storage and labeling task with V27 (Licensed Practice Nurse), surveyor observed the (03/2023) Controlled Substance Check form with an entry in column 'Nurse Off' on Date: 13, Time: 3. This observation was pointed out to V27. V27 stated, I (V27) just sign both in and out after I (V27) counted the meds. This surveyor inquired if V27 counted the controlled medications with another nurse. V27 stated, She (V32) was already gone when I (V27) came in. On 03/13/23 at 11:28am, observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of loose pills in the bottom of 1st floor medication cart, failed to remove expired house stock medications from 1st floor medication cart, and failed to remove expired insulin for 2 residents (R4, R88) residing on the 3rd floor receiving insulin from 3rd floor medication cart. This failure has the potential to affect all 16 residents receiving medication from the 1st floor medication cart and 35 residents receiving medication from the 3rd floor medication cart. Findings: On 3/13/2023 at 11:27am surveyor observed 24 loose pills in the bottom of the medication cart that provides medication for the residents residing in the odd room numbers. At 11:36am surveyor observed 2 bottles of Aspirin 325mg with an expiration date of 2/2023 in the top drawer of the medication cart. On 3/13/2023 at 11:38am V28 (LPN) stated that medication from those bottles should not be given, and those bottles should be discarded. On 3/14/2023 at 1:51pm V2 (DON) stated that it's the 11:00 pm to 7:00 am nurse's responsibility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post isolation signs on the door of positive covid residents rooms; failed to have isolation equipment available prior to entering an isolation room, failed to ensure that staff don PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) face mask covering the nose and the mouth for prevention and control of Covid-19, and failed to change and date oxygen tubing and humidification bottle in an effort to prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms including COVID-19. These failures affected five resident (R16, R23, R72, R 213, and R214) and has the potential to affect all 39 residents on the second floor and all 36 residents on the third floor in the facility. Findings include: The (3/12/23) Facility Census was 114. On 3/12/23 at 9:45 am surveyor toured the third floor and noted all staff walking in the hallway and going in and out of resident's rooms with N95 mask on and no eye shields. On 3/12/23 at 9:50 am surveyor observed an isolation cart outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-15 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility handrail on the first floor was firmly secured to the wall. This failure has the potential to affect all 38 residents residing on the 1st floor. Findings include: 3/12/2023 resident census on the first floor was 38. On 3/12/2023 at about 12:05pm surveyor observed the hand railing on the first floor between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to be loose, and when touched the screws were visible. On 3/14/2023 at 9:52am V26 (Maintenance Assistant) stated, I tighten up the handrail on the first floor; it was loose. V26, further stated, Yes, the loose handrail on the first floor could be harmful to the residents. On 3/14/2023 at 12:05pm surveyor observed that the handrail between rooms on 111 and 115 was repaired and was no longer loose once this was brought to the attention of V26. Undated Maintenance Service Request documents, in part, 3/14/2023 handrail by RM [ROOM NUMBER] loose. Job description dated 8/2018 titled Maintenance Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two residents (R10, R28). This failure has the potential to affect two residents (R10, R28) in a sample of 45 residents. Findings: R10 is a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnosis of but not limited to Parkinson Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Lymphedema, Major Depressive Disorder, Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee, Syncope and Collapse and Asthma. R10 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 that suggests moderately impaired. On 3/12/2023 at 10:33am surveyor observed R10's call light on the floor underneath the bed not within reach. Surveyor asked R10 if R10 could locate her call light. R10 said, They gave me this new bed, so I don't have the call light anymore. On 3/12/2023 at 10:43am V11 (CNA) stated, The call light is right here on the floor and no, ma'am I (R10) cannot reach it. V11 stated that the call light is supposed to be attached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the monthly trust fund allowance to one resident (R77) out of a sample of 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings: R77 is an [AGE] year-old female with a diagnosis of but not limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (Left Shoulder), Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Failure, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. R77 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 that suggests moderately impaired. On 3/12/2023 at 10:00am R77 stated that she does not get the monthly trust fund benefit and does not know why. On 3/13/2023 at 1:00pm surveyor reviewed the Withdrawal Record (Trust Fund Account) dated 2/15/2023 that does not include R77 as receiving an allowance amount. Trust Fund form for February 2023 does not list R77. Surveyor also reviewed the Trail Balance (Trust Fund Account) as of 3/13/2023 that indicates R77 has a balance and is entitled to an allowance of $30.00. On 3/13/2023 at 2:15pm surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions as per resident care plan and failed to provide and document wound treatments as ordered for one resident (R14) with a Stage III pressure ulcer in the total sample of 45 residents. Findings include: On 03/12/23 at 10:57 AM, R14 was observed lying on a regular bed with a standard mattress. The surveyor inquired if R14 had any pressure sores. R14 answered, Yes, I do, and added that she (R14) gets wound care, Once a week. On 3/12/23 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor inquired if R14 has any wounds. V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, No. I don't believe she (R14) does. The surveyor requested to see R14's back side which R14 agreed to. V21 and V22 (LPN Orientee) turned R14 to the right side. V21 stated, It looks like she (R14) does have a wound. No dressing was observed over R14's coccyx wound. The surveyor inquired what was on the cloth incontinence pad. V21 stated, Looks like a little discharge. Like blood. The surveyor inquired if R14 was on a standard mattress.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ordered oral nutritional supplements, for one resident (R213) reviewed for nutrition in a sample size of 45 residents. Finding include R213 has a diagnoses of but not limited to osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm of stomach, anemia, hypertension, and chronic fatigue. R213's (3/6/23) BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 8 (Moderately impaired). On 3/12/23 at 10:15 am R213 stated that R213 has not been getting any dietary supplement for 2 weeks. R213 stated that the supplement helps R213 get up, walk and give R213 energy. On 3/12/23 at 12:35 pm observed R213 lunch tray with rice, ground meat, carrots, cake, and juice. No dietary supplement noted on R213's tray. R213's diet ticket reviewed, no dietary supplement on R213's diet ticket. On 3/13/23 at 12:25 pm observed R213's lunch tray with chicken broccoli casserole, mash potatoes, fruit cocktail and juice. No dietary supplement noted on R213's tray. R213's diet ticket reviewed, no dietary supplement on diet ticket. R213's order summary report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' call device was functioning to allow resident to call for staff assistance. This failure affected 1 resident (R28) reviewed for functioning resident call device in a total sample of 45 residents. Findings include: On 03/12/2023 at 10:36 AM, R28 was in the room by herself (R28). This surveyor requested R28 to activate the call device. Surveyor checked if the overhead call device indicator was lit. Surveyor observed the overhead call light was not lit. On 03/12/2023 at 10:40am, V10 (CNA) checked R28's call device, per surveyor's request and stated, It is not working. This surveyor inquired how R28 would be able to call for assistance if needed. V10 stated, If the roommate is here, the roommate will be able to call for help, but the (roommate) is not here. On 03/12/2023 at 10:55am, V8 (HK/Laundry/Maintenance Director) checked R28's call device, per this surveyor's request. V8 stated, It is not working. V8 checked the cord and stated, The cord is cut. I (V8) think what happened was, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$105,248 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $69,439 — penalty dated 2024-09-30
- $22,122 — penalty dated 2024-04-19
- $13,687 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PAVILION HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILANA D AARON TRUST C/U MAURICE AARON 2014 FAMILY GIFT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 12/19/2022 |
| ILANA D AARON TRUST C/U MAURICE AARON 2014 LEGACY GIFT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 12/19/2022 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 12/19/2022 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/19/2022 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/19/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145939. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.