Pavilion Of Ottawa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 22.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 128.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify fall risks and follow policy and procedures to prevent falls for two (R1 and R2) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 falling from wheelchair to the floor, bleeding, pain, bruising, and hospital visit with a diagnosis of nasal fracture and receiving sutures. These failures also resulted in repeat falls for R2. Findings include: The facility's undated Fall Management policy and procedure documents: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. The responsibility to respect a resident's choices is balanced by considering the potential impact of these choices on other residents and the facility's obligation to protect the residents from harm. The facility will educate the resident and his or her family and staff regarding significant risks related to a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a grievance was resolved for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for resident's rights in the sample of 14.The findings include:On 2/20/26 at 10:33 AM, V8 (R3's daughter) said last month, she had brought a concern regarding R3's missing tooth (two natural teeth) to staff including V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing). V8 said no one can tell her what happened to R3's missing tooth or how R3 lost her tooth. Did it just come off in her mouth? What caused it to fall off? V8 said as of today, no one yet (at the facility) came back to tell her what happened.On 2/20/26 at 12:30 PM, V11 (CNA) said a couple of weeks ago, she noticed R3 tapping her mouth, she has dementia so she cannot speak, it looked like she lost a tooth. V11 said this was reported to the Nurse who said she will refer R3 to the dentist.R3's progress notes dated 1/27/26 documents, Oral visual check done, deny pain and discomfort, no redness or swelling on her gums noted. 1 right lateral tooth noted missing. daughter aware.On 2/20/26 at 12 PM, V2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 124 residents in the facility.The findings include:The CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) form 671 dated 8/26/2025 showed 124 residents resided in the facility.On 8/27/2025 at 8:20 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said the facility did not have any residents with a feeding tube. On 8/26/2025 between 9:45-10:15 AM, while doing the initial Kitchen observation, a scoop was left inside of the large container of thick-it (a powder used in food preparation to thicken food consistency). The scoop was directly on the powder mixture. The handle was touching the powder.On 8/26/2025 at 11:09 AM V11 (Cook) prepared the pureed foods (hamburger patties) for the lunch meal, then separated the pureed meat into several small pans for the different halls they were to be served on. V11 picked up half of the pans and held them against her clothing when she was taking them to put in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with shaving facial hair for 3 female residents (R48, R57, R65) and failed to provide assistance with grooming, shaving and denture care for 1 resident (R131). This failure affected 4 of 4 residents (R48, R57, R65, R131) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample size of 49.The findings include:1. On 08/26/2025 at 11:56 AM observed R48 seated in a wheelchair at the nurse's station on the 800 unit and noted facial hair to chin area that appeared thick and course and was approximately 4-5 milliliters in length. R48 indicated that the girls help me with her chin hair. No aides were observed present on unit at this time.On 08/27/2025 at 12:14 PM, observed R8 seated at the dining room table on the 800 unit and noted facial hair to her chin area that appeared thick and course that was approximately 2-3 milliliters in length at this time.R48's face sheet showed an admission date of 05/14/2025 with a past medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple insulin pens and a vial of liquid morphine were properly labeled with an open and discard date in accordance with professional standards. This failure affected 6 of 6 residents (R5, R8, R41, R74, R82, R94) reviewed for medication storage in the sample size of 49. The findings include: On 8/27/2025 at 10:38 AM, R94's long-acting prefilled insulin pen had a yellow sticker with a spot to document Date Open, Date Exp (expired), and initials. The sticker was not filled out or initialed. The cap for the pen had a tamper resistant red tape which indicated the pen had been opened. V4 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she had given R49's long-acting insulin that morning and the pen had already been previously opened and used prior to the morning of 8/27/25. On 08/27/2025, medication storage and labeling task was performed by this surveyor with V6 (Registered Nurse) on the 800 unit with the following findings. At 12:22 PM, observed two glargine insulin pens for R82 and one glargine (lantus) insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the device used to check residents' blood sugar levels (a glucometer) was disinfected according to the manufacturer's instructions, to prevent cross-contamination for 9 of 9 residents (R3, R10, R13, R20, R34, R40, R75, R107, and R127) reviewed for glucose checks in the sample of 49.The findings include:On 8/26/2025 at 12:13 PM, V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) performed a blood glucose test on R127 prior to the lunch meal. After checking R127's blood sugar level, V15 used a micro-kill disinfectant wipe to clean the glucometer. V15 did one swipe across the glucometer, then place the glucometer on a tissue that was on the medication cart. At 12:26 PM, V15 used the same glucometer to check R3's blood sugar level prior to the lunch meal. After obtaining the blood sample, V15 placed the glucometer on the windowsill in R3's room. V15 picked up the glucometer, informed R3 of the results and went out of the room. At 12:28 PM, V15 used the micro-kill wipes again on the glucometer, wiping the glucometer for 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wheelchair foot rests were in place for a resident during transport and failed to ensure a resident's medication was secured. This applies to 2 of 9 residents (R77, R74) in the sample of 49. The findings include: 1. R77's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an admission date of 7/7/23 with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's (dementia), muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, history of falling, osteoporosis, and weakness. R77's Care Plan showed she was a mechanical lift transfer. R77's 6/11/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she required Partial/Moderate assistance for wheelchair transports of 50 feet and she was totally dependent upon staff for transport of 150 feet. On 8/26/2025 at 12:12 PM, R77 was in the central common area of the locked memory care unit. R77 was in her wheelchair. V3 Agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transported R77 to the dining area. As V3 pushed R77 in her wheelchair, R77's right foot was dragging and skipping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep a resident's urinary catheter off of the floor; failed to keep catheter tubing below the level of the resident's bladder, and failed to have orders or diagnoses in place for an indwelling catheter. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R43, R128) reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of 49. The findings include: 1. R43's Face Sheet showed an admission date of 11/10/24 with diagnoses to include dementia, interstitial cystitis (bladder pain and/or urgency), and urinary retention. R43' Care Plan showed [R43] has a UTI (urinary tract infection) and is at risk for recurrent UTI's.(11/18/24) On 08/26/2025 at 11:50 AM, R43 was sitting in her wheelchair in the common area on the locked memory care unit. R43's catheter tubing exited her lower pant leg and discharged into a catheter bag suspended under the seat of her wheelchair. At least 18 inches of R43's catheter tubing was laying on the floor. In the middle of the tubing was a clip. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician prescribed rate for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for oxygen in the sample of 49. The findings include: R9's face sheet dated 8/28/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, emphysema, cerebral atherosclerosis, and dependence of supplemental oxygen. R9's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment. R9's order summary report dated 8/28/25 showed an order for oxygen at three liters via nasal cannula every shift for dyspnea (difficulty or shortness of breath), start dated 7/22/25. R9's care plan showed a focus area for the risk of acute exacerbation of COPD and the use of oxygen at two liters per nasal cannula (initiated 5/13/25). The same care plan showed to administer the oxygen at two liters per continuous nasal cannula per physician orders. On 8/27/25 at 10:05 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure range of motion was implemented for a resident with functional limitations and failed to ensure an assistive device was in place for a resident with a contracture for four of four residents (R19, R38, R1 and R6) reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Range of Motion and Contractor Assessment and Preventions policy, dated 10/2019, documents that the objectives of range of motion exercise is to preserve resident's present range of motion. 1. R19's Restorative Program Note, dated 9/11/24, documents that R19 requires AAROM, active range of motion program, along with dressing and grooming. R19's Functional Abilities and Goals, dated 9/11/24, documents that R19's has an impairment to one side of her upper extremities. This form documents that R19 required substantial/maximal assistance for activities of daily living. On 10/24/24 at 10:15 AM, R19's Rehab/Restorative Assessment, dated 9/11/24, active assist range of motion-to prevent limitations, to be performed BID…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) rescreen after the emergence of a newly diagnosed severe mental illness for one of three residents (R103) reviewed for PASARR screening, in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility policy, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR), dated (effective) 11/18/2023 documents, This facility promotes and supports a resident centered approach to care. The purpose of this guideline is to define and set expectations regarding the appropriate preadmission assessment of all individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. This includes incorporating the recommendations from the PASARR level 11 determination and evaluation in the residents' assessment, care plan and transition of care; and referring all level 11 residents and all residents with new or evident conditions related to Level 11 review upon significant change in status assessment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PAVILION HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL