No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg

1000 West Sloan Street, Harrisburg, IL 62946 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (618) 252-0351 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 actual-harm citations$92,920 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (25) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $92,920 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
901 S Commercial St · (618) 993-3817 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
304 S Commercial St · (618) 252-5349 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.9 mi
740 N Commercial St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Harrisburg High School Footb Fld · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.0%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.0%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.9%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.6%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.2%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication10.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.6%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.0%13.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 33.9 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.485 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 (R1, R2, R3, and R4) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 7. This failure would result in a reasonable person such as R3 and R4 feeling vulnerable, threatened, fearful or distressed due to R2's presence in the facility and not receiving adequate protection from aggressive behaviors.Findings include:R2's admission Record documented an admission date of 11/10/25 and included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 6, indicating R2 was severely cognitively impaired.R2's Care Plan included a Focus Area of Potential for aggressive behavior r/t (related to) dementia initiated on 11/17/25, with corresponding interventions that included to encourage participation in activities, monitor labs as ordered, observe residents location and change in aggression level, remove from area when resident shows increased aggression, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess, follow physician orders, and implement interventions to prevent and/or treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 (R78) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 26. This failure resulted in R78's Stage 4 pressure ulcer not being treated as ordered by the physician from 3/11/25 to 3/20/25 (nine days) and unstageable pressure ulcers to bilateral heels not being assessed and/or treated from 3/11/25 to 3/20/25 (9 days). Findings Include: R78's admission Record with a print date of 3/20/25 documents R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, benign neoplasm of prostate, and vascular dementia with a diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy identified on 2/15/25. R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R78 is at risk of developing pressure ulcers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate skin assessments and/or ensure preventative treatment and services were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 developing unstageable DTI's (deep tissue injuries) to the right and left heel with undetermined thickness. The findings include: R1's face sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Physician's orders dated 12/4/23-12/31/23 list some of R1's diagnoses as UTI (urinary tract infection), A-Fib (Atrial fibrillation), HTN (hypertension), seizure disorder, dementia, AKI (Acute kidney injury), and HLD (hyperlipidemia). R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/8/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS, in Section GG, documents R1 is dependent for rolling left and right in bed, sit to lying, lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely report a resident to resident abuse allegation for 1 (R1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7.Findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 3/25/25 and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, panlobular emphysema, and dysphasia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R2's admission Record documented an admission date of 11/10/25 and included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 6, indicating R2 was severely cognitively impaired.A Report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Regional Office marked as Initial & Final documents a Date of Incident/Accident as 02/03/2026 with no time documented and names R1 and R2 as the residents involved. Under Description of Occurrence is documented Alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely initiate and complete a thorough investigation of a resident to resident abuse allegation for 1 (R1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7.Findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 3/25/25 and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, panlobular emphysema, and dysphasia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R2's admission Record documented an admission date of 11/10/25 and included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 6, indicating R2 was severely cognitively impaired.On 2/4/26 at 3:20 PM, R1 was alert and oriented to self, time, and place. R1 said he was not sure of the exact date of the incident with R2. R1 said he was sitting in the dining room after the evening meal talking to V9 (Family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of the services of a Registered Nurse 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's November 2025 Nurse Schedule documented the facility did not provide 8 consecutive hours of the services of a Registered Nurse in the month of November 2025 for the days of: 11/1/25, 11/9/25-11/21/25, 11/23/25-11/30/25.The facility's December 2025 Nurse Schedule documented the facility did not provide 8 consecutive hours of the services of a Registered Nurse in the month of December 2025 for the days of: 12/6/25 and 12/7/25.On 12/12/25 at 2:20 PM, V2 (Registered Nurse/ Assistant Director of Nursing) said the Director of Nursing was off on medical leave due to a surgery since 11/10/25 and V2 was the only full time RN employed in the facility. V2 said she worked Monday through Friday for 8 consecutive hours but there was not always a RN on the weekends. V2 verified the facility did not provide 8 consecutive hours on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents living in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's Resident Daily Census Report document dated 8/27/2025, documents 35 residents residing in the facility. Review of the nursing schedules for June and July document that no RN was on shift on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025 for 8 consecutive hours.On 8/27/2025 at 2:22 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she is not aware if there had been any Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025. V2 stated, there are no RN hours documented on the schedule for those days.On 8/28/2025 at 11:51 AM, V14 (Regional Reimbursement Specialist) stated the facility did not have registered nurse coverage for 8 hours a day, seven days a week on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025.On 8/28/2025 at 11:53 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not have registered nurse coverage for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The Facility schedule for February and March 2025 documents there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 2/1/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/22/2025, 2/28/2025, 3/1/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/14/2025, 3/15/2025, 3/22/2025, and 3/29/2025. On 03/17/2025 at 9:25 AM, R78 states there isn't enough staff at times. On 03/19/2025 at 4:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, they don't have RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 day a week. V2 stated, they usually lack Saturdays, and some Sundays are covered. V2 said they have a RN that works as needed who does every other Sunday. On 03/19/2025 at 4:11 PM, V2 stated, there was no RN coverage on 2/1/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/22/2025, 2/28/2025, 3/1/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/14/2025, 3/15/2025, 3/22/2025, and 3/29/2025. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 03/17/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 2 (R7) residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 26. Findings Include: R7's admission Record with a print date of 3/20/25 documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, depression, hypertension, and low back pain. R7's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/19/25 documents R7 has a severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents R7 has a history of falls without serious injury. R7's Investigation Report for Falls documents the following falls. 11/24/24 documents R7 was found lying on her back in the lobby. The intervention implemented was a physical therapy and occupation therapy evaluation and treatment. 12/20/24 documents R7 was found across from her room in the hall sitting on the floor. The intervention implemented was to check her frequently when in bed and to use a pad alarm instead of a tab alarm. 1/25 (did not document full date)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide doctor ordered wound care for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for wound care in a sample of 9. Findings included: R5's admission Record documented an admission dated of 11/27/2024 with diagnoses in part of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus with diabetic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, muscle wasting and atrophy and acquired absences of left and right legs below the knee. R5's MDS (minimum data set) dated 12/26/2024 documented R5's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 total which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. The MDS documented R5 is dependent on staff for all toileting, bathing and dressing tasks and needs partial/moderate assistance with all personal hygiene tasks. On 1/21/2025 at 11:00pm, R5 said he has developed a wound on his penis and his doctor has ordered his wound treatment to be done twice per day since 1/8/25, but usually the nursing staff only performs his wound care one per day. R5 said he has spoken with the nursing staff about getting his treatment done twice per day, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This has the potential to affect all 19 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: On 3/26/24 at 1:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is not able to provide any documentation of minutes or attendance sheets for the facility's quarterly QAPI meetings. V1 further stated she started her employment at this facility in September 2023 and no QA information was available because she has not held a QAPI meeting since being employed. During the survey, a review of facility records revealed no documentation quarterly QAPI meetings were held. No meeting minutes or attendance sheets were found. The facility was unable to provide reproducible evidence QAPI meetings had been scheduled or occurred. The facility's QAPI Plan revised on 12/1/2022, documents Aspects of services and care are measured against established performance goals. Key monitors are measured and trended on a quarterly basis. The QAPI Committee analyzes performance to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a medical provider of an out of therapeutic range PT/INR (Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio) lab result for one (R7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 18. Findings include: R7's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 12/4/23 and listed diagnoses including a history of Cerebral Infarction and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. R7's Physicians Order Sheet for March 2024 documented an order dated 3/18/24 for Coumadin 4mg (milligrams) by mouth at bedtime Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, alternating with Coumadin 3mg. by mouth at bedtime on Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and a 12/26/23 order for, PT/INR (to be drawn) weekly. A Lab Report dated 3/26/24 documented, Coagulation: PT-37.6 (reference range 9.8-12.2 seconds). INR-3.8 (reference range 0.9-1.2). Handwritten on this document was, 3/26/24, 18:00. Called (V10/Physician's) office. Awaiting call back, and 3/27/24 14:25: Spoke with (V10's) Nurse, states (she) will call back (when) (V10) is in the office. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sinks in working order for 2 of 6 residents, (R1 and R6) reviewed for environment in the sample of 6. Findings: 1. On 2/13/2024, at 9:15 AM, in R1's room there was a sign covering R1's sink that stated out of order. On 2/13/2024, at 10:30 AM, R1 who was alert to name walked this surveyor to his room. When asked what happened to his sink R1 said it was broke. When asked where he washed his hands he pointed and said, I use a bathroom sink down the hall. 2. On 2/13/2024, at 9:18 AM, R6's bathroom sink was noted to be clogged with dirty water. On 2/13/2024, at 9:40 AM, R6 who was alert to person, place and time stated he has problems with his bathroom sink clogging up daily. R6 stated the maintenance person must come daily and unclog his bathroom sink. On 2/13/2024, at 10:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated V9 (Regional Maintenance) is coming to the facility on Thursday afternoon, 2/15/2024, to check on R1's bathroom sink. V1 stated the issue is a plumbing issue. V1 stated V9 is bringing more equipment with him to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 12 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This failure has the potential to affect all 20 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/25/24 at 10:40am, V1 (Administrator) said she thinks they are doing better with RN/Registered Nurse Coverage. V1 said they now have an RN that comes in when needed. V1 said they do not currently have a DON/Director of Nurses and have not had one in about a month or so. On 1/25/24 at 12:30pm, V5 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said they do not have a DON/Director of Nurses. The facilities January 2024 licensed nursing schedule documented no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 1/5/24, 1/6/24, 1/12/24, 1/13/24, 1/19/24, 1/20/24, 1/25/24, and 1/26/24. On 1/25/24 at 11:00am, V1 verified there was no RN coverage in the facility on the above listed dates. On 1/25/24 and 1/26/24, there were no RN's observed working in the facility during the survey. Facility Document labeled Nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This affects all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/23 at 10:52 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) said she was the only licensed nurse working on the floor. V8 said the facility did not currently have a Director of Nursing (DON). The facility's December 2023 licensed nursing schedule documented no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on: 12/2/23, 12/8/23 12/9/23, 12/14/23, 12/15/23, 12/16/23, 12/21/23, 12/22/23, and 12/28/23. On 12/29/23 at 11:23 AM, V1 (Administrator) verified there was no RN coverage in the facility on the above listed dates. On 12/29/23 at 8:32 AM, V1 stated the facility had not had a full time Director of Nursing (DON) since 12/6/23. V1 said no staff were interested in taking the position because they don't want to take call. V1 said the facility had been advertising for the position online but no one had shown interest. V1 said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical grade gloves for resident care. This affects all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/23 at 11:29 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) and V5 (CNA) said the facility had one Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) storage room. V4 and V5 said the only gloves available from the PPE storage room were vinyl food handler gloves. Boxes of food handler gloves were observed being used for resident care around the facility. On 12/27/23 at 11:57 AM, V1 (Administrator) said facility nursing staff had been using the vinyl food handlers gloves for about a month due to the medical supply company having gloves on back order. V1 said due to the facility not being able to acquire medical grade gloves, the food handler gloves were better than no gloves. V1 said she had not tried to contact the local health department for assistance with acquiring PPE. On 12/27/23 at 1:03 PM, V7 (Health Department Director of Nursing) said the local health department no longer was assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control of rodents. This has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 10:10 AM V2 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said the facility had a chronic mouse problem. V2 said R6's room had mice. V2 said she had reported the mice to V1 (Administrator). On 12/12/23 at 2:50 PM V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) said she had seen mice all around the facility. V5 said she had reported it to the nurses, V1, and V6 (Maintenance Director). V5 said she had heard there was a staff member who found a mouse in a resident's bed but could not recall which staff member or the specific resident. 1. R6's face sheet documented an admission date of 1/20/18. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented diagnoses including: hypertension, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness (generalized), cellulitis of right lower limb, difficulty in walking, venous insufficiency. R6's 11/3/23 Cognitive Assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight hours a day, seven days a week: and failed to have a Registered Nurse to serve as a Director of Nursing on a full-time basis. This has the potential to affect all 21 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: V1 (Administrator) stated, the facility currently does not have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. However, they have hired a Director of Nursing (DON) that is starting next week. V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/MDS) stated, the facility does not have a Registered Nurse seven days a week for at least eight hours a day. V4 stated they did hire a DON that is starting next week. The facility schedule titled, October 2023 documents the facility did not have a RN working on: 10/07/23, 10/12/23 - 10/14/23, 10/19/23 - 10/21/23. The facility document titled, September 2023 documents the facility did not have a RN working on: 09/04/23 - 09/06/23, 09/11/23, 09/12/23, 09/21/23, and 09/28/23. There is no DON listed on the schedule or DON hours for October 2023. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff. This has the potential to affect all 21 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: On 10/26/23 at 11:45 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, V12 (Previous Dietary Manager) quit on 09/11/23 and they hired V3 (Dietary Manager) on 10/12/23. V1 said that on 09/08/23, 10/02/23, 10/03/23, 10/04/23, V13 (Registered Dietician) helped in the kitchen. V1 said that on 09/25/23 through 09/27/23, and 09/29/23, V14 (Dietary Manager from another facility) helped in the kitchen. On 10/11/23 through 10/13/23, V15 (Dietary Manager from another facility) helped in the kitchen, and on 09/10/23 through 09/13/23, 09/21/23, 09/28/23, and 09/30/23 through 10/08/23 there was no one scheduled for dietary. V1 said that on 09/15/23, 09/16/23, 09/18/23, 09/19/23, 09/20/23, 09/22/23, 09/24/23 through 09/27/23, 09/29/23 and 10/08/23 there was one person scheduled for dietary services. V1 stated, V1 and V2 (Business office manager/Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Director of Nursing for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 05/9/23 at 10:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility currently does not have a Director of Nursing (DON) and has not since December 2022. V1 states the facility has sought to hire a DON but been unsuccessful. V1 verified the accuracy of nursing schedules provided and stated the facility does not have any nursing waivers. On 5/11/23 at 2:00 PM, V10 (Registered Nurse) stated that they do not currently have a DON on staff. On 5/9/23 at 1:00 PM, V2 (MDS) stated that they have not had a DON for quite some time but that they are interviewing for the position. During the survey from 5/9/23 to 5/12/23, there was no DON observed working at the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form provided by the facility on 5/9/23 documents 23 residents reside at the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a recapitulation of stay at the facility for 1 of 1 resident (R26) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 22. The Findings Include: R26 profile face sheet documents that R26 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acquired absence of left leg, below knee. R26's nursing progress notes document that on 3/21/23 R26 was discharged from facility and left with husband in personal vehicle at 12:05. Discharge instructions and medications reviewed and sent with resident. A Discharge Evaluation was found in R26's medical record but was blank. On 5/11/23 at 10:00 AM, V2 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated that there was not a completed discharge evaluation on R26. On 5/12/23 at 9:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R26 was admitted for a very short time and was here for her home to be made handicap accessible, and when she found out she could leave there was not a lot of notice. V1 confirms the only information on R26's discharge is in the progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents blood sugar prior to administering fast-acting insulin for 1of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for insulin administration a sample of 22. The findings include: R23's document labeled Profile Face Sheet notes that R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's Profile Face Sheet documents diagnoses including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, unspecified open wound, left lower leg. R23's Physician's Orders note an order dated 4/3/23 for Insulin Lispro 100 units/ml Inject 5 units Sub Q (subcutaneous) three times daily 6am, 11am, 4pm. R23's Physician's Orders dated 4/3/23-4/30/23 and 5/1/23 to present do not document any orders to check R23's blood sugar. R23's facility progress note dated 4/4/23 written by V8 (Physician) document under Plan .will monitor blood sugars closely and adjust insulin as necessary. On 5/9/23 at 11:15am, R23 was observed being administered 5 units of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 of 8 residents (R3, R6, R12, R13, R18, R23, R24, and R80) reviewed for room size in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 3/20/25 at 8:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) measured rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 10 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 10 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6 sq. ft. (72.3 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.1 sq. ft. (76 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 315.7 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 314.6 sq. ft. (78.7sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 of 8 residents (R2, R7, R9, R11, R12, R14, R15, R16) reviewed for room size in a sample of 18. Findings include: On 3/27/24 at 12:20 PM, this surveyor accompanied V3 (Maintenance Supervisor) for the purpose of measuring the 10 resident rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 10 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 10 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6 sq. ft. (72.3 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.1 sq. ft. (76 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 315.7 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per bed) room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 16 of 16 residents (R1, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R15, R16, R17, R20, R21, R23, and R24) reviewed for room size in a sample of 22. Findings include: On 5/11/23 at 12:20 PM, this surveyor accompanied V7 (Housekeeping) for the purpose of measuring the 13 resident rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 13 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 13 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.5 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 299.9 sq. ft. (75 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$92,920 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $92,920 — penalty dated 2026-02-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-18 for 24 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-28 for 42 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AXIOM HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
DAUBER, JONATHANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
DAUBER, ELIANAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
HOEHN, CRYSTALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
JACKSON, TAMMYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WEBB, JESSICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
AXIOM CARE, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025
RIDER, SHANNONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
TUROFSKY, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WILHELM, NAFTALIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
BERKOWITZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2026
MEYSTEL, YOSEFIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2026
CURIS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PETERSEN SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$96K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 10%Other / private 19%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $96K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$273per resident / day
operating cost
$8,309per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$259per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145978. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next