No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Montgomery Nursing & Rehab Ctr

State Route 127, Hillsboro, IL 62049 · For profit - Individual · 110 certified beds · (217) 532-6126 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 532-6126 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$12,048 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,048 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-23)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1220 E Tremont St Ste A · (217) 532-9471 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
608 S Main St · (217) 532-9479 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1201 Vandalia Road
Park
509 School St · (217) 532-9001 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.0%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%6.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms78.1%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.1%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%63.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.842.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.642.221.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.5%CMS range 37.4–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.1–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
38.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 65.5 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-27)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise 1 of 1 resident (R5), reviewed for accidents and incidents, in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R5 spilling coffee on herself and sustaining second degree burns. This past non-compliance occurred between 4/28/24 and 4/30/24. Findings Include: Facility reported incident, dated 4/30/2024, documented, [AGE] year-old female with Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Anxiety, Severely Cognitively Impaired. On 4/28/2024 at 10:16AM R5 was in room with breakfast tray. R5 attempted to stand and used the bedside table to stand up and the coffee that was on the breakfast tray spilled onto R5's lap. R5 was immediately assessed and R5 noted to have redness to right upper thigh. Medical Doctor, MD, and Power of Attorney, POA, were updated and R5 put on follow up to monitor area. No complaints of pain or discomfort to the site. On 4/30/2024 small clusters of blisters were noted to the right and left upper thigh. Call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of all pertinent information regarding a resident's change in condition for one of one resident (R324) reviewed for physician notification in the sample of 31. This resulted in R324 having a delay in treatment for a change in neurological condition. Findings include: R324's Face Sheet, undated, documents R324 had the following diagnoses: Type 2 DM (Diabetes Mellitus), CHF (Congested Heart Failure), Obesity, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, HTN (Hypertension), ASHD (Atherosclerotic Heart Disease), GERD (Gastric Esophageal Reflux Disease), Neuropathies, Osteoarthritis, Asthma, Hyperlipidemia, Disease of Liver, Chronic Pain, Unspecified Kidney Failure, COVID-19. R324's Physician Order, dated [DATE], documents FULL CODE. R324's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents Code Status: She elected for full code status. The Approach, dated [DATE], documents Family/MD to notified of any changes in her condition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a change in neurological condition, notify the physician/nurse practitioner (NP) of all pertinent information, and provide service to address changes in condition for one of one resident (R324) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 31. This resulted in R324 having a delay in treatment for a change in neurological condition. Findings include: R324's Face Sheet, undated, documents R324 was admitted on [DATE], and was discharged on [DATE]. The Face Sheet documented R324 had the following diagnoses: Type 2 DM (Diabetes Mellitus), CHF (Congested Heart Failure), Obesity, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, HTN (Hypertension), ASHD (Atherosclerotic Heart Disease), GERD (Gastric Esophageal Reflux Disease), Neuropathies, Osteoarthritis, Asthma, Hyperlipidemia, Disease of Liver, Chronic Pain, Unspecified Kidney Failure, and COVID-19. R324's Physician Order (PO), dated [DATE], documents FULL CODE. R324's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (R1) resident was free of sexual abuse from one (R8) resident reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8. This past non-compliance occurred from 1/9/2026-1/13/2026. Findings include:On 3/23/2026 at 12:41 V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated R1 reported allegation to her spouse and R1's spouse notified the facility. V3 stated she came in to the facility on 1/9/2026 to do a skin assessment. V3 stated R1 had no injuries.On 3/23/2026 at 12:45PM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated she got a statement from R1. V2 stated R1 stated she was sitting on side of bed without any pants on. V2 stated R1 stated that R8 entered her room in his wheelchair and touched her privates. V2 stated R1 reported she slapped R8 and he left her room. V2 stated the camera footage was reviewed and R8 was observed entering R1's room in his wheelchair and exiting a short time later. V2 stated R8 was moved to the 400 hall which is a hall where would be more visibility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication and label multi dose insulin vials and pens. This has the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/24/2025 at 11:12 AM the facility's 500 Hall Medication Cart was inspected. The medication cart contained the following: 1. An opened and unlabeled multi dose Lispro insulin vial. The multi-dose vial did not have a resident identifier or open date. On 3/24/2025 at 11:13 AM V20, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), verified that the vial was open, partially used, undated and not labeled. V20 stated that the vial should be labeled with the resident's name and open date. V20 stated that the vial belonged to R31. On 3/26/2025 at 1:56 PM V7, LPN, stated that the multi-dose vials that are not labeled are stock. V7 stated that when using the multi-dose vial it is labeled with the resident's name and open date. V7 stated that R31's insulin was discontinued October 2024. A review of R31's medical record Physician Order Sheet (POS) document no current Lispro…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to follow their Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy by not posting signage or utilizing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when caring for residents with qualifying criteria for 4 of 4 residents (R33, R74, R75, and R230) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) in the sample of 40. Findings include: 1. On 3/24/2025 at 10:10 AM, R75 was observed in a low bed with a catheter bag attached. The catheter bag was rested on the floor. There was no signage or Personal Protective Equipment outside R75's room or near the vicinity of R75's room. On 3/24/2025 at 3:18 PM, V20, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R75 had a catheter but she removed it because he was pulling at it. V20 stated R75 still has a nephrostomy tube that gets flushed every day by the nurses. R75's Progress Notes dated 3/23/2025 at 10:27 AM documents R75's nephrostomy tube and catheter were in place. R75's Progress Notes dated 3/23/2025 at 1:58 PM documents R75's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity for two of six (R3 and R19) residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 40. Findings include: On 3/24/2025 at 11:00 AM, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was at a half round table, in the assistive dining room, where there were 3 residents that needed feeding assistance. She was standing up feeding R3 from behind the half round table. V1, Administrator, asked V4 to sit down when she was feeding the resident. V4 stated that she was too short to reach R3. V1 walked away. She continued to feed R3 standing up instead of sitting down next to her. Another CNA asked V4 to switch her tables and feed R19. V4 did so, sat down and could not reach R19 across the table so she stood up instead of sitting next to R19 and gave her bites of food. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documented that she was rarely or never understood and that she was dependent upon staff for eating. R3's Care Plan, dated 11/24/2020, documented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) feeding according to standards of care for 1 of 1 residents (R230) reviewed for tube feedings in the sample of 40. Findings include: R230's Face sheet dated 3/26/2025 documents R230 has a Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube). R230's Care Plan dated 3/18/2025 documents R230 currently has a feeding tube in place, placing him at risk for complications, including aspiration (inhaling fluid into the lungs). R230's Physician's Orders dated 3/19/2025 documents R230 gets a tube feeding at 237 milliliters over 60 minutes four times a day via G-tube. On 3/24/2025 at 4:00 PM, V6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered R230's room to administer his tube feeding. V6 donned gloves, but no gown. V6 connected the tube feeding to R230's G-tube and began the feeding at 237 milliliters per hour. R230 was laying flat in bed. V6 did not elevate the head of R230's bed. On 3/25/2025 at 7:58 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated she would expect the nurse administering a tube feeding to elevate the head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to discard insulin pens after being in use for longer than 28 days, remove and dispose of expired medications, and not store food items in the medication refrigerator. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: On 03/10/24 at 8:40 AM, The front medication room was inspected. The unlocked refrigerator, in the medication room contained the following: 1. There was a container of personal food and a 2% milk. 2. An unopened box of Tylenol suppository's 650mg (milligrams) with an expiration date of 12/2023. 3. R68's opened Lansprazole suspension 3mg/ml (milligrams/milliliter) with no open date or discard noted to the bottle. On 03/10/24 at 8:43 AM, 12, Registered Nurse (RN) stated the Lansprazole suspension should have an open date on it and there shouldn't be any food in the medication storage refrigerator. On 03/10/24 at 8:45 AM, The stock medication cabinet was inspected and contained the following: 1. Oyster Shell calcium Vitamin 250mg expiration date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed supervise and assist with meals for 1 of 1 (R45) residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 38. Findings include: R45's Face sheet, print date of 03/12/24, documents R45 has diagnoses of other specified eating disorder and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oropharyngeal phase. R45's Minimum Data set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, R45 is severely cognitively impaired and requires partial/moderate assistance with eating. R45's Care Plan, last care conference date of 10/26/23, documents, Goal: R45 will consume 75% of all meals and will remain free from significant weight loss. Approach list but is not limited to protein supplement three times a day with med pass, fortified ice cream with lunch and dinner, routine weights, record, notify doctor (MD)/registered dietitian (RD) of any significant changes in weight, and selective menu choices. Substitutions available for food dislikes. R45's Weights for the past six months are as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were within easy reach for 1 of 11 residents (R2) reviewed for call lights in a sample of 11. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, print date of 09/26/23, documents R2 has diagnoses of Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left nondominant side, Epilepsy, and Gastroesophageal reflux disease, (GERD). R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is moderately cognitively impaired and requires extensive assistance, two plus person physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and he is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 09/20/23 at 10:50 AM, R2's call light was observed to be lying on the floor beside his bed where he was unable to reach it. When this surveyor questioned R2 about his call light, he stated it's supposed to be hooked to the bed, but sometimes they will drop it on the floor, and he is unable to reach it and he must scream for someone to come…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment in a clean and sanitary condition for 1 of 11 residents (R2) in a sample of 11. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, print date of 09/26/23, documents R2 has diagnoses of Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left nondominant side, Epilepsy, and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is moderately cognitively impaired and requires extensive assistance, two plus person physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and he is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 09/20/23 at 10:50 AM, upon entry to R2's room, a strong odor of urine was noted; there were two urinals hanging on the side of the trash can with urine in them. One had approximately 500 milliliters, (ml), of dark yellow urine in it and the other had approximately 200ml of dark yellow urine in it. The trash can was full of trash/food wrappers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 69 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 2/6/2023 at 3:00 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, There was a few times in the last month that the facility has not been staffed with an RN for 8 hours in a 24-hour period. On 2/9/23 at 11:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, I am having difficulty getting RNs who want to work full time. I am aware that I am supposed to have an RN for 8 hours 7 days a week. The Staffing schedules were reviewed for the past month. On the dates of 1/4/2023, 1/28/23 and 1/29/2023 the facility did not have a RN for 8 consecutive hours. The Facility's Daily Staffing Information policy, dated 7/2014, documents, It is the policy of (this company) that, as required by CMS, to post daily staffing information in the facility. This must be posted in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors at the start of each shift. DON's and ADON's (any nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to provide services to maintain resident's personal hygiene for residents who are dependent upon staff for hygiene for 4 of 4 residents (R26, R15, R35, R44) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living in a sample size of 31. Findings include: 1. R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a R35 has moderately impaired cognition. MDS documents R35 requires extensive assistance with bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers, and personal hygiene. On 2/5/23 at 9:30 AM, R35 stated the call light times are longer on the weekends; he must wait long times for showers, he hasn't had assistance with shaving, and he only gets shaved on shower days, but would like to get shaved every day. On 2/5/23 at 9:30 AM, R35 was sitting in chair with facial hair stubble. On 2/5/23 at 1:00 PM, R35 was sitting in chair with facial hair stubble. On 2/6/23 at 9:30 AM, R35 was sitting in chair with facial hair stubble. R35 states he would like to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to limit the use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications to 14 days unless justification is provided by physician for 4 of 4 residents (R8, R46, R61 and R24) reviewed for psychotropic medication use in the sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R24's Face Sheet, undated, documents R24's diagnoses in part as major depressive disorder, single episode, and generalized anxiety disorder. On 2/8/23 at 9:00 AM, R24's Physician's Order (PO), with a start date of 9/13/2022, documents alprazolam 0.25 MG take 1 tab PO (orally) BID (twice a day) PRN RE-EVALUATE 3/10/23. R24's medical record contains pharmacy recommendation, dated 9/1/21, that documents end date re-eval 3/10/22, with no rationale indicated for extended use of the alprazolam. R24's Care Plan, Problem, dated 9/13/22, documents, Anti-Anxiety med use: she receives anti-anxiety med Xanax as needed, as she does become anxious, placing her at risk for significant side effects from med (medication). The Care Plan Approach, dated 9/13/22, documents Administer med…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure appropriate care and placement of indwelling urinary catheter drainage bags and tubing to prevent infection for 2 of 4 residents (R34, R52) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R34's undated Face Sheet documents the diagnoses to include, Urinary tract infection (UTI), site not specified, Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and Retention of urine. R34's Care Plan documents goal for R34 will remain free from s/s (signs/symptoms) of UTI thru next review. Interventions: Position the collection bag below the bladder, ensure the bag and tubing are off the floor at all times. On 2/9/23 at 8:05 AM, R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R34 requires extensive assist with bed mobility, dressing, and dependent on staff for toileting, transfers and personal hygiene. On 2/5/23 at 10:00 AM, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and V10, CNA, transferred R43 to bed with full body lift. V4 placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,048 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HELIA HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MILLER, STEPHENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 05/15/2006
COX, CHRISTOPHERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/17/2021
MILLS, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2017
MUELLER, NATALIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$323K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 10%Other / private 38%

This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$259per resident / day
operating cost
$7,869per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$232per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145483. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next