Helia Healthcare Of Newton
300 S Scott Street, Newton, IL 62448 · For profit - Corporation · 57 certified beds · (618) 783-2309 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 2.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.95 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.1%CMS range 29.7–59.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 9.6–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.0–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.82 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, revise and/or implement care plan interventions and to follow facility policy to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 3 of 13 residents (R9, R10, R12) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 27. This failure resulted in and R9 experiencing an 11.1 percent weight loss in 3 months. Findings include: 1. R9's Care Plan documents an admission date of 2/21/22 and lists diagnoses including, but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (Primary), Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance (Admission), Psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, Restlessness and agitation, Anxiety disorder, unspecified, Essential tremor, Essential (primary) hypertension, Constipation, unspecified, Hyperlipidemia, unspecified, Vitamin D deficiency, unspecified, Mixed incontinence, Personal history of COVID-19, Nausea with vomiting, unspecified. R9's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wheelchair foot pedals were in place to prevent resident injury for 1 (R4) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 8.This past non-compliance occurred between 3/24/2026 and 3/26/2026.The findings include:R4's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 6/19/2024 with admitting diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cough, muscle weakness, history of multiple fractures, right patellar tendon rupture and age-related osteoporosis. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R4 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documented R4 utilizes a wheelchair for locomotion and does not walk.The facility's Long Term Care Facility-Serious Injury, Incident and Communicable Disease report dated 3/25/2026 documents the following in part: Administrator notified of an x-ray report resulting in an acute non-displaced tibia fracture.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 02/20/2025 at 10:29 A.M. V1 (Administrator) stated she is aware there are a few shifts that did not have 8 hours with a Registered Nurse. V1 stated that V2 (Director of Nursing) has been working weekends to ensure that the facility has RN coverage every shift. V1 stated on 02/16/2025 that V2 was in the building and left for several hours before coming back. V1 stated she did not realize that registered nurse coverage hours had to be consecutive. On 02/21/2025 at 10:15 A.M. V1 stated that the facility uses several nurses from one shift who keep extending their contract to work for the facility. V1 stated that they have hired a new MDS (Minimum Date Set) nurse who will help cover RN hours when she gets trained. V1 verified the accuracy of the December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025 nursing schedules. Review of December 2024 Nursing Schedule documents four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate direct care staffing to meet resident's needs. This has the potential to affect all 32 residents living at the facility. Findings include: 1. R7's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 1/31/20 and listed diagnoses including History of Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Congestive Heart Failure. R7's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R7 has moderate deficits in cognition and is totally dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and dressing. R7's Care Plan dated 8/27/24 documented a problem area, Resident's ability to perform activities of daily living requires assistance of staff. On 09/10/24 at 02:11PM, R7 was in his room sitting in his wheelchair watching TV. R7 was alert to person and place but not time. R7 stated he needed to use the bathroom and pushed his call light. After 15 minutes and 46 seconds, V8, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), responded and assisted R7 with toileting. 2. R15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of June 2024 Nursing Schedule documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on 06/19/2024 and 06/29/2024. Review of July 2024 Nursing Schedule documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on 07/13/2024, 07/14/2024, 07/17/2024, 07/27/2024 and 07/28/2024. Review of August 2024 Nursing Schedule documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on 08/03/2024, 08/04/2024, 08/17/2024 and 08/18/2024. On 09/10/24 at 02:01 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that she is aware there are shifts that have no RN (Registered Nurse) coverage. V1 stated the facility utilizes agency nurses to fill in gaps. V1 stated that she has recently hired RN's and the September schedule has more RN coverage on it. On 09/13/2024 at 10:47 A.M., V1 stated the facility tries to have RN coverage for all days but it is hard to get RN's to apply. V1 stated that she recently hired more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food and maintain the kitchen in safe and sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination. This has the potential to all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 9/10/24 at 9:45 AM, the initial kitchen tour was completed and the following concerns were noted: the top of the dish machine had a layer of flaky dried matter on top covering the entire surface, a scoop with a handle was found inside the bulk thickener touching the food item, bottom shelves of stainless steel tables were dusty and had old/dried food debris on them, bulk food containers were found to be sticky to touch and dried spills going down the side and food debris on top, a container on the cooks table holding various utensils/seasonings was found to have crumbs and food debris in the bottom, the steam table had dried/black food substance burnt to the bottom of all inserts, the side of the stove was found to have old/dried food spills down the side, the floor under the stove and cooks stainless steel table had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were successfully transmitted within 14 days of completion for 1 (R32) of 12 residents reviewed for assessments in the sample of 41. Findings Include: R32's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 04/29/2024. Diagnoses include, but not limited to dementia, Alzheimer's disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and essential hypertension. On 09/11/2024 at 1:52 PM, V2 (Registered Nurse / Minimum Data Set Nurse) stated R32 had an admission assessment on 05/03/2024 and the discharge assessment was completed on 05/24/2024. V2 stated that she does not have to transmit the MDS because it was a private pay discharge. V2 stated that she did not transmit the assessment as it is not required to be. On 09/11/2024 at 2:55 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that she is unfamiliar with the MDS not being transmitted. V1 stated that she will reach out to the corporate office and get the correct information on whether or not the MDS should have been transmitted. On 09/12/2024 9:45 AM, V2 stated she was inaccurate with what she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility has failed to update comprehensive care plans for 2 of 12 residents (R15 and R21) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 41. The Findings Include: 1. R15's Face sheet documents an admission date of 2/9/21. R15's Face sheet includes the following diagnosis: major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, depression, unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, vascular dementia with agitation. R15's Current care plan documents a problem area of falls. The goal for this problem area is that resident will remain free from injury. The approach to this problem area include: therapy to evaluate and treat if POA (Power of Attorney) approves, provide proper well maintained footwear, staff assess pressure alarm is functioning when providing care, lock brakes of wheelchair when resident is not in it, non skid strips placed on the floor next to the bed, observe frequently and place in supervised area when out of bed, resident will be monitored when in the dining room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement fall precautions by placing the call light within reach for 1 of 2 (R15) residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 41. Findings Include: R15's face sheet documents an admission date of 2/9/21. This same document includes the following diagnosis: muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and vascular dementia. R15's care plan has a problem area category of falls that has a start date of 8/18/22 and an edited date of 8/27/24. The goal for this problem area with a long term goal target date of 11/29/24 is that the resident will remain free from injury. An approach to this problem area with a start date of 8/18/22 is to keep the call light in reach at all times. R15's most recent recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Date Set) dated 5/20/24 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 6, indicating R15 is severely impaired with cognition level. R15's same MDS Section J documents that R15 has had falls since admission/reentry. On 9/10/24 at 10:30 AM, R15 was observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 (R2) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 41. The Findings Include: R2's Face sheet documents an admit date of 9/6/23 and includes the following diagnosis: vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. R2's current Physician Order Sheet documents an order for 1 mg (milligram) Risperadol with diagnosis: vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety with a start date of 9/6/2023. A psychotropic and sedative/hypnotic utilization by resident report provided by V1 (Administrator) dated 9/6/24 documents that R2 started Risperidone 1 mg pm (as needed) on 9/6/23 and is due for a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) evaluation on 12/2024. The column labeled Last GDR is blank. On 9/13/24 at 1:30PM, V1 stated at this time there are no other pharmacy reports that show communication to recommend any medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate direct care staffing to meet resident's needs. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 5/15/24 at 8:30am, V1 (Administrator) stated the current resident census is 37. V1 stated since the facility received a staffing citation from IDPH (The Illinois Department of Public Health) on 4/19/24, the facility signed a contract with a staffing agency. V1 stated the agency currently has nurses available which the facility is utilizing, but no CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are available. On 5/15/24 at 9:15am, V3 (Power of Attorney/POA) of R1, stated on Tuesday 5/7/24 from about 3:30pm to about 6:00pm, the only CNA working was V11 (CNA). V3 stated during that time, she tried to find V11 for help transferring R1 into the wheelchair from the recliner and back again, but V11 was busy with other residents, and V3 stated she transferred R1 by herself although it takes two people to transfer R1. V3 stated the facility has an ongoing problem with being short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate direct care staffing to meet resident's needs. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 8:40am, V1, Administrator, stated she is the staff member responsible for scheduling nursing staff. V1 stated that for each 8-hour shift, one nurse and two CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) are scheduled. V1 stated on Easter Sunday, 3/31/24 the facility experienced, A staffing situation. V1 stated the two CNAs and one nurse scheduled for 6am to 2pm called in sick. V1 stated she called other CNA and nursing staff and everybody refused to come in except V9, Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator, V1 stated V1 worked as a CNA, although she is not certified, and she and V9 had to perform all resident care from 6:00am to 2:00pm until staff came in to relieve them. V1 denied there were any negative outcomes associated with this event. On 4/3/24 at 9:55am, R4 was alert and oriented.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a trained, competent Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 3/31/24. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 8:40am, V1, Administrator, stated on Easter Sunday, 3/31/24 the facility experienced, A staffing situation. V1 stated the two CNAs and one nurse scheduled for 6am to 2pm called in sick. V1 stated she called other CNA and nursing staff and everybody refused to come in except V9, Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator. V1 stated V1 worked as a CNA, although she is not certified as a CAN. V1 stated she and V9 had to perform all resident care duties from 6:00am to 2:00pm. V1 denied there were any negative outcomes associated with this event. V1 acknowledged she performed transfers and incontinence care with no training or experience in personal care. V1 denied feeding residents or assisting with resident medications or treatments. On 4/3/24 at 9:55am, R4 was alert and oriented. R4 stated on Easter morning only V1 and V9 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a full time Director of Nurses/DON. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 8:40am, V1, Administrator, stated V2, former DON, walked out 3/24/24, giving no notice of termination of employment. V1 stated V2 had stated she was tired of having to frequently work the floor as a nurse in addition to her DON duties. V1 stated there have since been no interested applicants. V1 stated the facility's other nurses, as well as corporate staff, have had to take over some of the DON duties. V1 stated V2 acted as the facility's Infection Control Preventionist and no staff has been assigned to take over those duties. V1 stated V2 is still employed by the facility as a PRN (as needed) staff nurse. On 4/11/24 at 3:30pm, V2 stated she left the position on 3/24/24 because she was tired of not being able to spend time with her family due to her DON duties as well as working the floor when there were call ins. V2 stated she is still employed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient kitchen staff to carry out nutrition services on 3/26/24. This has the ability to affect all 36 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 9:25am, V1, Administrator, stated the facility's long term Dietary Manager died suddenly on 2/15/24. V1 stated her replacement started on 3/28/24. V1 stated in addition to the new Dietary Manager, there are two full time cooks, one morning and one afternoon. V1 stated the kitchen is fully staffed based on their census according to their corporation's guidelines. V1 stated on 3/26/24, Tuesday, one of the cooks called in and the other cook was scheduled to come in at 11:30 and could not come in early, so V1 cooked breakfast that morning. V1 stated she prepared scrambled eggs and provided a choice of cereal as well as donuts, which she stated were not on the menu that day but that combination had been on the menu previously as a Dietician approved meal. V1 stated for lunch she ordered pizza and breadsticks and served chocolate chip cookies which had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check the dish machine and surface cleaning agent for the correct proportion of a sanitizing agent, failed to maintain equipment, food contact surfaces and storage areas in a clean and sanitary manner, and failed to store foods to prevent potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 11:15am, all cabinets in the kitchen were noted to be covered on the outside with a layer of grime. The floors throughout the area were sticky and had dried food debris around the and under the stove and under prep tables. The steam table held food debris and grime in its empty compartments. All drawers in the kitchen contained food debris. Shelves under prep tables had a thick layer of grime and also food debris. The cooler doors were dirty and grimy with food debris in the bottom. The microwave was dirty inside and out, the turntable had what appeared to be a layer of baked on oatmeal, and there was food debris under the turntable. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve the appropriation portions for a lunch meal according to the menu spreadsheet for four (R3, R9, R13, R14) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 17. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 11:45am, lunch service trayline was observed. V4, Cook, stated regular trays were to receive a 4 ounce portion of the ham and augratin potato casserole entree. V4 used a 4 ounce scoop to portion the casserole for R3, R9, R13, and R14's trays. The Menu Spreadsheet for lunch 4/2/24 for regular texture diets called for the service of an 8 ounce ladle of the ham and potato casserole. R3's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 8/12/23 and listed diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Hypertension. R3's Physicians Orders listed an order for a regular texture diet. R9's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 7/15/21 and listed diagnoses including Hearth Failure and Anxiety Disorder. R9's Physicians Orders listed an order for a regular diet. R13's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide twice weekly showers for 3 of 17 dependent residents (R4, R12, R13) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in the sample of 17. Findings include: 1. R4's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 5/31/17 and listed diagnoses including Anxiety Disorder, Hypertension, and Osteoarthritis. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R4 requires substantial assistance from staff for bathing or showering. March and April 2024 Shower Sheets documented that R4 received showers on 3/2/24, 3/4/24, 4/4/24, 4/8/24, and 4/11/24, with only one shower given on the week of 3/3/24, no showers given on the weeks of 3/10/24, 3/17/24, and 3/24/24, and only one shower given on the week of 3/31/24. On 4/3/24 at 9:55am, R4 was alert and oriented. R4 stated she is to get a shower twice weekly, and she was to have gotten a shower on 4/1/24 but didn't because there was no hot water on the North Hall where she lives. R4 stated nobody offered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident requiring the use of a mechanical lift for 1 of 4 residents (R13) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 17. Findings include: On 4/4/24 at 12:05pm, V1, Administrator, identified R13 as a resident who requires mechanical lift transfers. R13's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 2/6/24 and listed diagnoses including Cervical Spine Fusion following Wedge Compression Fracture. R13's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R13 is dependent on 2 or more staff members for transfers. R13's Physical Therapy Evaluation dated 2/7/24 documented, Patient is bed bound and uses (a mechanical lift) for transfers. On 4/10/24 at 3:00pm, V13, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated at times there is only one nurse and one CNA per shift, and that V13 has had to do mechanical lift transfers on residents by herself, which she stated is not policy. V13 stated there have been no negative outcomes associated with these transfers. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements according to physician's orders for four (R3, R14, R15, R16) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 17. Findings include: On 4/2/24 at 11:45am, lunch trayline was observed. Although the diet cards of R3, R14, and R16 specified they were to be served a liquid nutritional supplement, none was sent on their trays. During lunchtime dining observation on 4/3/24 at 11:25am, R3, R15, and R16 did not get supplements on their tray. R3's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 8/12/23 and listed diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Hypertension. R3's Physicians Orders listed an order for a liquid nutritional supplement at breakfast and lunch. R14's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 1/25/20 and listed diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and Hypertension. R14's Physicians Orders listed an order for a liquid nutritional supplement at lunch. R15's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 3/31/22 and listed diagnoses including Huntington's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors for one of four residents (R7) reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 17. Findings include: R7's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 1/27/23 and listed diagnoses including Diabetes Type 2 with Diabetic Neuropathy. R7's April 2024 Physicians Orders documented an order for Humalog U-100 Insulin per sliding scale as follows: If blood sugar is less than 60, call the Physician. If Blood Sugar is 200 to 250, give 2 Units. If Blood Sugar is 251 to 275, give 4 Units. If Blood Sugar is 276 to 300, give 6 Units. If Blood Sugar is 301 to 350, give 8 Units. If Blood Sugar is 351 to 400, give 10 Units. To be given three times daily, dose 1 from 6:00am-10:00am, dose 2 from 11:00am-2:00pm, and dose 3 from 3:00pm-6:00pm. The Physicians Orders also documented an order for Insulin Lispro give 12 units three times daily, dose 1 from 6:00am-10:00am, dose 2 from 11:00am-2:00pm, and dose 3 from 3:00pm-6:00pm On 4/4/24 at from 7:15am to 8:00am, V8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and thorough incontinence care for a dependent resident who requires assistance with toileting and hygiene for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of four. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/31/24 and listed diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Type 2, and Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attacks. R1's 2/5/24 MDS (Minimum Data Set) documented a Brief Inventory for Mental Status Score of 8, indicating R1 has moderate deficits in cognitive functioning. The same MDS documented that R1 is always incontinent of both bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene. R1's Care Plan dated 2/12/24 documented a problem area,Resident experiences bladder and bowel incontinence, with a corresponding intervention, Provide incontinence care after each incontinent episode. On 2/28/24 at 8:55am, V5, Family Member, stated R1 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 38 residents who reside at this facility. This past non-compliance occurred between 1/14/23 and 5/20/23. Findings include: On 7/20/2023 at 2:00 pm, V6 (Regional Director of Operations) stated that for the following dates in January 2023 (1/14/23 and 1/28/23), February 2023 (2/25/23), and May 2023 (5/20/23) there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for those days. On 7/20/23 at 2:15 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that the nursing agency RN's had picked up these shifts to cover the hours and then did not show up for the actual shift. The facility at this time did not have many RN's on staff and many were working on finishing their schooling. As of July 1, 2023 the facility has only RN's on staff with the exception of a new hire (Licensed Practical Nurse) as of 7/20/23. A facility document titled Resident Census and Condition dated 7/20/23 documents there are currently 38 residents living in the facility. Prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to correctly code restraint use for 1 (R11) of 2 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) restraint coding in the sample of 21. Findings Include: Review of R11's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] and documented as being a quarterly review assessment noted in section P0100 Physical Restraints, A. Bed Rail is documented as 1. Used less than daily. On 07/19/23 at 01:58 PM, R11 was observed lying in bed sleeping. No bed rails or other restraint devices of any kind were observed being utilized or in place on her bed. Review of R11's current and active Physician Orders documents no order for a bed rail or any other restraint use. On 07/20/23 at 11:24 AM, V4 (MDS / Care Plan Coordinator) acknowledges that R11's 6/20/23 MDS did have an error in coding, and R11 does not utilize a bed rail as a restraint. V4 stated she will get the coding error corrected.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer a resident for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 2 residents (R22) reviewed for PASARR's in the sample of 21. Findings Include: R22's PASARR, as provided by the facility, dated 11/1/19 documents no Developmental Disability or Mental Illness diagnoses during this evaluation, therefore not requiring a level II screening. Review of R22's Continuity of Care with a created date of July 20, 2023 documents active diagnosis of Delusional Disorders with an effective date of 05/27/2022. This same document also lists a diagnosis of Major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate with an effective date of 06/23/2023. No PASARR re-evaluation is documented as being completed after these diagnoses were added. On 07/20/23 at 09:28 AM, V5 (Social Services) stated that residents only receive a PASARR screening when they are admitted to the facility, and are not referred back for re-evaluation should new diagnoses be added. V5 confirms that R22 was not referred back for a PASARR Level II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required supervision to prevent a fall for 1 of 7 residents (R31) reviewed for falls in the sample of 21. Findings include: On 7/28/23 at 12:45pm, R31 was observed in the dining room during lunch service. R31 was in a specialty high backed wheelchair, and was being fed by staff. R31 was noted to be contracted in all limbs and was very spastic, making frequent involuntary jerking movements. R31's Face Sheet listed an admission Date of 3/31/22, and diagnoses including Huntington's Disease and Dysphagia. R31's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented that R31 is at high risk for falls. R31's Minimum Data Sets dated 1/6/23, 4/5/23, and 6/15/23 all documented that R31 requires extensive assistance from at least 2 staff for transfers, locomotion on the unit, and personal hygiene, and is totally dependent on two plus staff for bathing. R31's Care Plan with a start date of 7/11/22 and the most recent review date of 7/19/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications for one resident of five residents (R4) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 21. Findings include: R4's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 2/1/23, a date of birth indicating R4 is [AGE] years of age, and diagnoses including Hypertension, Diabetes Type 2 and Developmental Disorder of Scholastic Skills, unspecified. R4's Behavior Tracking for May, June, and July 2023 documented that R4 has displayed no behaviors in that time. R4's July 2023 Physician Order Sheet documented an order for Zoloft 50 mg (milligrams) one tablet daily, Seroquel 25mg one tablet every morning, and Seroquel 50mg one tablet at bedtime, all with a start date of 2/1/23. R4's AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) dated 5/10/23 documented that R4 is not experiencing any side effects from atypical antipsychotic use. R4's Psychiatric Initial Diagnostic Interview dated 2/16/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure dishes in the dishwasher were being properly sanitized. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 08/15/22 at 10:55 AM, V19 (Cook) stated she did not know how to check the sanitizer in the dish machine. V19 asked V8 (Dietary Manager) how to test the sanitizer and V8 handed her the quaternary ammonia test strips and told her how to test it. After three attempts of trying to test it, V19 was asked what kind of sanitizer the machine used and what kind of test strip she was using. V19 (Cook) read the label stating sodium hypochlorite and realized the test strips and sanitizer where not compatible. After finding the correct strips, tested the sanitizer in the machine and it read 20 parts per million (PPM) Chlorine. On 08/15/22 at 10:58 AM, V8 (Dietary Manager) stated she checked the machine this morning and it read 100 ppm Chlorine. On 08/15/22 at 11:40 AM, V20 (Cook) started doing dishes again and when asked to check the sanitizer in the dish machine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in accordance with professional standards of practice and failed to utilize and/or correctly apply approved disinfectants to prevent the spread of Covid-19. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents that reside at the facility. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 9:00 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) provided the Facility document titled, Daily Census Report: [DATE] this document was marked with the Covid-19 residents and date of positivity by V2. This list documented that R2, R16 and R32 were positive for Covid-19. On [DATE] at 11:35 AM, V7 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator) was assisting delivering residents lunch trays with her N95 respirator on. The bottom strap of the N95 mask was not worn properly, as the bottom strap was hanging down in front of her mask. On [DATE] 11:46 AM, V7 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator) was still wearing her N95 mask improperly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and sanitary environment for the folding and storage of clean clothes. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: On 08/18/22 at 2:15 PM during inspection of the laundry facility, the room was noted to be rectangular with the washers and dryers on the opposite wall from the entrance. There were clean clothes noted across from the washers and dryers, as well as on the wall next to the entrance. Directly above the washers was a 6 foot by 6 foot hole in the drywall ceiling. Insulation was observed hanging down from the hole. There was visible mold on the insulation. There were dust and drywall particles falling onto the floor from the ceiling. Above the entrance there was another 3 foot by 4 foot hole in the ceiling with insulation and mold hanging down. There was a lot of airflow from the air conditioner vents blowing the drywall particles and insulation around the room. The residents clothes were exposed to these dust particles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide food at palatable, hot temperatures for 4 (R15, R29, R31 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for cold food in a sample of 37. Findings include: On 08/16/22 at 9:30 PM - 10:30 AM, during resident council meeting R15, R29, R31 and R3, all alert and orientated, stated, the food is cold, especially at breakfast. The Summer 2022 Regular Week 2 menu for 08/16/22 documents: Teriyaki Chicken, white rice, sugar snap peas, wheat bread, peanut butter brownies and margarine. On 08/16/22 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor's metal stemmed digital thermometer was calibrated using the ice point method. On 08/16/22 at 1:05 PM, a test tray was received off of the hall cart and was temped with the metal stemmed thermometer. The chicken was 98.0 degrees Fahrenheit, the rice was 98.1 degrees Fahrenheit, and the peas were 100.1 degrees Fahrenheit. All items on the plate tasted cold.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were offered snacks and that snacks were distributed per the facility policy for 4 (R15, R29, R31 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for providing snacks in a sample of 37. Findings include: On 08/15/22 at 9:30 AM, the snack cart was observed behind the nurse's station with an uncovered pitcher of water, an uncovered pitcher of tea, an undated plate of cut up sandwiches and some small bowls of grapes. On 08/15/22 at approximately 3:00 PM the snack cart was taken back to the kitchen without ever leaving the nurse's station. All food items still appeared to be present on the cart except for half a sandwich, which R18 came to the nurse's station and asked for at 2:15 PM. On 08/16/22 at 9:30 AM, the snack cart was observed behind the nurse's station with an uncovered pitcher of water, an uncovered pitcher of tea, an undated plate of cut up sandwiches and some small bowls of cake. On 08/16/22 at approximately 3:00 PM, the snack cart was taken back to the kitchen without ever leaving the nurse's station…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered diet for three (R1, R15 and R34) of 12 residents in a sample of 27. Findings Include: The facility diet spreadsheet dated, Cycle Day: 9, Monday 06/06/2022 documents: Regular diet: oven baked fish 1 fillet, parsley noodles 4 ounces, tossed salad 1 cup, breadstick 1 each and strawberry ice cream 1 each. Mechanical soft diet: ground oven fish #6 (4.75 ounces) scoop with 2 ounces gravy, parsley noodles 4 ounces, shredded lettuce 1 cup, breadstick 1 each, strawberry ice cream. The Pureed diet: Pureed fish #8 scoop, pureed parsley noodles #8 scoop (0.5 cup), pureed green beans #16 scoop (2 ounces), pureed bread 2/3 slice and vanilla pudding #8 scoop. On 08/15/22, in reference to the menu above dated 06/06/22, V8 (Dietary Manager) stated that it is the correct menu, it is on the next cycle of the menu, that is why the date is not correct, it has not been updated. The recipe #681 documents: fish oven baked ground: 2. Remove amount of cooked fish and place in a food processor. Grind to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HELIA HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, STEPHEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 09/21/2020 |
| MILLS, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/21/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $181K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145807. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.