No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pillars Of North County Health & Rehab Center, The

13700 Old Halls Ferry Road, Florissant, MO 63033 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (314) 355-0760 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 355-0760 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Sep 2025Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
3390 N US Highway 67 · (314) 824-0022 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
175 Flower Valley Shopping Ctr · (314) 837-7771 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13789 Le Sabre Dr · (314) 615-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.5%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.1%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.4%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.5%63.5%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.54 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-21)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their pressure ulcer and wound care policies/procedures by failing to ensure Resident #3's wound care Physician's orders were initiated when ordered, and Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations were promptly followed. The facility also failed to promptly identify, assess, document and notify the resident's Physician regarding the resident's pressure ulcers located on both feet/heels. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who was admitted on [DATE], with a pressure ulcer on the coccyx (the tailbone), had a treatment order in place until 7/1/24, failed to ensure a nurse contacted the physician for a treatment order prior to administering a treatment to the coccyx, failed to ensure the wound care Physician's orders were initiated and the RD's recommendations were promptly followed. The facility identified two residents with pressure ulcers and problems were found with both. The census was 57. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2020-10-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by not communicating the significant weight loss of four sampled residents (Residents #38, #50, #42 and #210) to the physician and registered dietician (RD). Furthermore, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain weekly weights and monitor nutrition/fluid intakes and failed to implement RD recommendations for nutritional supplements, fortified foods and additional staff assistance to prevent further weight loss for these four residents, two who developed a wound or experienced a decline in their wound condition (Residents #38 and #50). The sample was 14 and the census was 55. Review of the facility weight management policy, dated July 2014, showed the following: Policy: -It is the policy of the facility to manage resident weight through prevention, assessment, and implementation and evaluation of interventions; Procedure: -Upon admission/re-admission, quarterly and with a significant change; -On the first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge procedures for one resident (Resident #6) when staff failed to re-admit the resident from the hospital following an immediate discharge order dismissal. The sample size was six. The census was 58. Review of the facility's Immediate Discharge Policy & Procedure Manual, revised November 2017, showed:-Residents would not be transferred or discharged unless permitted by federal and Missouri regulations. An immediate discharge occurred when the safety or health of the resident or others was endangered, when the facility could not meet the resident's needs, or when the resident's behavior presented an immediate threat;-Purpose: To ensure immediate discharges were conducted safely, consistently, and in compliance with survey requirements;-Criteria:-Immediate danger to self or others;-Violent, aggressive, or threatening behavior;-Repeated unmanageable behaviors;-Facility unable to meet the resident needs;-Medical or psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for the Abuse Prevention Program to ensure one resident's safety when staff failed to report an abuse allegation immediately to administration for one of four sampled residents (Resident #2). The census was 64.Review of facility policy and procedure for Abuse Prevention Program dated 9/29/22, showed: -Internal reporting requirements and identification of allegations;-Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property they observe, hear about, or suspect immediately to the administrator. Review of Resident #2's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included dementia, heart failure, mood disturbance, anxiety and psychotic disturbance;-Admitting nursing assessment dated [DATE], resident is alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of facility's investigation of sexual abuse allegation for the resident, dated 9/4/25 at 9:00 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards when the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility did not provide adequate enteral gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a feeding tube inserted into the stomach for resident nutrition, fluids and medications) management, which led to resident weight loss. The census was 64Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition Policy and Procedure, dated 3/28/25, showed: Adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered;-If a resident has an enteral feeding tube placed prior to admission or returning to the facility, the Physician and interdisciplinary team (a team that consists of at least a physician, nursing and dietary), will review the rational for the placement of the enteral feeding tube, the resident's current clinical and nutritional status, and the treatment goals and wishes of the resident;-The nursing staff and physician will monitor the resident for signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility recipe review, the facility Dietary [NAME] (DC) failed to ensure the puree chicken lunch entrée was proper texture for four of four residents (Resident (R) 6, R13, R39, and R262) reviewed for pureed diet of 22 sample residents. This failure had the potential to make the entrée unpalatable and difficult to swallow for the residents who required a puree meal. Findings include: Review of the Chicken Maple Glazed Puree Thick recipe found in the dietary department recipe folder for week five lunch, dated 10/15/24, revealed .Maple Glazed Chicken 10 serving 1 breast. Chicken Base 1 1/8 teaspoon. Water 1 cup 2 tablespoons. Food Thickener 2 2/3 cup. WASH HANDS. 1. Place prepared Maple Glazed Chicken into food processor. 2. Add broth and process until smooth in texture. 3. Add food thickener and process 4. briefly until mixed. scrape down sides with spatula and reprocess. Pour into the steam table pan coated with cooking spray. Cover tightly and heat in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in refrigerator at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below during two of two observations in one of one kitchen of 55 of 71 census residents which could have caused food spoilage and failed to distribute and maintain clean water pitchers for three of three residents (Resident (R) 47, R61, and R38) observed for cleanliness. This failure had the potential to affect resident safety. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Food Preparation and Safe Handling, dated January 2012, revealed . Food will be prepared to conserve maximum nutritive value in a safe and sanitary environment . Review of the 2022 Food and Drug Administration Food Code, dated 01/18/23, and located at https://www.fda.gov/media/164194/download?attachment, page 3-28, revealed Time/ temperature control for safety food shall be maintained .at 41 degrees F or less. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bedside Water Containers, dated February 2012, revealed Bedside water containers will be cleaned and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain clean and bug-free bathroom vents, store urinals and plungers in a sanitary manner, and maintain fixtures/equipment in a safe and functional manner for 11 of 26 residents (Resident (R) 27, R24, R43, R111, R14, R9, R112, R56, R11, R26, and R30) observed for the environment. These failures had the potential cause avoidable allergies or spread of infection and injury from broken fixtures/ equipment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Routine Maintenance, dated 08/06/22, revealed Maintenance staff is responsible to ensure that preventative, routine maintenance is completed in compliance with applicable life safety standards and needs of the facility. A housekeeping policy was requested but was not received prior to the survey exit. 1. Review of R56's entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/26/25 and located in the MDS 3.0 tab of the electronic medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 163 and R34) reviewed for accommodation of needs and preferences. This failure had the potential to cause R163 and R34 to have unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of R163's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of R163's entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/25 and located under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab, showed there had been no assessment of R163's cognition prior to her passing on 03/18/25. Review of R163's Progress notes, dated 03/07/25 through 03/18/25 and located under the Assessments tab of the EMR, revealed documentation the resident had multiple falls during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten residents (Resident (R) 55) reviewed for bathing had his preference of bathing type of 22 sample residents. The failure affected R55's right to make choices and honor preferences. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 08/31/23, indicated The resident has the right to accommodations of residents need and preferences . The resident has the right to make choices that are significant to the resident . Review of R55's Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, quadriplegia, C5-C7 incomplete, depression, and hypertension. Review of R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/24, located under the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of an allegation of abuse to the Administrator and to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of three residents (Resident (R) 24) reviewed for abuse of 22 sample residents. These failures placed residents at risk of continued verbal abuse, which could cause depression, fear, or mental anguish. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Staff Obligations to Prevent & Report Abuse, Neglect, and Theft, dated 12/26/16, revealed The facility will report to the State agency .any incident of alleged abused [sic], neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment .The alleged violations are to be reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a level two pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) assessment for one of one residents (Resident (R) 19) reviewed for PASARR of 22 sample residents. This failure could affect R19 from receiving services to assist in the treatment of psychiatric diagnoses. Findings include: Review of the admission Referral Paperwork located in the Document tab of the EMR, dated 03/18/24, revealed R19 had diagnosis which included anxiety disorder 02/03/17, schizoaffective disorder 11/24/23, and major depressive disorder 03/29/22. Review of the Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the EMR revealed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/24, revealed R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R19 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Care Plan was developed for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 111 and R27) to address R111's pain and R27's dependence on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). These failures had the potential to contribute to inadequate or inappropriate pain intervention for R111 and lack of provision of ADL care for R27. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, dated November 2017, revealed, Information derived from the comprehensive assessment helps the staff to plan care that allows the resident to reach his/her highest practicable level of functioning .Within seven (7) days of the completion of the resident assessment, a comprehensive care plan will be developed. 1. Review of R111's Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis, pain in the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for one of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 34) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure had the potential to cause R34 to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of R34's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and epilepsy. Review of R34's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/29/25 and located under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab, reveal R34 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 out of 15 which indicated R34 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R34's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab and last revised 02/27/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 55) reviewed for appointments had scheduled physician's appointments. The failure increased R55's risk of delayed medical care. Findings include: Review of R55's Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, quadriplegia, C5-C7 incomplete, depression, and hypertension. Review of R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/24, located under the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)' score of 14 out of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 03/20/25 at 4:00 PM, R55 stated he had an appointment that he was unaware he had and at the last minute he was notified so needed to get ready. R55 pointed to white board on wall that had his appointments written on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 32) reviewed for dialysis received as-needed medication as ordered and her physician was notified when a dialysis appointment was missed of 22 sample residents. These failures had the potential to cause significant risks, including increased mortality, hospitalization, and cardiovascular complications, due to the buildup of toxins and fluids in the body. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease, dated November 2017, revealed Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care .Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. The policy did not address procedures for missed dialysis appointments. Review of R32's Face Sheet located under the Face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 14) reviewed for dental was provided with a visit to the dentist as ordered by the physician to address a mouth infection of 22 sample residents. This failure had the potential to lead to spread of infection, increased pain, and difficulty eating for R14. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dental Examination/Assessment, dated July 2014, revealed 1. Prior to, or within ninety (90) days after admission, the resident shall undergo a dental examination. 2. Dental examinations will be made by the resident's personal dentist or by the facility's Consultant Dentist. 3. Records of dental care provided shall be made a part of the resident's medical record. 4. Upon conducting a dental examination, a resident needing dental services will be promptly referred to a dentist. Review of R14's Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 2, R32, and R7) had accurate physician's orders. These failures had the potential to affect provision of hospice services for R2, provision of dialysis and communication with the dialysis center for R32, and provision of restorative services for R7. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Obtaining and Following Physician Orders, dated July 2014, revealed Physician orders will be obtained by licensed personnel and followed. If the licensed professional does not in his/her best judgment think that the order is not in the best interest of the resident, he/she has the obligation to further investigate prior to fulfilling the order. If those orders are not followed for any reason, the Physician and Director of Nursing will be promptly notified. Procedure: 1. Physician orders may be obtained by: a. The physician visiting and writing the order. b. The physician visiting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for three of five residents (Resident (R) 43, R61, and R262) reviewed for use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions of 22 sample residents. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infection from staff to other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Isolation Precautions/Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP), dated 04/01/24, revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions is [sic] used in combination with Standard Precautions and expand the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to donning of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs [multi-drug resistant organisms] to staff hands and clothing .EBP will be used for any resident who meets the following criteria: Infection or colonization with a CDC-targeted MDRO when Contact Precautions do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (Resident (R) 164 and R61) reviewed for vaccinations, who consented to receive vaccinations, were administered the vaccines of 22 sample residents. These failures had the potential to cause avoidable spread of pneumonia or influenza. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control, dated July 2017, revealed Residents and employees are offered the influenza vaccine annually between October and March. The pneumococcal vaccine is offered to all residents at the time of admission and throughout their stay as per current standards of practice. 1. Review of R164's Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and right lower leg fracture. Review of R164's Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent and Release, dated 02/03/25 and provided by the facility, revealed she consented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a full code resident who was diagnosed with COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), in accordance with their policy (Resident #1). The facility did not document assessments of symptoms, vital signs, oxygen saturation levels and respiratory symptoms. The sample was four. The census was 57. Review of the facility's Change in Condition Policy, dated February 2012, showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility that resident change in condition will be assessed promptly and follow up activity will occur as appropriate and in a timely manner; -Definition: -Change in condition is defined as an improvement or decline in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status that affects less than two areas of activities of daily living; -Significant change is defined as an improvement or decline in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status that affects two or more areas of activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 8DC412. Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were within reach for four sampled residents (Residents #204, #18, 406 and #405) with mobility limitations, and by failing to ensure a call light was installed at the bedside for one resident (Resident #407). The census was 58. Review of the facility's Answering the Call Light policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs; -General guidelines, included: --Be sure that the call light is plugged in at all times; --When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. 1. Review of Resident #204's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/9/23, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Upper and lower extremity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not following the physician orders to hold one resident's (Resident #400) Eliquis (a blood thinner) three days prior to his/her surgical procedure. This resulted in the resident's urological procedure being canceled and rescheduled for two weeks later. The facility also failed to ensure a specialist's recommendation for nothing by mouth (NPO) was communicated to the physician and followed for one resident with a swallowing disorder (Resident #204). The sample was 11. The census was 58. Review of the facility's Obtaining and Following Physician Orders policy, revised 2014, showed: Policy: It is the policy that physician orders will be obtained by licensed personnel and followed. If the licensed professional does in his/her best judgment think that to the order is not in the best interest of the resident, he/she has the obligation to further investigate prior to fulfilling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed for an accurate accounting of all monies, by failing to research outstanding checks and failing to reconcile the resident petty cash. The facility also failed to obtain documentation one resident or his/her responsible party were notified before using his/her funds to purchase personal items for the resident (Resident #4). In addition, the facility also failed to ensure the resident personal resident trust fund (RTF) account was not overdrawn (Resident #25). This affected residents whose funds were managed by the facility. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Resident Rights packet, undated, showed: -The resident has the right to manage his or her financial affairs. This includes the right to know, in advance, what charges a facility may impose against a resident's personal funds; -If a resident chooses to deposit personal funds with the facility, upon written authorization of a resident, the facility must act as fiduciary of the resident's funds and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0571 — pattern
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility imposed a charge for a service for which payment was made under Medicaid for two residents (Resident #36 and #4) out of a sample of 3. The facility census was 55. Record review of the Missouri Department of Social Services, MO Health Net Division State Regulations for Medicaid Reimbursement for Long Term Care Facilities, showed the following: -13 CSR 70-10.010 (5) Covered Supplies, Items and Services. All supplies, items and services covered in the per-diem rate must be provided to the resident as necessary. Supplies and services which would otherwise be covered in a per diem rate but which also are billable to the Title XVIII Medicare program must be billed to that program for facilities participating in the Title XVIII Medicare program. Covered supplies, items and services include, but are not limited to, the following: -(K) All routine care items, including disposables and including, but not limited to, those items specified in Appendix A to this rule; -Record review of Appendix A showed the following items covered under the per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to determine the presence of a federal indicator with the Nurse Aide Registry (NA) check for three of 10 sampled employees hired since the last survey. The facility hired at least 290 new employees since the last survey. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, revised 9/29/22, showed: -Procedures for Prevention; -Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees; -The facility will not knowingly employ any individual convicted of resident abuse, neglect or misappropriation of property. The facility will not knowingly employ any direct care staff with findings of abuse listed on the Health Care Worker Registry. Prior to a new employee starting a working schedule, the facility will: -Obtain a copy of the state license of any individual being hired for a position requiring a professional license; -Check the Health Care Worker Registry on any individual hired prior to reports of abuse, previous fingerprint check results, and the sex offender website…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure side rails were accurately assessed as a necessary device prior to installation and use. The facility also failed to obtain physician's orders for the use of side rails and failed to document usage in the resident's care plan for four (Residents #10, #47, #41 and #17) of 14 sampled residents. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Bed Rail Maintenance and Installation and Entrapment Prevention policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Purpose: To diminish the potential for and severity of adverse events related to bed rail usage and compatibility of bed rails, mattresses and bed frames; -Procedure; -Center will follow manufacturer's recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bed rails; -The maintenance department will conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment; -Inspections will occur at least semi-annually and results will be documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents by failing to ensure the quality of the labs obtained when they failed to perform quality control checks of the blood glucose (sugar) test machines to ensure accurate results. The census was 55. Review of the Evencare G3 Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide, Copyright 2016, showed the purpose of the control solution testing is to validate that the EVENCARE G3 Meter is working properly with the test strips. Control solutions are not included in the kit; -You should perform a control solution test when: -Using the meter for the first time; -Using a new package of EVENCARE G3 Blood Glucose Test Strips; -At least once per week to verify that the meter and test strips are working properly together; -For vial strips, if the test strip bottle is left open; -The meter is dropped; -You suspect the meter and test strips are not working properly together; -A patient's test results do not agree with how they feel; -A patient's readings appear to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow recipes to ensure adequate nutritive value, taste and texture for pureed foods (a very smooth blended food like applesauce or mashed potatoes) for three out of four observations. This deficient practice affected the four residents who ate pureed meals at the facility. The census was 55. Review of the facility's breakfast menu, dated 10/27/23, showed breakfast consisted of choice of cereal, eggs and sausage strata, wheat toast, margarine, juice, milk, coffee or tea. Observation on 10/27/23 at 7:33 A.M., showed [NAME] I prepared puree sausage for three residents. He/She added 6 sausage patties to the blender and one and one half cups of tap water to the blender and blended the mixture for approximately one minute and a half. He/She poured the mixture into a pan for serving. The sausage was runny, watery and choppy. Review of the facility's recipe for 25 servings of pureed sausage, showed: -25 sausage patties; -One and one fourth cups of water; -One and one fourth teaspoons of ham base concentrate; -Three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, date and properly store opened food items and failed to maintain cleanliness in the freezer and refrigerator for four of five days of observations. In addition, the facility failed to discard expired food items and properly store dry foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 55. 1. Observations of the walk-in freezer on 10/25/23 at 9:38 A.M., 10/26/23 at 10:13 A.M., 10/27/23 at 6:25 A.M. and 10/30/23 at 7:19 A.M., showed: -An opened bag of frozen hamburger patties in a box. The box was opened and the bag was also opened, with the meat patties exposed; -Three unidentified brown patties in a bag, not labeled or dated; -A bag of what appeared to be carrots, not labeled or dated. The bag was opened and the contents were exposed; -White specs all throughout the freezer floor; -A cup of ice cream on the floor, under a shelf in the freezer; -A dirty paper towel or napkin on the floor, under the shelf in the corner of the freezer. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine to four out of five residents sampled for immunizations review (Residents #41, #23, #10 and #47). The census was 55. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program Policies and Procedures, revision October 10, 2023, showed: -Immunization and vaccination, general statement: The organization receives one time consent from residents/patients for vaccines, as recommended by Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention guidelines: pneumococcal; -These are standing orders for pneumococcal for all residents/patients; -Pneumococcal vaccination are offered to all residents/patients per CDC guideline and applicable regulation. 1. Review of Resident #41's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/25/23, showed: -admitted : 7/28/22; -Is the pneumococcal vaccine up to date? Yes. Review of the resident's electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment, for four of 14 sampled residents (Residents #10, #47, #41 and #17). The census was 55. Review of the facility's Bed Rail Maintenance and Installation and Entrapment Prevention policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Purpose: To diminish the potential for and severity of adverse events related to bed rail usage and compatibility of bed rails, mattresses and bed frames; -Procedure; -Center will follow manufacturer's recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bed rails; -The maintenance department will conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment; -Inspections will occur at least semi-annually and results will be documented on the Equipment and Device Safety Log. 1. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not following the physician orders to hold one resident's (Resident #400) Eliquis (a blood thinner) three days prior to his/her surgical procedure. This resulted in the resident's urological procedure being canceled and rescheduled for two weeks later. The facility also failed to ensure a specialist's recommendation for nothing by mouth (NPO) was communicated to the physician and followed for one resident with a swallowing disorder (Resident #204). The sample was 11. The census was 58. Review of the facility's Obtaining and Following Physician Orders policy, revised 2014, showed: Policy: It is the policy that physician orders will be obtained by licensed personnel and followed. If the licensed professional does in his/her best judgment think that to the order is not in the best interest of the resident, he/she has the obligation to further investigate prior to fulfilling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who discharged to the community had a recapitulation of stay, final summary of status, reconciliation of all pre and post discharge medications and a post discharge plan of care for one of three residents selected for a closed record review (Resident #53). The census was 55. Review of Resident #53's medical record, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/6/23. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On 8/4/23 at 8:31 A.M., the Director of Social Services (DSS) spoke with the resident's family member to follow up on discharge planning. The family member is still planning on taking the resident home upon discharge. DSS and the family member discussed arranging a home health aide to help the family upon the resident's return to home; -On 8/6/23 at 9:26 A.M., discharged home with family. Alert to person, place and time with no signs of pain. Took face sheet and medication list, medications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribed one resident's treatment order onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR), which resulted in the treatment not being provided for three days (Resident #204). The sample was 14. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Wound Care Program, dated revision July 2014, showed: - In developing a comprehensive treatment plan for wounds, the clinician should assess not just the wound, but the whole person. The factors affecting the ability of the wound to close and ultimately heal need to be included in the overall treatment plan; -Provide for heel pressure relief by placing a pillow under the calves to completely off weight heels. -Suspected Deep Tissue Injury (DTI): Purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue. Further description: Deep tissue injury may be difficult to detect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed in a timely manner for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents #10 and #40). The census was 55. Review of the facility's Smoking Policy and Procedure, dated 10/21/22, showed: -Purpose: To assure that all residents are safe while smoking; -Procedure; -Any resident that expresses an interest to smoke will be assessed at the time of admission and at least quarterly or with any significant change to determine the level of assistance and supervision that will be needed to ensure the resident's safety. 1. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/25/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Current tobacco use: was blank; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, end stage renal disease (ESRD, chronic irreversible kidney failure) and diabetes. Review of the care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Problem:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #41) who received tube feeding (supplies liquid nutrition) through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) received the appropriate treatment and services when staff provided care with the resident laying flat while tube feeding formula infused and when staff failed to know how to operate or trouble shoot the tube feeding pump. The sample size was 14. The census was 55. Review of the monitoring Enteral Feeding-Tube policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Policy; -It is the policy of the facility that Enteral Feeding-Tubes will be monitored to ensure that feedings are delivered per physician's orders; -Procedure; -Maintain the head of the resident's bed at a minimum of 30 degrees elevation; -Enteral Feeding-Tubes are to be checked at the start of each shift to ensure that the flow rate is correct; -Enteral Feeding-Tubes are also to be checked periodically during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 32 opportunities observed, two errors occurred resulting in a 6.25% error rate (Residents #25 and #39). The census was 55. Review of the facility's Administration Medication policy, dated June 2020, included: -Policy: To administer all medications safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve, and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis; -Procedure: -Wash hands before beginning, whenever you contaminate your hands, and if contact is made with the medication; -Review the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). Read each order entirely; -If there is any discrepancy between the MAR and the label, check physician orders before administering medication; 1. Review of Resident #25's physician order sheets (POS), dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, showed: -An order, dated 4/15/22, for acetaminophen (medication used to treat elevated temperature/pain) 325 milligrams (mg), give two tabs by mouth, three times a day; -An order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws, when controlled medications were not stored in double locked compartments in the medication room refrigerator. In addition, the refrigerator had an undated vial of influenza vaccine that was half empty and a container of applesauce in the refrigerator. The facility did not complete refrigerator temperature checks per facility policy. These deficient practices affected one out of one medications rooms reviewed. The census was 55. Review of the medication storage in the facility policy, dated June 2020, included: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. -Procedure: -All drugs classified as Schedule II of the Controlled Substance Act will be stored under double locks. Schedule III-V medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-06 · tag F0620 — widespread
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admission policy did not require residents to waive potential facility liability for losses of personal property. This had the potential to affect all residents admitted to the facility. The census was 55. Review of the facility's undated admission agreement contract, showed the following: -The resident acknowledges receipt of the written items identified in the Supplement A: Required Consents and Notifications Index; -All items identified and checked in Supplement A: Required Consents and Notification are incorporated into this contract. The resident will abide by all rules and regulations of the facility and will cooperate in the carrying out of the resident's Plan of Care; -The facility is not responsible for money, valuables, or personal effects of the resident unless delivered to the Administrator for safekeeping. During an interview on 10/6/20 at 12:00 P.M., the administrator said she was not aware the facility's admission policy required residents to waive facility liability for loss of personal affects.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to provide consistent resident care for activities of daily living and restorative therapy. The census was 55. During an interview on 9/29/20 at 10:37 A.M., the administrator said the facility utilized agency staff due to a lack of facility staff. The facility has raised their starting salaries to the highest in the area and are hopeful they will be able to hire enough staff where they will no longer need agency staff. During the survey process, the survey team identified problems with residents receiving their showers and restorative therapy services as scheduled due to staffing shortages. During an interview on 10/5/20 at 10:06 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I said it is not uncommon for there to be too many residents, 12 to 14, for one CNA to care for on day shift, and it happens frequently. CNAs are expected to give the showers, keep residents clean, dry and turned and repositioned, clean resident rooms, and feed the residents. When they have 12 to 14 residents, something…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly pharmacist recommendations were being forwarded to physicians for their review and response. Of the 14 sampled residents, eight had pharmacy recommendations that were not forwarded to physicians for review (Residents #37, #44, #52, #57, #15, #32, #50 and #18). In addition, the facility failed to forward any of the pharmacist recommendations for physician review since April 2020. The census was 55. Review of the facility Drug Regimen Review policy, revised on 10/2017, showed: Purpose: -The intent of this requirement is that the facility maintains the resident's highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible, by providing a licensed pharmacist's review of each resident's regimen of medications at least monthly; Procedure: -The Consultant Pharmacist shall review the resident's drug regimen and make appropriate recommendations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed follow proper sanitation practices in order to prevent cross contamination by not ensuring the dishwashing machine sanitized dishware correctly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Proper Dishwashing policy, revised January 2012, showed: -Proper dishwashing is an important part of a good sanitation program; -Operating instructions, including the correct water pressure (20 pounds per square inch (PSI)), should be posted. If the water pressure is too high or low, the sanitizer will not be effective in sanitizing dishware; -Temperature gauges should be checked before each use. The correct temperature of each cycle should be maintained according to manufacturer specifications; -When hot water is used to sanitize, the water should reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Temperature sensitive test strips need to be available to periodically check the appropriate water temperature is reached for hot water sanitizing. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-06 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) policy and procedures by not holding monthly QAA meetings, and failed to follow federal and state regulations by not holding QAA meetings at least quarterly for the past 12 months. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all required attendees attended their QAA meetings and failed to develop and implement corrective actions for systemic problems within the facility. The lack of consistent and complete QAA meetings and the failure to identify and implement corrective actions had the potential to effect all residents The census was 55. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Procedure, revised on 11/2017, showed: -The facility Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/Quality Assurance and Improvement Procedure (QAPI) committee will meet monthly and document meetings on the QAPI minutes form; -Attendees sign page one of the minutes to indicate their attendance. Attendance includes at a minimum the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an adequate bond in the amount of one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The census was 55. Review of the resident trust account, showed: -From September 2019 to August 2020, the average monthly balance was $40,566.54. This would require a bond in the amount of $61,000; -Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services data base for approved bonds, showed the facility had a bond in the amount of $55,000; -Review of the resident current balance report for September 2020, showed an amount of $62,453.10 in the trust account. During interviews on 9/30/20 at 11:50 A.M. and 10/2/20 at 10:15 A.M., the business office manager was not sure who was responsible to ensure the bond amount was sufficient. She would have to check as the company has homes in different states. She provided a form on 10/2/20, showing an increase in the bond amount and was being mailed to corporate for review.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue written emergency transfer/discharge notices to residents and/or residents' representatives when the residents were transferred to a hospital for various medical reasons, and failed to send a copy of the notice to a representative of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, for six of six sampled residents (Residents #44, #50, #53, #9, #18 and #32). The sample was 18. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Notice of a Transfer and/or Discharge policy, revised October 2017, showed: -Procedure: -A resident and/or his or her representative will be given notice as soon as practicable before transfer or discharge when: -An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; -The written notice to the resident and/or representative will include the following: -The reason for the transfer or discharge; -The effective date of the transfer or discharge; -The location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue bed reserve notification notices to residents and/or residents' representatives when the residents were transferred to a hospital for various medical reasons, for six of six sampled residents (Residents #44, #50, #53, #9, #18, and #32). The sample was size was 14. The census was 55. Review of the facility bed reserve policy notification, undated, showed: The bed reserve policy will be given to the resident at the time of admission and a copy will be given to the resident each time you are transferred from the facility; -Under normal circumstances, if you leave the facility for a hospitalization, you will be readmitted to the first available bed in a semi-private room; -Under certain conditions, we can reserve your existing bed for you at your request, so when you return to the facility, you will have the same bed and room as before; -Neither Medicare of Medicaid will pay to hold your same bed if you are hospitalized . If you are a private pay,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their showers as scheduled for 10 of 14 sampled residents, three expanded sample residents and one closed record. (Residents #53, #18, #9, #42, #3, #50, #30, #32, #36, #37, #14, #57, #29 and #17). The sample size was 14. The census was 55. 1. Review of Resident #53's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/1/20, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Always understood; -Rejection of care not exhibited; -Required extensive assistance for transfers, personal hygiene and bathing; -Diagnoses include heart failure, wound infection and diabetes. Review of the facility's shower schedule, showed the resident scheduled for showers during day shift on Mondays and Thursdays. Review of the resident's medical record, showed no documentation of showers offered or provided in August or September 2020. Observations of the resident on 9/29/20 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received Restorative Therapy (RT) as ordered. The facility identified 25 residents receiving RT services. Of those 25, seven were sampled and problems were identified with three. In addition, problems were identified with three of four expanded sample residents. (Residents #15, #42, #55, #3, #52 and #58). The census was 55. Review of the facility Rehabilitative (Restorative) Nursing Care policy, dated 2/2012, showed: Policy: -Rehabilitative nursing care is provided for each resident admitted ; Procedure: General rehabilitative nursing care is that which does not require the use of a Qualified Professional Therapies to render such care. Nursing personnel are trained in rehabilitative nursing care. Our facility has an active program of rehabilitative nursing which is developed and coordinated through the resident's care plan. The facility's rehabilitative nursing care program is designed to assist each resident to achieve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a thorough, documented assessment after one resident (Resident #38) sustained an injury of unknown origin and another resident (Resident #36) sustained an injury from improper wheelchair positioning. Furthermore, the facility failed to prevent resident access to razors in two of three unlocked shower rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The sample size was 14. The census was 55. 1. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/1/20, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for transfers, bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene; -Unable to ambulate; -Diagnoses included heart failure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD-lack of blood circulation usually affecting the legs), diabetes, Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that leads to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-06 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for the use of side rails for three sampled residents (Residents #52, #42 and #32), and failed to properly assess residents for the use of side rails, to attempt alternative interventions prior to installing side rails, and to update resident care plans regarding the use of side rails for three sampled residents (Residents #44, #57 and #37). The facility identified 30 residents with side rails and six were sampled. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Restraint policy, revised April 2020, showed: -Policy: Restraint usage will always be an interdisciplinary decision, including the resident or responsible party and based on a comprehensive assessment. Residents with restraints will be assessed on admission and periodically (at least quarterly) by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for application, reduction, or continuation of a restraint; -Procedure: -Determine the level of risk a resident exhibits concerning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly pharmacist recommendations, for gradual dose reductions for psychotropic medications, were being forwarded to physicians for their review for a possible gradual dose reduction. Of the 14 sampled residents, six had pharmacy recommendations for psychotropic medication gradual dose reductions and the facility failed to forward any of those six residents' pharmacy recommendations to their physicians for review for possible gradual dose reductions (Residents #37, #44, #52, #57, #32 and #18). In addition, the facility failed to forward any pharmacy recommendations for possible gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medications since April 2020. The census was 55. Review of the facility Drug Regimen Review policy, revised on 10/2017, showed: Purpose: -The intent of this requirement is that the facility maintains the resident's highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 35 opportunities for error, 2 errors occurred resulting in a 5.71% medication error rate (Residents #16 and #15). The census was 55. Review of the facility's policy on Medication Administration, updated 5/1/10, showed: -Procedure: 4.1: Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident; -Confirm that the Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflects the most recent medication order; -Check the expiration date on the medication; -Check for allergies to the medication; -If necessary, obtain vital signs. 1. Review of Resident #16's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 10/1/20 through 10/31/20, showed: -Carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) 25 milligram (mg) by mouth twice a day, contact the physician for blood pressure not within normal limitations for the medication; -No documentation of blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin (used to regulate blood sugar levels) vials and flex pens (pre-filled insulin pens) were labeled with the date opened on one of two nurse medication carts for nine of nine vials and flex-pens observed. In addition, the facility failed to write the resident name on multi-use medications and relied solely on bins with resident room numbers for two of two certified medication technician carts. The census was 55. Review of the undated facility policy regarding insulin, showed: -Opened/in use Humalog insulin is good for 28 days; -Opened/in use Novolog insulin is good for 28 days; -Opened/in use Lantus insulin is good for 28 days; -Levemir insulin not addressed; -No information in the policy regarding steps to follow when opening a new vial or flex-pen of insulin. 1. Observation on [DATE] at 8:15 A.M., of the 200/400 nurse medication cart, showed: -Two undated, opened and in-use Humalog (fast acting insulin) vials; -Two undated, opened and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship policy by failing to collect data regarding residents antibiotic treatments and reviewing and documenting that data on the facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. In addition, the facility failed to review their antibiotic utilization during the quarterly quality assessment and assurance meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving antibiotics. The census was 55. Review of the facility antibiotic stewardship policy, dated 10/2017, showed: Policy statement: -Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. As part of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two expanded sampled residents (Residents #39 and #47) who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The census was 55. 1. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and federal regulations by not reporting one resident's injury of unknown origin to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) within the required time frame. This failure affected one resident (Resident #38). The sample size was 14. The census was 55. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, last revised 12/16/16, showed the following: -External Reporting of Potential Abuse: -In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: a. Must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the event that cause the allegation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician orders were followed when staff failed to complete treatments for wound care and administer insulin as ordered for one sampled resident (Resident #53) and failed to notify the physician when one resident's blood sugar was outside parameters as ordered (Resident #60). The sample was 14 and the census was 55. 1. Review of Resident #53's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/1/20, showed: -admission date 8/26/20; -Cognitively intact; -Required extensive assistance with dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes, end stage renal disease and wound infection; -Number of venous ulcer (A wound on the leg or ankle caused by abnormal or damaged veins) or arterial ulcer (caused by poor blood circulation to the lower extremities): 3; -Special treatments received as a resident: Dialysis (Process for removal of waste and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) center for one sampled resident (Resident #53) and one resident (Resident #15) selected from an expanded sample. The facility identified five residents as receiving dialysis. The sample size was 14. The census was 55. 1. Review of the Resident #53's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 9/1/20, showed the following: -admission date of 8/26/20; -Cognitively intact; -Required extensive assistance with transfers, dressing and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes and end stage renal (kidney) disease; -Special treatments received while a resident: Dialysis. Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 8/27/20 and in use during the survey, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have adequate indications to support the use of a behavior altering medication for one resident (Resident #38) and failed to inform the resident's responsible party of the order for and use of the medication. The sample size was 14. The census was 55. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/1/20, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for transfers, bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene; -Unable to ambulate; -Behaviors not exhibited; -Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes, Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with walking, balance, and coordination) and dementia. Review of the physician's order sheet (POS) showed: -Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance; -An order, dated 7/17/20, to administer Depakote (anti-seizure medication also used for episodes of mania (excessive enthusiasm and delusions)), 125…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HELIA HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 52.7+2.3 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MILLER, STEPHENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 04/01/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-39.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$204K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $204K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$292per resident / day
operating cost
$8,892per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$210per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265341. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next