No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Village At Victory Lakes, The

1055 East Grand Avenue, Lindenhurst, IL 60046 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (847) 356-5900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$93,506 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $93,506 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2020 E Grand Ave · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3021 Falling Waters Blvd Ste A · (847) 457-4770 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2240 E Grand Ave · (224) 572-1536 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2170 E Grand Ave · (847) 356-3007 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.0%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.5%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.3%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.2%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.542.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.722.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 704 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 310 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.4%CMS range 58.5–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 10.0–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.6–8.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.01
RN hoursweekends
34.8%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.43 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately identify the code status and initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to a resident (R96) who had elected to be a full code. This failure resulted in an approximate 2 - 4 minute delay in initiating CPR to R96 who was pronounced deceased on [DATE] at the facility. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R96) reviewed for resident death in the sample of 18. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] when V5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) found R96 without a pulse or respirations, V5 did not begin CPR, she exited R96's room and went to find V3 Registered Nurse (RN). V3 and V5 both returned to R96s room and V3 confirmed that R96 was not breathing and did not have a pulse, both staff without starting CPR or calling a code again left R96s room to inform V6 (RN) that R96 had passed away. V1 (Administrator) and V19 (Assistant Director of Nursing) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:19 PM. This surveyor confirmed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used a resident transfer device in a safe manner for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for safe transfers in the sample of 5. This failure led to R1 being transferred unsafely and dislocating R1's hip.The findings include:R1's Facility Final Report dated 5/8/26 showed on 5/8/26, R1 was being transferred with a assistive transfer device (ATD). R1 was unable to be adjusted safely onto the toilet, was lowered to the floor, and 911 was called to transfer R1 to the hospital.R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include right femur fracture, post right artificial hip joint replacement, muscle wasting and atrophy, and dislocation of internal right hip prostheses. This assessment showed R1 is a fall risk. This assessment showed R1 is dependent on staff with toileting and bed to chair transfers.On 5/14/26 at 9:00 AM, R1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was transported safely in a shower chair. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a bimalleolar fracture of the right ankle. This affects 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 3. This past non-compliance occurred from 2/11/26 to 2/19/26. The findings include:R1's Facesheet shows R1 has diagnoses that include, but are not limited to: osteoarthritis of the right and left shoulders, atherosclerotic heart disease, history of poliomyelitis, dementia, and chronic kidney disease stage three. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 2/6/26 shows R1 is cognitively intact.On 2/23/26 at 9:08 AM, R1 had two wheelchair footrests with R1's name written on it. One footrest was on the seat of the wheelchair and the other was in a bag attached to the back of the wheelchair. R1 was lying in bed with a green cast on R1's right ankle that went up to the top of R1's right calf. R1 was not exhibiting any signs of pain. R1 said on the morning of 2/11/26, V3 (Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the Wound Physician's recommendations, failed to identify, report, and obtain treatment for wounds and failed to provide pressure relieving intervention to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 4 of 9 residents (R73, R45, R135, R35) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 20. This failure resulted in R73's MASD-Moisture Acquired Skin Disease to the left and right gluteal area developing into a left gluteal Stage 3 and right gluteal Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The findings include: 1. R73 Predicting Pressure Ulcer score risk dated 10/12/2024 (admission) shows, High Risk On 01/28/25 at 11:11 AM, V2 DON-Director of Nurse changed the dressing for R73's Stage 4 pressure wound to the left buttock and the Stage 4 pressure wound to the left heel. On 01/28/25 at 11:11 AM, V2 DON-Director of Nursing said, R73 did have redness to the right butt cheek upon admission but developed the pressure ulcer in the facility. R73 admission assessment dated , 05/10/24 at 7:18 PM, shows, Skin MASD in buttocks - very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner. This failure resulted in R432 being sent to the hospital for 8 days due to increased pain after a transfer. The facility also failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dyspagia was supervised during meals and failed to ensure a resident was provided nectar thick liquids as ordered. This applies to 4 of 18 residents (R5, R7, R44 and R432) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R432's Face Sheet shows that he originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R432's Physical Therapy Evaluation dated 1/8/24 shows that he was referred to therapy for strengthening and decrease level of assistance in bed mobility and transfer. The report shows, Patient exhibiting difficulty performing bed mobility, transfer, sitting balance and ability to stand. The assessment shows that he needs maximum assistance of 2 people for transfer and is dependent on staff for bed-to-chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and identify a resident's pressure injury to her right lower leg until it was a stage 3 acquired pressure injury from a medical device. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for acquired pressure injuries in the sample of 3. This resulted in R2 sustaining a facility acquired stage 3 pressure injury. The findings include: R2's face sheet shows R2 is [AGE] year old who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include right femur fracture that had undergone hip surgery, history of falling, and diabetes. , R2's Braden scale (predicting pressure score risk), dated 10/30/23, shows R2 is at risk for developing pressure. R2's skin admission assessment, dated 10/11/23, shows R2 had no pressure injury except a surgical incision to right hip. R2's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], shows an order for R2's right lower extremity to be non weight bearing, and the knee immobilizer to be on at all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that only authorized personnel entered the medication room.This has the potential to affect all the residents residing at the facility.The findings include:The form CMS 671 dated 3/9/26 show there are 86 residents residing at the facility.On 03/10/2026 at 9:11 AM, V12 (Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) approached V16 (Registered Nurse-RN) and asked for the keys for the medication room. V16 (RN) handed V12 (Restorative CNA) the set of keys. V12 opened the medication room and went inside the medication room. V16 (RN) said V12 is not a Nurse but she is the CNA manager so she can enter the medication room, otherwise only Nurses can enter the medication room. On 3/10/26 at 9:35 AM, V9 (Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) said the Medication room is a secure room where resident's medications including narcotics and over the counter medications were stored. Only authorized personnel which would be the nurses are the only ones allowed to enter a medication room to ensure safety and proper handling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served in a manner to prevent cross contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility and receiving food from the kitchen. The findings include: On 3/9/26 The noon meal service line in the facility kitchen was observed continuously from 10:56 AM though 12:01 PM. At 11:11 AM, V8 (Dietary AIde) put on gloves and during the entire meal service V8 wore the same gloves. At 11:18 AM, a green bean had fallen into the mashed potatoes and V8 picked it out with her gloved hands and continued to wear the same gloves and plated to serve the mashed potatoes to residents. At 11:23 AM, V8 used her gloved hands to pick up a hamburger patty and place it on a bun and plated it to be served to a resident. At 11:43 AM, V8 picked up 2 sandwiches and plated and served them to residents. During the meal service V8 handled residents meal cards, plates, utensils, trays and took additional items out of the warmer when needed. V8 plated all dinner rolls using the same gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safe during care to 1 of 18 residents (R86) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18.The findings include:R86's face sheet show R86 has diagnoses that include s/p (status post) left hip arthroplasty, dementia with agitation, depression and hypertension.R86's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R86 is severely cognitively impaired.R86's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] shows R86 is high risk for falls.On 3/8/25 at 11 AM, R86 was in the common area being monitored closely. V15 (Registered Nurse) said R86 was kept in the common area due to being a high fall risk.Review of R86's fall incident report show R86 fell on: 2/16/26- fell out of bed while being changed by a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) during care. On 3/5/26 at 9:12 AM, V11 (CNA) said she was R86's CNA last 2/16/26 when R86 fell out of bed. V11 (CNA) said she provided incontinent care to R86. V11 said she was applying R86's incontinent pad, turning R86 in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter bags were kept from resting on the floor for 1 of 5 residents (R102) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 18.The findings include:On 3/9/26 at 12:07 PM, R102 was lying in bed in his room. R102's catheter drainage bag was resting directly on the floor to the left side of his bed. R102 said staff position his catheter bag since he's stuck in bed.R102's admission Record dated 3/10/26 shows R102 has hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting his left, non-dominant side. R102's Order Summary Report dated 3/10/26 shows current, active orders written on 3/3/26 for an indwelling catheter for a diagnosis of (urine) retention and catheter site care to be performed every shift.On 3/10/26 at 1:10 PM, V19, Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Prevention nurse, said it is not acceptable for a catheter drainage bag to be on the floor due to infection control issues.The facility's Foley Catheter Management Policy (effective 9/1/23) under the heading of Infection Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was weighed upon admission and readmission and failed to verify the accuracy of a resident's weight for a resident with potential for weight loss which applies to 2 of 7 residents (R1, R14) reviewed for weight loss in a sample of 18.The findings include:1.) R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is a [AGE] year-old cognitively intact resident with diagnoses which include: dysphagia and aftercare following surgery on the digestive system (feeding tube). R1's Census Sheet printed on 3/12/26 showed R1was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 1/10/26 (to local hospital), and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Weights and Vitals Summary printed on 3/10/26 showed R1 had no weights recorded from 1/7/26 through 1/10/26 and was not weighed until 2/9/26 after being readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/9/26 at 1:35 PM, V13 Dietitian stated residents who are on tube feeding are at risk for weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered and/or received an influenza vaccination for 1 of 5 residents (R18) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 18.The findings include:R18's admission Record dated 3/11/26 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R18's Immunizations list dated 3/11/26 shows R18's last influenza vaccination was administered on 11/4/24.On 3/11/26 at 1:00 PM, V19, Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Prevention Nurse, said influenza vaccines are offered to all residents annually and on admission/readmission. V19 said the facility had an influenza vaccine clinic this past fall.The facility was not able to provide documentation that an influenza vaccine was offered and/or administered to R18 between 10/2025 and 3/10/26 when inquired about R18's immunization status.The facility's Immunization Program Policy (effective 9/1/23) shows the facility offers immunizations against seasonal influenza to all residents. Residents are encouraged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was served the noon meal at the scheduled time. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for dietary services in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 10/30/25 at 10:20 AM, V9 (R1's spouse) said on 10/26/25, R1 did not fill out the meal ticket form and this was his 2nd time he missed a meal. She had to alert the staff R1 did not receive the lunch meal. On 10/30/25 at 12:02 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said on 10/26/25, she was R1's CNA. That day it was really busy, V9 came up to her after the noon meal was served and said R1 did not get a noon meal tray. V6 said she called the kitchen, and they said his tray should have gone out, she looked and looked and could not find his tray. She went to the kitchen between 1:00 PM to 1:30 PM to get a meal tray for R1 and the kitchen had closed up and did not have any food remaining for the noon meal. V6 said she got R1 a grilled cheese sandwich. V6 said PM staff delivers meal tickets for the following day, the residents choose their meals, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from injury during a shower for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 3. The findings include:Findings Include:R1's face sheet shows she had diagnoses including artificial hip replacement surgery, difficulty walking, and osteoarthritis of the hip.R1's care plan initiated on 12/17/24 shows she is at risk for falls due to unsteady gait, balance, and decreased strength and endurance. The care plan also shows she requires partial to moderate assist for showers, dressing, and transfers. Interventions added on 12/18/24 to R1's care plan to help prevent a fall include keep personal items within easy reach and nursing staff should provide instructions on safety measures. R1's incident note completed by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) on 1/7/25 shows that R1 had a fall in the shower room and was very upset. A witnessed fall incident form completed by V3 on 1/7/25 shows that R1 was lying on the floor in the shower room and had a skin tear to her right outer elbow and said she had hit her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) in a contact isolation and enhanced barrier precaution room, and failed to ensure gloves were changed during incontinence care to prevent cross contamination. This applies to 4 of 10 residents (R24, R54, R63, R135) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1.) On 1/27/25 at 9:35 AM, outside of R24's open door were two isolation signs, one for Contact Isolation indicating gloves and gowns must be applied when entering the resident room. The second sign was for Enhanced Barrier precautions that showed when providing cares such as dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting staff must wear gloves and gowns. Outside of R24's doorway was also a cart containing PPE including gowns, gloves, and masks as well as a bin to place linens and garbage. At 9:37 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) went into the room of R24 without applying a gown or gloves, she proceeded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with the bed hold policy when transferring a resident to a hospital for 1 of 2 residents (R23) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 20. The findings include: A facility assessment done on 12/13/24 showed R23's mental status was intact. R23's Progress Note dated 1/10/25 showed R23 was sent to the hospital because he was having abdominal pain. R23's SNF/NF to Hospital Transfer Form dated 1/10/25 showed R23 was being transferred to a local hospital for evaluation of abdominal pain. The same document showed R23 was capable of making decisions. On 01/27/25 at 11:43 AM, R23 stated when he was sent to the hospital on 1/10/25 he was not given the bed hold policy or informed what the facility's bed hold policy was. On 01/28/25 at 12:44 PM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she was the nurse that sent R23 to the hospital on 1/10/25. V5 said she did not provide or inform R23 of the facility's bed hold policy on transfer. The facility's Bed Hold Notices policy dated 5/1/19 showed the facility support the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure R36 and R54's PASRR-Preadmission, Screening & Resident Review was reassessed after being newly diagnosed with a mental illness for 2 of 5 residents (R36, R54) reviewed for PASRR in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 01/29/25 at 9:12 AM, V12 Director of Admission/Community Outreach said, PASRR is usually completed at the hospital prior to admission. If the resident comes from out of state or from their home, it is completed as part of the admission process at the facility. The facility has not been performing the PASRR when a resident is diagnosed with a mental illness after admission. Every resident will be assessed with Level 1 PASRR. That assessment will cue the facility if an additional screening is needed. Diagnosis of a mental illness, psychotropic medications, and behavioral documentation facilitates the need for the type of PASRR the resident needs. I was just notified yesterday of the need for PASRR reassessments with changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions and pressure injury treatments were in place. The facility failed to report a new pressure wound. These failures apply to 4 of 8 residents (R40, R34, R62, R432) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R40's care plan dated 11/29/23 showed R40 was at risk for pressure injuries and/or skin breakdown due to his diagnoses of limited mobility, incontinence, and cognitive deficits. R40's skin/wound note dated 2/3/24 showed R40 was readmitted to the facility, from the hospital, with a new wound to his sacrum that measured 1.5 centimeters (cm) x 0.3 cm x 0.1 cm. The note showed R40 was referred to the facility's wound physician. R40's Order Summary Report dated 2/3/24 showed a physician order for R40's sacral wound to be cleansed with normal saline and covered with an absorbent, foam dressing, every 12 hours as needed for soiled or missing dressing. On 2/5/24 at 9:31 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to serve residents the right amount of food to 4 of 4 residents on pureed diets (R38, R433, R62, R12) reviewed for nutritional needs of residents on pureed diets in the sample of 18. The findings include: The facility Diet type report dated 2/5/24 show R38, R433, R62 and R12 were all on pureed diets. The facility spreadsheet for 2/5/24 show the serving size for pureed diet was as follows, steamed broccoli- 4 ounces (oz), cheesy grits-4 oz and grilled chicken broccoli tortellini-6 oz. On 2/5/24 at 12:30 PM, during the lunch service V17 (Dietary Aide) was plating the lunch trays with pureed consistency foods. V17 used a blue scoop for the pureed steamed broccoli and cheesy grits. V17 said those blue scoops were 2 ounces (oz.) Then V17 used the green scoop to serve the pureed chicken tortellini and said the green scoop was 3.5 oz. On 2/6/24 at 11:30 AM, the facility spreadsheet for 2/5/24 was reviewed with V13 (Dietitan) and V18 (Dietary Manager). Both V13 and V18 confirmed that V17 did not use the right scoop sizes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure glucometer machines were cleaned in between resident use and failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn appropriately for a resident on contact/droplet isolation for COVID-19 to prevent the spread of infection. This applies to 5 of 18 residents (R16, R434, R182, R8, R432,) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 2/5/24 at 11:35 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) performed a blood glucose check on R16. After performing the check, V3 took a disinfecting wipe and set it on the nurse's cart. V3 placed the glucometer machine in the center of the wipe and folded the wipe over the top of the machine. V3 had another machine on the cart and wrapped it in the same manner. V3 then checked R434, R182 and R8's blood sugars and wrapped the machines in the same manner after each use. On 2/5/24 at 11:27 AM, V7 (Nurse Supervisor) said that glucometers should be cleaned after each use by vigorously wiping the front, back and sides of the machine using a disinfectant wipe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident bed had side rails for bed mobility for 1 of 18 residents (R34) reviewed for accommodation of need in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 2/5/24 at 10:35 AM, R34 said he was recently transferred from one room to this room and they gave him a new bed that doesn't have side rails on it. R34 said uses the side rails to help turn himself from side to side, and to shift positions. R34's bed had an air mattress with no side rails on it. On 2/6/24 at 11:18 AM, V16 (CNA) said she is not sure why R34 does not have the same bed but he did use the side rails to assist himself for re-positioning and turning. On 2/6/24 at 1:50 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she was not aware that R34 was moved into a new bed without side rails but he should have side rails and does use them for bed mobility. On 2/6/24 at 11:21 AM, and 2/7/24 at 8:40 AM, R34's bed still did not have side rails on either side. R34's Face sheet shows he has diagnoses including: osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written notice of a room change, with rationale, to a resident prior to the resident's room change for 2 of 2 residents (R34 and R7) reviewed for resident rights the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 2/5/24 at 10:25 AM, R34 said he is so upset because he got moved again the other day without a warning due to his roommate being sick. R34 said he doesn't understand why he had to be the one to move from one room to the other and he wants to go back to his original room immediately. R34 said he refused to go at first but ended up giving in and let them move him. R34 said they did not give him any written notice and not much of a notice at all. A room change notification for R34's room change was requested from the facility. They provided a paper titled room transfer dated 2/2/24 showing R34 is moving from one room to another and a copy should be placed in his chart but did not identify a copy was given to the resident. 2. On 2/5/24 at 9:15 AM, R7 was seated in a wheelchair in her room. R7's roommate was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide restorative services to residents with limited mobility for 3 of 5 residents (R34, R4, R26) reviewed for restorative services in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R34's current care plan showed R34 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis, right foot drop, carpal tunnel syndrome of the upper limb, spinal stenosis, and a history of falls. R34's current care plan showed no focus area, goals, or active interventions related to restorative programming. R34's most recent PT (Physical Therapy) Therapist Progress and Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed discharge recommendations for R34 as include in (R34's) daily schedule to be up in wheelchair and maintenance therapy for ROM (range of motion exercises) to BLE (bilateral lower extremities). R34's medical record showed R34's last PT session was 1/18/22. R34's most recent OT (Occupational Therapy) Therapist Progress and Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed R34 received OT related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a resident's decreased oral intake and failed to identify a resident's severe weight loss. These failures apply to 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 18. The findings include: R4's care plan dated 12/30/23 showed R4 was at risk for impaired nutrition. The care plan showed, Monitor weight as ordered. Monitor oral intake of food and fluid . The care plan showed no significant weight loss for R4. R4's Comprehensive Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] showed R4 was evaluated by V13 Registered Dietician (RD), based on R4's weight of 159 pounds (lbs) from 1/3/24. The assessment showed no significant weight loss for R4. R4 was not on any dietary supplements. The assessment showed, RD to monitor po (oral) intake/weight/labs/meds/skin integrity. RD available prn (as needed) . R4's Weight Summary Records showed R4 weighed 159 lbs on 1/3/24 and 125 lbs on 2/2/24. R4 was weighed in a wheelchair on 1/4/24 and via mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication errors. There were 29 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 6.9% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 10 residents (R26 and R434) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 2/5/24 at 11:46 AM during medication pass, V3 (Registered Nurse) prepared a Novolog Insulin Pen to administer R434 her insulin. V3 put the needle onto the pen and dialed the pen to 9 units and administered the insulin. V3 did not prime the pen before administering the insulin. On 2/5/24 at 12:27 PM, V3 stated, Insulin pens should be primed with one unit before giving, I think. On 2/6/24 at 11:27 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse) said that insulin pens should be primed with 2 units before administering the insulin to ensure that the resident receives the ordered dose of insulin. V7 said that the staff should put the needle on, turn the dial to 2 units and push the button and then turn the dial to the required dose and then administer it. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R434's Face Sheet shows diagnoses of: diabetes mellitus. R434's Medication Administration Record shows an order for Novolog FlexPen-Inject 5 units subcutaneously with meals and an order for Novolog FlexPen as per sliding scale: 200-249=4 units. On 2/5/24 at 11:46 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) performed a blood sugar check on R434 and her blood sugar was 214. V3 prepared a Novolog Insulin Pen to administer R434 her ordered insulin. V3 put the needle onto the pen and dialed the pen to 9 units and administered the insulin. V3 did not prime the pen before administering the insulin. On 2/5/24 at 12:27 PM, V3 stated, Insulin pens should be primed with one unit before giving, I think. On 2/6/24 at 11:27 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse) said that insulin pens should be primed with 2 units before administered the insulin to ensure that the resident receives the ordered dose of insulin. V7 said that the staff should put the needle on, turn the dial to 2 units and push the button and then turn the dial to the required dose and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitation services, including speech therapy (ST), physical therapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT), to a resident for 1 of 13 residents (R5) reviewed for skilled therapy services in the sample of 18. The findings include: R5's hospital records showed R5 was hospitalized on [DATE] with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding. R5 was discharged from the hospital, back to the facility, on 12/14/23. R5's physician orders summary report, dated 12/14/23, showed orders for R5 to be evaluated and treated by ST, PT, and OT, upon readmission to the facility. R5's ST-Therapist Progress and Discharge Summary Report showed R5 was last seen by speech therapy on 12/5/23. On 2/6/24 at 1:30 PM, V9 Speech Therapist stated, The last time I treated (R5) was before she was hospitalized in December. I haven't seen her since she got readmitted . On 2/6/24 at 1:50 PM, R5's electronic medical record was reviewed with V22 Director of Rehab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$93,506 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $11,480 — penalty dated 2026-05-14
  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
  • $19,135 — penalty dated 2026-02-23
  • $20,253 — penalty dated 2025-01-29
  • $15,953 — penalty dated 2024-02-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRANCISCAN COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF CHICAGO SERVICES CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/22/1988
PARKHILL, ROBERTAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/18/2021
STARK, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/19/2014
UMANSKIY, REGINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/05/2022
RAMIREZ-JUSTIN, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/23/2020
ROSENBERGER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/11/2023
CARROLL, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
POMERANETS, EUGENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
RAINA, ANSHUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/02/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 28%Other / private 53%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$857per resident / day
operating cost
$26,038per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$823per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145602. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next