No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Goldwater Care Spring Valley

1300 North Greenwood Street, Spring Valley, IL 61362 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (815) 664-4708 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (815) 664-4708 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 23 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1302 N Greenwood St · (779) 323-8150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
130 E Saint Paul St · (815) 663-4711 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
508 W Dakota St · (815) 664-5484 · Call to confirm hours
Park
123 W 2nd St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms100.0%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%14.3%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.2%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.5%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.9%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.1%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.0%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.4%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.242.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.182.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.8%CMS range 32.7–63.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.9–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
32.1%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete and accurate for1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in the sample of 8.The findings include R1 was admitted to the facility last 12/23/25 with diagnoses that include alcoholism and diabetes.On 2/13/25 at 9:38 AM, V7 (Social Services) said R1 was at the facility for approximately two days. R1 left the facility last 12/25/25. R1 did not sign the form of AMA (Against medical advice.)R1's medical record did not include R1's AMA unsigned form.On 2/13/26 at 10:43 AM, V9 (Registered Nurse-RN) said she was the PM Nurse last 12/25/26. V9 said she received report from V11 (RN Day Nurse) that R1 went out on pass (OOP) for the holidays this morning. As the day went on, and it was getting late, R1 did not come back. V9 said she checked in the sign in and out sheet binder at the front desk. There was no sign out done for R1, or who was the responsible party that took R1 out of the facility. V9 said she called V2 (Director of Nursing) who directed her to call R1's family.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, monitor, and review prophylactic antibiotic use for five (R1, R2, R33, R54, and R67) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Infection Surveillance, Tracking and QA (Quality Assurance) Reporting policy and procedure, dated 2/14/18 documents infection tracking includes: Completing Infection Tracking Log for all residents with an infection and/or treated with antibiotics. Review documentation of clinical signs and symptoms to determine if McGeer's criteria for infection were met and antibiotic use is appropriate. The facility's Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship Program policy, dated 11/28/17, documents This facility is dedicated to implementing an Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship program to reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics. This program helps ensure that our residents get the right antibiotics at the right time for the right duration, and can improve individual patient outcomes, prevent deaths from resistant infections, slow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's range of motion quarterly, and failed to implement and follow through ROM (Range of Motion) exercises for one of two residents (R2), a resident with functional limited range of motion, in the sample of 36. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Passive Range of Motion Exercises (PROM) directs staff, Residents will be assessed for their need of passive range of motion per the Functional Limitation in Range of Motion assessment. If the resident is recommended for a PROM program, trained nursing staff will provide the range of motion exercises. Range of Motion exercise will assist to prevent changes in the structure of the joints. Improve circulation of the involved part of the body. Aid in preventing pressure areas. Maintain normal range of motion. Increase joint motion to the maximum possible range. Increase or return power in muscles. Retain muscle strength. Develop control and coordination. Prevent deformities. Promote deformities. Promote a sense of well- being. Assist in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall precautions for one of five residents (R43), reviewed for falls in a sample of 36. The facility policy, Fall Prevention Program, dated (revised) 11/21/17 directs staff, To assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Programs will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness. The fall prevention program includes the following components: Methods to identify residents at risk, communication with direct staff members. Safety interventions will be implemented for each resident identified at risk. Fall/safety interventions may include, but are not limited to: Nursing personnel will be informed of residents who are at risk for falling. R43's current Physician Order Sheet, dated February 2025 includes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform urinary catheter care to reduce the risk of infection for one of two residents (R221) reviewed for urinary catheters, in a sample of 36. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Urinary Catheter Care, dated (revised) 2-14-19 directs staff, To establish guidelines to reduce the risk of or prevent infections with an indwelling catheter. The following should be discouraged: Use of antiseptic/antimicrobial solutions for cleansing during catheter care. Routine hygiene (cleansing of the meatal surface during daily bathing or showering) is appropriate. Encrustations on the foley catheter should be removed from the meatus outward with a clean wash cloth, rinsed with clean water on an as needed basis. R221's current Physician Order Sheet, dated February 2025 includes the following diagnoses: Traumatic Amputation Below the Left Knee, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Right Buttock, Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer Left Buttock, History of Urinary Tract Infection. This same form includes the following physician orders: (Indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a rationale for the continued use of an antibiotic for one of two residents (R2), reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 36. Findings Include: The facility policy, Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, dated 11/28/2017 directs staff, This facility is dedicated to implementing an Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship program to reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics. This program will help ensure that our residents get the right antibiotics at the right time for the right duration, and can help improve individual patient outcomes, prevent deaths from resistant infections, slow antibiotic resistance, decrease Clostridium difficile infections and reduce healthcare costs. This facility utilizes the McGeer's Criteria for determining if an infection meets criteria for treatment with an antibiotic. R2's current Physician Order Sheet, dated February 2025 documents, 11/11/2024 Nitrofurantoin 100 MG (Milligrams) one capsule by mouth one time a day related to Personal History of Urinary Tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for one of two residents (R48) reviewed for medication administration, in a sample of 36. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Medication Administration General Guidelines, directs staff, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principals and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling and administration). Examination gloves are worn when necessary. R48's current Physician Order Sheet, dated February 2025 includes the following medications: Aspirin 81 MG (Milligrams) one tablet by mouth in the morning; Calcium 600 MG with Vitamin D3 10 MG one tablet by mouth one time a day; Cetirizine 10 MG one tablet by mouth one time a day; Docusate Sodium 100 MG one capsule by mouth one time a day; Multivitamin one tablet by mouth one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety during transfer, failed to use a gait belt during resident transfer, and failed to follow the facility policy and procedure for mechanical lift slings for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program policy, revised 11/21/17, documents Purpose: To assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Programs will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness. Malfunctioning equipment will be immediately reported to maintenance for repair or removed from service. The facility's Transfers - Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts policy, revised 1/19/18, documents: Purpose: In order to protect the safety and well-being of the Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice scoop, for the ice machine, was stored on the outside of the ice machine. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility Policy, entitled Cleaning Instructions: Ice Machine and Equipment, dated 2010, document, 10. Store the ice scoop outside the machine in a separate, sanitized container that allows the water to drain and not collect around the scoop. On 03/26/2024, at 9:35 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, with V6/Dietary Manager, the ice scoop, for the ice machine, was inside of the ice machine and full of ice. V6 confirmed the ice scoop should not be left inside the ice machine, but rather in a container outside of the ice machine. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form, entitled Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 3/26/2024, signed by V1/Administrator, document, 79 residents reside in the facility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lids, to the trash receptacle, were closed and the area surrounding the trash receptacle was free of litter. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility Policy, entitled Garbage and Rubbish Removal, dated 2020, document, 8. Outdoor trash receptacles will be kept covered and the surrounding area kept free of litter. Trash receptacles will be placed a pad that is cleanable and non-porous. On 03/26/2024, at 9:30 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, with V6/Dietary Manager, the lid, to the steel trash receptacle, located outside, was left opened. Additionally, the area surrounding the trash receptacle was littered with cigarette butts. V6 confirmed the lid, to the trash receptacle, should have been closed and area free of debris. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form, entitled Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 3/26/2024, signed by V1/Administrator, document, 79 residents reside in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for three residents (R8, R24, and R35) of 29 residents reviewed for Care Plans in a sample of 29. Findings includes: The facility's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 11/17/17 documents: To develop a Comprehensive Care Plan that directs the care team and incorporates the resident's goals, preferences, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. A) Facility's Smoking Safety Policy dated 10/24/22 documents: Smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes and vaping devices. Resident's plan of care and smoking compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a plan of care for two (R27 and R49) of 29 residents reviewed for care planning in the sample of 29. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy and procedure, revised 11/17/17, documents the care plan is to be Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments; and The care plan should be revised on an ongoing basis to reflect changes in the resident and the care that the resident is receiving. On 3/28/24 at 2:30 PM, V3 MDS (Minimum Data Set)/CPC (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed resident Care Plans are to be revised as needed. 1. The current Care Plan for R27, documents the following focus areas for R27: Potential nutritional problem related to swallowing disorder, dependent on nutrition by PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube; Swallowing problem related to dysphasia; and unplanned/unexpected weight loss related to poor food intake. The following interventions for the focus areas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed obtain a physician order for a weight loss program and to ensure a resident with significant weight loss was monitored and followed by a physician for one (R8) of three residents reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 29. Findings include: The facility's Weight Assessment and Intervention policy and procedure, dated 2020, documents The goal is to ensure adequate parameters of nutritional status are maintained by preventing unintentional weight loss. Any weight change of 5% (percent) or more since the previous weight assessment shall be re-taken the next day to confirm. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the appropriate designated individuals such as the physician, Registered Dietician, Dining Services Manager, or other members of the interdisciplinary team within 24 hours. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss shall be based on the following criteria: 1-month significant loss - 5% and severe loss greater than 5%; 3 months…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube dressing change was completed as physician ordered for one (R27) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 29. Findings include: The facility's Gastrostomy Tube - Feeding and Care policy and procedure revised 8/3/20, documents Stoma Site Care: Inspect the surrounding skin for redness, tenderness, swelling, irritation, purulent drainage, or gastric leakage: immediately report skin irritation or infection and provide treatment. Clean skin with soap and water or antiseptic of choice - begin next to stoma site, using a spiral pattern and moving outward; clean under skin disk with cotton swab. Dry thoroughly; leave area open to air to minimize dampness, skin irritation, and maceration; use a dressing only if ordered. The current Order Summary Report for R27 documents physician treatment order dated 5/9/23: Tx (treatment) to g-tube (gastrostomy tube): Cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, apply bacitracin (antibiotic ointment), cover with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to clean, maintain and change disposable Respiratory supplies for two of three Residents (R52 and R71) reviewed for Respiratory Care in a sample of 29. Findings include: The Facility Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment (Changing and Cleaning) Policy, revised 1/7/19, documents: to provide guidelines to employees for changing all disposable respiratory supplies; ensure the safety of Residents by providing maintenance of all disposable respiratory supplies; minimize the risk of infection; Nasal Cannulas are to be changed once a week and as needed; a clean plastic bag with a zip lock/draw string will be provided to store the cannula when not in use and will be dated with the date the tubing was changed; and oxygen humidifiers should be changed weekly or as needed and will be dated when changed. The Facility Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/CPAP Therapy Policy, undated, documents: the goal of this therapy is therapy include ventilation, improve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician treatment order for one resident (R1) reviewed for wound treatment orders in a sample of three. Findings Include: The facility's Pressure Injury and Skin Condition Assessment Policy, dated 1/17/18, documents: Purpose: To establish guidelines for assessing, monitoring and documenting the presence of skin breakdown, pressure injuries, and other ulcers and assuring interventions are implemented. 18. Physician ordered treatments shall be initialed by the staff on the electronic Treatment Administration Record after each administration. R1's diagnoses include: Personal history of other malignant neoplasm of skin, varicose veins of right and left lower extremities, non-pressure ulcer of right and left lower extremities, excoriation (skin picking) disorder, end stage renal disease. R1's Treatment Administration Record/TAR dated 10/2023 documents: Treatment to bilateral lower extremities/BLE: Cleanse wounds to BLE with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to open areas, cover with unna boots and wrap…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-29 · tag F0555 — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed they could choose their own physician for three residents (R1, R3, and R4) of four residents reviewed for Resident Rights in a sample of four. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, undated, documents, You have the right to choose your own doctor. 1. R1's clinical record documents R1 admitted on [DATE] under the care of V3 Medical Director. On 8-25-23, at 1:04pm, R1 was lying in bed. R1 stated that on admission, They did not ask about choosing my own doctor. They said they had one here. He's not my first choice. 2. R3's clinical record documents R3 admitted on [DATE] under the care of V3 Medical Director. On 8/25/23, at 1:11pm, R3 stated the following, When I was admitted they never asked who I wanted for a doctor. They didn't tell me that I could choose. I would have chosen (V8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-29 · tag F0712 — widespread
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician personally conducted the required face to face visits for four of four (R1-R4) residents reviewed for physician visits in a sample of four. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's admission Agreement, undated, documents, Contract Between Resident and Facility. C. Residents' Rights and Obligations. 15. Selection of Health Care Professionals. Resident may select, or have selected on his/her behalf, qualified health care professionals who conforms to the Facility's policies, rules, applicable laws, and regulations. Resident must have, select, or have chosen on his/her behalf a personal physician who will be available, or whose agent will be available, at all times for notification of significant changes in the Resident's clinical condition. On 8/25/23, at 10:50am, V1 Administrator, who stated V1 just spoke with V3 Medical Director, stated the following: (V3) is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure current daily nurse staffing information was posted, and 18 months of nurse staffing postings were maintained. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 04/04/23 at 02:25 PM, the facility's Daily Staffing Requirements form was posted on the wall next to V15's (Social Service Director) office. This form was dated 03/28/23. At this time, V15 confirmed the Daily Staffing Form posted was not current and stated, I think the person who posts this is off with COVID. On 04/05/23 at 01:00 PM, the facility's Daily Staffing Requirements form (dated 03/28/23) remained posted next to V15's office. V1 (Administrator) stated, The person that posts the staffing is working from home due to COVID, so this is why a current form is not posted. On 04/06/23 11:19 AM, V16 (Business Office Manager) stated during a telephone interview that she does not maintain the facility's daily staffing sheets for 18 months. V16 stated, I put them in the paper shredder after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a dietary manager on a full-time basis, and ensure all dietary staff withheld a food handler's certification. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Dietary Manager job description, dated 3/23/17, documents, The Dietary Manager is responsible for partnering with the Dietitian to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Dietary Department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that quality nutritional services are provided on a daily basis and that the dietary Department is maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Qualifications: Must possess, as a minimum, a high school diploma. Must possess a Food Service Sanitation Manager Certification in the State of Illinois. Must have, as a minimum three years' experience in a supervisory capacity in a hospital, nursing care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at an appropriate temperature to prevent pathogenic microorganisms that may cause foodborne illness, maintain safe food temperatures of food being held on the steam table, monitor food temperatures, use a sanitizing solution to sanitize the high contact surfaces of the kitchen and dining room tables, monitor the sanitizer levels prior to cleaning surfaces, and maintain clean air vents in the kitchen. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service, dated 2020, documents, Food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures. Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper serving temperatures. Any food item not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served but will undergo the appropriate corrective action listed below. The temperature for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to wear appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while in COVID-19 positive resident rooms, failed to remove/disinfect contaminated PPE upon exit from COVID-19 positive resident rooms and prior to traveling throughout the facility for one resident (R71) and failed to wear proper PPE while handling COVID-19 positive resident laundry during laundry services, during a facility-wide COVID-19 outbreak. The facility also failed to apply the required PPE prior to resident COVID-19 testing and perform hand hygiene after removing gloves for three residents (R26, R64, R67). These failures have the potential to affect all 75 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility policy, Interim COVID-19 policy, dated (revised) 10/31/2022 directs staff, If entering a Red Zone under COVID-19 transmission- based precautions, staff must wear full PPE, including N95 respirator, eye protection, gown and gloves. PPE including N95 should be discarded and new applied between each resident encounter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve pureed food according to the facility's menu for three of three residents (R4, R28, R31) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Pureed Food Preparation policy dated 2020, documents, Pureed foods will be prepared using standardized recipes to ensure quality, flavor, palatability, and maximum nutritive value. Each menu cycle will be reviewed to ensure there is a pureed recipe for each item to be served. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet Week 3, dated Fall/Winter 2022, documents that the pureed menu for 4/3/23 was to include pureed applesauce cake. On 04/03/23 at 01:10 PM, V6 (Cook) and V8 (Dietary Aide) were plating up the lunch pureed meals. No pureed cake was placed on the tray. V8 stated, We didn't have enough cake. So, the pureed residents are getting applesauce instead. The facility Diet Type Report, dated 4/5/23, documents that R4, R28, and R31 are pureed diets.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLDWATER CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 51.5+2.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
KATZENSTEIN, MEIRIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
TVERSKY, AARONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
ARGUBRIGHT, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
STACHOWIAK, MELISSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
TUROFSKY, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
GOLDWATER CARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
SIDDIQUI, MOHAMMEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
WALSH, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
BERKOWITZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
MEYSTEL, YOSEFIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
1300 N GREENWOOD ST, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
CURIS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 6%Other / private 74%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$307per resident / day
operating cost
$9,337per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$267per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145486. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next