No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Four Seasons Retirement Center

1901 Taylor Rd, Columbus, IN 47203 · Non profit - Corporation · 30 certified beds · (812) 372-8481 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (812) 372-8481 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 8 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3902 E 25th St, Columbus, IN 47203
Pharmacy
735 Whitfield Dr · (812) 372-4220 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
1505 N National Road
Park
National Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1901 Taylor Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.9%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%10.8%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.79U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.82hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.63hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.5%CMS range 62.2–73.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.2–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.5–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.98
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.27
RN hoursweekends
20.0%
Total nursing turnover
12.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 14.2 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.26 to 1.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-23)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-05)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines related to indwelling urinary catheter care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Urinary Catheter Care. (Resident 116) Findings include: During an observation, on 06/16/25 at 12:29 P.M., Resident 116 was sitting in a recliner in his room. His indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging on the side of a small trash can with an inch of the bag touching the floor. There was no barrier between the bag and the floor and the trash can was one third full. During an observation and interview, on 06/19/25 at 11:09 A.M., Resident 116's indwelling urinary catheter bag and cover had between one to two inches of the bag touching the floor. The resident indicated staff helped him move it when he wanted to get up. The bag was hanging under his recliner's footrest. During an observation and interview, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2, on 06/19/25 at 3:33 P.M., the resident was sitting in his room in his recliner. His indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging under his recliner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an extended-release medication was administered as recommended for 1 of 10 medication observations related to pharmacy services. (Resident 65) Findings include: During an observation, on 06/19/25 at 10:57 A.M., RN 3 sanitized her hands and prepared medications for Resident 65. She placed all the medications into a cup and handed the cup to the resident. The resident requested all large pills to be crushed and placed in applesauce. Upon returning to the medication cart, RN 3 poured the medications that included, but were not limited to, Klor-Con M20 Extended Release (a Potassium Chloride Microencapsulated Crystals Extended-Release 20 milliequivalent tablet), into a pouch, crushed the medications, placed them back into the medication cup, and added applesauce. The medications were then administered to the resident. The resident was not educated by the nurse related to the risk of crushing an extended-release tablet. The current, open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 06/07/25, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain STAT (immediate) labs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 22) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 04/02/24. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the right femur, anemia, kidney disease, and hypertension. A Progress Note, dated 03/28/24 at 12:08 P.M., indicated the resident completed and antibiotic for a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) the day before, on 03/27/24. The resident had slightly bloody urine. The Nurse Practitioner was notified. A Progress Note, dated 03/29/24 at 11:51 A.M., indicated the resident continued with blood in her urine. A new order was received for a STAT CBC (Complete Blood Count) and UA (Urinalysis). The resident's Eliquis (a blood thinning medication) was put on hold for 48 hours. A Progress Note, dated 03/29/24 at 2:09 P.M., indicated the resident's urine specimen was obtained for the UA. They were waiting for the lab to come and draw the CBC and pick up the urine. A Progress Note, dated 03/29/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly secure a resident's wheelchair during transfer resulting in a fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 5) Findings include: During an interview on 02/02/23 at 1:50 P.M., Resident 5's family member indicated he was in the resident's room when she fell a few days ago. A staff member was assisting the resident out of her wheelchair and they forgot to lock the wheelchair brakes. The resident fell to the ground. The resident was wearing a gait belt and the aide stood in front of her, took a hold of the gait belt from the middle of the resident and tried to pull her up from the floor by herself. That didn't work, so the aide went and got help. Another aide came in and the two aides assisted the resident up from the floor and onto the bed. The family member was concerned, because the resident was recovering from a broken back, but she didn't suffer any injuries from the fall. The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 02/07/23 at 1:23 P.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to administer medications appropriately for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 6) Findings include: During an observation and interview of medication administration on 02/03/23 at 8:57 A.M., RN 3 prepared the following medications for Resident 6 by placing them in a medication cup: - Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams), 1 tablet - buspirone 15 mg, 1 tablet - Cetirizine 10 mg, 1 tablet - Lasix 20 mg, 1 tablet - Daliresp 500 micrograms, 1 tablet, and At approximately 8:59 A.M., RN 3 took the cup of medications and a glass of water into Resident 6's room. She handed the medication cup to the resident. The resident tipped the medication cup into her mouth. The resident sat the medication cup on her breakfast tray. The medication cup still contained one pill. The nurse gave the resident her water glass and the resident swallowed the medications she had in her mouth. The resident administered 1 puff of her inhaler and rinsed her mouth. The nurse was leaving the resident's room when she was stopped by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to laboratory services for 1 of 9 residents reviewed. (Resident 65) Findings include: During an observation on 02/06/23 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 65 was sitting in a chair in her room. The call light was in reach and had no concerns. The clinical record for Resident 65 was reviewed on 02/06/23 at 1:37 P.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 01/18/23, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The active diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures, anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) in the last 30 days, hyponatremia, thyroid disorder, and malnutrition. A current physician's order, dated 02/02/23, indicated the resident was to have a recheck of a CBC (Complete Blood Count) and CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel) on 02/06/23. The clinical record lacked indication that the laboratory services were completed on 02/06/23. During an interview on 02/07/23 at 10:25 A.M., RN 3 indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a STAT chest X-ray in a timely manner for 2 of 9 residents reviewed. (Residents 65 and 5) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 02/06/23 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 65 was sitting in a chair in her room. During an interview on 02/07/23 at 9:34 A.M., the scheduler indicated Resident 65 was being sent to the hospital. The clinical record for Resident 65 was reviewed on 02/06/23 at 1:37 P.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 01/18/23, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The active diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures, anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) in the last 30 days, hyponatremia, thyroid disorder, and malnutrition. A Skilled Evaluation Progress Note, dated 02/06/23 at 4:33 P.M., indicated the resident was having 2+ pitting edema in her bilateral lower extremities that was a new onset. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-05 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 04/03/24 at 10:28 A.M. An admission MDS assessment, dated 01/25/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, cancer, left humerus fracture, and a seizure disorder. The resident's physician conducted a regulatory nursing home visit on 01/23/24. The resident was a new admission to the facility. The resident was examined, and their medications and laboratory results were reviewed. The Nursing staff, NP documentation, and the resident's plan of care was reviewed. The physician's visit documentation was electronically signed and provided to the facility by the physician on 02/06/24 at 7:34 A.M. The resident's physician conducted a routine regulatory nursing home visit on 02/20/24. The resident was examined, and their medications and laboratory results were reviewed. The Nursing staff, NP documentation, and the resident's plan of care was reviewed. The physician's visit documentation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BHI SENIOR LIVING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BLOOMSTROM, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CALDWELL, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
DALTON, DOUGLASSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
ELLIS, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
HASH, SHERRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
JONES, L. DEANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
KELLY, BETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
KOSELKE, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
LEWIS-HAGEN, TONYAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LUDWIG, LONIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MEREDITH, WENDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
MILLER, ROGERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
RICHARDSON, JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
ROBBINS, FREDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
SEIGEL, JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
SMILLIE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
STENNER, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CARR, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/02/2018
DATTILO, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PRIFOGLE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
WEIDEMAN II, ROGERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BHI SENIOR LIVING, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HEALTHCARE THERAPY SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NEESE, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
PLANTE & MORAN PLLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SCHMIDT, MELINDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SMITH, ANGELAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
THOMPSON, KELLYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 64 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$560K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 27%Other / private 73%

This home reported $560K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$453per resident / day
operating cost
$13,774per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$468per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Indiana Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155471. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next