Clark Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 30.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 1293524 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer and implement facility policy to prevent falls in 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for fall prevention, resulting in a fall during a lift transfer resulting in a right fractured humorous for Resident #2, which had impacted the resident's functional status and quality of life with the potential for further injury and falls due to unsafe transfers. Findings include: Resident #2Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included fracture of right femur, dementia, quadriplegia (partial or total loss of function in all four limbs and the torso), and polyosteoarthritis (flexible tissue at the ends of the bones wear down). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2, with a reference date of 6/25/25 revealed, .Section GG: Mobility: Chair/bed-to-chair transfer. 01 - Dependent.Review of current Care Plan for Resident #2,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00143296. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions (utilize a bedside impact/fall mat) for 1 resident (Resident #100) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in Resident #100 falling out of bed sustaining a soft tissue laceration over the midline frontal scalp, non-displaced facial fractures, and mild displaced angular fracture of the left humeral shoulder and the potential for further accidents and hazards to occur for residents at risk for falls. Findings include. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 1/04/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03/15 which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively severely impaired. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs, resident change of condition to not be properly assessed and negative clinical outcomes. This deficient practice has the potential to impact all 29 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of Nursing Schedules for 1/1-3/31/25 revealed the facility did not provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week during 5 of 14 weekends included in this timeframe.Review of Nursing Schedules with a reference date of 5/1-7/27/25 revealed the facility did not provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day during any of the 13 weekends included in this timeframe. During 8 of the weekends in question, the facility had no scheduled RN coverage at all. Review of a Registered Nurse Job Description with a reference date of 2024 revealed POSITION SUMMARY: the Registered Nurse (RN) provides exceptional care.promoting their health.ensuring their safety and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings include: On 07/28/25 at 9:40 AM, Observation of the clean utensil storage area found a mechanical scoop stored with stuck on food debris. Further observation found that the bins containing whisks and spoons were found with an increased accumulation of crumb debris. When asked how often this area gets cleaned, Dining Services Director (DSD) W stated they should get done every Tuesday. On 07/28/25 at 10:05 AM, An interview with DSD W found that the tabletop mixer and the slicer get used often. Observation of the mixer found dried stuck on food debris on the back shield and front grate of the mixing under arm. Observation of the slicer found stuck debris that looked like tomato seeds on the top backside of the blade. When asked Chef Y if tomatoes are used on the slicer he stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a qualified Infection Preventionist worked at least part-time at the facility, was provided sufficient time to perform the Infection Preventionist role, and to properly assess, implement, and manage the Infection Prevention and Control Program.Findings include:During an interview and record review on 7/29/25 at 10:00 AM, Infection Control Preventionist/Director of Nursing/Unit Manager (ICP/DON) B stated, I am the DON, ICP, and UM not only for the LTC side of the facility but also for AL (Assisted Living). I do MDS (Minimum Data Set) part-time as well. This all takes up a lot of time. I am interrupted by staff from my duties, and it is hard to get everything done with all I have to do.During an interview on 7/29/25 at 4:01 PM, ICP/DON B stated, There is a resident that has been here since sometime in June 2025 that requires the PCV20 vaccine, and I have not ordered it yet. I was going to get the other residents' immunization consent to know how many I needed but I just have not been able to get to them before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in residents' satisfaction of living. Findings include:On 07/28/25 at 1:25 PM, Observation of the 3500 Hall Spa room, with Maintenance Director (MD) X, found a stack of clean towels stored between the sink and the commode open and exposed for contamination. Further review of the shower room found multiple dime size pieces of dried bowel movement on the grate for the shower drain with a used glove and wash cloth found under the shower equipment. When asked if that is where clean linens are normally stored, MD X stated the linen is usually protected in a cabinet or covered cart. On 07/28/25 at 1:31 PM, Observation of the housekeeping closet, next to the pantry room, found that the cold-water line was turned off, indicating a stagnant water line. On 07/28/25 at 1:37 PM, Observation of the soiled utility room found brown and discolored water dispense from the cold-water line on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience for 3 (Resident #21, Resident #4 and Resident #14) of 4 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in a potential for a reduced quality of life, feelings of frustration, helplessness and a decreased sense of self-worth.Findings include: Resident #21: During an observation on 07/29/25 at 4:41 PM, Resident #21 was placed at the table with Resident #14 and the other female resident who was eating her meal. Resident #21 had a plate covered with a grey top in front of her, she had cooked cinnamon apples in a dessert dish on the table. During an observation on 07/29/25 at 4:45 PM, LPN “J” proceeded to assist Resident #21 by opening her napkin with silverware and removed the top to the plate. LPN “J” proceeded to sit down between Resident #21 and Resident #14 to assist with each with dinner. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #21 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included Alzheimer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained their right to self-determination for 1 resident (Resident #32), of 1 reviewed for choices, resulting in feelings of anxiety when staff did not wear a surgical mask while caring for the resident, despite her preference for them to do so.Findings include:Resident #32Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: history of falls.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #32 with a reference date of 7/25/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #32 was moderately cognitively impaired.Review of a Care Plan for Resident #32 with a reference date of 7/29/25, revealed a focus/goal/interventions of: Focus: Resident and family encourage visitors to resident's room utilizing hand sanitizer and PPE (personal protective equipment) before entering residents room. Goal:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guidance to administer pneumococcal vaccinations to residents who consented for immunization, screen and assess residents for eligibility of receiving pneumococcal vaccinations, and offer pneumococcal vaccinations to residents who were eligible to receive it, for 1 of 5 (R19) residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations, resulting in the potential for contracting the virus. Finding include:Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy revision date October 2023, revealed, Policy statement: All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation.upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146821. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively develop and implement comprehensive, person centered care plans for 2 residents (Resident #106 and #107), of 8 residents reviewed, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for negative physical, mental and psychosocial outcomes. Findings include: Resident #106 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #106 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dysphagia (swallowing disorder) and urinary retention (inability to empty bladder). Review of Resident #106's Orders revealed, Meals: upright in chair, at table. Feeding assist needed. Small bites and sips. Oral care before meals. Would benefit from sippy cup. every day shift for SLP (speech language pathologist: a person who helps with swallowing problems) recommendations. Active 9/21/2024. Review of Resident #106's Nutritional Risk Care Plan revealed, .at nutritional risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146821 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely, effective incontinence care was provided for 1 resident (Resident #106) of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence, resulting in an increased risk for UTI (urinary tract infection) and the potential for skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #106 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: urinary retention (inability to empty bladder). Review of Resident #106's Incontinence Care Plan revealed, .bladder incontinence r/t (related to) dementia, parkinson's (a disorder that effects movement), impaired mobility. date initiated 8/25/24. Interventions: .Check every 2-3 hours and as required for incontinence. Wash, rinse and dry perineum (genitals and anus) .date initiated 8/25/24. In an interview on 2/19/25 at 9:00 AM, Family Member (FM) M reported that Resident #106 sat in his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all 35 residents. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, starting at 9:25 AM on 8/20/24, it was observed that four pans of cooked, whole intact, beef roasts were found on the expediting cart in the preparation walk in cooler dated for 8/20. At this time, there were also a couple pans of beef dated for 8/19, and further review of the walk in cooler found a large container of bean soup (roughly 3 gallons) cooling with two ice wands in the soup. A review of the kitchen's Cooling Log, dated August, found beef roasts that were cooled on 8/19, but none that were logged for being cooked/cooled on 8/20. Further review of the log found the bean soup starting cooling at 8:30 AM this morning (8/20/24), but was unclear if the cooling started at 140F or 190F. At 9:30 AM on 8/20/24, an interview with [NAME] NN found that the beef was all cooked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BHI SENIOR LIVING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $216K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI