Miller's Health & Rehab By Miller's Merry Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 312 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 56.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications and had physician's orders for the medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 23 and F)1. During random observations on 7/21/25 at 11:00 a.m. and 3:24 p.m., on 7/22/25 at 10:18 a.m. and 3:33 p.m., on 7/23/25 at 9:37 a.m. and 2:38 p.m., and on 7/24/25 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 23 was observed sitting in a recliner chair. At those times, there was a tube of Neosporin cream on the over bed table. During an interview on 7/21/25 at 11:00 a.m., the resident indicated he used the cream for his dry skin on his arms. On 7/24/25 at 11:26 a.m., RN 1 entered the resident's room and observed the Neosporin cream on the over bed table. During an interview on 7/24/25 at 11:30 a.m., RN 1 indicated the resident told her his family brought it in and he used it on his arms for the scabs. She removed the cream and will see about getting an order for it and complete an assessment for the resident to apply the cream himself.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained related to the computer screen being left open with resident information visible on 1 of 2 units throughout the facility. (The 100 unit)Finding includes:During a random observation on 7/21/25 at 10:22 a.m., the computer screen on the front 100 unit medication cart was left open and resident information was visible. At 10:33 a.m., the computer screen was still open. RN 1 returned to the cart and walked away from the cart at 10:35 a.m. The RN did not close the computer prior to walking away. At 10:41 a.m., the RN returned to the medication cart. At 10:44 a.m., she walked away from the medication cart to answer a phone call, again, she did not close the computer prior to walking away. The RN returned to the medication cart at 10:46 a.m. At 10:50 a.m., the RN walked away from the medication cart with resident information visible. Staff and other residents were observed in the hallway at that time. During an interview on 7/23/25 at 4:45 p.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a stat (immediate) chest X-ray was reported timely, eye drops were administered as ordered by the physician, a skin tear was treated and monitored, and a resident was treated for constipation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation. (Residents B and G)Findings include: 1. The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/22/25 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, kidney failure, heart failure, high blood pressure, falls, glaucoma, and heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/14/25, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Care Plan, dated 3/10/25, indicated the resident had visual impairment related to glaucoma. The approaches were to instill medication as per physician orders. A Care Plan, dated 3/17/25, indicated the resident had a skin tear to the right great toe. A Care Plan, dated 3/18/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound vac (vacuum) tubing was kept off the floor and treatments were followed as ordered by the physician for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents F and 44)Findings include:1. During random observations on 7/21/25 at 10:36 a.m., on 7/22/25 at 3:40 p.m., on 7/23/25 at 9:38 a.m., 11:40 a.m., 12:10 p.m., and 2:39 p.m., and on 7/24/25 at 11:14 a.m., Resident F was observed in bed. At those times a wound vac (a specialized dressing and a vacuum pump that creates gentle suction on a wound to help it heal faster) was contained in a bag and observed on the floor next to the bed. The wound vac tubing was not contained and was laying directly on the floor. On 7/24/25 at 11:26 a.m., LPN 1 entered the room and observed the wound vac tubing on the floor.During an interview at that time, LPN 1 indicated the tubing should be contained inside the bag and off the floor.During a wound treatment observation 7/25/25 at 10:30 a.m. the resident was observed with a large wound to the sacrum. The wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure indwelling Foley (urinary) catheter tubing was kept off the floor, urinary outputs were documented, and urinalysis was collected in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents H and E)Findings include:1. During random observations on 7/21/25 at 10:16 a.m. and 12:40 p.m., Resident H was observed sitting in a wheelchair. At those times, an indwelling Foley catheter was observed underneath the wheelchair and the bottom of the bag was on the floor. The record for Resident H was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 10:07 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right femur fracture, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition where urine flows backward from the bladder into the ureters and potentially the kidneys), urine retention and chronic kidney disease. The 6/26/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and had an indwelling Foley catheter. The Care Plan, dated 6/13/25, indicated the resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs and health supplements were completed for a resident with a history of weight loss for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 3)Finding includes:The record for Resident F was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 10:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis of the sacral region, COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), acute respiratory failure, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, emphysema, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/10/25, indicated the resident was moderately intact for daily decision making and needed supervision and set up assistance with eating. She weighed 93 pounds and received a regular diet. The Care Plan, dated 6/20/25, indicated the resident was at nutritional risk related to a pressure ulcer. The approaches were to serve a four-ounce house supplement at breakfast, lunch, and dinner and to monitor meal intakes. The resident weighed 93 pounds on 5/31/25. The resident weighed 89…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to a resident's temperature on the Infection Control Assessment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary tract and respiratory infections, completed meal consumption and monitoring intake of nutritional supplements for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition, discontinuing pressure injury treatments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and the documentation of oxygen when not in use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. (Residents 25, 40, 48 and 11) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 5/20/24 at 2:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive uropathy, urine retention, high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's dementia. The 5/1/24 admission minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for decision making. The resident was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferences were honored related to the type of diet they received for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident 50) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/16/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 50 indicated there was one issue that kept upsetting her. She indicated her doctor told her she could have whatever she wanted to eat, however, the staff here kept telling her she cannot have certain items. On Mother's Day, she was in the dining room and everyone at her table received ham and she got something else to eat. She asked the staff if she could have a piece of ham and was told No. She then handed the person the plate and said I want ham so get it for me please. The staff took the plate and brought back a piece of ham and mashed potatoes but there was no gravy on the potatoes. She asked the staff where the gravy was for the potatoes, and the staff stated, Well you wanted the ham so you do not get gravy on the potatoes because that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure individualized Care Plans were developed and implemented related to behaviors for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for care plan development and implementation. (Resident 22) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 5/16/24 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 22 voiced concerns of another resident stealing items from her room and indicated the same resident smacked her in the face after she had snatched a marker out of the other resident's hand. The resident indicated this resident consistently steals from everyone and she was attempting to stop her from stealing the marker. She indicated the Director of Nursing was informed about the incident. The resident's allegations of abuse were reported to the Administrator on 5/16/24 at 11:55 a.m. The Administrator indicated she was unaware of this incident and would report and investigate the matter. Resident 22's record was reviewed on 5/16/24 at 11: 00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive and anxiety disorder. An Annual Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bruised areas were assessed and monitored, and non-pressure skin treatments were completed as ordered, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents 40 and 6) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 5/17/24 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 40 was observed in a recliner chair in her room. At that time, a bruise was noted under the left eye. On 5/20/24 at 12:10 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in a wheelchair eating lunch in the main dining room. At that time, the bruise remained under the left eye. The record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 5/17/24 at 11:14 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included,but were not limited to, fractured ribs, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, acute kidney failure, falls, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and anxiety. The 4/24/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLER'S MERRY MANOR — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN