Miller's Merry Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 94.5 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 1). Finding includes: A record review was completed on 4/4/2025 at 11:40 A.M., for Resident 1. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic pain, anxiety and depression. A Fall assessment, dated 1/10/2025, indicated Resident 1 fell in her room while being transferred from her bed to her wheelchair by a staff member. When the staff member assisted the resident to stand, her knees buckled and the resident fell onto her right knee. A Post IDT (interdisciplinary team) Fall Risk assessment, dated 1/10/2025 indicated the root cause for Resident 1's fall was because a gait belt was not used during the transfer. The assessment indicated the staff member was counseled on the proper use of a gait belt. A Fall assessment, dated 3/13/2025 indicated Resident 1 fell attempting to toilet herself via her wheelchair. It indicated the resident was found during rounds on the bathroom floor by a staff member. The assessment indicated a new intervention to keep her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide independent leisure activities for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 61) Finding includes: During an observation, on 4/2/2025 at 9:34 A.M. and 2:40 P.M., Resident 61 was observed in bed with her eyes closed without any visual or hearing sensory activities. During an observation, on 4/3/2025 at 2:17 P.M., Resident 61 was observed in bed with her eyes closed without any visual or hearing sensory activities. During an observation, on 4/4/2025 at 10:51 A.M., Resident 61 was observed in her Broda chair at the bedside with her eyes closed. There were no stimulating activities occurring in her room. During an observation, on 4/7/2025 at 8:56 A.M., Resident 61 was observed sitting in the hallway outside her room in a Broda chair. At 9:41 A.M. and 1:53 P.M., she was observed in her bed with her eyes closed and without any visual or hearing sensory activities. During an observation, on 4/8/2025 at 10:21 A.M., Resident 61 was observed in her bed with her eyes closed. A record review for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the recommended laboratory work recommended per the facility dietician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 76) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 76 was completed on 4/3/2025 at 1:09 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: fracture of the left femur, mild cognitive impairment and chronic kidney disease stage 3b. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/2025, indicated Resident 76 was cognitively intact and had a stage 2 and 3 pressure ulcer that were not present on admission. A Nursing Progress Note, on 12/2/2024 at 5:47 P.M., indicated Resident 76 had laboratory kidney function values of a blood urea nitrogen of 96 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliters) with a normal range of 7-20 mg/dL and a creatinine of 2.9 mg/dL with a normal range of 0.7-1.3 mg/dL An Admission/Annual/Significant Change/Other Registered Dietician Assessment, dated 1/2/2025, indicated to nursing a suggestion to monitor kidney function due to high protein supplementation and chronic kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and were labeled and dated for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (Windsor 1) Finding includes: During a medication storage observation, on 4/7/2025 at 2:00 P.M., with QMA 4, the following was observed: - an opened and undated bottle of dorzolamide eye drops with no resident identifiers. - an unsealed and unlabeled package of petrolatum gauze dressing. - an open and undated bottle of lactulose (stool softener). During an interview, on 4/07/2025 at 2:09 P.M., QMA 4 indicated the eye drops should have been labeled and dated. The lactulose should have been dated and the gauze dressing should have been sealed and labeled. On 4/8/2025 at 8:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing provided the policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated, 12/26/2024, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .3. All medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label . 8.Expiration Dating . 5. When the original…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow general Infection Control Practices for 1 of 1 staff observed providing a skin treatment and failed to use a barrier when obtaining a blood sugar sample for 1 of 1 staff observed for insulin administration. (LPN 2 & RN 5) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 4/4/2025 at 10:00 A.M., LPN 2 was observed to complete a skin treatment on Resident 145's inner left glueteal cleft. LPN 4 applied gloves and assisted Resident 145 to lay on his right side. LPN 4 removed the dressing from the resident's inner cleft, then removed her right-hand glove and applied a new glove. LPN 4 opened a package of comfort foam dressing. She applied a small amount of Medi-honey (wound gel) to a cotton tipped applicator and then applied the gel to the left gluteal cleft. LPN 4 then placed the foam dressing over the open area. LPN 4 removed the right-hand glove, then used a marker to write the date on the dressing. She applied a new glove to her right hand and assisted the resident to position in the bed. She then applied…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food brought in by outside sources and placed in resident nourishment refrigerators was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety and used for food and beverages only, for 3 out of 4 pantry rooms reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 67 of 67 residents who reside on the units. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/2/2024 at 1:32 P.M., the Boulevard unit pantry had an opened container with 5 slices of cheesecake, an opened package of milk chocolate morsels, and 3 full containers of Culver's ice cream in the refrigerator without a label. 2. During an observation on 5/3/3035 at 1:36 P.M., the Windsor unit pantry had a large blue ice pack in the freezer compartment only. The Dietary Manager did not know why it was in there. During an interview on 5/2/2024 at 1:38 P.M., CNA 9 indicated the ice pack was used for a resident and had been placed on her hip when she asked for it. LPN 8 then indicated that was where she had always seen it placed, but it should not be in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and clarify a change in advanced directive status related to not keeping physician orders current with a resident's advanced directive instructions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. (Resident B) Finding includes: A record review for Resident B was completed on 4/30/2024 at 10:38 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, atrial fibrillation, and status post below the knee amputation. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/16/2024, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact and was receiving hospice services. Advanced Directive forms indicated the following: - An Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate was signed by the Medical Director on 2/9/2024. - An Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated, 3/13/2024, indicated, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation, comfort measures, use of antibiotics for infection only, and no artificial nutrition. The POST was signed by Resident B on 3/13/2024, and the facility Nurse Practitioner signed the form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance related to shaving and nail care, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 234) Finding includes: During an observation on 4/29/2024 at 10:01 A.M., Resident 234 was observed to have long facial hair and long fingernails with a brown/black substance underneath them. Resident 234 indicated he did not normally have a beard, and preferred to not have a beard. He indicated his wife had requested for him to be shaved. During an observation on 5/1/2024 at 10:52 A.M., Resident 234 was observed to not have the longer beard hair, but still had significant stubble on his face. Resident 234 indicated his wife shaved him yesterday. Resident E continued to have long fingernails with the black/brown substance under the nails. A record review for Resident 234 was completed on 5/1/2024 at 12:49 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: urinary tract infection, sepsis, quadriplegia, and diabetes mellitus type 2. An admission Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care for a central venous catheter (a long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein that leads to the heart) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotics (Resident 234) and failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Resident 236) Findings include: 1. During an observation on, 4/29/2024 at 10:01 A.M., Resident 234's central venous catheter to the right chest had a transparent dressing dated 4/19. A record review was completed on 5/1/2024 at 12:49 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: urinary tract infection, sepsis, quadriplegia, and diabetes mellitus type 2. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/24/2024, indicated Resident 234 had intravenous access with medications administered. A Physician Order dated, 4/25/2024, indicated to change the transparent dressing to the intravenous line every 7 days and as needed if soiled or loose. A Care Plan dated 4/19/2024, indicated Resident 234 had an intravenous infusion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment/tubing was properly stored when not in use and cleaned, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 46 & 62) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 4/29/2024 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 42 indicated he slept in his recliner, so the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine was on top of his bed. The tubing and mask were on top of the machine uncovered. The staff had not cleaned the mask or the tubing for the past 3 months. During an observation on 4/30/2024 at 9:42 A.M., the mask and tubing were lying on the bed not covered. During an observation and interview on 5/1/2024 at 2:30 P.M., he indicated no one had cleaned his CPAP tubing or mask yesterday, it was sitting on his bed uncovered. A record review was completed for Resident 42, on 5/1/2024 at 2:16 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's Disease with dyskinesia, and obstructive sleep apnea. A Physician's Order, dated 3/31/2023, indicated to disinfect tubing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLER'S MERRY MANOR — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN