Miller's Merry Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident S and U). This deficient practice resulted in a hand injury and extensive bruising for 1 of 3 residents. (Resident S) Findings include:A report, dated 9/29/25, alleged Resident U had several physical altercations with Resident S due to Resident S wandering into her room. It was alleged there had been no interventions put in place to protect Resident S and staff had been instructed to not document these altercations. It was alleged during one of the altercations, Resident U had caused bruises on Resident S. Resident S had been kicked, punched, and swung at by Resident U, who had allegedly had similar behaviors at another nursing facility prior to being admitted . On 10/6/25, from 11:20 A.M. to 11:40 A.M., residents were observed on the secured memory care unit (MCU). There were 11 female residents on the secured unit. Two residents, Resident S and an unknown resident, were observed walking throughout the hall and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect Resident Funds from misappropriation related to theft of funds by an employee. (Employee 2) This deficiant practice was corrected on 4/30/2026, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: During a record review of an incident that had occurred on 4/27/2026, Employee 2 had called to self-report she had borrowed $40.00 from petty cash and $240.00 from the Resident Trust account. Employee 2 was immediately terminated and a police report was filed. The corporate Field Accountant and the Regional [NAME] President were notified as well. In addition, an audit had been completed of financial and resident facility accounts. The Petty Cash Count Form showed a General Ledger total of $200.00 and total cash as $159.65. A withdraw in cash of $40.35 was noted on the form.The Resident Trust Cash Box showed a General Ledger total of $250.00 and total cash as $10.00. A withdraw in cash of $240.00 was noted on the form.A statement from Employee 2 on 4/27/2026 indicated she had admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 5) Findings included:1.The clinical record of Resident 5 was reviewed on 12/3/2025 at 2:02 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, adult failure to thrive, emphysema, difficulty in walking and pressure ulcer of the right hip. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/30/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An admission MDS assessment, completed on 5/15/2025, indicated it was very important for Resident 5 to do her favorite activities but the assessment had not identified her favorite activities.A Physician's Order, dated 5/8/2025, indicated Resident 5 could participate in an individual activity program according to the resident's care plan.Resident 5's clinical record lacked an individualized care plan related to activities.During an interview, on 12/4/2025 at 1:45 P.M., the Activity Director indicated there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the treatment plan for a resident with a pressure injury and failed to notify the provider and responsible party of a worsening pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents who were reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 15)Finding includes:Resident 15 was observed in bed and was not wearing a palm guard on her left hand during the following observations: 12/1/2025 at 10:44 A.M., 12/1/2025 at 2:15 P.M. and 12/3/2025 at 9:44 A.M.Resident 15's record review was completed on 12/3/2025 at 10:45 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, major depressive disorder, contracture of the left elbow and left hand. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/12/2025, indicated Resident 15 had severely impaired cognition and had one unhealed stage 2 pressure injury. A current Care Plan initiated on 5/21/2025 indicated Resident 15 was at risk of complications related to her left-hand contracture. Resident 15's Care Plan had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions related to fall prevention for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. This resulted in the resident incurring a fall from her wheelchair and sustaining facial bruising and two skin tears (Resident 9) In addition, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided related to the use of an electrical power strip and coffee maker in 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 1) Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident B was completed on 12/4/2025 at 10:00 A.M. Diagnosis for Resident B included, but was not limited to, history of falling. A nursing progress note, dated 11/4/2025, indicated Resident B was found lying face down on the floor in front of her wheelchair on 11/4/2025 at 5:45 P.M. by a staff member. Resident B's face was bruised, and she had sustained 2 skin tears. A current Care Plan Problem, related to falls included an intervention initiated 7/2/2024. The intervention indicated Resident B was to be assisted into her recliner or into bed when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure employee certifications were active for 2 of 28 employees whose certifications were reviewed. This has the potential to effect 45 of the 45 residents who resided in the facility. (Employee 3 & 4)Findings Include:A review of the employee certifications was completed on [DATE] at 11:00 A.M. Employee 3, a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) had a hire date was [DATE]. Employee 3's CNA certification had expired on [DATE].A review of the facility schedule indicated Employee 3 had worked on the following recent dates at the facility as a CNA: 11/6, 11/10, 11/11, 11/13, 11/15-18, 11/20, 11/21, 11/24, 11/25, 11/30, 12/1 and [DATE].During an interview on [DATE] at 11:50 A.M., Employee 3 indicated she had not known her CNA certification had expired on [DATE].2. Employee 4 was hired on [DATE].Employee 4's QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) certification had expired on [DATE] and her CNA certification had expired on [DATE].A review of the facility's recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be informed and involved in care planning was upheld for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident O).Findings include:A report, dated 9/11/25, indicated Resident O had been prescribed opioid pain medication to be given routinely every 4 hours. The resident had taken the opioid as prescribed and alleged they had experienced withdrawal symptoms when they requested the medication be decreased in dose and frequency.During an interview, on 10/8/25 at 12:36 P.M., with Resident O she indicated she had had a short-term stay at the facility in August 2025 for rehabilitation following a right knee replacement and had since been discharged home. She indicated, during her stay, she was prescribed pain medication which was to be taken every 4 hours. Resident O indicated she was told by a nurse, she should take the medication as prescribed to keep ahead of the pain. She indicated she had missed a dose of pain medication, one day during her stay, and started to feel sick. She was given the pain medication 2 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse were reported for 2 of 2 cognitively impaired residents reviewed for abuse (Resident S and Resident U).Findings include:A report, dated 9/29/25, alleged Resident U had several physical altercations with Resident S due to Resident S wandering into her room. It was alleged there had been no interventions put in place to protect Resident S and staff had been instructed to not document these altercations. It was alleged during one of the altercations, Resident U had caused bruises on Resident S from kicking, punching, and swinging at her. On 10/6/25 at 12:30 P.M., Resident S's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included early-onset Alzheimer's and severe dementia without behaviors. A Nurses Progress note, dated 9/9/25 at 4:30 P.M., indicated Resident S had a 1-centimeter (cm) skin tear to her left hand due to Resident U hitting her hand. Resident S's family and staff had witnessed the altercation between Resident S and Resident U. There was no follow up documentation, investigation completed or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective behavior care plan, behavior monitoring and documentation was completed related to dementia for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia needs. (Resident U). Findings include:A report, dated 9/29/25, alleged Resident U had several physical altercations with another resident who would wander into her room. It was alleged there had been no interventions put in place to protect the other resident and staff had been instructed to not document these altercations. It was alleged during one of the altercations, Resident U caused bruises on the other resident from being kicked, punched, and swung at. Resident U allegedly had similar behaviors at another nursing facility prior to being admitted . On 10/6/25 at 12:12 P.M., Resident U's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, and sleep disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/19/25, indicated Resident U had moderately impaired cognition, had no mood indicators but had had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with depression for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan development. (Resident 34) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 34 was completed on 1/9/2024 at 2:21 P.M. Resident 34's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: depression and cerebral infarction. Resident 34's record lacked the documentation to show she had a care plan for depression. An interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) was completed on 1/11/2024 at 10:10 A.M. The SSD indicated that Resident 34 didn't have a care plan for depression, but should have had a care plan for depression. On 1/11/2024 at 3:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a policy, dated 1/24/2020 and titled, Care Plan Development and Review. The DON indicated that the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated, .2. Care Plan Development: A. An interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident, physician and representative will develop a comprehensive care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a fall care plan with a new interventions after a fall for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident 27) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/8/2024 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 27 indicated he had a fall but was unsure of the date. A record review was completed on 1/11/2024 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: heart failure, presence of left artificial hip, and difficulty walking. An MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 12/22/2023, indicated Resident 27 had intact cognition, transferred with supervision of one staff assist, toileting with supervision of one staff assist, independent with walking and walker. A Care Plan, dated 1/19/2022, indicated Resident 27 was at risk for falls related to condition and risk factors and required the use of assistive devices. Interventions included but were not limited to: encourage to use call light and wait for staff to assist as needed, although likes to toilet self, encourage resident to use handrails or assistive devices properly, encourage and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLER'S MERRY MANOR — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 39% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN