Cedars The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.44 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.78 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 7, Resident 18 and Resident 20).Findings include: Resident 7's record was reviewed on 8/29/25 at 12:29 PM. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that leads to blood clots) and anemia. Resident 7's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 (moderate cognitive impairment). A physician order, dated 7/1/25, indicated Resident 7 was to be administered warfarin sodium (warfarin) 4 milligrams (mg) every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday for prevention of blood clots. A physician order, dated 7/5/25, indicated Resident 7 was to be administered warfarin 5 mg every Saturday and Sunday. The physician order indicated warfarin was not to be administered on Monday 8/11/25 and Tuesday 8/12/25. A lab report, dated 8/11/25, indicated Resident 7's blood clotting time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident specific accident prevention interventions were implemented for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 7 and Resident 21).Findings include: Resident 7's record was reviewed on 8/29/25 at 12:29 PM. Diagnoses included dementia and right upper arm fracture. Resident 7's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 (moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 7 had no impairment of their arms or legs. The MDS indicated Resident 7 required staff supervision or touching assistance with walking. The MDS indicated Resident 7 had experienced 2 falls. A clinical assessment log indicated Resident 7 had experienced falls on the following dates: 1/18, 1/20, 1/21, 3/28, 7/30, 7/31, 8/6, 8/9, 8/12, 8/15, 8/17, 8/20, 8/22, and 8/26/25. Resident 7's care plan, dated 2/6/25, indicated they had a behavior of not waiting for staff assistance. The target goal was to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed when expired and labeled when opened for 3 of 6 residents reviewed. (Resident 35, Resident 24, and Resident 39) On [DATE] at 9:40 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 5 was observed preparing medications for Resident 35. An opened vial of Resident 35's insulin was observed to have a handwritten open date of [DATE]. RN 5 indicated the inulin should have been disposed of 30 days after the open date.On [DATE] at 9:47 AM, RN 5 was observed examining open medications in the medication cart. RN 5 indicated Resident 24's eye lubricant had been opened and had not been labeled with an open date. RN 5 indicated Resident 39's inhaler had been opened and had not been labeled with an open date. RN 5 indicated all medications should be labeled with the date the medication had been opened.Resident 35's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:55 AM. Resident 35 had been diagnosed with diabetes.A physician order indicated Resident 35 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident B). Findings include: Resident B's record was reviewed on 6/30/25 at 11:30 AM. Diagnosis included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. A report, dated 6/18/25, was provided by the Administrator on 6/30/25 at 12:33 PM. The report indicated on 6/19/25, Resident B's family reported they had observed staff talking about Resident B on their camera while care was provided to Resident B on 6/18/25. The family reported staff had indicated Resident B did not like them. An investigation timeline, dated 6/18/25 - 6/19/25, was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/30/25 at 11:30 AM. The timeline indicated the following: On 6/18/25, the DON and Administrator met with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 for discussion of Resident B's care concerns per the family observation on Resident B's room camera. CNA 2 indicated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident B). Findings include: A facility reported incident, dated 2/15/25, was provided by the Administrator on 2/17/25 at 10:58 AM. The report indicated Resident B had a fall with resultant fracture involving the distal fibula with no displacement. Resident B's record was reviewed on 2/17/25 at 11:25 AM, diagnosis included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and dementia. A nursing note, dated 2/15/25, indicated Resident B was found in the bathroom at 9:40 AM alone on the floor due to a self transfer. The note indicated Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 3 assisted Resident B onto the toilet, exited the room, then found Resident B on the bathroom floor around 10 AM. A nursing note, dated 2/15/25, timed 3:11 PM, indicated Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 4 noticed swelling and bruising at Resident B's ankle. An X-ray was ordered and indicated a fracture involved the distal fibula with no displacement. A care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food items were laebled and stored to prevent contamination and hand hygiene was performed consistently. 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 9/9/24 at 9:16 AM, a container of chopped lettuce was observed in an assembly area with no date on the container. The lettuce was observed to have brown and yellow edges. [NAME] 2 indicated the lettuce appeared old and should not be used. A container of grape tomatoes was observed in the assembly area with no date on the container. A package of polish sausage was wrapped in foil in the freezer with no date found on the package. Bags containing corn, peas and potatoes were also found open with the packaging twisted and tied with a twist-tie in the walk-in freezer with no open dates. [NAME] 2 indicated items should be labeled and dated when opened. A package was observed in the walk-in cooler labeled turkey 9/1-9/7. [NAME] 2 indicated the turkey was expired and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided with required transfer information for a hospital transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: Resident 37's record was reviewed on 9/11/24 at 2:28 PM. Diagnoses included dementia, cognitive communication deficit, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia. Resident 37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 6 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 37 was being administered anticoagulants (blood thinners). A Health Status Note, dated 5/31/24 at 12:10 AM, indicated Resident 37 had been transferred to the hospital by an ambulance due to critical laboratory results. An admission summary, dated [DATE] at 11:33 PM, indicated Resident 37 had returned from the hospital at 3:00 PM. A hopsital transfer form was unable to be located in the resident's record for the date of 5/31/24. In an interview, on 9/13/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders related to a high-risk medication were clarified and followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: Resident 37's record was reviewed on 9/11/24 at 2:28 PM. Diagnoses included dementia, cognitive communication deficit, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia. Resident 37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 6 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 37 was being administered Eliquis (blood thinner). An Order Note, dated 5/21/24 at 12:13 PM, indicated Resident 37 had a moderate amount of rectal bleeding. New orders were obtained from the Nurse Practitioner (NP). The new orders and labs were noted into the facility laboratory (lab) system and Resident 37's medical record. A physician order, dated 5/21/24, indicated Resident 37 was to have blood tests drawn for a complete blood count (counts the different blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: During wound care observation, on 9/11/24 at 10:29 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 entered Resident 12's room where a tray of supplies was prepared on the bedside table containing a pair of scissors, dressing supplies, wound cleanser, and Dakins solution. LPN 5 opened the Dakins solution and poured about 10 ml in a plastic cup. She then opened a jar of wound packing, pulled out about 1 inch of packing, cut it with the scissors, and placed the packing in the cup of solution. She poured wound cleanser in another cup and placed a piece of gauze in the cup. LPN 5 removed the dressing and packing for Resident 12's right hip wound and then picked up a prepared plastic cup containing the wound cleanser and cleaned the wound with the gauze, then patted it dry with a dry piece of gauze. No hand hygiene or glove change was observed. LPN 5 picked up the cup of Dakin's solution and had the soaked packing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: During an observation and interview, on 9/9/24 at 10:41 AM, Resident 29 was observed lying in bed with an oxygen concentrator positioned near the bed with tubing and a nasal cannula lying on top of the concentrator. The nasal cannula was not contained in a bag. The Director of Nursing (DON) indicated oxygen tubing not in use should be bagged to prevent contamination. During an observation, on 9/10/24 at 10:17 AM, Resident 19's oxygen concentrator was observed positioned near the bed with tubing and a nasal cannula lying on top of the concentrator. The nasal cannula was not contained in a bag. Resident 29's record was reviewed on 9/9/24 at 1:30 PM. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with early onset, dyspnea, unspecified and heart failure unspecified. Resident 29's current significant change Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $13K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN