No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Manderley Health Care Center

806 S Buckeye St, Osgood, IN 47037 · For profit - Corporation · 71 certified beds · (812) 689-4143 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 689-4143 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 20 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
112 N Buckeye St · (812) 689-3424 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
221 S High St · (812) 689-5553 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Jay C<0.1 mi
711 S Buckeye St · (812) 689-4082 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1820 W County Rd 300 N · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1384 W County Road 300 · (812) 689-5950

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.8%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.5%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.1%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.0%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.5%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.8%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.6%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.1%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.4%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.971.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.491.441.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 40.7–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.0–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.1–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
34.1%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to cardiac medication hold parameters, obtaining vital signs and weights, and notifying the physician of weight changes for 3 of 17 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 3, 40 and 14)Findings include: 1.Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed on 01/21/2026 at 2:34 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (decline in mental abilities), anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), and orthostatic hypotension(sustained increase in blood pressure after standing). A Pharmacy Consultant Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber, dated 07/02/2025, indicated the resident had an order for Midodrine 2.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day. The resident's blood pressures were being recorded twice a day, and some Systolic Blood Pressures (SBP) (top number) were measuring 130 or higher.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner for 2 of 3 kitchen observations and unmarked random food containers in the resident snack refrigerator for 1 of 1 resident snack refrigerators observed. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 01/20/2026 at 10:33 A.M., the following was observed: -a large, enclosed meal tray cart had a tray on top with a toaster sitting on the tray. The tray was heavily littered with breadcrumbs. An unlabeled respiratory medication inhaler was sitting on top of the cart within an inch of a bottle of seasoning spices, -The walk-in freezer had two frozen bottles of water, one was a green two-liter bottle, one was a clear old juice bottle, both were stained brown. The DM indicated they regularly used the bottles to cool down the pitchers of prepared iced tea, -An open rack of dishes consisting of small bowls and plates was littered with crumbs, the DM indicated they were clean dishes, -One large trash can that sat at the end of a food prep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's ordered blood tests for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 9)Findings include:Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed on 01/21/2026 at 2:49 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/06/2026, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia (deficiency of health red blood cells), hypertension (high blood pressure), hypothyroidism (under active thyroid), and seizure disorder (neurological condition characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures). The resident's current medication orders included, but were not limited to, the following:- An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 07/10/2025, for Synthroid, 25 Micrograms daily for hypothyroidism.- An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 07/10/2025, for Depakote Sprinkles capsules, 500 milligrams twice a day for a seizure disorder.The resident's current physician's orders included an open-ended order, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow appropriate food handling guidelines related to food storage, open dating, and protecting food and drinks from gnats. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 47 of 48 residents receiving food and drink items from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.a. During an observation, on 07/21/25 at 8:07 A.M., of the facilities kitchen refrigerators, freezers, and dry food storage the following was observed: - a raw premade frozen hamburger patty was lying on the floor of the freezer in the back left corner of the kitchens walk in freezer, - Two popsicles were lying on the floor under the shelves in the walk-in freezer, - An undated, half full, opened half gallon of nectar thick orange juice was in the refrigerator, - An undated, three fourths full, opened half gallon of nectar thick cranberry juice was in the refrigerator, and - Three unopened salt packets, lying on the floor, in the center walkway of the floor into the dry food storage area. During an interview and observation, on 07/21/25 at 8:25 A.M., Kitchen Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained and the facility was free of gnats. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 47 of 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 07/21/25 at 8:07 A.M., in the kitchen there were multiple gnats observed flying in the air near the dry food storage area. Upon entering the dry storage room, the number of gnats increased. Five gnats landed on an unopened bag of cereal on a shelf at eye level. Three gnats landed on an unopened can of cheese approximately four feet off the ground on a metal shelf. A blue light was in the dry food storage area, plugged into the wall inside the doorway. The device was approximately two inches wide by five inches long. It had a plastic cover housing the blue light and a tacky substance strip on the inside covered in an abundance of dead gnats. Kitchen Staff 3 indicated the gnats had been an ongoing problem for months within the kitchen. A company came in to clean the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner during a meal service for 1 of 2 dining observations. (Resident 15) Findings include: Meal service was observed in the Main Dining Room on 01/27/25 at 12:01 P.M. At 12:10 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 stood upright next to Resident 15's wheelchair, to the resident's left side, with the resident's head at chest height to the CNA. The CNA was saying the resident's name over and over again, to get her attention, as she spooned food into the resident's mouth. Several empty chairs were observed in the dining room. Another staff member was sitting down in a chair, at the same table, assisting another resident with their meal. CNA 6 continued to stand over Resident 15 while she assisted the resident with her meal until 12:36 P.M. The clinical record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 01/28/25 at 1:29 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident records in a private manner related to information visible on a computer screen and on top of a medication cart for 2 of 6 random observations. (100 and 300 Hall Medication Carts) Findings include: 1. During a continuous observation on 01/27/25 from 2:17 P.M. to 2:39 P.M., the 100 Hall Medication Cart was left unattended. Resident 249's information was visible on the screen, - On 01/27/25 at 2:17 P.M., two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) walked by the medication cart. - On 01/27/25 at 2:23 P.M., The computer screen on the medication cart remained unattended. - On 01/27/25 at 2:25 P.M., two CNAs walked by the medication cart. - On 01/27/25 at 2:28 P.M., a CNA walked by the medication cart. - On 01/27/25 at 2:31 P.M., RN 3 walked to the medication cart, made some notes on a piece of paper, and walked back to the nurse's station without closing the computer screen. - On 01/27/25 at 2:33 P.M., a Laundry Aide walked by the medication cart. - On 01/27/25 at 2:38 P.M., two CNAs and a Laundry Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 01/28/25 at 10:05 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/10/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hip and knee replacement, hypertension, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain syndrome. A physician's order, dated 09/06/24 through 01/23/25, indicated the resident was to take Midodrine 10 mg, three times a day for low blood pressure. The staff were to hold the medication when the resident's systolic blood pressure (top) number was greater than 110 or the diastolic blood pressure (bottom number) was greater than 70. A current open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 01/23/25, indicated the resident was to take Midodrine 10 mg, with meals for low blood pressure. The staff were to hold the medication when the resident's systolic blood pressure number was greater than 110 or the diastolic blood pressure was greater than 70. The current November and December 2024 and January 2025 EMAR indicated the resident had received the Midodrine when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to treat a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for UTIs. (Resident 1) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 01/28/25 at 2:10 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/07/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, aortic valve disorder, urinary retention, and hypertension. A Nursing Note, dated 11/02/24 (Saturday) at 11:51 P.M., indicated new physician's orders were received to obtain a Urinalysis and Culture and Sensitivity (UA/CS). A Nursing Note, dated 11/03/24 (Sunday) at 8:38 A.M., indicated the resident denied pain or discomfort but experienced frequent incontinent episodes and frequent feelings of needing to void. The resident's urine had a strong odor. The laboratory (lab) report for the urinalysis indicated the resident's urine was collected on 11/06/24 (Wednesday) and the results were reported on 11/08/24 (Friday). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. (100-Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: During a continuous observation on 01/27/25 from 2:17 P.M. to 2:39 P.M., the 100-Hall Medication Cart was unlocked and left unattended, - On 01/27/25 at 2:17 P.M., two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) walked by the medication cart, - On 01/27/25 at 2:23 P.M., The medication cart remained unlocked and unattended, - On 01/27/25 at 2:25 P.M., two CNAs walked by the medication cart, - On 01/27/25 at 2:28 P.M., a CNA walked by the medication cart, - On 01/27/25 at 2:31 P.M., RN 3 walked to the medication cart, made some notes on a piece of paper, and walked back to the nurse's station without locking the medication cart, - On 01/27/25 at 2:33 P.M., a Laundry Aide walked by the medication cart, and - On 01/27/25 at 2:38 P.M., two CNAs and a Laundry Aide walked by the medication cart. During an observation and interview on 01/27/25 at 2:39 P.M., RN 3 approached the medication cart and indicated the Qualified Medication Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a blood test and a urinalysis for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 1) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:10 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, and aortic valve disorder. The resident's [DATE] physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following: - An order, with a start date of [DATE], to administer warfarin (an anticoagulant) medication. The resident was to receive 3.5 milligrams (mg), every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday and 4 mg every Tuesday and Friday, and - An order, with a start date of [DATE], to obtain a weekly PT/INR (a blood test that measured how long it took for a blood sample to clot). A Nursing Note, dated [DATE] at 4:51P.M., indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store foods in a sanitary manner related to unlabeled and outdated foods for 1 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 45 of 47 resident that receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 01/27/25 at 10:35 A.M., the following items were observed: - A 1/2 full half gallon of lactose free 2% milk that expired on 01/21/25, - An unopened half gallon of lactose free 2% milk that expired on 01/21/25, and - A metal pan 1/3 full of brown gravy. The pan was covered with plastic wrap and dated 01/21/25. During an interview on 01/27/25 at 10:40 A.M., [NAME] 5 indicated the milk and brown gravy were expired and should have been thrown out. The current facility policy, titled Policy: Storage Areas, dated 07/2023, was provided by the Director of Nursing on 01/30/25 at 10:25 A.M. The policy indicated, .Leftover food is used within 3 days or discarded .All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated . 3.1-21(i)(2) 3.1-21(i)(3)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to urinary catheter care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 19) Findings include: 1a. During an observation on 01/27/25 at 1:50 P.M., Resident 19 was lying in bed. His entire urinary catheter bag was lying on the floor. The urine in the tubing appeared to be cloudy. During an observation 01/30/25 at 10:17 A.M., half of the resident's urinary catheter bag was lying on the floor. During an interview and observation on 01/30/25 at 10:18 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 7 indicated the resident's urinary catheter bags should be below bladder level and should not touch the floor. She went to Resident 19's room, donned gloves and removed the urinary catheter bag off the floor and secured it to the side of the bed. The clinical record for the resident was reviewed on 01/29/25 at 10:15 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 of 3 dining observations. (Main Dining Room and 300 Hall Room Trays) Findings include: 1.a. During and observation and interview in the Main Dining Room on 03/04/24 at 12:13 P.M., Resident 4 indicated his meatloaf was not done and was pink in the middle. His meatloaf had a quarter size pink spot in the middle. He had asked for a grilled cheese sandwich, which he was eating at that time. Resident 19 was sitting at a different table with her head slumped down, asleep. Her meal tray was sitting in front of her, and her meatloaf was cut into pieces. There was a quarter size spot in the meatloaf that was pink. The Dietary Manager indicated the meat had been frozen and appear raw, but it was not. She would get any resident something else to eat if they wanted it. During an interview on 03/04/24 at 12:22 P.M., RN 8 indicated she had served resident's their meals and assisted with cutting up the meatloaf. She didn't see any concerns with the meat. If she had, she would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident records in a private manner related to records left unattended on the nurse's station counter and a computer screen left open with visible resident information for 3 of 45 residents who resided in the facility. (Residents 27, 14, and 20) Findings include: 1a. During an observation 03/05/24 at 3:27 P.M., the paperwork for Resident 27 was left laying on the upper counter of the nurse's station with a visible doctor's written order. 1b. A report for Resident 14 was visible on top of a stack of several papers. These were the only two visible resident names. Independently mobile residents were walking by the nurse's station. No staff members were sitting at the nurses station near the papers. The current Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy policy with a revised date of October 2017, was provided by the DON on 03/08/24 at 3:23 P.M. The policy indicated, .The facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records .Access to resident personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to hold parameters for a blood pressure medication for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 27) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 03/07/24 at 2:02 P.M. A Quarterly (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 01/23/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertension, heart failure, anxiety, and depression. A current physician's order, with a start date of 01/03/24, indicated the resident was to get Midodrine 10 mg (milligrams), before meals, for hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The staff were to hold the medication if the resident's systolic (top number) blood pressure was greater than 110. The January, February, and March 2024 EMAR/ETAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record/Electronic Treatment Administration Record) indicated the resident had received the medication when the systolic blood pressure was greater than 110 or when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address and monitor weight loss concerns in a timely manner (Residents 41 and 35) and monitor fluid intake (Resident 4) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. Findings include: 1. Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed on 03/07/24 at 11:15 A.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/30/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension and diabetes. The resident was 6' 3'' and weighed 226 Lbs. (pounds). The resident had no swallowing issues and did not receive a therapeutic or mechanically altered diet. Weight loss or weight gain was unknown. The following weights were documented in the resident's EHR (Electronic Health Record): - On 10/23/23 the resident weighed 226.2 Lbs., - On 11/03/23 the resident weighed 227.6 Lbs., - On 11/13/23 the resident weighed 225.2 Lbs., - On 11/14/23 the resident weighed 202.6 Lbs., and - On 11/20/23 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to medication reduction for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 25) Findings include: During an observation on 03/07/24 at 9:00 A.M., Resident 25 was lying in bed, awake and eating breakfast. His call light was in reach, and he had no concerns. The clinical record was reviewed on 03/06/24 at 9:43 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 01/06/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes, anxiety, and depression. The resident had received an antidepressant during the review period. A Care Plan for taking an antidepressant, with a start date of 11/24/23, included an intervention, but was not limited to, .Give antidepressant medications ordered by the physician ., with a start date of 11/24/23. A Psychiatry Progress Note, dated 02/26/24, indicated the resident was to continue Zoloft (sertraline), 50 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders to obtain blood tests for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 12) Findings include: Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed on 03/07/24 at 1:41 P.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 02/22/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). A current physician's order, dated 06/01/23, indicated the resident was to have a CBC (Complete Blood Count), CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel), TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone), Free T4 (Thyroxine), and a Depakote level obtained every six months, in March and September. The resident's record lacked documentation that the blood tests were obtained in September 2023. During an interview on 03/08/24 at 9:45 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated the resident's blood tests were not obtained in September 2023 as ordered by the physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for functioning call lights. (Resident 26) Findings include: During an observation and interview on 03/04/24 at 1:10 P.M., Resident 26 was sitting on the side of his bed. He turned the call light on and indicated it should turn a light on in the hallway. The light in the hallway did not turn on. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 7 indicated the call lights were battery operated and if the batteries were dead then the call light stopped working. The resident would just yell for staff when they walked by if he needed something. During an observation and interview on 03/05/24 at 9:07 A.M., Resident 26's call light was not working. There was no bell or other staff-alerting device in the resident's room. The resident indicated there were no concerns overnight and he would yell for help if he needed something. During an observation on 03/05/24 at 12:10 P.M., Resident 26 was sitting on the bedside commode inside his room with the door open. He was asking for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LAKE FOREST BANK & TRUST COMPANY, N.A.Organization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/01/2022
BORNE-BAUMAN, CANDICEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
FLUECKIGER, RUSSELLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
LEHMAN, SCOTTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
MACKLIN, LARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
MCINTIRE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
SPRUNGER, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
WHEELER, DANEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2022
ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
MANDERLEY OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
OGDEN, MONICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2023
RADADIYA, PRAGNESHKUMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
SMITH, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
GREATOREX, TINAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025
LEISER, ASHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025
SCHIOWITZ, MARCIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025
SEBBAG, GABRIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025
806 S BUCKEYE PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
BLUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
FIRST BANK OF BERNEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$756K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 11%Other / private 20%

This home reported $756K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,260per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155728. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next