Dover Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 78.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-12-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to protect 9 of 15 sampled residents from abuse and neglect. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Residents #79, #5, #63, #18, and #48 from staff-to-resident verbal and/or physical abuse and Resident #21 from staff neglect. In addition, the facility and failed to protect Residents #63, #34, #49, and #231 from resident-to-resident physical and/or verbal abuse. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Protection Plan, dated 09/15/2022, revealed, Our facility does not condone resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, physicians, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, other residents, friends, or other individuals. Further review of the policy revealed, Verbal Abuse - is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 18 sampled residents, Resident (R) 52.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/18/2025, and review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/14/2026, revealed the facility failed to identify R52 had an indwelling catheter. The findings include:Review of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0, dated 10/2025, revealed the intent of the items in this section is to gather information on the use of bowel and bladder appliances, the use of and response to urinary toileting programs, urinary and bowel training programs, and bowel patterns. Each resident who is incontinent or at risk of developing incontinence should be identified, assessed, and provided with individualized treatment (medications, non-medicinal treatments and/or devices) and services to achieve or maintain as normal elimination function as possible. An indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 18 sampled residents, Resident (R) 70. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activity Program, effective 08/04/2024, revealed the facility will provide an on-going activities program to support residents in their choice of activities and to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Review of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0, dated 10/2025, revealed the overall care plan should be oriented towards: 1. Assisting the resident in achieving their goals; and 2. Individualized interventions that honor the resident's preferences. Review of R70's admission Record revealed the facility admitted R70 on 07/14/2024 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 18 sampled residents, Resident (R) 2.The findings include:In an interview with the Administrator on 03/19/2026 at 10:42 AM, she stated the facility did not have a policy related to oxygen administration for residents.Review of R2's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/26/2025 with diagnoses to include acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, other chronic osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic ophthalmic complications.Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/2026, revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.Review of R2's Physician Orders,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the facility's documents, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received a performance review at least once every 12 months for 1 of 4 employee files reviewed, State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) 6.The findings include:Review of the facility's policies revealed no documentation of a policy addressing staff performance evaluations.Review of SRNA6's employee file revealed the facility hired the employee on 06/04/2024; however, further review revealed no documentation of a performance evaluation completed within 12 months of the hire date.In an interview with SRNA6 on 03/18/2026 at 5:38 PM, she stated she thinks she had a performance evaluation in August of 2025, however, no documentation of a completed performance evaluation was available upon request.In an interview with the Administrator on 03/18/2026 at 2:50 PM, she stated she was unable to locate a performance evaluation or training records for SRNA6. She stated it could be misfiled, but was unable to produce any documentation.In further interview with the Administrator on 03/19/2026 at 9:12 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store food safely in two of two nourishment refrigerators as determined by observations on 12/09/2024, the nourishment refrigerators on the A Unit and the B Unit. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Brought in from Outside Sources and Personal Food Storage, dated 2019, revealed foods from outside sources that required refrigeration or freezing would be labeled with the resident's name and date and stored in the refrigerator/freezer. Per the policy, staff would monitor and document the unit refrigerator temperatures. 1. Observation of the B Unit nourishment refrigerator on 12/09/2024 at 1:42 PM revealed an opened container of applesauce and an opened pudding cup in the door of the refrigerator. Further observation revealed grapes and a container of Chinese food was not dated and not labeled. Also observed in the freezer door were two boxes of lemon glycerin swab sticks, one one-half cup of ice cream, and 36 popsicles that were not dated or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the package insert for latanoprost ophthalmic solution, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents and were stored properly for one of four medication carts, the B Wing Upper medication cart. 1. Observation on [DATE] of the B Wing Upper medication cart revealed it was unlocked and unattended. The staff member who was working with the cart was not in the area. 2. Observation on [DATE] of the B Wing Upper medication cart revealed it contained an unopened box of latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% (used to treat glaucoma) belonging to Resident (R) 3, which was labeled refrigerate. There was also an opened box of latanoprost 0.005% belonging to R3, and neither the box nor bottle were dated. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated [DATE], revealed medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0575 — widespread
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post the contact information needed for residents to file concerns with the State Survey Agency (SSA). This deficient practice had the potential to affect eighty-one (81) residents. The findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes covering the timeframe from January 2023 through November 2023 included a list of residents' rights. The resident rights included, The resident has the right to receive information from the agencies acting as client advocates, and be afforded the opportunity to contact these agencies. Observation on 12/09/2023 at 10:08 AM, revealed there was no information on how to contact the SSA to submit grievances was posted in the facility. During an interview on 12/07/2023 at 1:27 PM, Resident #51 stated they had no idea how to contact the SSA to file concerns and had no idea where the number for the SSA was located. During an interview on 12/09/2023 at 10:38 AM, Resident #2 stated they did not know how to contact the SSA and added they had no idea where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to act promptly on grievances from individual residents and from the Resident Council related to call light response times, receiving scheduled showers, and food concerns involving nine (9) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Residents #2, #13, #14, #35, #42, #50, #51, #54, and #58) with the potential to affect eighty-one (81) residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, dated 11/28/2017, revealed the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. It further stated the facility wourl ensure all written grievance decisions would include the date the grievance was received, a summary of the resident grievance, the steps taken to investigate, and a summary of the conclusion. 1. During an observation and interview with Resident #2 on 12/09/2023 at 10:38 AM, the resident stated they had activated their call light at 10:30 AM, per the clock in their room, because they required incontinence care. Resident #2 stated most of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to label and date food items in the reach-in and walk-in coolers; failed to ensure stored cookware was free of food particles and debris; failed to ensure staff maintained the appropriate parts per million (ppm) of available sanitizer for dishes; and failed to ensure staff utilized proper hand hygiene practices and the appropriate use of gloves to prevent food contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 81 residents. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 2019, revealed, All time and temperature control for safety (TCS) foods (including leftovers) should be labeled, covered, and dated when stored. Observation of the kitchen on 12/04/2023 at 8:44 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed the following items were in the kitchen: - A container of leftover ribs in the walk-in cooler with no date or label; - A fruit cup in the reach-in cooler with no date; - 25 cups of dessert in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the mandated timeframes for seven (7) of fifteen (15) residents sampled for allegations of abuse (Residents #184, #79, #5, #63, #48, #34 and #49). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Protection Plan, dated 09/15/2022, revealed, Any individual observing an incident of abuse or suspecting abuse must immediately report such incident to the Administrator or Director of Nursing Services. Further review of the policy revealed, Should a suspected violation or substantial incident or mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, or abuse (including resident to resident abuse) be reported, the facility's Administrator, or his/her designee will promptly notify the following persons or agencies (verbally and written) of such incident: a. The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility. The policy indicated, 3. All alleged violations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$163,742 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $163,742 — penalty dated 2023-12-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BLUEGRASS HEALTH KY — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $879K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY