Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 97.6 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.09 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.09 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions by failing to ensure: 1. Ceiling vents in the kitchen were clean, free of rust and debris; 2. Ceiling tiles (6) in the kitchen and (2) in the adjacent Dining areas were free from water stains. The deficiency had the potential to affect 64 residents who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 06/09/2025 at 8:13 a.m., the initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted with S4DM. The following observations were made in the presence of S4DM during the initial tour: Main Kitchen/cooking Area: Rusty orange and dirty brown large ceiling vent coverings above serving steam table; Rust stains and flakey black debris noted on large ceiling vent covering in dishwashing room; Ceiling tiles (6), ranging from baseball to softball size, contained stains in main kitchen. On 06/09/2025 at 8:40 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4DM. She verified the ceiling vent coverings were dirty, rusty, and needed cleaning in the main kitchen, dining, and dishwasher room areas. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharges in writing for 1 (Resident #97) of 1 (Resident #97) sampled residents reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) revealed in part: Policy: It is the policy of the facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility except in limited circumstances. This policy applies to all residents regardless of their payment source. Definitions: Transfer and Discharge includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical place or not. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same facility. 5. The facility will maintain evidence that the notice was sent to the Ombudsman. Review of Resident #97's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge assessment was completed and transmitted for 1 (#82) of 2 (#82 and #88) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS (Minimum Data Set) 3.0 Completion and dated 05/2023 revealed the following, in part: Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop and interdisciplinary care plan. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2. Types of Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Assessments i. Death Tracking i. Complete when a resident expires in the facility no later than discharge (death) date plus seven calendar days. 7. Transmission Requirements: a. All assessments shall be transmitted to the designated CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days of completion. Review of Resident #82's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was pronounced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan which met the needs of 2 (#26 and #84) of 24 residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #26 was care planned for his preference of a daily bath; and 2. Ensure Resident #84's soft mitt or splint was in place on right hand at all times This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 97 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning Special Needs, with a revision date of 09/2020 revealed the following: Policy: To address special needs, this facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, including medical and nursing care, consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This policy pertains to the following needs: .respiratory care, prostheses .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Pressure Ulcer and at high risk for Pressure Ulcer development received care consistent with professional standards of practice and based on the comprehensive assessment by failing to ensure an air mattress was properly implemented for 1 (#54) of 3 (#45, #54, #150) residents reviewed with Pressure Ulcers. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management with a revision date of 07/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy: This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Evidence-based interventions for prevention will be implemented for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present. Basic or routine care interventions could include, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 (#300) resident reviewed for IV (Intravenous) therapy. The facility failed to monitor and flush a vascular device according to professional standards. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who may require IV antibiotic or fluid therapy. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy dated 09/2024 titled, Intravenous Therapy-LTC revealed, in part: Policy: The facility will adhere to accepted standards of practice regarding infusion practices. Compliance Guidelines: 11. IV sites are checked per facility protocol . 13. IV documentation is recorded in the nurses' notes and/or Medication Administration Record (MAR). Intermittent Medication Infusion: 1. Review and verify practitioner's order for infusion solution or medication . 13. Attach 10ml (milliliter) syringe and confirm patency of vascular access device as per protocol. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#26) of 3 (#10, #19, and #26) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented Resident #26's baths. Findings: Review of Resident #26's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/28/2025 revealed he was dependent on staff assistance for bathing. Review of the C.N.A. (Certified Nursing Assistant) Assignment Sheet dated June 2025 revealed Resident #26 should receive a bath Monday through Saturday. Review of Resident #26's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Flowsheet dated 06/01/2025 to 06/11/2025 revealed no documentation a bath was given on 06/03/2025, 06/05/2025 or 06/07/2025. Review of Resident #26's Nurses' Notes dated June 2025 revealed no documented evidence of refusals of baths. On 06/10/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to meet Hospice requirements by failing to maintain a system to ensure a hospice resident's Clinical Binder contained documentation of Hospice Nurse Visit notes for 1 (#81) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the residents receiving hospice services in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Services Facility Agreement, with a revision date of 10/2020 revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide and/or arrange for hospice services in order to protect a resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with, and access to, persons and services inside and outside the facility. A review of Resident #81's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #81 was a patient of a local hospice agency with a Certification Period of 04/03/2025 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable infection by failing to ensure staff performed appropriate infection control practices during and after incontinence care for 1 (#61) of 3 (#19, #37, and #61) residents observed for incontinence care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care. Compliance Guidelines: Female Wipe from front to back with a clean cloth moistened with water and perineal cleaner (soap). Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene revealed the following, in part: Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, patients, residents, and visitors. Additional considerations: The use of gloves does not replace hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure maintenance services were provided to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 4 (#R1, #R2, #R3 and #R4) residents' rooms observed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure A/C (air conditioning) window units were clean, free of debris, and received regular maintenance Findings: Resident #R1 Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMs of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. An observation was made on 12/23/2024 at 10:30 a.m. of Resident #R1's room A/C window unit. The right and left adjustable louvers of the A/C window unit were covered throughout with a buildup of black substances, spotted flat black stains and a blue glove stuffed into a crevice of one of the louvers. Further observation of the A/C window unit revealed the front panel grill had a buildup of gray dust. An interview was conducted on 12/23/2024 at 10:30 a.m. with Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CARPENTER HEALTH NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA