Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 27.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 113.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by a staff member for 1 (#116) of 22 residents reviewed in the final sample. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm on 04/18/2024 at 11:24 a.m. when surveyor observed S10CNA provide care to Resident #116, a [AGE] year old moderately cognitively impaired resident with a diagnosis of Guillain Barre Syndrome. Upon S10CNA entering the room, Resident #116 became visibly tense throughout her body, hands clenched into tight fist around the side rail, and her eyes filled with tears. S10CNA rushed through care then became argumentative with a rude, aggressive tone and tense body language after the resident requested to have her teeth brushed. This interaction left Resident #116 tearful and her body language tense. Resident #116 stated S10CNA made her feel worthless. Resident #116 reported S10CNA and other CNA staff spoke to her with harsh tones, exhibited negative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure: Food was properly stored, labeled and dated with an open date, or discarded for safety; and Staff documented food temperatures on food served to residents. There were 114 residents who received food served from the kitchen. Review of facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, last revised August 2022, revealed the following, in part:Policy: It is the policy of the facility to procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state and local authorities. Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. B. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms. 3.c. Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include: iv. Labeling,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a trauma-informed, comprehensive person-centered care plan, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (#14) of 30 Residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #14's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).Review of Resident #14's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of Resident #14's most current care plan revealed no documented evidence of a care plan for diagnosis of PTSD. On 04/08/2026 at 1:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. S4LPN stated he was unaware Resident #14 had a diagnosis of PTSD and confirmed he was not familiar with Resident #14's triggers that may result in a mental health crisis. S4LPN reviewed and confirmed Resident #14's care plan did not include a history of PTSD. On 04/08/2026 at 2:45 p.m., an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure a medication cart was free of unlabeled capsules for 1 (Cart A) of 2 medication carts reviewed.Review of facility's policy titled, Labeling of Medications and Biologicals, last revised October 2020, revealed the following, in part: Policy: All medications and biologicals in the facility will be labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration of medications. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All medications and biologicals will be labeled in accordance with applicable federal and state requirements and current accepted pharmaceutical principles and practices. On 04/06/2026 at 12:25 p.m., an observation was made of Cart A with an interview from S4LPN. Observation of Cart A revealed an unlabeled, clear, medication cup with 10 unidentified white capsules in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (#2) of 1 resident reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care to a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of 04/2024 revealed the following, in part:Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms.Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#4) of 22 residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included morbid obesity. Review of Resident #4's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 02/25/2025 revealed a BIMS of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 03/17/2025 at 11:05 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #4 in her room. She was lying in bed, with her call light resting on the floor behind the bed. On 03/17/2025 at 11:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #4. Resident #4 stated she was independent with eating but was dependent for all other ADL care. Resident #4 stated her call light was frequently out of reach and she had to yell out until someone responded. On 03/17/2025 at 1:45 p.m., an observation was made of Resident # 4 in her room. She was lying in bed, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (#4 and #50) residents out of a total of 22 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #4 was coded correctly for functional abilities and goals; and 2. Resident #50 was coded correctly for medications. Findings: Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #4's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 02/25/2025 revealed a BIMS of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she was coded as being independent for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing, and putting on/taking off footwear in Section GG: Functional Abilities and Goals. On 03/17/2025 at 11:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #4. Resident #4 stated she was independent with eating but was dependent for all other ADL care. On 03/19/2025 at 1:37 p.m., an interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician for 1(#52) of 22 residents investigated in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Diabetes. Review of Resident #52's Physician's Orders revealed, in part: Order date 11/25/2024- laboratory blood draw for HGBA1C every three months in March, June, September, December once every 3 months starting on the 25th of each month. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the last collected HGBA1C was performed on 10/26/2024. Review of the Medication Administration Record from November 2024 to present revealed no documented evidence Resident #52's HGBA1C labs were collected. Review of Resident #52's Care Plan Report revealed the following: Focus- I have a History of Diabetes Interventions- Obtain lab work as ordered An interview was conducted on 03/19/2025 at 3:08…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents reviewed for physical abuse. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. This deficient practice resulted in an actual physical harm on 01/18/2025, when Resident #1, a cognitively intact Resident, punched Resident #2 in his face three times. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Unspecified Fracture of Fifth Metacarpal Bone of his Right Hand on 01/20/2025. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 02/2025 and titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revealed in part, the following: Definitions: Physical Abuse-includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching. Prevention of Abuse-The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse. Resident #1 Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse were reported to the facility's administrator and the state agency in an appropriate time frame for 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for physical abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff immediately reported physical abuse to administration when Resident #1 and Resident #2 got into a physical altercation; and 2. The administrator reported 3 separate incidents of physical abuse involving Resident #1 and #2; Resident #2 and #3; and Resident # 1 and #4 to the state survey agency. This deficient practice resulted in an actual physical harm on 01/18/2025, when Resident #1, a cognitively intact Resident, punched Resident #2 in his face three times. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Unspecified Fracture of Fifth Metacarpal Bone of his Right Hand on 01/20/2025. Findings: Cross Reference F600 Review of the facility's policy dated 02/2025 and titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with an identified mental health diagnosis were referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 2 (#1 and #2) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 02/2025 and titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program revealed in part, the following: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with State's Medicaid rules for screening. 1ai. Negative Level I Screen-permits admission to proceed and ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. Resident #1 A review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Schizophreniform Disorder. Further review revealed additional medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$44,090 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $44,090 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-07 for 6 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-16 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CARPENTER HEALTH NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $709K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA