Center Point Health Care and Rehab
8225 Summa Avenue, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 172 certified beds · (225) 766-0130 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.0% | 17.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.5% | 17.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.6% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.0% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 22.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 14.7% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 28.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.5% | 14.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 2.56 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 2.74 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.2%CMS range 28.3–59.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.6–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.2–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 151.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.07 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.07 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient LPN staff to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident based on the facility assessment and observations of untimely medication administration. The deficiency had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 155 residents. Findings:Review of the facility's assessment, dated 05/02/2025, revealed LPN staffing needs for day, evening and night shift required 1 LPN per 23.5 Residents. Review of Facility's Census dated 04/20/2026 revealed Hall A had 52 residents, Hall B had 53 residents, and Hall C had 49 residents. Review of the Posted Daily Staffing Shift Detail revealed 6 LPN's scheduled on the day, evening and night shift on 04/20/2026 and 04/21/2026. An observation was conducted of Hall A, B, and C on 04/20/2026 from 8:33 a.m. to 9:57 a.m. which revealed 2 LPN's providing resident care on Hall A, Hall B, and Hall C. On 04/20/2026 at 9:57 a.m., an observation was made of S3LPN on Hall C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by having a medication error rate of 36% during the medication administration observation. A total of 36 opportunities were observed, which included 13 medication errors for Resident #151 out of 5 residents observed for medication administration. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 155 residents currently residing in the facility. Review of the facilities policy titled, Medication Administration with a revised date of 04/2022, revealed, in part:11. Compare medication with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time.b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. Review of Resident #151's current Physician Orders and MAR revealed the following medications were scheduled for administration at 7:30 a.m.Pantoprazole Sodium Tablet Delayed Release 40 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day; and the following medications were scheduled at 8:00 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in 1 (MedCart 1) of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage.Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage dated 01/2026 revealed in part, the following:1.a. All drugs will be stored in locked compartments (medication carts).An observation was made on 04/21/2026 at 2:32 p.m. of MedCart 1 unlocked, unsupervised, and located outside the nurses' station. Multiple residents were observed walking near the unlocked, unsupervised medication cart. An interview was conducted on 04/21/2026 at 2:40 p.m. with S2ADON. She confirmed MedCart 1 was unlocked and supervised. She opened the top drawer of MedCart 1 and observed 3 medication cups, each with loose pills located inside. She confirmed loose pills should not have been located in the medication cart and confirmed all medication carts should have been locked when unattended by a nurse.An interview was conducted on 04/22/2026 at 2:45 p.m. with S12ADM. She confirmed loose pills should not have been located in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection by failing to perform proper hand hygiene and gloving practices for 2 (#1 and #106) of 8 residents observed during direct care.Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection by failing to perform proper hand hygiene and gloving practices for 2 (#1 and #106) of 8 residents observed during direct care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Hand Hygiene, with an effective date of 10/2025, revealed the following, in part:Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's room was clean and maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 (#101) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #101's room and restroom were properly cleaned and free of odor.Review of the facility's policy titled Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, with an effective date of 10/2025, revealed the following, in part:Policy:It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:3. Consistent surface cleaning and disinfection will be conducted with a detailed focus on high touch areas12. Cleaning of walls, blinds and window curtains will be conducted when visibly soiled. Review of Resident #101's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available for administration for 1 (#151) of 5 residents reviewed for medication availability. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 152 residents currently residing in the facility.Review of facility's policy titled Medication Reordering revealed the following, in part:2. Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely manner to ensure medications are administered in a timely manner.3. When administering medications, nurses must monitor remaining supply and reorder medications timely to prevent omissions, time permitting. Review of Resident #151's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #151's April 2026 Physician Orders revealed an order for Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day.Review of Resident #151's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#1) resident of 4 residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility failed to ensure:1. Resident #1's tube feeding bag was changed every 24 hours; and 2. Resident #1's tube feeding formula and free water flushes were administered per physician's orders.Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, and Gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #1's Current Physician Orders revealed an order dated 10/23/2025 for enteral feed every shift: Continuous feed: Jevity 1.5 at 70 ml per hour and 170 ml water flush every four hours. On 03/30/2026 at 11:35 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #1's tube feeding infusing at 50 ml per hour, with the pump set at 165 ml flush…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by having a medication error rate of 60% during the medication administration observation. A total of 65 opportunities were observed, which included 39 medication errors with Resident #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, and #R4 of 5 residents observed for medication administration. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 152 residents currently residing in the facility. Review of the facilities policy titled, Medication Administration with a revised date of 04/2022, revealed, in part: 11. Compare medication with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time. b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's current Physician Orders revealed: Hydralazine HCL 10 mg one tablet by mouth two times a days at 8:00 am and 5:00 p.m. On 02/18/2026 at 9:36 a.m., an observation was made of S2LPN. S2LPN was observed not administering Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available for administration for 1 (#3) of 3 residents reviewed for medication availability. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 152 residents currently residing in the facility.Review of facility's policy titled Medication Reordering revealed the following, in part: 2. Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely manner to ensure medications are administered in a timely manner. 3. When administering medications, nurses must monitor remaining supply and reorder medications timely to prevent omissions, time permitting. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #3's current February 2026 Physician Orders revealed an order for Hydralazine HCL 10 mg one tablet by mouth two times a days with a start date of 01/06/2025. An observation ad interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 1 (#1) of 3 residents reviewed with feeding tubes. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff:Clarified Resident #1's tube feeding orders with the physician; andVerified accurate administration of Resident #1's tube feeding rate prior to documenting administration of tube feedings. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care and Management of Feeding Tubes, revised 01/2025, revealed the following, in part:Policy: It is a policy of this facility to utilize feeding tubes in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible.Definitions:Feeding tube refers to a medical device used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids, and medications by bypassing oral intake.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Feeding tubes will be utilized according to physician/nurse practitioner's orders, which typically include: the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to ensure the resident received tube feedings based on the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#1) of 3 residents reviewed with feeding tubes.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutritional Management, and revised 05/2023, revealed the following, in part:Policy: The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition.Compliance Guidelines:1. A systematic approach is used to optimize each resident's nutritional status:c. Developing and consistently implementing pertinent approaches.4. Care Plan implementation:d. Tube feeding or parenteral fluids will be provided in the context of the resident's overall clinical condition and resident goals/preferences. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 01/20/2025 and diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners, and effectively transition them to post discharge care and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 1 (#1) of 2 (#1 and #3) residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to ensure: 1. The discharge needs of the resident were identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan;2. Involve the interdisciplinary team in the ongoing process of developing the discharge plan;3. Document the resident had been asked about their interest in receiving information regarding returning to the community; and 4. Create a discharge summary that included a post-discharge plan indicating where the resident planned to reside, any arrangements that had been made for the resident's follow-up care and any post-discharge medical and non-medical services.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or RP (Responsible Party) with written notice, which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 (#2 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents.Review of the facility's Bed Hold and Returns policy, revised on 04/2025, revealed, in part:Policy:It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. The facility will issue (2) written notice of bed hold policy to the resident/or resident representative as follows:1. As part of the admission packet and2. At the time of a transfer to the hospital or a therapeutic leave.The facility will provide the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies:a. the duration of the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-07 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary support personnel had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility failed to ensure S18DW was competent to effectively and sanitarily perform the functions of the facility's dishwasher. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 140 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: An observation was made of S18DW performing the dish washing process in the facility's kitchen on 05/05/2025 at 10:10 a.m. S18DW was observed to place 18 meal trays upright with two stacked together with no spacing between them in one washing tray. He was observed to stack 17 insulated food tray bases, one on top of the other, with no spacing between them and sent them through the dishwasher. A drink lid was observed between two insulated food tray bases after the washing process was complete and the food tray bases were holding water. An interview was conducted with S18DW at that time. He stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary support personnel were employed to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when meals were served late on 05/05/2025 and 05/06/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 140 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 05/2023 and titled, Dietary Services - Staffing revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility employs sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the Food and Nutrition Services, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Staffing: 6. The facility will provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a newly identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Evaluation as required for 2 (#19 and # 92) of 6 (#9, #19, #36, #53, #92 and #138) residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, in part, Schizoaffective Disorder with an onset date of 10/01/2020. Review of Resident #19's most recent Level I PASRR Screening and Determination form revealed a previous assessment was performed on 07/05/2020. Review was attempted of Resident #19's Level 1 PASRR Screen and Determination submission following the addition of a new relevant mental illness diagnosis on 10/01/2020, with no documentation available for review. An interview was conducted on 05/07/2025 at 2:15 p.m. with S9SW. S9SW confirmed Resident #19's Pre-admission Level I PASRR Screen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (#11 and #111) of 4 (#9, #11, #30, and #111) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to: 1. trim fingernails for Resident #111; and 2. provide incontinent care in a timely manner for Resident #11. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Nail Care , with a revision date of 09/2017, revealed the following, in part: Policy: Nail care should be included in a Patient's daily hygiene; the best time is during the Patient's bath. Procedure: -Cut nails immediately after bathing when they are the softest and easiest to cut. -Cut nails straight across with a nail clipper. 1. Resident #111 Review of the clinical record for Resident #111 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Gastrostomy Status and Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician for 3 of 3 (#7, #39, and #40) residents reviewed with double/large portions with meals. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Therapeutic Diet Orders with a revision date of 11/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by the physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the patient's/resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: 5. Dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #7's current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were provided at regular meal times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community and consistent with facility scheduled meal times for 2 (Hall A and Hall B) of 3 (Hall A, Hall B, and Hall C) halls observed for dining. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 140 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 05/2023 and titled, Frequency of Meals revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility will ensure that each resident receives at least three meals daily without extensive time lapses between meals. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility has scheduled three regular meal times, comparable to normal meal times in the community. Review of the posted meal times outside of the facility's dining room revealed the following: Breakfast - 7:30 a.m. Lunch - 11:30 a.m. Dinner - 4:30 p.m. An observation was made of the first Hall A breakfast meal tray cart being prepared in the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure: 1. The kitchen floor remained clean; 2. Food was properly sealed in the refrigerator of the facility's kitchen; 3. Food cans and containers remained uncompromised in the dry storage areas of the facility's kitchen; 4. The dishes were cleaned and sanitized in a way that minimized the spread of foodborne illness; and 5. The food service area remained in a sanitary condition during the meal serving process. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 140 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings: On 05/05/2025 at 8:54 a.m., an initial tour was made of the kitchen with S10DM. Observations were made of the following: 1. Food particles and residue were on the floor throughout the kitchen. 2. The refrigerator contained 1 uncovered bowl of pineapple and 1 uncovered container of pudding. 3. The dry storage pantries contained 7 dented cans of mandarin oranges, 2 dented cans of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was maintained in safe operating condition for 2 (#92 and #97) of 2 (#92 and #97) sampled residents reviewed for call light safety. Findings: Resident #92 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part: Need for Assistance for Personal Care, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Other Symptoms involving Cognitive Function and Awareness. Review of Resident #92's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 12/31/2024, revealed a BIMS of 13 indicating she was cognitively intact. On 05/05/2025 at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #92's room of the call light pulled off the wall with the wires exposed. On 05/05/2025 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #92, she stated the call light cover had been pulled off the wall for weeks. She stated she told staff about it several times. On 05/06/2025 at 8:45 a.m., an interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a mental disorder had an accurate Pre-admission Screening for 1 (#138) of 6 (#9, #19, #36, #53, #92, and #138) residents reviewed for PASSAR. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASSAR Program dated 05/2023, revealed in part, the following: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the state's Medicaid rules for screening. 6. The social services director shall be responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASSAR screening status, and referring to the appropriate authority. Review of Resident #138's Medical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #138's Level 1 Pre-admission Screening completed by a social worker at a local hospital dated 03/12/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan by failing to implement Physician's Orders for 1 (#30) of 30 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in the final sample. Findings: Review of Facility's Policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 06/2023 revealed the following, in part: Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. 1. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician. Review of Resident #30's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 08/19/2022 and diagnoses, which included Anxiety, Parkinson's Disease, Depression, and Dementia. Review of Resident #30's Current Physician Orders dated 05/05/2025 revealed the following, in part: Start date: 06/01/2024 - O2(Oxygen) @2L per NC (Nasal Cannula) to maintain Sp02 (Oxygen Saturation) >92% every 24 hours as needed. Review of Resident #30's Quarterly MDS revealed, in part, a BIMS summary score of 7, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered safely and timely by leaving the medications at the bedside for 1(#19) of 31 residents observed in the final sample. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy titled Medication Storage and dated 12/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy Explanation and General Guidelines 1. General Guidelines: a. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments ( i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. b. Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. c. During medication pass, medications must be under the direct supervision of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. Review of Resident #19's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (#111) of 5 (#104, #111, #208, #337, #342) residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility failed to ensure: 1. The enteral feeding flush bag was appropriately labeled with a date and time; and 2. The enteral feeding pole was kept clean and free of dried formula. Findings: Review of the Manufacturer's Insert for Kangaroo ePump ENPlus Spike with revealed the following: Note: It is recommended that this device be replaced every 24 hours. Review of the facility's policy titled, Tube Feeding, and dated 05/2023 revealed the following: K. Pre-filled closed system containers will be used to provide enteral nutrition utilizing an enteral feeding pump. A new administration set will be used with each new container, and containers will be changed when empty, or every 48 hours according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 (#138) resident reviewed for IV (Intravenous) fluid therapy. The facility failed to monitor and flush according to professional standards. Findings: Review of Resident #138's Medical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #138 acquired a new diagnosis of Pneumonia on 05/02/2025 requiring central line device placement. Review of Resident #138's physician orders, dated May 2025, revealed an order on 05/02/2025 for Cefepime Intravenous Solution 2 grams per 100 milliliters. Use 2 grams intravenously three times a day for pneumonia for 7 Days. Further review revealed no physician orders for an assessment daily, dressing changes, or flushing schedule for Resident #138's maintenance of PICC line. Review of Resident #138's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated May 2025, revealed no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician for 1(#9) of 31 residents investigated in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder and Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #9's Physician's Orders revealed, in part: Order date 04/24/2025- laboratory blood draw for Depakote level every three months in January, April, July ,October once every 3 months. Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed the last collected Depakote level was performed on 02/04/2025. An interview was conducted on 05/07/2025 at 1:52 p.m. with S7NP. She confirmed the last collected lab on record for Depakote level for Resident #9 was collected on 02/04/2025. S7NP confirmed Physician Orders should have been followed and a Depakote level should have been drawn for Resident #9 in April 2025, and was not. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage properly by failing to ensure: 1. Trash was contained in the facility's kitchen and outdoor dumpster; and 2. Garbage receptacles and dumpsters were covered. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse and dated 05/2023, revealed in part, the following: 1. Garbage shall be disposed of in refuse containers with plastic liners and lids. 7. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/rodent attractions are minimized. On 05/05/2025 at 8:54 a.m., an observation was made of the kitchen garbage receptacle, which was uncovered with garbage present. Further observation revealed an empty box of fruit punch on the floor with left over residue to the left side of the garbage receptacle. On 05/05/2025 at 10:26 a.m., an observation was made of the outside garbage area with S10DM. The dumpster was open and full with 1 bag of trash partially falling out of the receptacle. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#84) of 7 (#9, #11, #49, #56, #84,#109, and #293) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing gastrostomy feeding to a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised on 04/2025, revealed the following, in part: For residents for whom EBP are indicated, EBP is employed when performing the following high-contact resident care activities: g. feeding tubes Review of Resident #84's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy. An observation was made on 05/05/2025 at 11:00 a.m., of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a facility assessment which addressed staff training for skills and non-pharmacological interventions and the process to evaluate competency of skill sets necessary to provide the level and type of care necessary to meet the mental and psychosocial health needs of their resident population diagnosed with Schizophrenia Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Substance Use Disorder (SUD); and 2. Provide staff training for non-pharmacological interventions and ensure competency in the skill sets necessary to meet the mental and psychosocial health needs of their resident population diagnosed with Schizophrenia, PTSD and SUD for 4 of 4 (S4LPN, S5LPN, S6RN, and S7MSW) Personnel Files reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 147 residents. Findings: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 03/15/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Part 1: Our Resident Profile 1.3 Diseases/Conditions, Physical and Cognitive Disabilities Accepted by Facility Psychiatric/Mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 1 (#2) of 7 (#1-#7) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #2 was coded for diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); and 2. Resident #2 was coded for his most recent Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) date and the provider's response. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 147 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's Psychiatry Progress Note, dated 01/31/2025, revealed, in part, the following: Active Diagnoses: Schizoaffective Disorder and PTSD. Review of Resident #2's GDR, performed on 01/09/2025, revealed, in part, the following: Medications Reviewed: Seroquel 400mg 1 by mouth every night. Vistaril 25mg by mouth three times daily. Physician Response to Review: Currently on minimal effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a trauma-informed, comprehensive person-centered care plan, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (#2) of 7 (#1-#7) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #1's diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 147 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change policy, effective 05/2023, revealed, in part, the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. 2. Procedure for reviewing and revising the care plan when a resident experiences a status change: f. Care Plans will be modified as need by the MDS Coordinator or other designated staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's diet order was updated in the electronic medical record. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the 134 residents residing in the facility receiving physician ordered nutrition. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Therapeutic Diet Orders with a revision date of 11/2024, revealed the following, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 4. The therapeutic diet order shall be documented in the medical record . Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Unspecified Cerebral Infarction and Pneumonitis Due To Inhalation of Food and Vomit. Review of Resident #2's current electronic Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Diet:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis which included the total resident census number, and total number and actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 142 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated June 2024 and titled Nurse Staffing Posting Information revealed in part, the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: c. Facility's current resident census d. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: i. Registered Nurses ii. Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses iii.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II by failing to: 1. Refer all Level II residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for Level II resident review after expiration of 6 month temporary effective period for 1 (#5) of 5 (#5, #12, #37, #46 and #131) residents reviewed for PASARR; and 2. Incorporate a PASARR Level II determination and recommendations into a resident's care plan for 1 (#37) of 5 (#5, #12, #37, #46 and #131) residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #5's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included in part Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety, Other Bipolar Disorders, and Depression. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS with ARD of [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to implement interventions after weight loss for 1 (#45) of 5 (#17, #19, #45, #52, and #132) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Osteomyelitis, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer Of Right Ankle, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Of Other Site, Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer Of Other Site, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Of Right Ankle, Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/17/2024, revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 12, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #45's current care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Physician ordered narcotic pain medication was available for administration for 1 (#132) of 5 (#5, #12, #45, #78, and #132) residents reviewed for pain management; and 2. As needed narcotic pain medication was documented as administered on the MAR for 1 (#132) of 5 (#5, #12, #45, #78, and #132) residents reviewed for pain management. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Medication Reordering policy with an approval date of May 2023 revealed the following, in part: Policy: it is the policy of this facility to accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services including the provision of routine and emergency medications and biologicals in a timely manner to meet the needs of each resident. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will utilize a systematic approach to provide or obtain routine and emergency medications and biologicals in order to meet the needs of each resident. 3. Each time a nurse is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at regular times comparable to normal times in the community for 1 (Hall B) of 3 (Hall A, Hall B, and Hall C) halls observed for dining. Findings: Review of the facility's policy last approved May 2023 and titled, Frequency of Meals revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility will ensure that each resident receives at least three meals daily without extensive time lapses between meals. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: 1. The facility has scheduled three regular meal times, comparable to normal meal times in the community, per day . Review of the facility's listed meal times revealed 200 Hall should be served lunch at 12:30 p.m. An interview was conducted with Resident #132 on 06/24/2024 at 10:11 a.m. He resided toward the end of Hall B. He stated meals are often served late. He stated sometimes he received lunch at 2:00 p.m. An observation was made of Resident #132 on 06/24/2024 at 12:35 p.m. He did not have his lunch tray yet. An observation was made of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute foods under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to effect 141 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the policy titled Staff Attire with a revision date of 09/2017 revealed the following, in part: Procedures: 1. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained. Review of the policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods with a revision date of 04/2018 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Procedures 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the policy titled Food Storage: Dry Goods with a revision date of 09/2017 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement All dry goods will be appropriately stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility was free of pests and insects. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 142 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings: On 06/24/2024 at 8:31 a.m., an observation was made of a live roach the size of an almond outside of the bathroom in Room K. On 06/24/2024 at 8:31 a.m., an observation was made of a live roach the size of an almond outside Resident #78's bathroom. An interview was conducted with Resident #78 at that time. He stated he sees roaches often. On 06/24/2024 at 8:42 a.m., an observation was made of a small live roach noted on the wall just outside of Room F. On 06/24/2024 at 8:43 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3's bathroom. There was one large brown, live roach approximately 3 inches in length. An interview was conducted with Resident #3 at that time. Resident #3 stated he saw live roaches often in his room and bathroom. He stated he sprayed and the pest control company sprayed, but he had not done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's needs for tube feeding management for 1 (#19) of 3 (#1, #19, and #72) residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #19's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Dysphagia, and Gastrostomy Status. Review of Resident #19's Annual MDS with an ARD of 04/12/2024 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #19's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: I am at risk for adequate nutrition; I have a PEG tube; I have a diagnosis of Dysphagia; and I am NPO. Interventions: Provide feedings per MD order. Problem: I am NPO; I require tube feeding; I am at risk for aspiration related to my diagnosis of Dysphagia.; and I am disconnected from my tube feeding as ordered due to I like to propel myself around facility at times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Discharge MDS assessment was completed and transmitted timely for 1 (#105) of 2 (#100 and #105) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated May 2023 and titled MDS 3.0 Completion revealed, in part the following: Policy: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2. Types of OBRA Assessments. f. Discharge Assessment - completed using the discharge date as the ARD. Must be completed within 14 days of the discharge date /ARD. 7. Transmission Requirements: a. All assessments must shall be transmitted to the designated CMS system (QIES ASAP) within 14 days of completion. Review of Resident #105's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/23/2024. Further review revealed the resident did not have an electronically transmitted discharge MDS assessment. An interview was conducted on 06/27/2024 at 12:20 p.m. with S21MDS. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A record of the Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form was maintained in the resident's record for 1 (#37) of 5 (#5, #12, #37, #46 and #131) residents reviewed for PASRR; and 2. A resident with a mental disorder had an accurate Pre-admission Screening for 1 (#46) of 5 (#5, #12, #37, #46 and #131) residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #37's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Other Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Unspecified Mood Affective Disorder, and Recurrent Severe Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Symptoms. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/26/2024, revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Section I - Active Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure documentation of weekly nurses' notes were filed as documented on the TAR for 1 (#46) of 32 residents investigated in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #30's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Primary Hypertension, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Supraventricular Tachycardia, Vascular Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Bilateral Hearing Loss. Review of Resident #30's Physician's Orders revealed the following: 04/27/2023 Weekly Nurses note should be performed every Friday on 2:00-10:00 p.m. shift Review of Resident #30's TAR for May and June 2024 revealed the following: Task: Weekly Nursing Note Further review revealed the task had a checkmark, which indicated the task was completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 (#19) of 3 (#1, #19, and #72) residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #19's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Dysphagia, and Gastrostomy Status. Review of Resident #19's Annual MDS with an ARD of 04/12/2024 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #19 did not exhibit rejection of care. Review of Resident #19's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: I am at risk for adequate nutrition; I have a PEG tube; I have a diagnosis of Dysphagia; and I am NPO. Interventions: Provide feedings per MD order. Problem: I am NPO; I require tube feeding; I am at risk for aspiration related to my diagnosis of Dysphagia; and I am disconnected from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by failing to ensure there was an acceptable diagnosis for antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications for 1 (#72) of 5 (#10, #46, #72, #117 and #132) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Drugs with a revision date of 10/2020 revealed the following, in part: Policy: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record . 1. Psychotropic drugs include, but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. Review of Resident #72's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction and Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure medications were in locked compartments permitting only authorized personnel to have access for 1 (#28) of 34 residents observed during initial screening of residents upon facility entrance. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration Storage dated 04/2022 revealed the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1.General Guidelines: a.All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) . b.During medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage areas/cart. Review of Resident #28's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for 1 (#132) of 3 (#102, #131, #132) residents reviewed for food. Findings: Review of the facility's policy last approved May 2023 and titled, Therapeutic Diet Orders revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. 5. Dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed. Review of Resident #132's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee, Acquired Absence of Left Leg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the resident's code status consistently reflected the resident's wishes for 1 (#30) of 36 residents reviewed in the initial screening for advanced directives. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with a last approved date of 05/2023 titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to . formulate an advance directive. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. Review of Resident #30's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had a BIMS of 1, which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #30's Advanced Directive in her physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate hospice care services to ensure a system was in place to update hospice binder with current orders, certification period and care plans for 1 (#30) of 4 (#28, #72, #30 and #78) residents reviewed for hospice care. Findings: Review of the Hospices Services Agreement with an effective date of 10/01/2020 between the facility and local hospice company revealed the following: Article III Facility Services Section 3.5 Facility shall: d) The Facility's designated interdisciplinary team member is responsible for the following: 4) Obtaining the following information from the hospice: (A) The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient; (C) Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient; (F) Hospice medication information specific to each patient; and (G) Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient. Review of the facility's policy last approved 05/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure S13TN and S16CNA wore proper Personal Protective Equipment while providing care for 1 (#72) of 3 (#1, #19, and #72) sampled residents reviewed for peg tube care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of 03/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Definitions: Enhanced Barrier Precautions refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-07 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent standard survey and complaint survey were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 148 residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Availability of Survey Results and dated 07/2024, revealed in part, the following: 4. The facility will maintain reports of any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respecting the facility during the 3 preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect in respect to the facility. This information will be available for any individual to review upon request. Review of the facility's Survey History revealed the most recent standard survey was completed on 06/27/2024. Further review revealed a complaint survey was completed on 11/26/2024. An observation was made on 05/05/2025 at 11:05 a.m. of the facility's Survey Results binder located near the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE CARPENTER HEALTH NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8225 BR SNF, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/24/2020 |
| PCM HOLDINGS I, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/18/2025 |
| PCM INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/18/2025 |
| PCM REHAB ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/18/2025 |
| PHOENIX SNF HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/18/2025 |
| PTM 2018 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/18/2025 |
| ST. GEORGE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2020 |
| MITCHELL, PATRICK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2026 |
| NNADI, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| WILLIAMS, EMILY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2026 |
| HOLLEMAN, EMILY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2026 |
| MITCHELL, KELLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2026 |
| ST. JOSEPH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $935K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195483. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.