Wynhoven Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 119.1 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-04-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place to ensure the resident record accurately reflected a resident's wishes for a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) if an emergency occurred for 1 (Resident #103) of 46 (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #14, Resident #19, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #24, Resident #25, Resident #28, Resident #29, Resident #33, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #37, Resident #39, Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #46, Resident #52, Resident #53, Resident #60, Resident #61, Resident #68, Resident #71, Resident #72, Resident #76, Resident #77, Resident #80, Resident #82, Resident #83, Resident #85, Resident #86, Resident #87, Resident #88, Resident #92, Resident #93, Resident #94, Resident #97, Resident #99, Resident #102, Resident #103, Resident #154, Resident #354) sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's enabler bar was not an accident hazard for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm on 02/28/2026 at 7:33PM for Resident #1, when S3Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred Resident #1 from her wheelchair to the bed. Resident #1's left leg hit the enabler bar, with a missing end cap, which resulted in a laceration to Resident #1's left lower leg. Resident #1 was then transported to a local Emergency Department (ED) where she was assessed as having a large stellate (a star-shaped or irregular, multi-angled tear in the skin) laceration to the left lower leg, received 6 interior sutures, 27 exterior sutures, a tetanus shot, and pain medication. Resident #1 required daily wound care and 14 days of antibiotics. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a past noncompliance citation.Findings:Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff completed quarterly assessments within the required timeframes for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #23, Resident #88) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment requirements. Findings:Resident #1Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed Resident #1 had a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/17/2025. Further review revealed Resident #1 had a subsequent Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/23/2026. Further review revealed Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/23/2026 exceeded 92 days from the previous Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/17/2025. Resident #23Review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/22/2026 revealed, in part, the assessment was completed on 04/06/2026, exceeding the required timeframe of 14 days after the ARD. Resident #88Review of Resident #88's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/21/2026 revealed, in part, the assessment was completed on 04/06/2026, exceeding the required timeframe of 14 days after the ARD. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their controlled substance policy to ensure controlled drugs were reconciled for 1 (Medication Cart b) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c) medication carts reviewed for reconciliation of controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy and Procedure, revised on 10/06/2023, revealed, in part, nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. Further review revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together and discrepancies must be documented and reported to the Director of Nursing. Review of the March 2025 Daily Narcotic Sheet Count for Medication Cart b revealed the narcotic count was not signed off by both the coming on duty and the going off duty nurse on the following dates and shifts: 03/01/2025 for the Morning and Evening shift; 03/02/2025 for the Morning shift; and, 03/04/2025 for the Morning shift. Review of the April 2025 Daily Narcotic Sheet Count for Medication Cart b…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during a resident transfer and linen change for 3 (S10Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S11CNA, S12CNA) of 4 (S10CNA, S11CNA, S12CNA, S15CNA) CNAs observed while providing care to residents on EBP. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure dated 2001 and revised on 04/2024, revealed, in part, EBP should be followed when working with residents when close physical contact would occur during transfer and mobility. Further review revealed personnel should use gowns and gloves if they were changing the linens of residents on EBP. Review of Resident #99's April 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 03/19/2025 for EBP. Observation on 04/14/2025 at 12:15PM revealed an EBP sign on Resident 99's room door indicating staff must wear a gown and gloves when performing high contact resident care activities including transferring and changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 (Resident #29) of 1 (Resident #29) sampled residents observed with medications left at the bed side for self-administration. Findings: Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure revised on 11/2024 revealed, in part, the interdisciplinary team would assess each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administration of medications were safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Further review revealed if a resident was deemed safe for self-administration of medications, this was to be documented in the resident's medical record and care plan. Further review revealed self-administered medications should be stored in a safe and secure place and any medications found at bedside that were not authorized for self-administration were turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party. Review of Resident #29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility whirlpool rooms were maintained in a sanitary manner for 3 (Whirlpool Room a, Whirlpool Room b, Whirlpool Room c) of 3 (Whirlpool Room a, Whirlpool Room b, Whirlpool Room c) whirlpool rooms observed for cleanliness. Observation on 04/16/2025 at 10:30AM, of Whirlpool Room a, revealed there was an unidentified pink residue noted on the bottom of the whirlpool bathtub. Observation on 04/16/2025 at 10:45AM, of Whirlpool Room c, revealed there was an unidentified yellow residue and a piece of used paper noted on the bottom of the whirlpool bathtub. Observation on 04/16/2025 at 11:00AM, of Whirlpool Room b, revealed there was an unidentified pink residue noted on the bottom of the whirlpool bathtub. Observation on 04/16/2025 at 3:10PM, of Whirlpool Room c, with S4Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist present, revealed there was an unidentified yellow residue and a piece of used paper noted on the bottom of the whirlpool bathtub. Observation on 04/16/2025 at 3:12PM, of Whirlpool Room b, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to communicate and/or document the required information when a resident was transferred to the hospital for 1 (Resident #103) of 3 (Resident #83, Resident #102, Resident #103) sampled residents reviewed for transfer requirements. Findings: Resident #103 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence and the facility failed to present any documented evidence that nursing staff communicated and/or provided the hospital with Resident #103's face sheet/contact information, diagnosis list, LAPOST, medication list and a copy of the transfer order for the above mentioned transfer to the hospital. There was no documented evidence and the facility failed to present any documented evidence a discharge transfer summary was provided to the receiving hospital when Resident #103 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview on 04/16/2025 at 9:36AM, S14Licensed Practical Nurse indicated a discharge transfer summary should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record reviews the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for a resident with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) receiving Intravenous (IV) Antibiotics via a Midline Intravenous Catheter. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 (Resident #46) residents investigated for intravenous antibiotic usage. Findings: Review of Resident #46's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #46 had diagnoses, which included, in part, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Non- Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of Resident #46's April 2025 Physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 04/04/2025, for Resident #46 to receive intravenous antibiotics via a midline intravenous catheter. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence that a care plan was developed for Resident #46 receiving Intravenous (IV) Antibiotics for a UTI via a Midline Intravenous Catheter prior to when the surveyor brought it to the attention to facility staff. In an interview on 04/15/2025 at 2:00PM, S22Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised to update his code status (a term used to describe what type of interventions, if any, a healthcare team could perform if an individual's heart stopped beating or they stopped breathing). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #103) of 23 (Resident #5, Resident #23, Resident #25, Resident #29, Resident #33, Resident #35, Resident #39, Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #46, Resident #68, Resident #71, Resident #72, Resident #76, Resident #80, Resident #82, Resident # 83, Resident #92, Resident #93, Resident #94, Resident #99, Resident #102, and Resident #103) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #103's clinical record revealed, in part, Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #103's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/02/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #103 had a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 15, which indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse adhered to professional standards of practice when a Registered Nurse (S6Interim Clinical Care Coordinator [S6ICCC]) falsified a resident's medical record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (S6ICCC) of 2 (S6ICCC, and S7Quality Management Nurse) Registered Nurses identified as having revised Resident #103's care plan. Findings: Review of the facility's Code of Conduct, with a revision date of 09/2016, revealed, in part, falsification of records was a violation that was grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. Review of the Louisiana Title 46 Professional and Occupational Standards, Part XLVII 3915 Standard Number 7: Professional Performance revealed, in part, a registered nurse should demonstrate professional nursing practice behaviors by making nursing decisions and actions that are determined in an ethical manner. Review of Resident #103's physician orders revealed, in part, Resident #103…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer treatment plan was carried out in accordance with physician's orders for 1 (Resident #94) of 2 (Resident #94, Resident #99) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcer care. Findings: Review of the facility's Wound Care policy and procedure dated 01/09/2022 revealed, in part, pressure relieving devices should be adhered to as part of the resident's wound care plan. Review of Resident #94's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #94 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia (loss of movement on one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the left side and symptoms involving cognitive functions. Review of Resident #94's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/08/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #94 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #94 had an unhealed Stage 4 left lateral foot pressure injury. Review of Resident #94's care plan with a start…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,420 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
• $34,405 — penalty dated 2025-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMCARE CORPORATION — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA