Tioga Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 92.6 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from staff to resident verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #4) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Resident #4, a cognitive residents, experienced mental anguish and psyshosocial harm as a result of the verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm on 02/11/2025 at 10:00 a.m., when S3 CNA told Resident #4, Shut the F* up and F* this Sh! during ADL care (showering). Resident #4 stated this caused him mental anguish and psychosocial harm/emotional distress, as he felt disrespected, insulted, and pissed off that S3 CNA cursed and spoke to him in that way. Resident #4 reported the incident to staff and told them he did not want S3 CNA in his room again. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 02/26/2025 at 4:03 p.m. titled, Abuse Components Plan, Elder Justice Act and Affordable Care Act, with an effective date of 10/24/2022, read in part .Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her own quality of life by failing to honor a resident's right to be shaved prior to going to his medical appointment for 1 (Resident #71) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights with a revised date of 12/2016, read in part.Policy Statement: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/2026 with diagnoses which included, in part.Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region; Multiple Sclerosis; Muscle Weakness; and Other Lack of Coordination.Review of Resident #71's admission MDS with an ARD of 06/07/2026 revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #71 used a wheelchair for mobility and required partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene.Review of Resident #71's care plan with an initiated date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician and responsible party after a change in resident's condition for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 residents investigated for accidents. The facility failed to notify the physician and responsible party in a timely manner after a witnessed fall, which resulted in an injury.Findings:Review of a facility policy on 06/24/2026 at 3:00 p.m. titled, Change in Resident's Condition or Status with a revision date of 03/2024 revealed the following in part.Our facility notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (example: changes in level of care) in a timely manner. 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a. accident or incident involving the resident; d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; g. need to transfer the resident to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a choice of when to get out of bed. Findings: Review of the Facility's 12/2016 policy titled Resident Rights read in part. Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident rights to: C. be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. D. be free from corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion, and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's symptoms. E. self-determination. G. exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality. The sampled residents were 31. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper physician orders were obtained for Resident #13's oxygen requirements.2. Ensure proper physician orders were obtained for Resident #36's rescue inhaler.3. Ensure Resident #36's rescue inhaler was stored in a safe and secure manner. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 07/23/2025 at 9:34 a.m. titled, Oxygen Administration revealed the following in part.The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or the facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of a facility policy on 07/23/2025 at 9:34 a.m. titled, Storage of Medications with a revision date of 11/2020 revealed the following in part.The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 2 (#55, and #87) of 5 (#13, #22, #38 #55, and #87) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to:1.Store nebulizer mask appropriately for Resident #55; and2. Ensure oxygen was given or set at prescribed rate for Resident #87.Findings:Resident #87 Review of the facility’s undated policy entitled “Oxygen Administration” revealed, in part…staff is to verify there is a physician’s order for oxygen administration and provide oxygen at the prescribed flow rate. Review of Resident #87’s medical record revealed an admission date of 04/03/2023 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Shortness of Breath. Review of Resident #87’s Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/30/2025 revealed a BIMS Score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #87’s physician’s orders revealed oxygen at 2 LPM per NC was ordered on 03/28/2025. Observation of Resident #87 on 07/21/2025 at 11:00 a.m. revealed the resident’s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a clinical rationale for a denial of a gradual dose reduction for 2 (#30 and #77) of 5 (#6, #30, #55, #77, and #79) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure the physician documented on the Pharmaceutical Consultant Report a clinical rationale for not reducing psychoactive medications recommended for gradual dose reduction (GDR). Findings: Review of a facility policy on 07/23/2025 at 9:34 a.m. titled, “Psychotropic and Antipsychotic Medications and Non-Pharmacological Intervention” with an effective date of 01/2025 revealed in part…Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Residents should only receive psychotropic medications when other non-pharmacological interventions have been attempted and/or have been documented as being clinically contraindicated. Gradual Dose Reductions: Residents must only remain on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for 2 (#5 and #13) of 31 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Place an assist rail to the left side of Resident #5's bed, ensuring the resident could reposition himself as needed to maintain bed mobility as indicated on the patient-centered care plan; and2. Use ear protectors on Resident #13's nasal cannula as indicated in the resident's care plan. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 07/23/2025 at 9:34 a.m. titled, “Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered” with a revision date of 03/2022 revealed the following part…A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objective and timetables to meet the resident’s physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. G. Receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care. Resident #13 Review of Resident #13’s medical record revealed an admission date of 07/09/2024, with diagnoses that included in part…Parkinson’s Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 (#61 and #77) of 3 (#11, #61, and #77) residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure oral care was provided for Resident #61; and Bath/Shower was provided for Resident #77. Findings:Review of the facility's policy dated 03/2018 titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting read in part Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal/oral health. Resident #61 Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/2020 with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Spinal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to:Ensure food, dish washer, refrigerator, and freezer temperatures were performed and recorded appropriately; and Ensure food was properly stored in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 93 residents that received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Prevention of Food Borne Illness read in part.Holding: Assure holding temperatures are maintained as needed for hot/cold foods. Measures temperatures using a calibrated thermometer and check temperatures at 2 hours intervals. Review of the facility's 10/2017 policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage read in part.Policy statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy interpretation: 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ( received and/or open date). Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an incident of abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency in accordance with state law for 1 (#4) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) residents reviewed for abuse The provider failed to report staff to resident verbal abuse for Resident #4. Findings: On 02/26/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Components Plan, Elder Justice Act and Affordable Care Act with an effective date of 10/24/2022 read in part .Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse . Reporting: All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment .will be reported by the Administrator or designee, to the following persons or agencies as required to provide notification: a. LDH online tracking system, Statewide Incident Tracking System (SIMS).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$113,886 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $113,886 — penalty dated 2025-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMCARE CORPORATION — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $838K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA