Chateau De Notre Dame Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 155.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly secure a resident's wheelchair using the front securement straps in the facility's transportation vehicle for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for transportation safety. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/06/2025 at 11:30AM for Resident #1, when S3Certified Nursing Assistant/Transport Driver (CNA/TD) failed to properly secure Resident #1's wheelchair in the facility's transportation van with the front securement straps. Resident #1's wheelchair tipped over backwards during transport, which caused Resident #1 to strike the back of his head. Resident #1 was then transported to a local emergency room where he was assessed as having a bump to back of the head and had to receive pain medication for head and shoulder pain. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to the 104 residents who resided in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at risk for wandering/elopement, was supervised and unable to elope off of the facility's grounds; 2. Failed to ensure staff tested the WanderGuard system to ensure the transmitters were properly functioning at ankle level to alert staff and prevent residents from being able to exit the facility unsupervised for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for wandering/elopement and accident/hazards. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/07/2024 at 6:30 p.m. when Resident #1, a resident who was assessed as being at high risk for wandering and elopement, and who had a WanderGuard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at risk for wandering/elopement, was supervised and unable to elope off of the facility's grounds; 2. Failed to ensure staff tested the WanderGuard system to ensure the transmitters were properly functioning at ankle level to alert staff and prevent residents from being able to exit the facility unsupervised for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for wandering/elopement and accident/hazards. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/07/2024 at 6:30 p.m. when Resident #1, a resident who was assessed as being at high risk for wandering and elopement, and who had a WanderGuard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected medication orders for 1 (Resident #74) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #53, Resident #55, Resident #74, Resident #102) residents reviewed for medications. Findings: Review of Resident #74's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for April 2025 revealed, in part, an order for Lasix 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day (a diuretic medication used to reduce swelling and fluid retention) and Trazodone Hydrochloride50 mg by mouth one time a day (an antidepressant medication used to treat depression) were administered during the lookback period (the period required to review information to complete the MDS), 04/24/2025 through 04/30/2025. Review of Resident #74's Quarterly MDS Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2025 revealed, in part, Sections C: antidepressant was not checked, Section G: diuretic was not checked, and Section Z: none of the above was checked. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 12:24PM, S3Clinical Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding bag (bag that contains a formula for the purpose of supplying nutrients directly into the stomach) and the free water flush bag was properly labeled to include the rate of the infusion for 1 (Resident #130) of 1 (Resident #130) sampled residents reviewed for enteral feeding. Findings: Review of the Resident #130's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food and/or liquids) and gastrostomy status (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen and into the stomach to provide nutritional support). Review of the facility's Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy and procedure, undated, revealed, in part, to check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Further review revealed to check the resident's name and room number, type of formula, date and time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration for 1 (Resident #52) of 1 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #52's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #52 had a medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and lung cancer. Review of Resident #52's June 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, Resident #52's oxygen was to be administered at 4 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen through your nose) every shift related to COPD, which may be removed for bathing and daily care. Review of Resident #52's care plan revealed, in part, Resident #52 was at risk for altered breathing related to the diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop resident-specific approaches and implement a plan of care for a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident #52) of 1 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional services. Findings: Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #52's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #52 had a medical history of PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #52's June 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence an order was implemented to monitor for signs and symptoms of PTSD and/or triggers associated with Resident #52's PTSD. Review of Resident #52's Psychiatric Progress Notes dated 03/28/2025 and 04/28/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52's active medical problems were PTSD and depression. Further review revealed no documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was competent in the facility's procedure for securing a resident's wheelchair in a transport vehicle for 1 (S5CNASupervisor) of 3 (S4Maintenance Staff/Transport Driver [MS/TD], S5CNASupervisor, S6Maintenance Director [MD]) staff members investigated for resident safety competency. Findings: Review of the facility's CNA Job Description dated 12/03/2019 revealed, in part, CNAs may have been assigned additional assignments and duties to meet the needs of the residents. Further review revealed any additional tasks, duties, and responsibilities assigned to a CNA were to be performed in accordance with established policies, procedures, and standards. Review of the facility's Vehicle and Driver policy and procedure dated 09/27/2018, with a revision date of 11/29/2019, revealed, in part, wheelchairs/scooters must be properly secured with the securement equipment. Review of the facility's undated Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair and Patient Securing Systems…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident was given a 30 day written notice before a facility-initiated discharge as required; and, 2. A resident's written discharge notice included the name and contact information for Louisiana's Mental Health Advocacy Service. This deficient practice was identified (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) sampled residents investigated for discharge requirements. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an inpatient psychiatric hospital. Further review revealed Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 01/27/2025. Further review revealed Resident #1 received a written Discharge Notification on 01/27/2025. Review of Resident #1's Discharge Notification dated 01/27/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was discharged because the facility was unable to meet Resident #1's needs and Resident #1 continued to smoke in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care needs for a resident who displayed passive suicidal ideation for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health care needs. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy Statement: Resident suicide threats shall be taken seriously and addressed appropriately. Policy Interpretation and Implementation with a Revision date of 2002 revealed in part that staff were to report any resident threats of suicide immediately to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/16/2024, revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 5 which indicated Resident #1's cognition was severely impaired. Further review revealed diagnoses of Dementia, Depression, and Schizophrenia. In an interview on 07/30/2024 at 1:35 p.m., S3Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated on 07/22/2024 while transporting Resident #1 into the shower room, Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (Resident #64) of 4 (Resident #44, Resident #60, Resident #64, and Resident #112) residents reviewed for call devices. Findings: Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13. A score of 13 indicated Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #64's Care Plan revealed, in part, a potential for alteration in breathing pattern related to respiratory distress, self-care deficit, and risk for falls. Further review of Resident #64's Care Plan revealed an intervention to have the call bell within reach for the above mentioned issues. Observation on 06/10/2024 at11:18 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was on the nightstand. The surveyor asked Resident #64 how he called for help and he replied, I holler. Observation on 06/11/2024 at 11:07 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was on the nightstand. Observation on 06/12/2024 at 9:55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident and/or a resident's responsible party was invited to the resident's care planning meeting for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 (Resident #44) resident investigated for participation in care planning. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), dated September 2013 revealed, in part, the resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the residents care plan; every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family, and the mechanics of how the IDT meets its responsibilities in the development of the interdisciplinary care plan (e.g.; face-to-face, teleconference, written communication) is at the discretion of the care planning committee. In an interview on 06/10/2024 at 11:02 a.m., Resident #44's family member indicated when Resident #44 was first admitted to the facility they participated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services as identified in a therapy screening for 1(Resident #44) of 1 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of Resident #44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #44 had a functional limitation in range of motion of both upper extremities. Review of Resident #44's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #44 had limited physical mobility related to contractures of the bilateral upper extremities. Review of Resident #44's rehabilitation screen dated 09/01/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #44 had hand contractures and would be evaluated by Occupational Therapy for splint fitting to prevent further decline. Observation on 06/11/2024 at 11:06 a.m. revealed Resident #44 was in her room in her wheelchair. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$36,265 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,580 — penalty dated 2025-05-14
• $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMCARE CORPORATION — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA