Alliance Health At Marina Bay

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 522 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 238 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 154.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a decline in range of motion causing the development of a contracture for one Resident (#122), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Resident #122 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses the included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, depression, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #122's Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/12/23, indicated the Resident scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, which indicates intact cognition, requires extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, hygiene, and eats independently with set up. Further, the MDS indicated that Resident #122 did not have functional limitation of range of motion in his/her upper extremity. On 6/14/23 at 8:05 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #122 in bed. His/her right hand was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#131) with an unplanned weight loss, out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #131 to implement dietary recommendations/interventions after weight loss had been identified, and he/she continued to lose weight. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Dietician, dated as last revised 11/1/2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The consultant Dietician has weekly regular hours of sufficient duration to provide consultation to staff regarding Residents' dietary needs and assistance with the revision and implementation of Nutritional Policies and Procedures.-The Registered Dietician (RD) will provide a comprehensive report to the Executive Director and the Director of Nurses (DON) following each visit. Resident #131 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses which included B-cell lymphoma and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed during a medication pass made five errors out of 27 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 18.52%. Specifically,1. For Resident #161, Nurse #3 prepared his/her medications, failed to identify the Resident and attempted to administer the medications to Resident #162; and,2. For Resident #93, failed to administer the correct does of Calcium plus Vitamin D; and3. For Resident #143, failed to administer the correct form of Vitamin B.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to:-Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.-Five Rights- Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time, are applied for each medication being administered.-A triple check of these 5 Rights is recommended at three steps in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for an allegation of abuse for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate their abuse policy after an allegation of abuse was documented and reported on 5/1/25. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last revised 10/11/22, indicated but was not limited to:-The facility will provide an environment in which the resident is free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation, including but not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint that is not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.-Identifying events, occurrences, patterns, and trends of potential abuse for residents.-Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff members responsible for investigating incidents and the reporting of the same to proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 30 residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last revised 10/11/22, indicated but was not limited to:-Reporting of all alleged violations of resident abuse to appropriate state agencies utilizing the proper online reporting system with the simultaneous development of corrective actions determined as part of the internal facility investigation to prevent further occurrences of abuse.-The executive director shall assume the overall responsibility to ensure that incident reports are accurately completed and personnel statements are obtained timely to ensure proper completion of the internal facility investigation the executive director shall ensure that the appropriate agency agencies are notified in writing as warranted of abuse allegations in all investigatory findings by utilizing the state documentation tool the initial report shall be submitted to the department immediately but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for the use of psychotropic medications for one Resident (#163), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #163 to ensure a care plan had been developed for the use of Ativan/Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication), to monitor for adverse effects/side-effects of the medication, and to monitor for targeted behaviors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated as last revised 9/22/22, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The facility is required to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that is consistent with resident rights and includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs.-Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team, after each assessment, including comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#160) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 30 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care Program, revision date 10/16/22, included but was not limited to the following:-Procedures: residents will be screened for past trauma and for signs/symptoms of traumatic stress upon admission, quarterly, annually, and as needed. -If the result of the screen indicates the presence of trauma or traumatic stress, further assessment will be completed. The interdisciplinary team, in collaboration with the resident and with the approved resident's representative will create a culturally sensitive plan of care to help prevent re-traumatization and to optimize quality of life. Individualized resident triggers will be identified as able.-These plans of care shall include the identified trigger, prevention,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #163 that staff performed hand hygiene and donned (put on) gloves and/or used utensils while handling ready to eat food during breakfast service/meal preparation. Findings include:Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022 indicated:3-301 Preventing Contamination by Employees3-301.11 Preventing Contamination from Hands.(A) FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wash their hands as specified under S 2-301.12. (B) Except when washing fruits and vegetables as specified under S3-302.15 or as specified in (D) and (E) of this section, FOOD EMPLOYEES may not contact exposed, READY-TO-EAT FOOD with their bare hands and shall use suitable UTENSILS such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing EQUIPMENT. Review of the facility's policy titled Proper Food Preparation, dated as last revised 9/1/24, indicated but was not limited to the following:-All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than five percent when one of two nurses made seven errors out of 40 opportunities, totaling a medication error rate of 17.5%. These errors impacted one Resident (#14), out of three residents observed. Specifically, the nurse administered the wrong dose of Buspar (for anxiety), Neurontin (for seizures or nerve pain), and Tylenol (for mild to moderate pain), and failed to administer Anoro Ellipta (inhaler for lung conditions), Fluticasone Propionate (inhaler for lung conditions), Ipratropium Bromide (aerosol for lung conditions), and Lidocaine patches (local anesthetic for pain management) as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administration Procedures for All Medications, dated as last revised 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Review 5 rights 3 times -Check Medication Administration Record (MAR) for order -Check the label against the order on the MAR Review of the facility's policy titled Physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label and date food products, and to maintain safe and clean equipment in four of five nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food & Nutrition Services, revised 12/5/21, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Food brought in by family or visitors will be in a secure container/bag, dated and will be subject to disposal based on sanitary, safe consumption. - If there are leftovers, the Facility will label the leftovers and store them in accordance with the Facility's policies for use and storage of foods, including but not limited to, policies relating to food sanitation. On 9/17/24 at 9:09 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations on the Cityside Unit nourishment kitchenette: - The inside of the microwave had orange and brown residue and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#303) was informed of and actively participated in his/her baseline plan of care within the first 48 hours following admission, out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plan, dated as revised 8/15/23, indicated but was not limited to: - a baseline care plan is developed within 48 hours of admission to the facility Process: - interview resident, obtain physician orders, complete admission nursing assessment and begin interdisciplinary (IDT) assessment, review transfer information, develop baseline care plan with IDT, continue to gather information - the facility will provide the resident with a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to: initial goals of the resident, summary of resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services and treatments to be administered by the facility Resident #303 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $968K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA