Alliance Health At Maples

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 588 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 273 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 120.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to one Resident (#77), out of a total sample of 26 residents, who was identified as a high fall risk and received anticoagulant medication (medication that prevents blood from clotting). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and/or implemented adequate interventions in an effort to prevent five falls in one month, one of which resulted in the Resident being transferred to the hospital emergency department for evaluation, and he/she was diagnosed with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain). Findings include: Review of the facility's Fall Management Program, dated as last revised 10/13/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Policy: To identify, prevent, and treat residents at risk for negative outcomes based on their clinical comorbidities, functional status, cognitive status, and other risk factors that compromise their well-being through a systematic approach.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to solicit and consider input received from direct care staff, residents, resident representatives, and family members when conducting the facility assessment. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, titled Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements, dated 6/18/24, indicated but was not limited to the following:-In conducting the facility assessment, the facility must ensure active involvement of the following participants in the process:a. Nursing home leadership and management, including but not limited to, a member of the governing body, the medical director, an administrator, and the director of nursing; andb. Direct care staff, including but not limited to, Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, Nursing Assistants, and representatives of the direct care staff, if applicablec. The facility must also solicit and consider input received from residents, resident representatives, and family members.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in a safe and secure manner as required for two Residents (#9 and #121), from a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. For Resident #9, that prescribed topical wound treatment supplies were not left unsecured and unattended at the Resident's bedside; and2. For Resident #121, that antifungal powder was not left unsecured and unattended at a resident's bedside.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, last revised 2024, indicated but was not limited to:-Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly.-The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications.1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 and had diagnoses including dementia and a stage 4 pressure ulcer to the right buttock.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. For Resident #9, who has a stage 4 pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle), that staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities); and2. Surveillance documents in use by the facility, were complete and accurate each month. Findings include:1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 3/20/24, indicated but was not limited to: - Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#9 and #69), from a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #9, an air mattress was set according to physician's orders; and2. For Resident #69, oxygen was administered according to physician's orders. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled Air Mattress, last revised 1/14/25, indicated but was not limited to: -Policy: To maintain adequate circulation, relieve pain due to pressure and aid in healing and/or prevention of pressure ulcers. -Procedure: Verify MD order and settings according to manufacturer guidelines. -Check settings and function regularly and check setting on the pump. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 and had diagnoses including dementia and a stage 4 pressure ulcer to the right buttock. Review of the Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide the most updated COVID-19 vaccination to one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 27 resident, after the Resident consented to receiving the vaccination. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 vaccine immunization for Residents and staff, dated as revised 4/28/25, indicated but was not limited to: - when a current updated COVID-19 vaccine is available, it will be offered to residents unless medically contraindicated, they already received the vaccine or they have refused- if a resident requests the COVID-19 vaccination, and has missed earlier administration opportunities for any reason, the facility will offer the vaccine to this individual as soon as possible- if the vaccine is unavailable in the facility, the facility should document efforts made to make the vaccine available Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccines, dated as updated June 6, 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative was notified of a change in treatment for one Resident (#77), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Resident Representative when the Nurse Practitioner ordered the discontinuation of anticoagulant (medication that prevents blood from clotting) therapy following a fall resulting in a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Condition: Significant Change in, last revised 5/20/22, indicated but was not limited to: Policy: professional staff will communicate with physician, resident, and family regarding changes in condition. -Purpose: to provide timely communication of resident status change which is essential to Quality Care Management. -Process: The physician, resident and/or responsible party will be promptly notified by the nurse in the event of a condition change. -Order changes given by the physician will be carried out,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, for one Resident (#88), of three closed records reviewed, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay that included his/her course of illness/treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning Process, dated 6/11/24, indicated but was not limited to: Upon discharge the facility will complete a discharge summary which will include a recapitulation (the recapitulation of stay shall be a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment while in the facility) and a final summary which included the resident's status at the time of discharge. The discharge summary shall include a description of the resident's: -course of illness, treatment, and/or therapy since entering the facility Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with the following diagnoses: fracture of right femur (bone in the upper leg/thigh) and history of fall. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #88 was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) on 6/25/24. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#13 and #15), out of five residents selected for unnecessary medication review, that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #13, an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment (a clinical outcome checklist completed by a healthcare provider to assess the presence and severity of adverse outcomes, such as abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body) was completed timely in accordance with standards of practice; and 2. For Resident #15, as needed (prn) antidepressant medication was limited to 14 days, or extended beyond 14 days with a documented clinical rationale for its continued use and identified a clinical indication for use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, last revised 5/15/2022, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: Each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs. Administration of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that healthcare personnel performed hand hygiene following the self-collection of a nasal swab sample to rule out COVID-19; 2. Ensure that healthcare personnel donned (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering a precaution room as indicated by posted signs outside of the resident's room; and 3. Ensure staff performing aerosol generating procedures for COVID-19 residents were properly fit-tested for an N-95 mask, prior to performing the procedure. Findings include: 1. Review of the Fact Sheet for Health Providers for BinaxNow COVID-19 Care, dated 4/6/2021 indicated the following: - Specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions On 3/15/23 at 9:25 A.M., the surveyor observed Clerical Staff Member #1 perform a COVID…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for two Residents (#112 and #233), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy for investigating and reporting alleged allegations of abuse documented in the facility's Grievance Book for: 1. Resident #112's alleged allegation of sexual assault; and 2. Resident #233's alleged allegation of physical abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Policies and Procedures, dated 7/17/2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility prohibits any form of abuse (verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion; neglect and exploitation of residents and must ensure each resident is free from misappropriation of personal property. - All injuries of unknown source or unwitnessed injuries such as bruises, skin tears, and fractures will be investigated as potential abuse or neglect incidents. - All employees of the nursing facility have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$47,886 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $47,886 — penalty dated 2024-07-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $909K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA