No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sterling Care Riverside

1123 Belcamp Garth, Belcamp, MD 21017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 129 certified beds · (410) 575-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 575-6400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Dec 2018$4,194 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $4,194 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-11)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1200 Brass Mill Ed · (410) 272-7756 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1321 Riverside Pkwy · (410) 272-8741 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4692 Millennium Dr Ste 104 · (410) 272-4905 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1119 Belcamp Garth · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5 Church Creek Dr. · (410) 272-3222

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.4%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.7%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.1%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.1%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.4%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.0%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.821.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 545 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.1%CMS range 54.8–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.7%CMS range 10.8–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.6–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
53.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 108.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-25)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices were followed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and ensure the dishwasher reached adequate temperature according to the manufacturer's guideline. This was evident during the surveyor's tour of the facility's kitchen and 1 out of 1 nutrition room observed by the surveyor on the first floor of the facility during the survey. The findings include: 1. During the surveyor's tour of the facility's kitchen on 8/14/25 at 8:57AM the surveyor observed a closed container with a clear lid on it, of thickener powder in which a plastic handled scooper was observed laying within the thickener powder with the handle of the scooper touching the thickener powder. At the time of the observation, the surveyor informed the facility's Director of Dining Services #30 who, after surveyor intervention, observed and acknowledged the surveyor's concern and was then observed reaching into the container and they removed the scooper. At this time, the surveyor conducted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and observations it was determined that the facility failed to provide dignity and respect to residents dependent for activities of daily living assistance. This was evident for two residents (#7 and #43) out of 8 residents observed at mealtimes during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 08/14/25 at 0745 AM the surveyor initiated a tour of the second floor clinical unit. Resident#43 was observed at 08:35 AM eating breakfast in bed without staff assistance. Resident #43 had pureed and ground food items on the tray. There was a black handled adaptive spoon in the resident's contracted right hand. The surveyor observed the Resident #43 using the utensil to feed themself however, the resident was also spilling some food on her/his neck and chest. Resident #43 did not have any protective clothing covering the resident's neck, chest and/or bedsheets from spills. At the time of the observation there were no nursing clinical staff in Resident #43's room or in the hallway available to assist the resident. On 08/14/2025 at 08:39 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment and maintain the resident environment in a safe, clean, and homelike manner. This was evident for 1 out of 1 outdoor resident patio spaces and 5 of 15 resident rooms observed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1.) On 8/15/25 at 14:07PM the surveyor conducted an observation of the facility's first floor dining room at which time the surveyor observed from the dining room, two metal beds and two bed headboards sitting within the outdoor patio space and various weeds and overgrowth of plants protruding through the fence surrounding the outdoor patio space. Weeds were observed protruding upward from sections of the cement in the outdoor patio space. An overgrowth of weeds along the front parking area spaces was additionally observed by surveyors. On 8/15/25 at 14:09PM the surveyor requested a dual observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) and observed and shared the concerns with them. At this time the surveyor conducted an interview of the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) out of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/21/2025 at 8:06AM the surveyor observed LPN #22 perform a dressing change for Resident #10 for their pressure ulcers. On 8/21/2025 at 10:57AM the surveyor conducted a review of Resident #10's medical record which revealed an admission date to the facility in December 2024, and admission history documented by Physician #23 which indicated Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer. On 8/21/2025 at 10:57AM during the surveyor's review of Resident #10's medical record it was observed that an admission MDS assessment was completed for Resident #10 in December 2024 indicating under Section M- skin conditions, that the resident had pressure ulcers present. MDS section M0100 Determination of Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk, question A asks the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were timely administered to a resident (#68). This was evident during the surveyor's review of a complaint during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/14/25 at 1:26PM a review of complaint 357933 that was received by the State Survey Agency, alleged that Resident #68's medications were delayed several hours. During an interview 8/18/25 at 2:43PM conducted by the surveyor of the facility's Director of Nursing (DON), they stated the following information to the surveyor regarding Resident #68: No, I am not aware of any issues relating to medication administration. On 8/19/25 at 8:47AM the surveyor conducted an interview with the DON who reported they were not aware of any med pass delays regarding Resident #68, at which time the surveyor requested the Medication Administration Audit Report for Resident #68 to be provided for 6/18/24 and 6/19/24. On 8/19/25 at 13:55PM the surveyor was provided with the Medication Administration Audit Report for 6/18/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents were free from accident hazards and supervision. This was evident for 4 (Resident #2, 4, 73, and 22) out of 4 residents observed in the dining room area after breakfast time during the survey.The findings include:On 8/14/2025 at 8:47 AM, during the initial observation of the second floor, the surveyor went to the dining area and saw that there were several residents in the area talking amongst themselves. One of the residents (Resident #73) had finished their breakfast at the table and was trying to eat the aluminum lid from their apple juice container. As the surveyor was looking around, they heard a residents say, Don't eat that baby. You're not supposed to eat that. I don't know why they are eating that. Another resident (Resident #22) did not have any socks on and was in their wheelchair, moving around, using their feet to maneuver. The surveyor looked around the room to see if any staff were available to assist the residents. However, the surveyor did not see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) follow an active medical order in place for continuous oxygen for a resident, 2.) ensure the resident's care reviewed by the physician reflected the medical order in place, and 3.) ensure the respiratory care plan accurately reflected the medical order for oxygen. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #68) reviewed for respiratory care during the surveyor's review of a complaint and during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's review of investigation into a complaint, Resident #68 was observed by the surveyor on 8/18/25 at 10:53AM laying in bed with their oxygen concentrator on and set at 5 liters being delivered via nasal cannula to the resident. Review of the medical record at this time revealed Resident #68 had the following active medical order dated as beginning on 5/1/25: Respiratory: Oxygen- Continuous 4L via NC (nasal cannula), every shift. On 8/18/25 at 10:54AM the surveyor requested a dual observation of the concern with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the services of a registered nurse were provided for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This deficient practice was evident on 1 of 8 days reviewed (08/10/2025) during the recertification survey.On 08/15/2025 at 1:07 PM, record review of staffing schedules and assignments revealed that no registered nurse was scheduled or present to provide coverage for the facility on 08/10/2025 for an 8-hour consecutive period.At 1:26 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed there was no nurse coverage for the entire building during the overnight shift on August 9 and all day on August 10. She stated she lives close by and could come in if needed but was not in the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post nurse staffing information in a clear and visible manner as required. This deficient practice was evident for 1 of 2 floors during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 08/14/2025 at 7:39 AM, during observation of the first floor unit staffing board, the surveyor noted there was no clearly visible posting of the staff-to-resident ratio. The information could not be readily located or reviewed by residents, visitors, or staff. On 08/14/2025 at 1:35 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Regional Director were made aware of the findings.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all items in the medication storage rooms were free from expired expiration dates. This was evident for 1 out of 2 medication storage rooms.The findings include: On [DATE] at 12:50 PM, the Surveyor arrived on the first floor to observe the medication storage room. A nurse (LPN #13) was asked for the location of the med room and to unlock it for them. LPN #13 had to first locate the person with the keys for the medication room to unlock the door. LPN #13 stood in the doorway while the surveyor reviewed the medications and supplies. It was noted that blue laboratory tubes for blood collection had expiration dates on them for [DATE] and [DATE]. The Eswab Collection & Transport System for Aerobic, Anaerobic & Fastidious bacteria had expiration dates on them for [DATE], and a Luer Lock Disposable syringe with 25G X 0.625 needles had expiration dates for [DATE], and [DATE]. All items were shown to LPN #13. She then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate information was placed in residents' records. This was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and #132) residents reviewed during the survey. 1) On 8/21/2025 at 2:13 PM, the surveyor spoke with the DON #2 and asked the question, Who is responsible for reviewing and implementing orders from the doctor after a doctor's appointment? DON #2 explained that the nurse should review the visit summary and update the orders when the resident returns, and the unit manager should also follow up to make sure that the orders are completed. DON #2 was notified that during the surveyor's record review, for Resident #2, there was no documentation of when the Foley was ever changed. DON #2 stated that she is not sure how they document it and that she would get back to the surveyor. When the DON #2 returned, she had brought the ADON #3 back with her. The ADON #3 explained that she had documented on 7/1/25 how Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to: 1.) maintain optimal infection control and prevention precautions in one area of the laundry room and maintain a clean environment around the eye wash station and the laundry hopper, and ensure water pipes were not left exposed in the area next to and above the laundry hopper. This was evident for 1 out of 1 laundry area observed; 2.) ensure proper infection control/sanitization for any medical equipment that was shared among residents. This was evident for 1 out of 2 medication administration observations; and 3.) ensure oxygen equipment was properly dated to prevent potential infection control risks. This was evident for 1 (Resident #101) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen use during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1.) On 8/25/25 at 11:32AM the Administrator and the surveyor agreed to tour the laundry room on the ground floor of the facility. Laundry Supervisor #20 accompanied the surveyor and the Administrator into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of the facility it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a homelike manner. This was evident as a result of random observations. The findings include: An environmental tour of the facility on 3/30/23 and 4/5/23 revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brown stain on the walls. The coaxle cable box was detached from the wall and hanging freely. Observation on 4/5/23 at 12:42 PM revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER] had a protective covering, door skin, coming off the door. The top left corner could be pulled away from door 2-4 inches revealing the adhesive backing material. The door to room [ROOM NUMBER] had its door skin partially detached from the door. This was observed on 4/5/23 at 12:49 PM. The second floor shower room baseboard molding, on the left hand side of the entrance area, was observed to be partially detached from the wall and the bottom corner of the same wall had a section of drywall damaged. The fall mat for 226 bed B had torn corners and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) provide a resident with prompt assistance for positioning and failed to ensure the resident had access to their call bell device (Resident #504) and 2.) failed to document complete assessments of residents when there was a noted change in condition (#305 and #506). This was evident for 1.) 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning, and 2.) 2 of 4 residents reviewed for change of condition during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 3/27/23 at 10:00 AM surveyors observed a call bell request for assistance from Resident #504. Staff #11, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed standing in the hallway until 10:03 AM when another staff member verbally told Staff #11 that the resident needed assistance, at which time they responded to the call light. Staff #11 was heard by surveyors telling Resident #504: Let me get somebody, and then was observed leaving the resident's room. An observation was made by surveyors on 3/27/23 at 10:05 AM of Resident #504, no staff was present…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record in the most complete and accurate form for Residents (#5, #16, #24, #48, #61, #154, #156 and #508). This was evident for 8 of 63 residents selected for medical record review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A medical record is simply a record of a resident's health and medical history. Consistent, current, and complete documentation in the medical record is an essential component of quality resident care. 1. Observation of Resident #5 on 3/27/23 at 2:18 PM revealed the Resident had bilateral hand contractures with no splints in place. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 3/30/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include quadriplegia. Quadriplegia refers to paralysis from the neck down, including the trunk, legs and arms. Review of the Resident's orders revealed an order on 1/25/23 that stated: Splint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain the safest practicable level of precautions to prevent and control the spread of infectious disease. This was evident during multiple random observations throughout the facility. Review of the CDC website for Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes, updated 9/27/22, revealed the following guidance; Post visual alerts (e.g., signs, posters) at the entrance and in strategic places (e.g., waiting areas, elevators, cafeterias) These alerts should include instructions about current IPC recommendations (e.g., when to use source control and perform hand hygiene). Dating these alerts can help ensure people know that they reflect current recommendations. Implement source control measures by; 1.use of respirators or well-fitting facemasks or cloth masks to cover a person ' s mouth and nose to prevent spread of respiratory secretions when they are breathing, talking, sneezing, or coughing. 2. HCP who enter the room of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of medical records, interview with facility staff and review of pertinent documentation including facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and monitor the usage of antibiotics for the residents. This was identified during the review of the facility line listing during the annual Medicaid/Medicare survey and the infection control task. Random residents selected for review from the facility line listing included (R #80, #106 and #504) The findings include: Surveyor conducted initial review of the facility line listing related to the monitoring of infections in the facility with the facility Assistant Director of nursing/infection control nurse, staff #2 on 4/6/23 at 7:57 AM. Surveyors had immediate concerns with the provided line listings provided for the months of February though April. Through the titled 'Antibiotic Review' spreadsheet provided by the ADON and DON contained the expected columns and places to enter the appropriate and needed information to monitor and track antibiotics had many blank areas. For each month the name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently acquire resident vital signs timely for the Daily COVID-19 tool assessments. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed during the infection control part of the annual survey. The findings include: On 3/27/23 Surveyor reviewed random selection of residents identified as new admissions and monitored for COVID-19. 1. During the review of the medical record regarding COVID-19 daily screenings for Resident #95 on 3/27/23 revealed the following: Daily Covid Tool completed 3/26/23 at 3:45 AM with vital signs for 3/15/23 at 6:20 PM, these vital signs also were put in for the 3/15/2023 11:31 PM assessment. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #505 on 3/28/23 at 7:30 AM revealed the following: The Daily COVID Tool completed for 3/12/23 and 3/13/23 had vital signs that documented as acquired on 3/12/23 at 12:37 PM and 3/11/23 2:26 PM. Vital signs acquired on 3/13/23 at 12:28 PM documented on two of 3/14/23 Daily COVID Tool's and one of the 3/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were offered the opportunity to either provide a copy of already written Advanced Directives and/or create a set of Advanced Directives (#28 and #506). This was evident for 2 out of the 63 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: 1. A review of Resident #28's clinical record on 3/29/23 at 8:00 AM revealed that a copy of an Advanced Directive or a progress note indicating that the resident was offered the opportunity to create an Advanced Directive could not be found in the electronic health record. This surveyor requested evidence of an Advanced Directive on 3/29/23 at 1:00 PM from the Director of Nursing (DON). The social worker (Staff #21) was interviewed on 3/31/23 at 9:03 AM. She said the resident signed a form designating a Power of Attorney. Another request was made for a copy of the Advanced Directives. A review of the clinical records on 3/31/23 at 11:01 AM revealed that Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify family and the physician timely when notified of a residents change in condition. This was evident during a random observation. The findings include: Surveyor completed observations and interviews with Resident #95 on 3/27/23 10:34 AM. S/he was interviewed just after returning from a session at rehabilitation. Surveyor observed Resident #95 to have increased work of breathing and coughing which s/he also verbalized to the surveyor. Surveyors left the room and immediately reported the observations and reported concerns from the resident to LPN Staff #11 at 10:40 AM. The surveyor returned to the hallway on 3/27/23 to where Resident #11 resides to follow-up on Resident #95's status. Resident #95's son/RP was in the room visiting at that time. On 3/29/23, surveyor reviewed Resident #95's medical record. According to the completed 'SBAR' situation, background, assessment, recommendation, change in condition form initiated on 3/27/23, the resident 'RP' representative was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation while touring the facility it was determined that the facility staff failed to protect the privacy of its residents (#9). This was evident as a result of three random observations. The findings are: 1. While touring the facility as part of an environmental review two tops of medication bingo cards were found stuck between the small handrail in the middle of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] and the wall. Resident #9's medications were Lasix (a diuretic) and Potassium Chloride. The tops were handed to the unit manager for Unit One who then disposed of the tops. 2. On 3/27/23 at 8:30 AM, Staff #11 was observed walking away from their medication cart, off the unit, to obtain the blood pressure machine leaving patient information on their computer screen visible. At 8:31 AM Staff #11 returned and proceeded to walk past their medication cart, at which time surveyors communicated the concern to Staff #11, their response to surveyors was Oh, I just left it. Surveyors then observed Staff #11 lock their computer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code a resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Resident #50, #73 and #80). This was evident for 3 out of 63 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gathers information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #73 on 3/27/23 at 8:11 AM revealed the Resident to be edentulous (without teeth). Interview with the Resident at that time, the Resident stated he/she had his/her teeth pulled and is waiting on dentures. Review of Resident #73's medical record on 3/30/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/3/21 the facility staff completed an oral evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure its residents had a complete and accurate Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASRR). This was evident for 1 out of 63 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: A review of Resident #24's clinical record on 3/29/23 at 9:46 AM revealed the resident had a PASRR completed on 2/15/23. Section B Intellectual Disability (ID) and related conditions has four questions and if one or more is checked as yes then the resident is considered to have ID or a related condition. The facility staff answered one question as yes but marked no to whether or not the resident had ID or a related condition. A review of Section D revealed it was left blank. Staff are instructed to complete the section if a resident is scored to have ID or a serious mental illness. The social worker (staff # 23) was interviewed on 3/30/23 at 12:36 PM. She said they sent it to Adult Evaluation and Review Services (AERS) and a Level II evaluation was deemed unnecessary. The findings were explained and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to address presence and care of a resident's foley catheter (tube that drains urine from the bladder) in the resident's baseline careplan. This was evident for one out of three residents reviewed for catheters. The findings include: On 3/28/23 at 9:00 AM, surveyors observed Resident #506's foley catheter bag laying on the floor under their bed. During record review on 3/31/23 at 1:05 PM, the hospital discharge summary for Resident #506. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] addressed recommendations for the resident being discharged with a foley catheter in place. Upon further record review on 3/31/23 at 1:05 PM, the baseline careplan dated 3/20/23 and signed on 3/23/23 for Resident #506 was reviewed. The baseline careplan revealed Resident #506 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], approximately four days prior to the effective date of the baseline careplan. The baseline careplan provides for identification of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident medical records, the facility failed to take a resident to the bathroom (Resident #458), change a resident in a timely manner (Resident # 27) and provide showers (Resident #508). This was evident for 3 out of 7 residents reviewed for ADL care during an annual survey. Findings include: 1. Resident # 458 was admitted to facility on 12/3/22 and discharged on 2/23/23. According to a complaint from daughter of resident # 458, resident was left for over 4 hours before she/he was changed. Daughter stated he/she is expected to eat his/her lunch while needing to be changed. Daughter stated, 'we have tried to resolve the issues with the staff, but they just don't care. She/he has also been double diapered so they would not have to changed him /her so much. Daughter stated ' My niece is there every day and has spoken to them regularly about the problems. Physical therapy does not do therapy every day as it should be done, and did not try to help get her changed when this happened. Medical record review was conducted on 4/3/23 at 9:38 AM. Resident# 458 has a BIMS of 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide supplements as recommended by the dietitian for a resident (#64). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for review for nutrition during the annual survey. The findings include: Observation of Resident #64 on 3/27/23 at 10:06 AM revealed the Resident appeared to be thin. Review of Resident #64's medical record on 3/29/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident weighed 148.9 pounds on 3/1/23. The Resident was assessed by the Dietitian on 3/5/23 for weight loss. At that time the Dietician wrote in the Dietitian Progress Note for the Resident to have Ensure Plus twice a day. Ensure Plus is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to include provider notes in the medical record in a timely manner with accurate date of visit (Resident #508). This was evident for 1 of 63 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Resident #508 was admitted to the facility beginning on 3/22/23. Staff #49, Nurse Practitioner, documented they performed an initial visit with the resident on 3/23/23. Documentation of the visit via a progress note with a date of service for 3/23/23 was electronically signed and uploaded on 3/27/23 at 8:30 AM after surveyors were present in the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/30/23 at 9:16 AM concerning this resident's records, they reported the facility's medical records department is responsible for uploading of provider notes and keeping track of provider visits. After surveyor brought the concern to the DON's attention on 3/30/23 at 9:16 AM, Staff #49 electronically signed a progress note on 3/30/23 at 9:46 AM for a visit with Resident #508…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to address and identify the use of a medication in a resident's plan of care (Resident #508). This was evident for one out of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 3/31/23 at 9:26 AM, review of the medical record for Resident #508 revealed they required a necessary anti-depressant medication: fluoxetine. The facility's medication order for fluoxetine states the medication is being given to the resident for depression. Staff #49, Nurse Practitioner, documented via progress notes as having seen Resident #508 on the following dates: 3/23/23, 3/28/23, and 3/29/23. Staff #49's progress notes for visits occurring on 3/23/23, 3/28/23, and 3/29/23 revealed that fluoxetine use was not identified and addressed in the resident's plan of care. During an interview with the facility DON on 3/31/23 at 10:09 AM, surveyor concern was reviewed.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's kitchen and interviews of the dietary staff it was determined that 1) the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices were followed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and 2) ensure the food maintained an acceptable serving temperature. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Wet nesting occurs when wet dishes or pots and pans are stacked, preventing them from drying, and creating conditions that are ripe for microorganisms to grow. FDA guidelines mandate that all wares should be air dried. Using towels to dry dishes is never permitted. 1) During the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/27/2023 at approximately 12:14 PM, the surveyors and food service manager #15 observed large metal pans stacked inside of each other on a drying rack. On closer observation the surveyors and the food service manager observed wet nesting in several of the large metal pans. The food service manager confirmed the metal pans should not have been stacked inside one another preventing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined the facility staff failed to properly label and date food stored in the walk-in refrigerator. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: Observation was made during the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/18/2018 at 18 08:17 AM: 1. The egg salad sandwich in the walk-in refrigerator did not have an expiration date. 2. Two packages of yellow cheese in the reach-in refrigerator was wrapped in plastic wrap and did not have an expirations date. 3. The butter was open to air in the reach-in refrigerator and did not have an open or expirations date. 4. On 12/21/18 10:50 AM tour of kitchen revealed a floor fan blowing air in the direction of the prep table. These deficiencies were confirmed with the food service manager on 12/18/2018 and 12/21/18.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat each resident in a dignified manner for. This was evident for 8 of 40 residents (#13, #55, #39, #87, #12, #73, #100, and #63) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. During an observation of Resident #13 on 12/20/18, at 9:18 AM and 9:56 AM, it was observed that employee #18 failed to knock on the door before entering Resident #13's room on two separate occasions. 2. On 12-18-18 from 12:00 PM to 12:35 PM in the second floor dining room meal service was observed. Resident #55, #39 and #87 were seated at a table. At 12:00 PM Resident #87 had been served and was eating. By 12:15 PM Resident #55 who had not been served was grabbing for Resident #87's meal. Resident #55's meal was served at 12:18 PM and when served Resident #55 yelled Hallelujah. Resident #39 was not served until 12:20 PM. On 12-18-18 at noon Resident #12 was seated at a table with Resident's #73 and #100. Resident's #73 and #100 had been served and were eating. Resident #12 had not been served. At 12:20 PM Resident #12 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1) obtain a physician's order to use a restraint on a resident, 2) evaluate the use of a restraint on a resident, and 3) initiate a care plan for the use of the restraint on a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record on 12/20/18, revealed staff documentation of a phone call with Resident #55's health care power of attorney (HCPOA) on 08/14/18 that detailed Resident #55's HCPOA giving the facility staff permission to apply a body alarm to Resident #55 for the reason that Resident #55 attempted to get up unassisted, was unable to follow directions due to cognitive loss, and a benefit to deter falls. Review of Resident #55's care plans revealed a fall care plan that listed the following nursing interventions: check the function and placement of body alarm, ensure the environment is free of clutter, use floor mats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were adequately met by trimming the resident's finger nails. This was evident for 2 (#13, #96) of 6 residents reviewed for ADL care during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. During an observation of Resident #13 on 12/20/18 at 9:56 AM with employee #18, Resident #13's finger nails were observed to be long and pressing into both palms of his/her hands. No wounds were observed to Resident #13's palms. Resident #13 did not have any type of splint in place to both hands to protect his/her palms from his/her long finger nails. Employee #18 stated that Resident #13 was to have bilateral hand splints in place also. 2. This surveyor interviewed Resident #96 on 12/18/18 at 1:47 PM. During the interview it was observed that the resident's fingernails were long. The resident said a staff member told him/her they do not have fingernail clippers in the facility, so they can't be cut to the resident's liking. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to apply ace bandage wraps for Resident #89 and Ted stockings for Resident #351. This was evident for 2 of 40 residents during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #89 revealed on 11/28/18 the physician ordered: ace bandage wrap apply in am/remove at bedtime. To be applied before getting out of bed for orthostatic blood pressure control. Surveyor observation of the resident on 12/19/18 at 11:30 AM and on 12/20/18 at 9:30 AM, revealed the resident sitting in his/her wheelchair in the room, however the facility staff failed to apply the ace bandage as ordered by the physician. 2. Medical record review for Resident #351 revealed on 12/14/18 the physician ordered: Ted stockings, knee high apply in AM remove in PM. Surveyor observation of the resident on 12/19/18 at 10:30 AM, the resident was sitting in his/her wheelchair near the nursing station and on 12/20/18 at 2:00 PM revealed the resident sitting in his/her room however, the facility staff failed to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents with a limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline in range of motion. This was evident for 1 (Resident #13) of 4 residents reviewed for mobility during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #13's December 2018 physician's orders revealed the order Right and left-hand soft palm guard as tolerated. Remove for hygiene. Check skin every shift. with a start date of 03/13/18. There was also an order elevate heels while in bed every shift, and an order foam heel protectors to bilateral heels for pressure reduction, check for positioning every shift. Observation was made of Resident #13 on 12/20/18 at 9:56 AM with employee #18. Resident #13 was lying in bed with both legs pointed straight out to the end of the mattress. Both of Resident #13's hands were contracted with hands in fists. Resident #13 did not have hand splints on hands and both legs were lying directly on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform an annual performance review for a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA, Staff #5). The findings include: Review of Staff #5's employee file on 12-19-18 at 1:00 PM revealed an annual performance evaluations completed on 5-30-17 with none for 2018. On 12-19-18 at 1:30 PM confirmed with the Director of Nursing that the required annual performance evaluation for Staff #5 was not done.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility daily narcotic and amphetamine count per shift records, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the narcotic and amphetamine count per shift records. This was evident for 2 of 4 medication storage carts reviewed. The findings included: On 12-19-18 at 1:15 PM the narcotic and amphetamine count per shift record on their medication cart was reviewed with Staff #5. On 12-18-18 at 3:00 PM and 12-19-18 at 7:00 AM the nurse relinquishing the narcotic key did not sign the record. On 12-18-18 at 11:00 PM the nurse receiving the narcotic key did not sign the record. On 12-19-18 at 1:45 PM the narcotic and amphetamine count per shift record on their medication cart was reviewed with Staff #7. The record revealed on 12-16-18 at 11:00 PM and 12-19-18 at 7:00 AM the nurse receiving the narcotic key did not sign not the record. On 12-17-18 at 7:00 AM the nurse relinquishing the narcotic key did not sign the record. The inaccurate narcotic and amphetamine count records was confirmed with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain dental services for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) of 5 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/18, under section D - 0200, which indicated Resident #36 likely had cavities and broken teeth. The facility staff initiated a dental care plan at this time with nursing interventions that included: to refer resident to a dentist/hygienist for evaluation and treatment. During an observation of Resident #36 on 12/18/18 at 12:57 PM, Resident #36 was noted to have missing teeth. In an interview with employee #3 on 12/21/18 at 9:27 AM, employee #3 stated that resident had not had a dental referral or consult since admission to the facility. Review of Resident #36's MOLST form revealed Resident #36's guardian of person wanted Resident #36 to receive all types of care and treatment while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain dental services for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #55) of 5 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed a dental care plan on 08/20/18 with nursing interventions that included: Resident's dentures will be properly store & maintained in good repair, Resident will not lose dentures, check linens/ wastebasket for dentures before discarding, instruct resident in proper handling/ storage of dentures, Refer to dentist/ hygienist for evaluation/recommendations re: denture realignment, new fitting, teeth pulled, repair of carious teeth as needed. During an interview with Resident #55's representative on 12/18/18 at 11:12 AM, Resident #55's representative indicated the facility had lost Resident #55's upper denture. In an interview with employee #3 on 12/20/18 at 11:32 AM, employee #3 confirmed Resident #55 had an upper denture and had not been seen by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. This was evident during observation of an Indwelling Foley Cather for Resident #99. This was evident for 1 of 2 resident's selected for review of Indwelling Foley Cather. The findings include: A review of Resident #99's clinical record revealed that the resident had an Indwelling Foley Catheter related to urinary retention. During surveyor observation of Resident #99 on 12/18/18 at 9:45 AM, Resident #99 was sitting in the wheelchair in his room with the Foley Cather drainage bag attached to the bottom of the wheelchair causing it to rest on the floor. Another observation on 12/18/18 at 11:39 AM, The resident was being transported up the hall with Foley Cather drainage bag still attached to the bottom of the wheel chair dragging on the floor. An observation on 12/19/2018 at 12:53 PM, the resident was sitting in the wheelchair in his/her room and the Foley Cather drainage bag was noted to be hanging on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-12-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on daily observation during the annual recertification survey it was determined the facility failed to post the required nursing staffing data on the nursing assignment board. This was evident on 2 out of 2 nursing assignment boards The findings include: From 12-18-18 to 12-21-18 the nursing assignment boards did not have the following required items: facility name, the total number and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff providing direct care and daily census. The assignment boards were in a readable format but due to being placed high up on the wall it was difficult for someone in a wheelchair to read. On 12-21-18 at 9:00 AM with Staff #4 it was confirmed the assignment boards were incomplete and difficult to read from a wheelchair.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$4,194 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERLING CARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RO HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2019
JAKOBOVITS, NATHANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2019
KAGAN, JEFFREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2019

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 30%Other / private 17%

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$411per resident / day
operating cost
$12,491per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$467per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215233. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next