No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sterling Care Forest Hill

109 Forest Valley Drive, Forest Hill, MD 21050 · For profit - Corporation · 156 certified beds · (410) 838-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 838-0101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Oct 20231 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$10,036 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,036 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-14)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4 N Ave, Building C, Ste 420 · (410) 638-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1519 Rock Spring Rd · (410) 638-8757 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Giant0.4 mi
1401 Rock Spring Rd · (410) 420-2960 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Melrose Lane · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.6%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.3%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.9%16.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.5%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.1%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.0%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.981.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.891.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 472 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 213 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.2%CMS range 51.6–61.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 10.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.8–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
34.8%
Total nursing turnover
47.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 131.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-22)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to a cognitively impaired resident with known elopement risk and exit-seeking behavior from exiting the building unsupervised. This was evident for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for elopement during the survey. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #82. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following the incident. The facility's plan of correction and actions were verified during the survey; therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past non-compliance. The date of correction was 07.21.22. The facility administrator and director of nursing were provided a copy of the past compliance IJ documentation and both employees signed and dated the documents at 3:15 PM on 08.14.24. The findings include: On 08.08.24 at 10:15 AM the surveyor reviewed MD00181562 which revealed that on 07.21.22 Resident #82 was found approximately 800 feet from the facility at approximately 12:10 AM -12:15 AM at the Royal Farms gas station. Resident #82 was returned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a homelike environment. This was evident for 5 of the resident rooms observed during the initial tour of the facility during this recertification survey. The findings include: Members of the survey team made observations of the environmental conditions of certain rooms while touring the facility on 12/17/25. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole in the wall at the end of the bed and a patched area, room [ROOM NUMBER] had scraping on the wall below the window on the left side of the bed, room [ROOM NUMBER] had peeling behind the bed, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a sink that appeared to be coming off of the wall and had a sign on the bathroom door that said, do not use with a date of 6/8/25, Resident #77 in room [ROOM NUMBER] told surveyor on 12/17/25 at 9:19 AM that the bathroom door does not lock for privacy, and room [ROOM NUMBER] had peeling paint on the walls. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a call bell was in reach of a resident. This was evident for 2 (#37 and #85) out of 43 residents reviewed as part of the survey sample. The findings include: A member of the survey team observed on 12/17/25 at 10:36 AM the call light cord on the floor on the left side of Resident #37's bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] during the initial tour of the facility. This surveyor toured several rooms noted by the survey team for further observation on 12/22/25. This surveyor observed at 11:13 AM a call light cord below the bed of Resident #85 (roommate of #37) in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff #6 was interviewed at 11:15 AM. She identified herself upon request and was informed of the call bell cord being below Resident #85's bed. She asked to be shown and upon observing it herself she said she would take care of it. She knocked on the door, entered the room, and retrieved the call bell cord.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and observation, it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL care related to urine incontinence timely. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 6) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living during the recertification survey.The findings include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) is a term used collectively to describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, toileting, and mobility.On 12/17/2025 at 9:10 AM during an interview, Resident #6 expressed a concern regarding the timeliness of incontinence care. Resident #6 elaborated, When I get up and they put me in the wheelchair, I am raw on my skin from the urine; it hurts and burns my skin. They do not change me the way that they should. I get up in the morning and sometimes it may not be until 3 or 4 pm until I get changed again. On 12/18/2025 at 10:48 AM, a review of Resident #6's medical record showed that the last documented incontinence care, as recorded by the GNA in the TASK section (where the care provided is documented), was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an ordered consultation that necessitated an outside scheduled appointment was completed. This was evident for 1 of 28 residents (Resident #6) reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 12/17/2025 at 9:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #6 who voiced concern of irritated skin with incontinent episodes. On 12/18/2025 at 10:27 AM, during an observation while GNA Staff #5 was providing incontinent care to Resident #6, the resident stated, They said I have a yeast infection, and it just won't go away. They keep using the same stuff. This has been going on for a year, and it hurts so bad when I pee.On 12/18/2025 at 10:46 AM, a review of Resident #6's medical record revealed a physician order dated 9/23/2025 for Gynecology (GYN) consultation related to continuous vaginal discomfort.On 12/18/2025 at 10:50 AM, in an interview, Resident #6 denied that he/she had been to a GYN doctor. On 12/18/2025 at 10:57 AM, in an interview with Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to assist a resident with known difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) with feeding and failed to provide liquids during a meal. This was evident for 1 (Resident #37) of 4 residents reviewed for Nutrition during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 2/17/2025 upon initial tour at 8:40 AM, an observation was made of Resident #37 hollering out in bed, with a breakfast meal tray in front of them on the bedside table positioned over the bed and no staff was present. On 12/18/2025 at 8:07 AM, an observation was made of Resident #37 self-feeding with the head of the bed elevated and leaning to the right side, there was no staff present. The breakfast tray was missing the thickened milk (8 oz) and orange juice (4 oz) indicated on the meal ticket.On 12/18/2025 at 8:13 AM, review of Resident #37's medical record revealed a physician order dated 9/24/2025 that indicated 1:1 assist with meals.On 12/18/2025 at 8:14 AM, continued medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an 08/06/2020 ADL care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to label oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles with date of change to indicate maintenance of respiratory equipment for proper hygiene and safety. This was evident of 3 (Resident #1, #24, #66) of 4 residents observed for respiratory care during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the initial screening phase of the survey process on 12/17/2025 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 and Resident #24 receiving oxygen through an unlabeled (not dated) Nasal Cannula (N/C) tubing. Resident #1 did not have a dated label on the humidifier bottle. On 12/18/2025 at 9:37 AM the surveyor observed Resident #1 and Resident #66 sitting in their wheelchairs in the dayroom; both residents were receiving oxygen through unlabeled (not dated) nasal cannula tubing that was hooked to their oxygen tanks.A record review on 12/18/2025 at 10:02 AM noted the following:Resident#1 had an order: Oxygen at 2L/min via nasal cannula PRN for shortness of breathResident # 24 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon a pharmacy identified irregularities. This was evident for 1 (Resident #38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification survey.The findings includeOn 12/18/25 @10:05 AM review of the pharmacy's monthly medication review from February to November 2025 revealed recommendations for February, August, October and November. Further review revealed that the pharmacist recommended in February 2025 to add, Rinse mouth out after use of this medication to the order written as Fluticasone-salmeterol inhalation aerosol powder breath activated 100-50 MCG/ACT, This pharmacy recommendation was reviewed, signed and approved by the attending physician.Further review of the medication administration record (MAR) from February to November 2025 on 12/18/25 at 1:40 PM indicated that this recommendation was not carried out as ordered.In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/19/2025 at 9:19 AM, she was asked about the process for reconciling pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly store drugs and biologicals by not removing expired medications and supplies from the house stock medication cabinet. This was evident for 2 out of 3 stock medication cabinets observed during the recertification survey.The findings include:While conducting the medication storage and labeling facility task on 12/19/2025 at 09:10 AM, the surveyor observed the following expired medications in the house stock medication cabinet located on the 100 Hall: 16 FL OZ Liquid pain relief Acetaminophen 160 mg/5 ml exp date of 9/2025 12 FL OZ Geri Lanta Ant Acid regular strength exp 11/2025 Zinc 50 mg 100 tablets exp 11/2025 Docusate sodium liquid 50 mg/5 ml exp 7/2025 Aspirin 325 mg tabs, 100 tabs exp 8/2025 Gloke Gypopen Glucagon injection 1 mg per 0.2 ml exp 2024 [NAME] clearlink system continuous flo solution set 10 drpos/ml exp 3/15/2025The house stock medication drawer on 200 Hall: Zinc 50 mg 100 tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the provider accurately documented residents' current medications. This was evident for one resident (Resident #14) of the one resident reviewed for pain management during this recertification survey.The findings include:During an interview with Resident #14 on 12/17/25 at 11:40 AM, the resident reported that he/she was taking scheduled pain medication every six hours, which was not helping to reduce the pain.A review of Resident #14's medical records on 12/22/25 at 9:19 AM revealed that the resident was prescribed Hydromorphone 2mg every six hours for pain, starting in July 2025. However, the facility's attending Nurse Practitioner (Staff #12) consistently documented in progress notes for Resident #14: pain management: currently managed on Morphine Sulfate oral tablet 15mg, 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours for pain since 4/21/25.Further review of Resident #14's medical records on 12/22/25 at approximately 10:00 AM revealed that the Morphine Sulfate order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records, facility records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and track antibiotic usage effectively. Specifically, an antibiotic was prescribed to a resident without clinical evidence of infection, and the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program failed to document all prescribed antibiotics. This was evident in one (Resident #3) out of four residents reviewed for antibiotic use and stewardship during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 12/19/25 at 11:58 AM, a review of Resident #3's medical records revealed an order for Ceftriaxone 2g intravenously twice daily for a wound infection, scheduled for seven days starting 11/29/25. However, the medical record lacked detailed information, such as provider progress notes or laboratory results, to support the diagnosis of a wound infection.During an interview on 12/19/25 at 12:49 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the facility's antibiotic prescribing process: when a resident requires an antibiotic, the wound must be assessed, and the provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that influenza immunizations were consistently offered or administered during the active flu season. This was evidence one (Resident #124) out of a five-resident sample reviewed during the recertification survey.The Findings include:A review of medical records on 12/19/25 at 9:14 AM revealed that Resident #124, who was admitted in September 2025, lacked documentation of influenza vaccination. The electronic medical record (EMR) listed the resident's status as pending consent.During an interview on 12/19/25 at 10:41 AM, the Infection Preventionist (Staff #9) stated that all residents and staff are offered the vaccine during flu season and that the EMR should be updated to reflect vaccination or refusal.At 1:49 PM on 12/19/25, Staff #9 provided a consent form signed by the resident's family on 9/12/25. She confirmed that although the resident had been scheduled for vaccination on 12/06/25, the dose was not administered. Staff #9 acknowledged the oversight and stated that the vaccine would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' COVID-19 vaccine statuses were monitored and maintained in a timely manner. This finding was evident for one (Resident #129) of five residents whose immunization records were reviewed during this recertification survey.The findings include:A COVID-19 vaccine is intended to provide acquired immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease.On 12/19/25 at 9:14 AM, the surveyor reviewed five randomly selected residents' vaccination records. The review revealed that Resident #129 was admitted in October 2025; however, the resident's immunization status for COVID-19 was documented only as pending consent.During an interview with the Infection Preventionist (Staff #9) on 12/19/25 at 10:41 AM, she stated that facility staff review residents' vaccination status upon admission and offer vaccines to those who are eligible. The surveyor reviewed Resident #129's Immunization Session tab in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was found to be evident during the facility's survey and has the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted on 08/06/2024 at 8:35 AM with the dietary aide staff #13 accompanying the surveyors. Inside of the stand-alone refrigerator was a large bowl of croutons with a date-in of 06/13/24 and a date-out of 06/19/24. The dietary aide staff #13 immediately removed it after confirming that it should have been out of the refrigerator. During a continued tour of the kitchen on the same day at 08:40 AM, inside the walk-in freezer, the following items were observed, a small bag of sugar cookies was opened, 5 large bags of pancakes and 3 bags of French toast. There was no date label on any of the items observed. The dietary aide staff #13 stated that the items should have been dated and she removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to allow the residents on Unit 300 move freely throughout the facility as evidenced by the unit being locked and requiring a code to enter and exit. This deficient practice was discovered during the survey. The findings include: On 08/07/24 at 10:20 am the surveyor entered Unit #300 which required a code to gain entry onto the unit. Unit #300 is primarily used for residents who require rehabilitations services. On 08/07/24 at 10:37 am the surveyor asked Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager #35 why the unit was locked. RN Unit Manager #35 verbalized a resident on the unit was an elopement risk but was easily redirected. The resident's family and visitors receive the codes at the front desk. On 08/07/24 at 11:00 am while the surveyor was interviewing Resident #49 in their room, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #34 knocked on the resident's door. Upon entry GNA#34 proceeded to give the resident a piece of paper with the code to enter and exit the unit. When asked does the residents have the code to enter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to address and/or follow up on an ophthalmologist's recommendation. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) of 5 resident's reviewed for vision. The findings include: On 08/06/24 at 10:37 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #31. The resident stated they needed their eyes checked. The resident stated, my last appointment was January, and nothing has been done about my cataracts. They said I was going to need surgery. On observation the resident was not wearing glasses and glasses were not at bedside. On 8/07/24 at 9:23 AM, Resident #31's medical record was reviewed. There was an order for an Optometrist consult placed on 10/19/2023. On 08/08/24 at 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with the Unit Manager (Staff #24) for Unit 1. When asked about who schedules the specialty appointments for the residents, Staff #24 stated, I do. When asked about how often the residents see the specialists, Staff #24 stated, The specialists come to the facility at least once a month or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain facility equipment in good repair and provide a clean homelike environment. This was evident for 2 resident's rooms out of 8 resident rooms reviewed during the survey. The findings include: During observation rounds on 08/06/24 at 9:22 AM in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a heating and air-conditioning unit not working, with a wet black substance noted on the inside of the unit's grill, the unit's cover was falling off and there was a musty odor permeating throughout the room. During observation rounds on 08/06/24 at 9:25 AM in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom, there was approximately a 1-inch layer of dry gray/white substance located on the inside of the air duct vent opening. The bathroom sink was also noted to be detached from the wall. During observation rounds on 08/06/24 at 9:48 AM in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a heating and air-conditioning unit leaking water onto the floor, there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the assignment sheets were completed daily on Unit 300 and failed to reserve the posted daily nursing staff data for a minimum of 18 months. This deficient practice was discovered during the survey. The findings include: On 08/07/24 at 11:50 am the surveyor asked Geriatric Nursing Assistant #34 for a copy of the assignment sheets dated 08/02/24 - 08/07/24 all shifts. The surveyor reviewed the staffing sheets which revealed the written copy of the schedule for the dates 08/02/24 11pm-7 am, 08/03/24 & 08/04/24 all shifts, 08/05/24 11pm-7am, and 08/06/24 11pm- 7 am were not available. During an interview with RN Unit Manager #35 on 08/07/24 at 11:54 am the surveyor reported some of the assignment sheets were missing. RN Unit Manager #34 verbalized the staff are expected to complete the assignment sheets daily for all shifts. On 08/14/24 at 2:03 pm during an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing #5 they verbalized the assignment should be completed every shift. After one month they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that repairs were made, as needed, in the resident's room. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident# 32) out of 66 resident's rooms observed during the facility's survey. The findings include: During an observation of Resident #32's room on 08/06/24 at 11:37 AM, surveyors observed a large area of the baseboard (approximately 25 feet) located at the head of the resident's bed was totally separated from the wall with broken pieces of dry walls noted. In addition, observation of the resident's bathroom sink was noted to have a large area of separation along the width of the sink, between the sink and the corresponding wall, that was in need of caulking. During an interview with the resident at that time, he/she stated that some repairs were done but after a flood in the hallway some time ago, the wall located at the head of the bed shifted. The resident also stated that personal shoes and bags were placed in a plastic bag while on the floor. On 08/07/24 at 12:24 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 10/23/2023 at 8:45 AM, during a brief entrance conference, surveyor requested from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), all documentation of the investigations related to the Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) that were sent to OHCQ (Office of Health Care Quality) concerning Resident #1. On 10/23/2023 at 9:40 AM, review of the investigation of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), MD00197629, revealed that on 9/27/2023 Resident #1 alleged that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #5), was inappropriate during incontinent care. The report indicated that Resident #1 told the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/27/2023, that when GNA #5 was applying barrier cream to her/his buttocks, the GNA's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat residents in a dignified manner (#52, #54, #48, #87, #115). This was evident for 5 out of 56 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: 1. This surveyor was having a conversation with Resident #52 on 9/23/19 at 9:14 AM when Geriatric Nursing Assistant #2 entered the room. She walked to the other side of the resident's bed and picked up the breakfast tray from the table. The resident asked if GNA #2 knew where the nurse was because he/she would like his/her morning medications. The resident began to explain why he/she was asking for the nurse but GNA #2 turned around and walked out of the room while the resident was still talking. The resident asked me if I knew when the nurse was coming and I said that I saw the nurse pushing the medication cart in this direction. I added that the nurse was two or three doors down the hall. I interviewed the Director of Nursing(DON) on 9/25/19 at 7:40 AM. I informed her of the findings and she said that she would investigate. 3. Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for Resident (#94). This was evident for 1 out of 56 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A call bell is a bedside button tethered to the wall in the resident's room, which directs signals to the nursing station; a call light usually indicates that the patient has a need or perceived need requiring attention from the nurse or geriatric nursing assistant on duty. There is a call light for each resident in the room, for each bed. Of note, the facility staff obtained a pancake type of call light for Resident #94 in which any pressure on the call light would activate the light and notify the staff of the resident's need for attention. Surveyor observation of Resident #94 on 9/24/19 at 7:54 AM and 9/27/19 at 8:45 AM revealed the resident in bed. Further observation revealed the facility staff placed the resident's call light in the top draw of the bed side table and not within Resident #94's reach. On 9/5/19 the facility staff assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure residents were competent for health care decision making capacity prior to the residents signing medical forms (Residents #94 and #87). This was evident for 2 of 9 residents selected for review of advance directives and 2 of 56 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #94 was cognitively intact prior to the resident completing a MOLST. Medical record review for Resident #94 revealed on [DATE] and [DATE] the resident was assessed by 2 physicians and determined: the resident is unable to understand and sign admission documents and other information, unable to understand the nature, extent or probable consequences of the proposed treatment or course of treatment, unable to make rational evaluation of the burdens, risks and benefits of the treatment and is unable to effectively communicate a decision. It was also determined at that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident for 2 resident rooms in the facility. The findings include: On 9/23/2019 at 9:35 AM during an interview with Resident #57 in room [ROOM NUMBER] cobwebs and peeling wallpaper were observed above the window/door adjacent to the resident's bed. On 9/25/2019 at 9:57 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with peeling wallpaper on the wall outside the bathroom door. Inspection of the wall behind the peeling wallpaper revealed a black residue adhered to the drywall towards the bottom of the wall. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings during the exit conference on 9/27/2019.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the state agency upon being notified of an accusation of theft of resident property. This was evident for 1 out of 56 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: I interviewed Resident #26 on 9/23/19 at 3:05 PM. The resident stated that he/she went to the hospital in either November or December of 2018. The resident said that he/she had a computer that was missing upon return to the nursing home but was later found in a hospital locker. The Administrator was interviewed on 9/25/18 at 11:29 AM. Resident #26 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The Administrator received a call from the corporate headquarters inquiring about an online review where a reviewer accused the facility staff of stealing the resident's computer. An investigation was launched. The Administrator called the hospital and they found a backpack with the computer and other items in a Security Department locker. The backpack was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the responsible party and/or resident in writing of Resident's (#120, #74, #15) transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 3 of 5 residents investigated for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 9-4-19 Resident #120 who is his/her own responsible party was transferred to the hospital for treatment requiring a higher level of care. On 9-24-19 at 1:00 PM the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility had not sent a written notification stating the reason for the transfer to the hospital to the resident. 2. Resident #74's medical record was reviewed on 9/25/2019 and revealed that Resident #74 was transferred to the hospital on 8/11/2019. There is no documentation in the medical record to indicate that the ombudsman's office was informed of this transfer. The findings were shared with the Director of Nursing on 9/25/2019 at 12:48 PM who confirmed that the facility had not sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer pain medication to Resident (#61) in accordance with the standard of nursing practice. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents selected for review of pain management and 1 of 56 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to administer pain medication to Resident #61 in accordance with the standard of practice. Medical record review for Resident #61 revealed on 3/27/19 the physician ordered: Oxycodone 10 milligrams by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. Oxycodone is an opioid pain medication sometimes called a narcotic. Oxycodone is used to treat moderate to severe pain. On 6/3/19 the physician discontinued the Oxycodone 10 milligrams by mouth every 4 hours as needed and ordered: Oxycodone 5 milligrams by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain. Review of the Controlled Medication Utilization Record revealed on 6/3/19 at 10:22 PM and 6/4/19 at 10:22 PM the facility staff nurse broke the 10 milligram Oxycodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to aid with meals for Resident (#55). This is evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for review for ADL care and 1 out of 56 residents reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. The MDS 3.0 captures information about the residents' comorbidities, physical, psychological and psychosocial functioning in addition to any treatments (e.g., hospice care, oxygen therapy, chemotherapy, dialysis) or therapies (e.g., physical, occupational, speech, restorative nursing) received. Surveyor observation of Resident #55's lunch on 9/25/19 at 12:30 PM revealed the facility staff served the resident lunch; however, the facility staff failed to cut the resident's pork chop. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise a resident's plan of care related to a significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Geri-Sleeves is an arm protector designed for use by individuals with fragile skin, IV sites, or skin irritation. It provides full coverage of the arm, protecting the upper extremities from abrasions, bruises, snags and tears throughout the day. Geri-Sleeves use slight compression to aid in relieving the discomfort associated with swelling. Review of Resident #19 medical record on 09/23/19 revealed Resident #19 was observed with a skin tear to both arms during incontinence care on 09/19/19 at 6:00 AM. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed a physician order, dated 09/05/19, instructing the nursing staff to apply Geri sleeves to Resident #19's bilateral arms and to keep them on at all times except that the bilateral arm Geri sleeves can be removed during care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that a medication was given as ordered (Residents #120). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis during the annual survey. The findings include: Resident #120 was admitted to the facility for wound treatment and also required dialysis due to kidney failure. Resident #120's physician ordered calcium acetate to be given with meals. To work effectively the calcium acetate must be given while eating a meal. This allows the calcium acetate to bind effectively with the food at it is consumed. During an interview on 9-24-19 at 10:20 AM Resident #120 stated he/she refused the calcium acetate that morning because he/she was given breakfast at 7:00 to 7:30 AM and not offered his/her calcium acetate until 9:00 AM and they had already completed breakfast earlier. Interview with Nurse #1 on 9-24-19 at 11:00 AM and he/she stated Resident #120 refused the calcium acetate because he/she had already eaten. When questioned as to why the medication was not given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of nursing aides' in-services within a year. This was evident for 1 of 6 randomly selected staff members reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of the facility assessment on 09/25/19 revealed the facility does care for residents that suffer from cognitive, behavior, and substance abuse issues. Review of Employee #21's employee and education records on 09/27/19 revealed Employee #21's only received 1 hour of nursing aides' in-services in the past year. In an interview with the facility staffing coordinator on 09/27/19 at 9:37 AM, the facility staffing coordinator confirmed that Employee #21 only received 1 hour of education for the past year.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner for Residents (#14). This was evident for 1 out of 56 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner. Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed the Consultant Pharmacist was in the facility on 7/15/19 and made a recommendation for Resident #14 related to the resident receiving Miconazole 2% cream. Miconazole 2% cream is an antifungal medicine. It is used to treat certain kinds of fungal or yeast infections of the skin. The recommendation from the Consultant Pharmacist was to clarify the order for Miconazole 2% cream by adding a stop date. The recommendation from the manufacture supports the Consultant Pharmacist rationale that long-term use of topical antifungal agents may increased the risk for alteration of normal cutaneous flora, resistant microorganism, and secondary infections.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were secured in a locked environment. This was evident for 1 out of 2 medication administrations. The findings include: This surveyor observed on 9/27/19 at 8:19 AM CMA # 14 walk away from a medication cart and into a resident's room to administer medications. I walked over to the cart and observed the cart to be unlocked. CMA #14 was in the room at the bedside of the resident in the A bed behind the curtain. When CMA #14 exited the room, I showed her that the cart was unlocked and explained why it needed to be locked.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood specimens as ordered by the physician or NP for Resident (#94). This was evident for 1 of 56 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to obtain a laboratory blood test as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #94 revealed on 8/1/19 the physician ordered: BMP on 8/2/19 and 8/5/19. The basic metabolic panel (BMP) is a frequently ordered panel of 8 tests that gives a healthcare practitioner important information about the current status of a person's metabolism, including health of the kidneys, blood glucose level, and electrolyte and acid/base balance. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain the BMP on 8/2/19 as ordered. 1 B. The facility staff failed to obtain a laboratory blood test as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #94 revealed on 7/23/19 the physician ordered: Coumadin 5 milligrams by mouth at hour of sleep for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to arrange a dental consult to repair or replace broken dentures. This was evident for 1 out of 5 reviewed for dental issues. The findings are: This surveyor interviewed Resident #123 on 9/23/19 at 10:15 AM. The resident stated that he/she has dentures, but they are broken. The dentures were not broken on admission but sometime afterwards. The resident could not say when the dentures were broken or how they were broken. Resident #123's clinical record was reviewed, and it was revealed that the primary physician wrote an order for oral care to be provided twice a day and as needed. The resident inventory list includes upper dentures on the list. The resident also has a care plan: [Name of resident] has oral/dental health problems r/t Poor oral hygiene and use of upper dentures. The Unit Manager for Unit 2 was interviewed on 9/26/19 at 8:41 AM. He stated he was unaware that the resident has dentures and that they are broken. The Director of Nursing was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and surveyor observation it was determined the facility failed to provide food at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On the morning of 9/26/2019 the Food Service Manager (Staff #11) was asked to provide a test tray of a regular diet lunch to the 1st floor of the facility in response to resident complaints of cold food during individual interviews and during a meeting with representatives from the Resident Council. On 9/26/2019 at 8:02 AM Resident #57 began to eat their breakfast and allowed the temperature of their breakfast sausage to be taken. The sausage registered at 96 F. The resident stated that it was fine but they would prefer if their food was warmer upon arrival. On 9/26/2019 at 11:04 AM a meeting was held with representatives from the facility's Resident Council to discuss any ongoing issues in the facility. Resident #16, Resident #22, Resident #46 and Resident #47 all confirmed that food was lukewarm or cold by the time the trays were delivered to them at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure that sanitary practices were followed, equipment was maintained and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 9/23/2019 at 9:11 AM a tour of the facility's main kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Manager (Staff #11) and the Assistant Food Service Manager (Staff #12). Observation of the dish drying rack revealed wet stacked pans. This was acknowledged and corrected by the Assistant Food Service Manager. On 9/26/2019 at 12:33 PM surveyors obtained a test tray on the 1st floor hallway. When observing the utensils, dried food debris was observed between the prongs of the fork. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings during the exit conference on 9/27/2019.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Resident #92 who is a diabetic was admitted to the facility after surgery for rehabilitation. On admission the physician ordered blood sugars to be taken once a day by the facility nursing staff to monitor Resident #92's diabetes. The nursing staff completed the task of taking the blood sugars but from 8-5-19 to 8-9-19 failed to record the results in the medical record. On 9-26-19 at 9:44 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed that the nursing staff took the blood sugars from 8-5-19 to 8-9-19 but failed to record the results in the medical record. The results were recorded on the nurses scratch papers and 8-5-19 was obtained from the requested labatory blood draw but not transcribed onto the blood sugar results section of the medical record. Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for a residents (#14and #92) in the most complete and accurate form. This was evident for 1 of 56 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A medical record is the official…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of flies. This was evident in the facility's main kitchen. The findings include: On 9/25/2019 at 11:33 AM during a brief visit to the main kitchen 2 house flies were observed flying in the kitchen. Additionally on 9/26/2019 at 9:44 AM when entering the kitchen to request a test tray, a house fly was observed flying above a prep table. At this time the air curtain mounted over the kitchen's rear exit was observed with excess dust. An air curtain is a device that blows a stream of air downwards through a doorway or opening to prevent entry of pests. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings on 9/27/2019 during the exit conference.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-08-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERLING CARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BBF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2022
JEK IRRV TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
NMJ IRRV TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
SAVA ACQUISITION LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
FRANKEL, CHAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
KAGAN, JEFFREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$999K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 27%Other / private 18%

This home reported $999K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$422per resident / day
operating cost
$12,826per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$430per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215194. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next