No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sterling Care Rockville Nursing

303 Adclare Road, Rockville, MD 20850 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (301) 279-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 279-9000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
212 N Adams St · (301) 309-0566 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
430 Hungerford Dr · (240) 314-0343 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Giant0.8 mi
Wootton Pkwy · (301) 340-9378 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.2%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.4%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.1%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.991.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.391.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 314 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 45.7–55.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.4%CMS range 11.6–18.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 6.1–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 84.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-22)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2019-08-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (#12, #10, #11, #9) of 5 residents reviewed for MDS assessments during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.1) On 1/12/26 at 10:12 AM a review of Resident #12's medical record was conducted. A review of a 7/14/25 at 12:36 PM care plan update note documented, resident had an unwitnessed fall on 7/11/25 at around 1530. Resident was observed on the floor between the beds by a GNA during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to treat each resident in a dignified manner by failing to place a urinary catheter drainage bag in a dignity bag. This was evident for 2 (#14, #15) of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheters during a complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 1/13/26 at 12:25 PM observation was made of Resident #14 lying in bed. Resident # 14's foley catheter drainage bag was hanging off the side of the bed frame on the left side of the bed. A foley catheter is a flexible tub placed in the body which is used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag. The resident's drainage bag was not placed in a privacy/dignity bag to enhance privacy to the resident.Review of Resident #14's January 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented the physician's order, catheter care: ensure dignity foley bag is in use every shift. The order was written on 1/11/26.On 1/13/26 at 12:35 PM RN #15 was informed of the finding.2) On 1/13/26 at 12:27 PM observation was made of Resident #15 lying in bed. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to honor the wishes of a resident's representative (Resident #6). This was evident for 1 of 19 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: Review of a complaint on 1/12/26 from Resident #6's representative (RP) sent to OHCQ (Office of Health Care Quality) on 10/29/25 revealed the RP stated he/she received an email from the facility on 10/28/25 stating they would not discharge the Resident on 10/30/25 unless he/she sent a signed AMA (Against Medical Advice) form to the facility. Review of Resident #6's medical record on 1/12/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital for rehabilitation. Further review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the Resident had 2 physician certifications that he/she was unable to comprehend information and make decisions on 9/21/25 and 9/23/25. Further review of Resident #6's medical record revealed a Social Services Note on 10/23/25 at 9:56 AM by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call light and commonly used items were within reach, per the individualized care plans, to allow access to assistance when needed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 19 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care.On 1/12/26 at 10:12 AM Resident #12's medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #12 was admitted in November 2024 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, repeated falls, and multiple sclerosis. Review of Resident #12's care plan, actual fall and is at risk for falls related to generalized weakness and gait/balance problems that was initiated in November 2024, had the intervention, have commonly used articles within easy reach i.e. call bell, TV remote control, etc. On 1/12/26 at 11:26 AM observation was made of Resident #12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse . This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) of 9 residents reviewed for Facility Reported Incidents during a complaint survey.The findings include: A review of facility reported incident 367211 was conducted on 1/6/26 regarding an allegation Resident #7 reported to Staff #18 on 5/13/25 that he/she was uncomfortable the way Staff #17 cared for him/her on 5/10/25. On the initial report to OHCQ (Office of Health Care Quality) submitted on 5/13/25 the facility indicated the allegation was physical. Further review of the facility investigation revealed no statement from Staff #18 to include what was reported by Resident #7 and when it was reported. The investigation also did not include a statement from Resident #7 until 5/14/25, the day after the allegation. Review of the statement provided by Resident #7 on 5/14/25 revealed the Resident stated to the Social Services Assistant (SSA) that the Resident saw Staff #17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and initiate a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheters during a complaint survey.The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. A foley catheter is a flexible tub placed in the body which is used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag. Obstructive uropathy occurs when urine cannot drain through the urinary tract. Urine backs up into the kidney and causes it to become swollen. Reflux nephropathy is a condition in which the kidneys are damaged by the backward flow of urine into the kidney. On 1/13/26 at 12:20 PM observation was made of Resident #15 lying in bed with foley catheter tubing and a drainage bag hanging on the side of the bed. The urinary drainage bag was not in a dignity bag.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure fall mats and the resident's call bell were properly in place for a resident with a history of falls. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 19 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 1/12/26 at 10:12 AM a review of Resident #12's medical record revealed Resident #12 had been a resident of the facility since November 2024 and had diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, repeated falls, and multiple sclerosis. Review of a 7/14/25 at 12:36 PM note documented that Resident #12 had an unwitnessed fall on 7/11/25 at around 1530. The resident was observed on the floor between the beds by a GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) during rounds. The fall was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team, and they continued with a plan of care. Review of Resident #12's care plan, actual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and observation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 3 (Resident #8, #14, #7) of 19 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 1/12/26 at 9:30 AM a review of Resident #8's medical record was conducted. Review of the census section of the medical record revealed on 9/18/25 Resident #8's room was switched from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of a 9/23/25 psychotherapy note documented that the resident loved his/her new room and found it more calming and stated he/she was doing okay and adjusting to the new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a residents' dignity. This was found of 1 (Resident #40) resident on a random observation. The findings include: On 1/16/25 at 12:01 PM, the surveyor knocked and asked to enter into Resident #40's room. Resident #40 responded, yes. Next the surveyor observed Resident #40 with an open depends laying flat in the bed. The surveyor asked if Resident #40 needed any help. Resident #40 stated that he/she had just put on the call light to have incontinent care provided. He/she further stated that a staff member came in, turned off the light, and stated that they would get the person assigned to assist in cleaning up. Resident #40 stated that he/she had a full depends and could not get up on his/her own. On 1/16/25 at 12:07 PM, 6 minutes later, the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #25 walk right into the room without knocking or asking permission to come in. GNA #25 stated she was there to help Resident #40 with incontinent care. The surveyor asked the GNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had access to, and appropriate call bells. This was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #333) of 52 residents reviewed for access to the call system during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/7/2025 at 10:00 AM, surveyors observed Resident #333 did not have a call bell in their room. Surveyors interviewed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #12 at 10:01 AM and asked about the call bell for the resident. GNA #12 confirmed to surveyors that the resident did not have a call bell available and informed that the room needed a splitter for the outlet that would allow for 2 call bells (Resident #333's roommate had a functioning call bell). GNA #12 stated they would update their Unit Manager about the situation to correct. Further observations by surveyors at 11:30 AM revealed that Resident #333 had not received a call bell. GNA #12 was questioned by surveyors and stated they alerted their Unit Manager about the situation. At 11:30 AM, surveyors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment. 1) This was found to be evident in 2 out of 2 shower rooms observed during the annual survey, and 2) An handrail was broken on the toilet. This was evident for 1 (Resident #58) out of 9 residents reviewed for environment. The findings include: 1) During an interview with Resident #97 on 1/13/25 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor was told to investigate the showers because they were dirty and broken. On 01/14/2025 at 10:15 AM, the surveyors observed that the second floor shower room contained 4 shower stalls, had stained ceiling tiles, a taped up vent in the ceiling with brown colored tape and tape hanging off the vent, and visible dark spots in the ceiling light covers. It appeared that 2 shower stalls had been recently used. The other 2 stalls were dry and equipment stored in the stalls. The third floor shower room stalls had one stall that appeared to be in use and 2 stalls with big perforations in the walls covered with taped on plastic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #52) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy during the recertification survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Anticoagulant (AC) medication is a type of drug that helps prevent blood clots from forming or growing larger. It is important because it reduces the risk of serious conditions like strokes, heart attacks, or deep vein thrombosis, especially in people with conditions that increase the likelihood of clotting. These medications help keep blood flowing smoothly and prevent harmful blockages in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with a resident and staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #1. During the interview Resident #1 expressed that he/she was inaccurately assessed and/or diagnosed and that he/she wished to pursue looking into transfer to another facility. On 1/10/25 at 9:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's medical record. The review revealed that on 8/15/24 Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner Staff #37 wrote a progress notes that stated, Resident #1's goals,I want to go to a different nursing home which is closer to a shopping center and metro access because I like to shop. On further review, a Psychologist, Staff #38 wrote a progress note on 10/4/24 that stated, Resident #1 requested to leave the facility for several hours to go shopping. Staff #38 wrote in the note, my clinical impression, he/she is safe to do so and is generally good at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise a resident's care plan after a resident's situation changed. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #28) out of 3 Residents reviewed for care planning during the survey. The findings include: On 1/13/25 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #29's family member. During the interview Resident #29's family member was concerned that it was not communicated that his/her parent was hard of hearing. When asked if Resident #29 had hearing aids, the family member stated that Resident #29 had hearing aids at one time but would constantly take them out and they had asked the facility to stop using them so they would not be lost. On 1/16/25 at 10:53 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #29's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #29 had a care plan that stated Resident #29 had a hearing deficit. The care plan was revised on 3/9/21. In the interventions it stated, apply bilateral (both sides) hearing aids in the morning and out in the evening. On further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, observations, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents had safety equipment in working condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #58) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The findings include: On 1/08/25 at 10:24 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #58. Resident #58 stated they fell recently and stated that they believe it was due to a handrail on the toilet being broken. In an observation during the interview, there was a handrail on each side of the wall and handrails attached to each side of the toilet. The handrail attached to the left side of the toilet was broken. Staff #4 was notified of the concern and stated this was the 1st time notified of the issue and maintenance would be notified immediately. On 1/09/25 at 12:10 PM, an observation was conducted with Resident #58's room. The handrail on the toilet was visualized and was still broken. This surveyor notified the Administrator of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility administered oxygen to a resident without an order. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen administration during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 1/10/2025 at 8:17 AM, surveyors observed Resident #9 to be on oxygen through nasal cannula via an oxygen concentrator in their room. Previous observations of Resident #9 on 1/8/2025 did not reveal the resident to be on oxygen. Resident #9's medical record was reviewed by surveyors at 8:30 AM. A Change of Condition assessment note dated 1/9/2025 at 11:00 PM documented that Resident #9 had low oxygen saturations and the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #33 on duty was contacted by staff. The assessment note stated that Resident #9 was to be started on oxygen at 3 liters via nasal cannula per NP #33. Further review of Resident #9's record did not reveal an order in their chart for oxygen administration. Surveyors interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 on 1/10/2025 at 8:47 AM and asked about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staffing record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours. This was found to be evident for 1 of 21 days reviewed for RN staffing during the recertification survey The findings include: Prior to the recertification survey, review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) by the surveyors did not identify any staffing waivers. During the entrance conference on 1/7/2025 at 9:47 AM, it was confirmed to surveyors by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) that the facility did not currently have any staffing waivers in place. On 1/15/2024 at 11:30 AM, surveyors reviewed the daily nursing staffing sheets provided by the facility from 12/24/2024 to 1/13/2025. It was revealed that on 1/1/2025, there was no RN scheduled for the night, day, or evening shifts. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed by surveyors on 1/15/2025 at 12:45 PM. The DON stated that they were not aware of any staffing issues since they have been at the facility, and it is the DON and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians document that they reviewed the pharmacist's identified the irregularities and failed to ensure that physicians documented the action taken or not taken to address the irregularities. This was evident for 2 (Resident #38 and #51) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 1/10/25 at 9:22 AM, a review of Resident #38 and #51's records was conducted. Resident #38 was ordered Trazodone, an antidepressant, to be given for Depression. According to records, there was a pharmacist review with recommendations to Resident #38's medication regimen on 9/20/24, 6/14/24, and 5/7/24. Resident #51 was ordered Sertraline, a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (used to treat depression), and Mirtazapine, an antidepressant. On 1/9/25 at 9:25 AM, This surveyor requested the pharmacist medication recommendation for Resident #38 conducted on 9/20/24, 6/14/24, and 5/7/24; and requested pharmacist medication recommendation for Resident #51 conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #1) out of 8 residents reviewed for medications. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #1. During the interview Resident #1 expressed that he/she was not getting the correct doses of medications. On 1/13/25 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed the May 2024 Medication Administration Record. On May 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th it was documented that Resident #1 received 88 micrograms of levothyroxine Sodium (a medication used to treat hypothyroidism, a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) at 6:30 AM. On further review it was noted an additional dose of Levothyroxine Sodium 88 micrograms was given on May 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th at 9 AM, the combined dose was 188 micrograms for those 4 days. On 1/14/25 at 1:20 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that radiology services were set up to meet the resident's needs and scheduled in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) out of 1 resident reviewed for radiology services. The findings include: On 1/21/25 at 10:30 AM, a review of Complaint #MD00199976 was conducted. The complaint stated that Resident #88's discharge was delayed due to poor coordination of staff to plan transportation and appointments prior to discharge. On 1/22/25 at 10:36 AM, a review of Resident #88's progress notes were conducted. According to physicians and nursing notes, the resident had complained of left knee pain on 10/10/23. An Xray was completed on 10/10/23 to rule out a fracture, and the Xray did not show any signs of fractures but did show left knee joint effusion. On 10/13/23, a physician's note stated that the resident would need an orthopedic surgery consultation. After the orthopedic surgery consult appointment on 10/23/23, an ultrasound of the knee was ordered for 11/20/23. On 11/7/23, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate orders in a resident's medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #380) of 52 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical records must be maintained for accuracy in a manner that is consistent with resident's needs, medical history and physical. On 1/08/25 at 9:30 AM, surveyors observed Resident #380 in bed with bilateral below the knee amputations (BKA). On 1/15/25 at 9 AM the surveyor conducted a record review which revealed a history and physical progress note dated 1/05/25 that stated the resident was admitted to the facility with bilateral BKAs. Further review of the medical record showed an active physician's order to Float heels when in bed as tolerated every shift for Preventative Skin Measures. Review of the treatment administration record revealed that facility staff documented this order as performed three times daily from 1/03/25-1/14/25. On 1/15/25 at 09:54 AM surveyors and a licensed practical nurse (LPN), LPN #19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, functional sanitary environment for a resident. This was found in 1 of 18 resident rooms reviewed in the initial sample. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 8:37 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #1. During the interview Resident #1 stated that the floors were not cleaned regularly in the back corner of his/her room due to a fall mat that ran alongside the bed. The surveyor observed debris on the floor at the back wall at the end of the fall mat. On further observation the surveyor observed a dark substance noted on the privacy curtain that appeared to have been left by finger impression. Also noted was the ceiling tile removed from above the unoccupied bed in the room, chair rail falling down from behind Resident #1's bed, the edge of the foot board sticking out, the top drawer to Resident #1's bedside night stand falling out when pulled out and a brown staining along the side of Resident #1's toilet. On 1/9/25 at approximately 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective pest control program. This was found evident on 1 of 3 floors. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 8:37 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #1. During the interview Resident #1 reported that he/she had observed cockroaches in his/her drawer a few months back and the facility had to have someone come in to take care of them. On 1/10/25 at 9:38 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During the interview the NHA confirmed that in late October or November an exterminator came to the facility to treat rooms for cockroaches. The surveyor asked for the facility's pest management log and reports. On 1/13/25 at 10:59 AM, during an interview with Resident #29's family member it was reported that the family member saw a cockroach in their father/mother's room. On review of the documents provided by the NHA, a Special Service Record was given and the description on the forms stated, this form [should be used] to reported problems which occur between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent resident abuse. This was found to be evident for 2 (#134 & #85) out of 9 residents investigated for abuse during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of facility report MD00181452 on 1/13/25 at 7:54 AM, revealed that Registered Nurse #36 and Certified Medication Aide #21 observed Resident #135 approach and slap Resident #134, who was sitting in his/her wheelchair in the hall, on the left cheek on 3/19/2021 at 11:30 AM. The residents were separated and no injuries were observed or reported. Resident #135 was placed on 1:1 observation and sent to the Emergency Department for further assessment. The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property was reviewed by the surveyor on 1/13/24 at 9:47 AM. The policy stated that physical abuse included slapping. On 1/13/25 at 9:44 AM, the DON was interviewed regarding the concern for resident-to-resident abuse. She stated that although she was not able to speak about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, internal report review and interview with resident and staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse and an injury of unknown origin to the regulator agencies and Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was found evident in 2 (Resident #1 and #29) out of 10 residents reviewed for abuse and injuries of unknown origin. The findings include: 1a) On 1/8/25 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #1. During the interview Resident #1 recounted an alleged abuse that occurred. Resident #1 was not able to remember the exact date or recall what the person looked like but reported that it happened in the middle of the night and that he/she woke up with someone holding his/her nose closed. Resident #1 stated that he/she felt that the person was trying to kill them. On 1/10/25 at 9:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's medical record. The review revealed that on 12/12/23 a Palliative Care Physician Staff #39 evaluated Resident #1 and wrote a progress note that stated, Resident #1 noted with delusions. He/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's investigation file and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain evidence that an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #32) out of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 1/21/25 at 8:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed the investigation file regarding the investigation into the injury of unknown origin for Resident #32. The investigation listed all of the steps taken to investigate the injury and are as follows: 1. Head to toe assessment of the resident was completed and the Resident was sent for treatment and family updated 2. Residents in the hall were interviewed and any incapable residents had a head-to-toe assessment done 3. Director of Nursing was notified 4. Ombudsman notified 5. Interviews were conducted for any staff member on the hall at the time of the event 6. Police were notified 7. Self-report filed On review of the file no resident interviews or skin checks were in the investigation file. Statements from staff were provided, however, the statement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) On 1/17/25 at 8:30 AM, Complaint #MD00171169 was reviewed. The complaint states that Resident #132 was discharged on 8/18/21 and a home health nurse did not show up to provide care until 8/26/21. On 1/17/25 at 8:45 AM, a review of Resident#132's progress notes. On a discharge follow-up note from Social Services on 8/25/21 at 3:51 PM states, Resident was discharge to home on [DATE] with friends assistance. Resident was referred to Community home health of MD for Home health services, however during the call with community home health it was discovered resident did not have a primarily care doctor in the community. [Social Services], followed with resident's friend no answer left a message expressing for resident to be seen by the [Nurse Practitioner so services can began. Resident's friend followed back up with [Social Services] on Monday 08/23/2021 [Social Services] informed [them] about the issue [they] stated that [they] reached out the PCP in the facility and he's willing to follow resident in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility physician failed to acknowledge review of laboratory (lab) results of a resident. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #81) out of 2 residents reviewed for lab and radiology services. The findings include: On 1/21/25 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #81's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #81 was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with a past medical history that included, but not limited to, elevated white blood cell count (indicating infection), over active bladder, pyelonephritis (inflammation or infection in the kidney) and Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and Hydronephrosis (swelling of the kidneys due to urine build up). On further review of Resident #81's medical records the surveyor noted that on 10/28/21 a urinalysis (UA) was obtained and a culture and sensitivity (C&S) was completed related to an order placed by the provider on 10/2721 and again on 10/28/21. Both of these laboratory tests are ordered to assess the health of the urinary tract. A UA is a test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with routine medications as ordered. This was evident of 2 (Resident #82 & #99) out of 8 residents reviewed for medications. The findings include: 1) On 1/22/25 at 8:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #82's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #82 had a past medical history of diabetes mellitus type 2. Next the surveyor reviewed the May 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #82. The review revealed that the medication Sitagliptin Phosphate, a medication indicated for Diabetes Mellitus, was marked as see progress notes on 5/4/22, 5/8/22 and 5/9/22. On 5/4/22 the progress notes stated, reordered from pharmacy, on 5/8/22 and 5/9/22 the notes stated, awaiting delivery from pharmacy. On 1/22/25 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the surveyor asked the DON why on three occasions, within a week, Resident #82's mediation not available from pharmacy. The DON stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERLING CARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JAKOBOVITS, NATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 11/01/2020
KAGAN, JEFFREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 24%Other / private 26%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$417per resident / day
operating cost
$12,677per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$435per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215107. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next